Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[Smartprofit]

I really like that the online casino Betpanda.io does not have a mandatory KYC procedure.

In the vast majority of cases, the player will never face the need to provide any information about himself, reveal his identity and violate the requirements of anonymity and confidentiality. KYC may be required only if there was a gross violation of the rules of the online casino.

Privacy is one of the basic natural human rights, and in the modern world, a certain level of anonymity and confidentiality is also one of the requirements of cybersecurity.

Such a policy, in my opinion, is a big plus for this casino.

A few of the online casinos most especially the popular ones have this free hand for kyc and don't mandate players to get their accounts verified before they can gamble and withdraw from their accounts, so that is a big plus and a way to be flexible with their customers in a competitive market like gambling.


The only time those casinos ask a player for outright KYC verification os when their IPs seem to have been used previously to create an account on the casino.

I like this flexible approach! I understand that online casinos can no longer completely ignore the KYC procedure (in our imperfect world, where there is fraud, law enforcement, and force majeure situations).

In some situations, an online casino will be forced to require a player to go through the KYC procedure. In particular, this applies to situations when a player creates multiple accounts (as far as I understand, this is one of the signs of a fraudulent scheme).

Flexibility and variability are excellent qualities of an online casino! Players appreciate such things!

[Ultegra134]

A few of the online casinos most especially the popular ones have this free hand for kyc and don't mandate players to get their accounts verified before they can gamble and withdraw from their accounts, so that is a big plus and a way to be flexible with their customers in a competitive market like gambling.

The only time those casinos ask a player for outright KYC verification os when their IPs seem to have been used previously to create an account on the casino.

It's an interesting approach indeed, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it does not require KYC, some people who are unaware of the platform may get confused, it's not a KYC-free casino. Quoting from the terms and services:

We may use a recognised third party provider to undertake these checks on our behalf or we may get in touch with you directly to provide us KYC documentation.

Cryptocurrency casinos in general aren't that strict about KYC policies, some may ask for some basic personal details after sign-up, Betpanda however doesn't even require that, which from my experience, might be a little uncommon, even though I cannot accurately remember what details I had submitted in previous casinos.

[khaled0111]

Cryptocurrency casinos in general aren't that strict about KYC policies, some may ask for some basic personal details after sign-up, Betpanda however doesn't even require that, which from my experience, might be a little uncommon, even though I cannot accurately remember what details I had submitted in previous casinos.

That’s true. I've played on many online crypto casinos, and only a few of them asked me to verify my identity, either after registration or on my first withdrawal. They usually ask you to submit basic verification documents, such as an ID card or passport. I was never asked to take a selfie or anything like that.

What I like about BetPanda is that they don’t require level-1 verification upon registration, which many casinos have started enforcing recently.

[Jating]

Cryptocurrency casinos in general aren't that strict about KYC policies, some may ask for some basic personal details after sign-up, Betpanda however doesn't even require that, which from my experience, might be a little uncommon, even though I cannot accurately remember what details I had submitted in previous casinos.

That’s true. I've played on many online crypto casinos, and only a few of them asked me to verify my identity, either after registration or on my first withdrawal. They usually ask you to submit basic verification documents, such as an ID card or passport. I was never asked to take a selfie or anything like that.

What I like about BetPanda is that they don’t require level-1 verification upon registration, which many casinos have started enforcing recently.

I was about to mentioned level-1 verification as well, as I have been asked by a well known sports bookies to pass level-2 so that I can withdraw. Nevertheless, I don't want to pass my info and that money is not that big anyways so I decided not to do it.

As for Betpanda, there's no need to verify our identify as per registration unlike other casinos that you need to put at least a phone number which is really annoying because we really don't know what they are going to used that. Email is enough already for us to be spam by some casinos but phone number? Nah.

[Potato Chips]

I like this flexible approach! I understand that online casinos can no longer completely ignore the KYC procedure (in our imperfect world, where there is fraud, law enforcement, and force majeure situations).

Indeed a nice middle ground given our situation. What I especially like with no mandatory kyc approach is how we can test the platform first if it's the right fit for us before taking things further and submitting personal documents.

