GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 17, 2016, 03:10:24 PM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
|
|
|
|
ArticMine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1050
Monero Core Team
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 17, 2016, 05:13:07 PM |
|
Seems counterproductive to post about there being XMR apparel then show DASH and ETH images?
That was my thought also. Sounds like a marketing fail to me. I do find marketing fails amusing in general.
|
|
|
|
mmortal03
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1762
Merit: 1011
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 18, 2016, 09:45:15 AM |
|
Also if you are running a service that needs to use simplewallet in RPC mode to check if payments are received but you have no need to send funds remotely, it's good to enable this flag: --restricted-rpc: Restricts RPC to view-only commands
That's a cool feature. Which reminds me: It'd be useful to have a flag to open wallets on the *command line* in view-only mode, that is, to restrict the command line interface of simplewallet to only view-only commands. (Yes, I know how to generate a view-only wallet, but that requires a refresh from scratch.) Yes, ideally, if you're treating a wallet as view-only for the most secure puposes, you'll actually want to choose a different password for it, meaning a completely separate wallet file instance, but I can also see instances where you'd want to open an otherwise spendable wallet and leave it refreshing without the possibility of it being spendable while it's doing so, or just to quickly check the balance.
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 18, 2016, 05:08:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3766
Merit: 5146
Whimsical Pants
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 18, 2016, 09:35:23 PM |
|
Seems counterproductive to post about there being XMR apparel then show DASH and ETH images?
Haha. That was my first thought
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 19, 2016, 10:34:38 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
pookielax31
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 19, 2016, 06:40:51 PM |
|
Good shit happening in Monero, slowly accumulating.. cant wait for that GUI
|
|
|
|
|
dEBRUYNE
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1141
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 04:57:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
papa_lazzarou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 05:56:56 PM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty...
|
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 06:17:24 PM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty... awesome!! thanks! I assume thats bytes?
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 10:04:41 PM |
|
Only 14 pull requests were merged today ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
|
Hueristic
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3934
Merit: 5290
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 20, 2016, 10:34:48 PM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty... That's Killa! 0.42 last year and up to 0.67 last month, I think that is a great indicator. Charts would be a good addition.
|
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing.”
|
|
|
papa_lazzarou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 09:04:39 AM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty... awesome!! thanks! I assume thats bytes? Actually.. no. You see, http://moneroblocks.info is the only monero block explorer that measures block size in bananas. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
papa_lazzarou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 09:09:26 AM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty... That's Killa! 0.42 last year and up to 0.67 last month, I think that is a great indicator. Charts would be a good addition. +1 I am trying to get off my lazy ass and add charts for over a year now.
|
|
|
|
Arux
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 09:45:53 AM |
|
Only 14 pull requests were merged today ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) and GUI development is healthy i tested a recent commit from Ilya's github, video here: http://sendvid.com/nyyb48w9 (GUI launch at ~03:00)
|
|
|
|
GingerAle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1008
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 11:23:28 AM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty... awesome!! thanks! I assume thats bytes? Actually.. no. You see, http://moneroblocks.info is the only monero block explorer that measures block size in bananas. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Thats what I've been speculating! Thanks again - this is so cool. Now every user can see if our blocksize is actually going to expand at any point.
|
|
|
|
papa_lazzarou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 03:10:23 PM |
|
@papa_lazzarou , would it be possible to include the median blocksize over the last n blocks on moneroblocks.info ? for n, could you set it at 200, 400, 600, 800, 1k?
http://moneroblocks.info/statsHow do you like it? I'm afraid it's not very sexy but more than half the blocks are empty... That's Killa! 0.42 last year and up to 0.67 last month, I think that is a great indicator. Charts would be a good addition. +1 I am trying to get off my lazy ass and add charts for over a year now. Since Gingeropolous woke me up from my longlasting slumber I added links to more detailed data from the stats page. Only available for the transaction count for the time being. I think this is particularly interesting: http://moneroblocks.info/stats/transactions/m/12The charts are closer than ever...
|
|
|
|
jwinterm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1116
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 03:17:01 PM |
|
Isn't this misleading though? You can see the # of txs per block roughly double at the time of the hardfork, March 2016, which would mean that the # of txs per minute has remained roughly constant, and is still essentially the same as it was at the launc.
|
|
|
|
papa_lazzarou
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
July 21, 2016, 03:42:30 PM |
|
Isn't this misleading though? You can see the # of txs per block roughly double at the time of the hardfork, March 2016, which would mean that the # of txs per minute has remained roughly constant, and is still essentially the same as it was at the launc. Yes, you're right. Nothing to see here, folks.
|
|
|
|
|