[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[GingerAle]

sweep_dust ?

[1714208769]

1714208769

[primer-]

sweep_dust ?

sweep_dust
Sweeping 1.442914014341 for a total fee of 0.170000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Error: transaction <02bb556c411bb81861c09d3aff998908402100bc5415c55c9ab5731c0cb70b9f> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed


I've not had these issues before the fork/upgrading to 0.9.3 bins ...

[GingerAle]

sweep_dust ?

sweep_dust
Sweeping 1.442914014341 for a total fee of 0.170000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Error: transaction <02bb556c411bb81861c09d3aff998908402100bc5415c55c9ab5731c0cb70b9f> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed


I've not had these issues before the fork/upgrading to 0.9.3 bins ...

Well, there are some other tricks out there...

rescan_bc might work
there's the tried and true deleting everything with .bin and building from scratch.
But I'm just shooting from the hip. What you are describing has been noticed and fixed before, I just don't remember what the underlying issue is or what the exact fix was. Or this is some bug that will be addressed soon.

[primer-]

sweep_dust ?

sweep_dust
Sweeping 1.442914014341 for a total fee of 0.170000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Error: transaction <02bb556c411bb81861c09d3aff998908402100bc5415c55c9ab5731c0cb70b9f> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed


I've not had these issues before the fork/upgrading to 0.9.3 bins ...

Well, there are some other tricks out there...

rescan_bc might work
there's the tried and true deleting everything with .bin and building from scratch.
But I'm just shooting from the hip. What you are describing has been noticed and fixed before, I just don't remember what the underlying issue is or what the exact fix was. Or this is some bug that will be addressed soon.

This is a bug and the devs are keeping quiet like bitches.

[GingerAle]

sweep_dust ?

sweep_dust
Sweeping 1.442914014341 for a total fee of 0.170000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Error: transaction <02bb556c411bb81861c09d3aff998908402100bc5415c55c9ab5731c0cb70b9f> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed


I've not had these issues before the fork/upgrading to 0.9.3 bins ...

Well, there are some other tricks out there...

rescan_bc might work
there's the tried and true deleting everything with .bin and building from scratch.
But I'm just shooting from the hip. What you are describing has been noticed and fixed before, I just don't remember what the underlying issue is or what the exact fix was. Or this is some bug that will be addressed soon.

This is a bug and the devs are keeping quiet like bitches.

no, they're probably on IRC discussing it or something or perhaps, yah know, trying to address the problem.

like maybe this one

https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero/pull/767

[Hueristic]

sweep_dust ?

sweep_dust
Sweeping 1.442914014341 for a total fee of 0.170000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Error: transaction <02bb556c411bb81861c09d3aff998908402100bc5415c55c9ab5731c0cb70b9f> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed


I've not had these issues before the fork/upgrading to 0.9.3 bins ...

Well, there are some other tricks out there...

rescan_bc might work
there's the tried and true deleting everything with .bin and building from scratch.
But I'm just shooting from the hip. What you are describing has been noticed and fixed before, I just don't remember what the underlying issue is or what the exact fix was. Or this is some bug that will be addressed soon.

This is a bug and the devs are keeping quiet like bitches.

Yes, you don't have 24/7 Volunteer dev support holy fuck this coin sucks!.

Hey, here's an idea Dumbass. TRY the FUCKING IRC DEV Channel!

[primer-]

sweep_dust ?

sweep_dust
Sweeping 1.442914014341 for a total fee of 0.170000000000.  Is this okay?  (Y/Yes/N/No)y
Error: transaction <02bb556c411bb81861c09d3aff998908402100bc5415c55c9ab5731c0cb70b9f> was rejected by daemon with status: Failed


I've not had these issues before the fork/upgrading to 0.9.3 bins ...

Well, there are some other tricks out there...

rescan_bc might work
there's the tried and true deleting everything with .bin and building from scratch.
But I'm just shooting from the hip. What you are describing has been noticed and fixed before, I just don't remember what the underlying issue is or what the exact fix was. Or this is some bug that will be addressed soon.

This is a bug and the devs are keeping quiet like bitches.

Yes, you don't have 24/7 Volunteer dev support holy fuck this coin sucks!.