There's also the convenient side of things because you can start playing right away. Not to mention, passing identity verification could take some time in some cases.. I believe from a business standpoint, it's pretty effective as one important factor that could help when it comes to onboarding users because of convenience.

[khaled0111]

Indeed a nice middle ground given our situation. What I especially like with no mandatory kyc approach is how we can test the platform first if it's the right fit for us before taking things further and submitting personal documents.

Couldn’t agree more!
I understand that casinos and other service providers have to enforce KYC on their customers due to strict regulations they must comply with. However, as users, we also have the right to test the platform first before deciding whether to hand over our documents.

Allowing users to deposit, play, and make small withdrawals while requiring identity verification only for large withdrawals or suspicious activity would satisfy both parties, imo.

[reefsea]

Couldn’t agree more!
I understand that casinos and other service providers have to enforce KYC on their customers due to strict regulations they must comply with. However, as users, we also have the right to test the platform first before deciding whether to hand over our documents.

Allowing users to deposit, play, and make small withdrawals while requiring identity verification only for large withdrawals or suspicious activity would satisfy both parties, imo.

Gamblers with small capital certainly prefer to use casinos that do not enforce kyc on small withdrawals. User convenience is certainly always a priority for casinos and without kyc it is already one of the conveniences for its users, especially those who have just joined the casino.

Sometimes some casinos do not require kyc at the time of first registration, but when we make a withdrawal, that's when a tab appears to complete the basic kyc verification which may only take 2 minutes to complete. However, it is all up to the user if they object to the basic kyc verification, they can join another casino, but for now I think almost all gamblers must obey the rules.

[Baofeng]

Couldn’t agree more!
I understand that casinos and other service providers have to enforce KYC on their customers due to strict regulations they must comply with. However, as users, we also have the right to test the platform first before deciding whether to hand over our documents.

Allowing users to deposit, play, and make small withdrawals while requiring identity verification only for large withdrawals or suspicious activity would satisfy both parties, imo.

Gamblers with small capital certainly prefer to use casinos that do not enforce kyc on small withdrawals. User convenience is certainly always a priority for casinos and without kyc it is already one of the conveniences for its users, especially those who have just joined the casino.

Sometimes some casinos do not require kyc at the time of first registration, but when we make a withdrawal, that's when a tab appears to complete the basic kyc verification which may only take 2 minutes to complete. However, it is all up to the user if they object to the basic kyc verification, they can join another casino, but for now I think almost all gamblers must obey the rules.

If it is just basic level 1 KYC then there are not problem. The thing for us is that if the casinos ask for level 2 and obviously, it's more personal data and we didn't like that at all. And yeah, most of us are not that big gamblers anyways, so we really don't like to send more in exchange for what? Less than $1k money? We still value or privacy and we don't want our data to be out there.

But Betpanda.io is that the casino, they are friendly, you can play with VPN, and then there is no mandatory KYC as well.

[jstyler]

i get what you're saying, but betpanda.io sounds like they're offering a more relaxed approach than that, they mention welcome bonus up to 1btc and no mention of kyc being required, at least for small withdrawals, which is definitely a plus for gamblers who value their privacy, the no VPN block is another point in their favor, hope it stays that way, been burned before by casinos that promise a lot but end up being a hassle to use

[leonair]

i get what you're saying, but betpanda.io sounds like they're offering a more relaxed approach than that, they mention welcome bonus up to 1btc and no mention of kyc being required, at least for small withdrawals, which is definitely a plus for gamblers who value their privacy, the no VPN block is another point in their favor, hope it stays that way, been burned before by casinos that promise a lot but end up being a hassle to use

They mentioned there casino is anonymous crypto casino, so for this words they can't ask kyc to the customers. but every centralized platform has kyc policy. so if any gamblers want to gamble with high amount of money or if any gamblers win a big bet then he can face a restrictions for withdrawal without Level 2 verification. so when you will interested to use any centralized crypto casino then you must have to ready to pass kyc in any time.  yes betpanda offering up to 1 BTC welcome bonus, this is really very interesting.

