M's Miner (Ant/SP) Monitor v5.2: alerts,auto/mass/scheduled reboot/mobile miner

[MoreBloodWine]

Excuse me if I don't want to read through 26 pages, but... can this be used for Ant's outside the home ?

I have four S3's hosted about 5hrs from me and I usually just leave a browser tab open for each one but this program intrigues me.

All of my S3's have an IP like this, all using the same PW.

1.2.3.4:5676
1.2.3.4:5677
1.2.3.4:5678
1.2.3.4:5679

If you use the Web based screen scraping, as opposed to the API, there's a good chance it'll work for you.

M

And I just magically went blonde and started to twiddle my hair.

[MoreBloodWine]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

[mdude77]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

[MoreBloodWine]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

Code:

See the end of this message for details on invoking 
just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.

************** Exception Text **************
System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array.
   at System.Windows.Forms.ListBox.ItemArray.GetItem(Int32 virtualIndex, Int32 stateMask)
   at MAntMonitor.frmMain.RefreshGrid()
   at MAntMonitor.frmMain.TimerRefresh_Tick(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at MAntMonitor.frmMain.cmdRefresh_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.OnClick(EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Button.OnMouseUp(MouseEventArgs mevent)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmMouseUp(Message& m, MouseButtons button, Int32 clicks)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.ButtonBase.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Button.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m)
   at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)


************** Loaded Assemblies **************
mscorlib
    Assembly Version: 4.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 4.0.30319.1 (RTMRel.030319-0100)
    CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v4.0.30319/mscorlib.dll
----------------------------------------
MAntMonitor
    Assembly Version: 1.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 1.0.0.0
    CodeBase: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/Desktop/Ant%20Monitor/MAntMonitor.exe
----------------------------------------
Microsoft.VisualBasic
    Assembly Version: 10.0.0.0
    Win32 Version: 10.0.30319.1 built by: RTMRel
    CodeBase: file:///C:/WINDOWS/Microsoft.Net/assembly/GAC_MSIL/Microsoft.VisualBasic/v4.0_10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/Microsoft.VisualBasic.dll

[mdude77]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

It doesn't like something about your list of Ants to check.  Does at least one of them have the checkbox checked?

M

[MoreBloodWine]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

It doesn't like something about your list of Ants to check.  Does at least one of them have the checkbox checked?

M

Nope, all unchecked. Like I said, they're all hosted away from me about 5hrs with I{'s like this...

1.2.3.4:5676 <-- S30001
1.2.3.4:5677 <-- S30002
1.2.3.4:5678 <-- S30003
1.2.3.4:5679 <-- S30004

Do I need to do anything on the web UI side of things ?

[mdude77]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

It doesn't like something about your list of Ants to check.  Does at least one of them have the checkbox checked?

M

Nope, all unchecked. Like I said, they're all hosted away from me about 5hrs with I{'s like this...

1.2.3.4:5676 <-- S30001
1.2.3.4:5677 <-- S30002
1.2.3.4:5678 <-- S30003
1.2.3.4:5679 <-- S30004

Do I need to do anything on the web UI side of things ?

Unchecked ones are skipped.  Checked ones are the ones it tries to monitor.  See what happens when you check them?

M

[MoreBloodWine]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

It doesn't like something about your list of Ants to check.  Does at least one of them have the checkbox checked?

M

Nope, all unchecked. Like I said, they're all hosted away from me about 5hrs with I{'s like this...

1.2.3.4:5676 <-- S30001
1.2.3.4:5677 <-- S30002
1.2.3.4:5678 <-- S30003
1.2.3.4:5679 <-- S30004

Do I need to do anything on the web UI side of things ?

Unchecked ones are skipped.  Checked ones are the ones it tries to monitor.  See what happens when you check them?

M

I misread in haste, bu all are checked, I was thinking of the API uncheck.

[mdude77]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

It doesn't like something about your list of Ants to check.  Does at least one of them have the checkbox checked?

M

Nope, all unchecked. Like I said, they're all hosted away from me about 5hrs with I{'s like this...

1.2.3.4:5676 <-- S30001
1.2.3.4:5677 <-- S30002
1.2.3.4:5678 <-- S30003
1.2.3.4:5679 <-- S30004

Do I need to do anything on the web UI side of things ?

Unchecked ones are skipped.  Checked ones are the ones it tries to monitor.  See what happens when you check them?

M

I misread in haste, bu all are checked, I was thinking of the API uncheck.

Can you post a screenshot of your config?

M

[MoreBloodWine]

Think I go it, uncheck the API box.

That said, since I have S3's do I check S1 or S2 until you add S3 ?

Yes, uncheck the API box.

It behaves just like an S1, just faster.

M

When I add the miner and hit refresh, I get a .net popup about an unhandled exception.

This is just part of it...

It doesn't like something about your list of Ants to check.  Does at least one of them have the checkbox checked?