Hey, here's an idea Dumbass. TRY the FUCKING IRC DEV Channel!

I did you retarded moron.

[smooth]

There is a new fix that replaced sweep_dust with sweep_unmixable. It is in master, so you will need to either try building your own non-release or wait for the next update.

[primer-]

There is a new fix that replaced sweep_dust with sweep_unmixable. It is in master, so you will need to either try building your own non-release or wait for the next update.

It's not just sweep_dust, my wallet balance is 233 and I am unable to move them:

transfer_new 2 44pFi8kPVuyeuGMYSUctVB1RMHyf6W8W7SNYTcmRWCrGcCTeA2xv68qiXUAvfuP3dNTnDuHFj8x8viY gzjo9cDZm7bysCV3 230
Error: not enough outputs for specified mixin_count = 2:
output amount = 0.000409493368, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002414704633, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003717045132, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003606717702, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009650623277, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.006665032337, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009533575300, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004791355170, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002659999878, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009310307244, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 13.710000000000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.001342661501, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.000803378292, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004706702380, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008922997310, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007809272310, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003133238788, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.005944119888, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009974389276, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.001947352563, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009374052943, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007383043021, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002457197904, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009857052484, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007818049378, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008702140695, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.000331096140, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002760541350, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.005597569951, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008160421065, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008662205823, found outputs to mix = 1
refresh
Starting refresh...
Refresh done, blocks received: 59
Balance: 233.062914014341, unlocked balance: 233.062914014341, including unlocked dust: 1.442914014341


Doesn't work with mixin 0 neither

[smooth]

There is a new fix that replaced sweep_dust with sweep_unmixable. It is in master, so you will need to either try building your own non-release or wait for the next update.

It's not just sweep_dust, my wallet balance is 233 and I am unable to move them:

transfer_new 2 44pFi8kPVuyeuGMYSUctVB1RMHyf6W8W7SNYTcmRWCrGcCTeA2xv68qiXUAvfuP3dNTnDuHFj8x8viY gzjo9cDZm7bysCV3 230
Error: not enough outputs for specified mixin_count = 2:
output amount = 0.000409493368, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002414704633, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003717045132, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003606717702, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009650623277, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.006665032337, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009533575300, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004791355170, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002659999878, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009310307244, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 13.710000000000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.001342661501, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.000803378292, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004706702380, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008922997310, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007809272310, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003133238788, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.005944119888, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009974389276, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.001947352563, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009374052943, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007383043021, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002457197904, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009857052484, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007818049378, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008702140695, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.000331096140, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002760541350, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.005597569951, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008160421065, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008662205823, found outputs to mix = 1
refresh
Starting refresh...
Refresh done, blocks received: 59
Balance: 233.062914014341, unlocked balance: 233.062914014341, including unlocked dust: 1.442914014341


Doesn't work with mixin 0 neither

Obviously those crazy amounts are unmixable, so mixin 2 won't work. You would have to find the exact same amount on the blockchain to mix with, and that won't happen.

Mixin 0 general doesn't work, except for sweep_dust/sweep_unmixable. And sweep_dust doesn't work well and is replaced with sweep_unmixable, so see above.

[primer-]

There is a new fix that replaced sweep_dust with sweep_unmixable. It is in master, so you will need to either try building your own non-release or wait for the next update.

It's not just sweep_dust, my wallet balance is 233 and I am unable to move them:

transfer_new 2 44pFi8kPVuyeuGMYSUctVB1RMHyf6W8W7SNYTcmRWCrGcCTeA2xv68qiXUAvfuP3dNTnDuHFj8x8viY gzjo9cDZm7bysCV3 230
Error: not enough outputs for specified mixin_count = 2:
output amount = 0.000409493368, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002414704633, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003717045132, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003606717702, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009650623277, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.006665032337, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009533575300, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004791355170, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002659999878, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009310307244, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 13.710000000000, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.001342661501, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.000803378292, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.004706702380, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008922997310, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007809272310, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.003133238788, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.005944119888, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009974389276, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.001947352563, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009374052943, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007383043021, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002457197904, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.009857052484, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.007818049378, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008702140695, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.000331096140, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.002760541350, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.005597569951, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008160421065, found outputs to mix = 1
output amount = 0.008662205823, found outputs to mix = 1
refresh
Starting refresh...
Refresh done, blocks received: 59
Balance: 233.062914014341, unlocked balance: 233.062914014341, including unlocked dust: 1.442914014341


Doesn't work with mixin 0 neither

Obviously those crazy amounts are unmixable, so mixin 2 won't work. You would have to find the exact same amount on the blockchain to mix with, and that won't happen.