[Wiwo]

i get what you're saying, but betpanda.io sounds like they're offering a more relaxed approach than that, they mention welcome bonus up to 1btc and no mention of kyc being required, at least for small withdrawals, which is definitely a plus for gamblers who value their privacy, the no VPN block is another point in their favor, hope it stays that way, been burned before by casinos that promise a lot but end up being a hassle to use

From my understanding of Betpanda's terms and conditions towards both KYC and withdrawal, no difference between them and others have relaxed KYC models at least the small gamblers would not have anything to worry about asking for KYC to withdraw a small amount of money, and as for those who have large amounts to withdraw its either there are ready to go through KYC if they want to withdraw large amount of money or be willing to withdraw the money bit by bit below the maximum amount for none KYC accounts.

But what I do most times is to make sure I pass through KYC ahead even before I have such a large amount in my balance as long as I trust the casino and I begin to accumulate some level of wagering which means increasing inflows of money.

[Z_MBFM]

i get what you're saying, but betpanda.io sounds like they're offering a more relaxed approach than that, they mention welcome bonus up to 1btc and no mention of kyc being required, at least for small withdrawals, which is definitely a plus for gamblers who value their privacy, the no VPN block is another point in their favor, hope it stays that way, been burned before by casinos that promise a lot but end up being a hassle to use

They mentioned there casino is anonymous crypto casino, so for this words they can't ask kyc to the customers. but every centralized platform has kyc policy. so if any gamblers want to gamble with high amount of money or if any gamblers win a big bet then he can face a restrictions for withdrawal without Level 2 verification. so when you will interested to use any centralized crypto casino then you must have to ready to pass kyc in any time.  yes betpanda offering up to 1 BTC welcome bonus, this is really very interesting.

Although they claim to be anonymous casino sites, they are a centralized platform. But they can keep users kyc encrypted. kyc verification on casino site is not a problem if the site is trusted. There are many gambling sites in the market when you choose a site to gamble there regularly it means you trust that site. Then you shouldn't have any confusing for KYC verification there. but if you choice a platform for one time using because of interesting deposit bonus then KYC can be a issue

[SamReomo]

But what I do most times is to make sure I pass through KYC ahead even before I have such a large amount in my balance as long as I trust the casino and I begin to accumulate some level of wagering which means increasing inflows of money.

Yes, I think it's always a good step to complete the KYC at first before depositing huge amounts because later on one might get higher levels due to high wagering amount and also if that same person wins most bets then it won't be an issue to withdraw the money.

[PX-Z]

Yes, I think it's always a good step to complete the KYC at first before depositing huge amounts because later on one might get higher levels due to high wagering amount and also if that same person wins most bets then it won't be an issue to withdraw the money.

That's a good move but i'd better wait until the platform ask me to do it. It should be a reminder to any gambler who wants to make huge deposits, is to ready their selves and their KYC docs that any moment from that, they will be required sooner or later.

[SamReomo]

That's a good move but i'd better wait until the platform ask me to do it. It should be a reminder to any gambler who wants to make huge deposits, is to ready their selves and their KYC docs that any moment from that, they will be required sooner or later.

Yes, I also don't complete KYC before its needed. I'm also a normal gamer and I'm not a high roller and so far I haven't faced any KYC related issues. However, I still believe that the ones who deposit huge amount should complete their KYC before the deposit as they might face KYC related issues later on.

[BABY SHOES]

That's a good move but i'd better wait until the platform ask me to do it. It should be a reminder to any gambler who wants to make huge deposits, is to ready their selves and their KYC docs that any moment from that, they will be required sooner or later.

Yes, I also don't complete KYC before its needed. I'm also a normal gamer and I'm not a high roller and so far I haven't faced any KYC related issues. However, I still believe that the ones who deposit huge amount should complete their KYC before the deposit as they might face KYC related issues later on.

Maybe this is something the big gamblers should think about... even if they are big gamblers depositing large amounts and have done KYC then it is possible that the casino will also ask for other documents... such as bills for the past 6 months, source of funds - etc.
Since KYC level 1 is just a simple identity document... casinos may ask for more than that for big gamblers.