M

Nope, all unchecked. Like I said, they're all hosted away from me about 5hrs with I{'s like this...

1.2.3.4:5676 <-- S30001
1.2.3.4:5677 <-- S30002
1.2.3.4:5678 <-- S30003
1.2.3.4:5679 <-- S30004

Do I need to do anything on the web UI side of things ?

Unchecked ones are skipped.  Checked ones are the ones it tries to monitor.  See what happens when you check them?

M

I misread in haste, bu all are checked, I was thinking of the API uncheck.

Can you post a screenshot of your config?

M

Specifically which page ?

[MoreBloodWine]

Or do you mean this ?

http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30001.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30002.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30003.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30004.jpg

[mdude77]

Or do you mean this ?

http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30001.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30002.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30003.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30004.jpg

First page of the config from M's Ant Monitor.

M

[MoreBloodWine]

Or do you mean this ?

http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30001.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30002.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30003.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30004.jpg

First page of the config from M's Ant Monitor.

M

Here it is after adding a miner and hitting refresh.


Here's what happens when I "click" the miner if it matters at all.

[MoreBloodWine]

Ok... *scratches head*

8/10/2014 9:31:02 AM: M's Ant Monitor v2.6a starting
8/10/2014 9:32:17 AM: Initiated refresh
8/10/2014 9:32:19 AM: Submitting S1: xxx.xxx.xxx.89:2013 on instance 0
8/10/2014 9:32:31 AM: 89:2013 responded with login page
8/10/2014 9:32:35 AM: 89:2013 responded with login page
8/10/2014 9:42:30 AM: Initiated refresh

[Epoch]

I'd like to give this monitor a try with some S3's, but in the OP there is a statement: "- This does NOT work for S1s unless you modify the cgminer config to allow SSH API access."

Is the above caveat valid for S3's? That is, will the Monitor work with an S3 "out of the box". If not, exactly what needs to be done to the S3 to make it work? Thanks in advance.

[MoreBloodWine]

I'd like to give this monitor a try with some S3's, but in the OP there is a statement: "- This does NOT work for S1s unless you modify the cgminer config to allow SSH API access."

Is the above caveat valid for S3's? That is, will the Monitor work with an S3 "out of the box". If not, exactly what needs to be done to the S3 to make it work? Thanks in advance.

That's what were trying to figure out now, but my case is unique I guess. Have to use webui feature since mine are hosted outside the house.

[mdude77]

Or do you mean this ?

http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30001.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30002.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30003.jpg
http://eojmarket.com/NonForumStuff/bitcointalk/s30004.jpg

First page of the config from M's Ant Monitor.

M

Here it is after adding a miner and hitting refresh.

I think there might be a bug if you have less than 3 miners and use the web interface.  Can you add two more?

M

[mdude77]

I'd like to give this monitor a try with some S3's, but in the OP there is a statement: "- This does NOT work for S1s unless you modify the cgminer config to allow SSH API access."

Is the above caveat valid for S3's? That is, will the Monitor work with an S3 "out of the box". If not, exactly what needs to be done to the S3 to make it work? Thanks in advance.

The part that's referring to is updating the pool info via the app.  Everything else works fine to my knowledge.

M

[opieum2]

Great tool btw. It has worked well. However I am running into one small issue. I can't seem to add more than 5 machines before the 5th field gets shared with the 6th. I had hoped to be able to scale out. Is this possible?

For instance if I have 5 and add a 6th the two fields are shared I have no way of separating them. Anything I can do to address this?

I've had 9 Ants running on here (see op screenshot) and I know others have had a lot more than that.  Can you post a screenshot of what you mean?

There is an issue where if you have two ants with the same ending address only one will appear on the grid.  ie,

192.168.0.90
192.168.1.90

only the first will appear and it gets overwritten with the second.  But both are configurable for monitoring, they just don't both show up.

M

Here is what it looks like. As you can see the last entries are the one in question. Both having unique IPs. Ignore the fact that it has an error. That is deliberate and to demonstrate the contrast. One is an S3 (under S1 entry) and the working one is an S2.

[mdude77]

Great tool btw. It has worked well. However I am running into one small issue. I can't seem to add more than 5 machines before the 5th field gets shared with the 6th. I had hoped to be able to scale out. Is this possible?

For instance if I have 5 and add a 6th the two fields are shared I have no way of separating them. Anything I can do to address this?

I've had 9 Ants running on here (see op screenshot) and I know others have had a lot more than that.  Can you post a screenshot of what you mean?

There is an issue where if you have two ants with the same ending address only one will appear on the grid.  ie,

192.168.0.90
192.168.1.90

only the first will appear and it gets overwritten with the second.  But both are configurable for monitoring, they just don't both show up.

M

Here is what it looks like. As you can see the last entries are the one in question. Both having unique IPs. Ignore the fact that it has an error. That is deliberate and to demonstrate the contrast. One is an S3 (under S1 entry) and the working one is an S2.

What are the IPs of the last two?

M