Mixin 0 general doesn't work, except for sweep_dust/sweep_unmixable. And sweep_dust doesn't work well and is replaced with sweep_unmixable, so see above.

I've found another bug..... After cancelling a transfer_new tx (Is this okay? Y/N n) old transfer stops working (rejected by daemon with status: Failed)

[MoneroMooo]

Hey, here's an idea Dumbass. TRY the FUCKING IRC DEV Channel!

Please, don't give that guy that idea (with anyone else, sure though).

[primer-]

Hey, here's an idea Dumbass. TRY the FUCKING IRC DEV Channel!

Please, don't give that guy that idea (with anyone else, sure though).

I'll keep spamming this thread with the bugs then.. simplewallet - piece of garbage..

[MoneroMooo]

Darkcoin is ------> that way ^_^

[clintar2]

New pool. If you want to spread around your hash, now you have another option!

xmr.cncoin.farm

Uses my cryptonote-xmr-pool which has updates, but was based on fancoder's crytponote-universal-pool
Has support for Onishin's "keepalived" miner changes.

P.S. Not an April Fool's joke. A real honest-to-goodness DarkFlarb pool.

[adhitthana]

What is the relationship between Darkflarb and Moner*?  

april fools.

OK...you got me. I was sure some DarkFlarb fans must have hacked the thread

[Drhiggins]

New pool. If you want to spread around your hash, now you have another option!

xmr.cncoin.farm

Uses my cryptonote-xmr-pool which has updates, but was based on fancoder's crytponote-universal-pool
Has support for Onishin's "keepalived" miner changes.

P.S. Not an April Fool's joke. A real honest-to-goodness DarkFlarb pool.

Couldn't connect on port: 18888 All other ports are ok and working. Have
a higher end hashing rig. PM me if you have any questions. Happy to
help out a new pool for a while.

[clintar2]

New pool. If you want to spread around your hash, now you have another option!

xmr.cncoin.farm

Uses my cryptonote-xmr-pool which has updates, but was based on fancoder's crytponote-universal-pool
Has support for Onishin's "keepalived" miner changes.

P.S. Not an April Fool's joke. A real honest-to-goodness DarkFlarb pool.

Couldn't connect on port: 18888 All other ports are ok and working. Have
a higher end hashing rig. PM me if you have any questions. Happy to
help out a new pool for a while.

Thank you very much! I opened the port. Pool is on east coast. Maybe I should put some info up on the main page.

[wpalczynski]

Monero 0.9.4 released!!

https://getmonero.org/2016/04/02/monero-0.9.4-released.html

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

This has important bug fixes to 0.9.3 Hydrogen Helix

Fix remaining issues with coinbase transactions
Removed connectivity_tool
Switched to new Clang move diagnostics
Added a new --generate-from-json flag to simplewallet to allow wallet creation from a JSON file
Add a new and improved version of sweep_dust
Various bug fixes to handle failures such as map resize failures and bad simplewallet exit[/li][/list]

[bitebits]

Today dnaleor wrote on the Monero reddit that Poloniex took Monero onboard already on the 19th of May 2014. That is only one month after Monero got launched @ 2014.04.18
(I would btw suggest to change the date format on the really nice Excel with XMR Charts to YYYYMMDD or DDMMYYYY. MMDDYYYY really is confusing when only using numbers).

So who or what motivated Poloniex to adopt Monero in such an early stage? Did they just recognize the potential? You would assume they are mostly interested in volume, which has been rather moderate for quite some time even after it could be traded on Polo. Does someone in the Monero community have close contacts with Poloniex?

Or was Poloniex just trying to compete with Cryptsy (now goxed) where basically any altcoin was traded? It actually took Cryptsy quite some time to implement Monero, likely because of really being technically different and since before the 0.9 version it was heavy on the RAM usage.

Just curious.