[khaled0111]

But what I do most times is to make sure I pass through KYC ahead even before I have such a large amount in my balance as long as I trust the casino and I begin to accumulate some level of wagering which means increasing inflows of money.

I also prefer verifying my identity on reputable casinos (or any other reputable platform) before further engagement and making larger deposits or investments. Sure, there is always a chance they will ask for account re-verification at any moment, but at least I know my documents won’t be rejected since they were already accepted the first time.

I haven’t checked, but does anyone know if BetPanda has an option that allows users to verify their identity at any time they want, without being asked to do so?

[GeorgeJohn]

But what I do most times is to make sure I pass through KYC ahead even before I have such a large amount in my balance as long as I trust the casino and I begin to accumulate some level of wagering which means increasing inflows of money.

Yes, I think it's always a good step to complete the KYC at first before depositing huge amounts because later on one might get higher levels due to high wagering amount and also if that same person wins most bets then it won't be an issue to withdraw the money.

I don't know why some people feel reluctant in completing their KYC? I'm thinking that they seems KYC verification as something that is not important and that's why sometimes some people overlooked KYC, Do you know that people only pick interest to have done their KYC when they have issues of withdrawal, I think it's necessary for we to have done our KYC before complications in casino platform, most of people has denied access to make a withdrawal because of inability to have done KYC at the appropriate time or moment, so for me it's important to have completed your verification before depositing funds on any casino website.

[|MINER|]

I don't know why some people feel reluctant in completing their KYC? I'm thinking that they seems KYC verification as something that is not important and that's why sometimes some people overlooked KYC, Do you know that people only pick interest to have done their KYC when they have issues of withdrawal, I think it's necessary for we to have done our KYC before complications in casino platform, most of people has denied access to make a withdrawal because of inability to have done KYC at the appropriate time or moment, so for me it's important to have completed your verification before depositing funds on any casino website.

I think those who prioritize privacy avoid KYC verification most of the time.
In my own case, I often don't do KYC verification when I explore new crypto casinos because there is no guarantee that my data will be safe. However, if the platform is trustworthy, I do KYC verification for my needs.
But to be honest, I also gamble with very small amounts and most of the time I avoid websites that require KYC to play. And I think if I don't do any suspicious activities or don't violate any of their rules, then there's no problem if I gamble without doing KYC, and if later they ask for KYC verification, then I have no problem with doing the verification once I've done KYC.

[GeorgeJohn]

I don't know why some people feel reluctant in completing their KYC? I'm thinking that they seems KYC verification as something that is not important and that's why sometimes some people overlooked KYC, Do you know that people only pick interest to have done their KYC when they have issues of withdrawal, I think it's necessary for we to have done our KYC before complications in casino platform, most of people has denied access to make a withdrawal because of inability to have done KYC at the appropriate time or moment, so for me it's important to have completed your verification before depositing funds on any casino website.

I think those who prioritize privacy avoid KYC verification most of the time.
In my own case, I often don't do KYC verification when I explore new crypto casinos because there is no guarantee that my data will be safe. However, if the platform is trustworthy, I do KYC verification for my needs.
But to be honest, I also gamble with very small amounts and most of the time I avoid websites that require KYC to play. And I think if I don't do any suspicious activities or don't violate any of their rules, then there's no problem if I gamble without doing KYC, and if later they ask for KYC verification, then I have no problem with doing the verification once I've done KYC.

But you need to save yourself from stress by doing the KYC from initial time, reason been that you might forget your intentions of gambling much or staking much so that KYC will not be needed, and stake large amounts because in your first stake you won, and you want to stake higher so that you will win high...For me, any casino website you found trustworthy to gamble with, ensure you have done their necessary requirements so that you will not bridges their rules and regulations, once you bridge rules and regulations of gambling websites, you will be the one to look for them, they won't look for you.

Secondly, those casino platforms that's KYC-free, looking at them very well you will see that they're not trustworthy, because any good casino most demand for KYC verification in order to protect your image and also protect the images of the platform, but I don't know why people is been scared of documentations.