[ANN] LitecoinPlus (XLC) / super fast / green / great team!

[TwinWinNerD]

I don't want to finace this new scam, after you ran off with the XBC money.  what's the next scam after you run off with this?  are there discounts for early IPO prices?  I hate to buy into the current tired scam while you're already preminign the next one. what, XDC?  extra doge coin?  WOO HOO!

Again, when did he "ran off" with anything. Show me a single post where XBCplus promised to use *all* the funds to fund the community? He was honest and burned about 150,000$ worth of coins..

He never burned the coin, seriouscoins did.

And how did seriouscoin get the coins?

[nightwishx]

You can use your other account and everybody interaction。。。

[TwinWinNerD]

Hmmmm......

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=401382.0

What is the connection to XLC? Nothing..

Your right, IDENTICAL offering of coins as XBC. 100K coins at .001 each. Total coincidence. Last activity of user March 20. Ten Days before XBC announcement made with new user XBCplus.

Speculation sure. But I think my BTC paid to him earned the right.

Round numbers are very seldom...

[andyatcrux]

TwinWinNerD, regarding ZMeddy's statement. You know damn well that neither of us can provide proof. That is kind of the point. The offering on the exchange provided this opportunity. So he either took 52 BTC or a combination to then use to make more money. Why do you care? A scam is a scam. The theorized one only gives him more credit for being devious. AND if he still can control the market that should concern you. Even the remote possibility of this is relevant.

[TwinWinNerD]

TwinWinNerD, regarding ZMeddy's statement. You know damn well that neither of us can provide proof. That is kind of the point. The offering on the exchange provided this opportunity. So he either took 52 BTC or a combination to then use to make more money. Why do you care? A scam is a scam. The theorized one only gives him more credit for being devious. AND if he still can control the market that should concern you. Even the remote possibility of this is relevant.

What I don't understand is the hate for the dev. One day ago no one gave a shit about the original dev. Now people can't stop talking about him.

Its hypocrite. They just fear their investment in XBC gets deluted. But if they really believe in XBC they shouldn't have to worry.

It is sad in my opinion. People start making things about emotion instead of facts.

[andyatcrux]

TwinWinNerD, regarding ZMeddy's statement. You know damn well that neither of us can provide proof. That is kind of the point. The offering on the exchange provided this opportunity. So he either took 52 BTC or a combination to then use to make more money. Why do you care? A scam is a scam. The theorized one only gives him more credit for being devious. AND if he still can control the market that should concern you. Even the remote possibility of this is relevant.

What I don't understand is the hate for the dev. One day ago no one gave a shit about the original dev. Now people can't stop talking about him.

Its hypocrite. They just fear their investment in XBC gets deluted. But if they really believe in XBC they shouldn't have to worry.

It is sad in my opinion. People start making things about emotion instead of facts.

I was concerned about this loophole days ago and voiced my concern. I hope you haven't given him too much of your BTC for the worthless XLC. good luck.

[TwinWinNerD]

TwinWinNerD, regarding ZMeddy's statement. You know damn well that neither of us can provide proof. That is kind of the point. The offering on the exchange provided this opportunity. So he either took 52 BTC or a combination to then use to make more money. Why do you care? A scam is a scam. The theorized one only gives him more credit for being devious. AND if he still can control the market that should concern you. Even the remote possibility of this is relevant.

What I don't understand is the hate for the dev. One day ago no one gave a shit about the original dev. Now people can't stop talking about him.

Its hypocrite. They just fear their investment in XBC gets deluted. But if they really believe in XBC they shouldn't have to worry.

It is sad in my opinion. People start making things about emotion instead of facts.

I was concerned about this loophole days ago and voiced my concern. I hope you haven't given him too much of your BTC for the worthless XLC. good luck.

Nothing I can't afford to lose

[ownerbest]

I'm wondering which exchange will accept XLC?
I don't think polo will do it

[armin22]

Polo said they wont accept XLC on their exchange.

[pineapples]

i got a reply from user XBCPlus

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=294365

[ssh2003]

Hello!

Launched new pool http://xlc.coinsinfo.net/ with 1% fee

Enjoy with mining!

[WayForward]

Polo said they wont accept XLC on their exchange.

Nice selective quoting here, that is NOT what busoni said at all. He said, as I asked him directly, that he was skeptical about adding it in because he like yourself and the rest of the lemmings think the dev SHOULDNT be allowed to make money on his coin ?  A lot of you people are just plain selfish. Demanding the extra coins to be destroyed after you all got in at 0.001 FMD. He then went on saying he would have to monitor it closely.  Thats all I have to say about your quote the rest is my comment in general.

Where is the proof that the previous dev had to do what YOU ALL wanted with HIS share that he admitted paying for himself ?   It seems in this world only YOU the investor is allowed to make money but screw the dev? Its only NOT fair when someone cant hoard more than everyone, including the dev.  The fact that this guy already has a working wallet out already shows me who the real devs were/are behind XBC, considering aren't you XBC guys still waiting for your wallet ?  

I wonder what internal problems there are within XBC from the committee that arent devs/coders but merely bagholders - you guys dont always decide the best course of action you know nor the correct one - most decisions made by the team have been pretty selfish that benefits them more so.  Had nothing to do with the dev and he wanted out ? go figure. The frenzy of ugly support/hate from the committee you see on here, if its any indication of the team running XBC, then what can i say? can you blame anyone for wanting out of that ?  I hate drama and would have left too. and cashed out on my investment.  

You guys demanded that they destroy the coins, and he did, all for the purpose so you could all cash out at a higher price - which if you were SMART (as I doubt most of you are) you would have made bank when XBC peaked at 0.04. Pretty good return if you bought in at 0.001

You all forgot the first IPO of xbc was a complete and utter disaster, a failure of epic proportions.  Poloniex trollbox became a frenzy of XBC support less than a week ago, and anyone with an opinion otherwise was trolled and shut down hard.  Now they are up in arms about another coin.

You cant have your cake and eat it too but it seems this group of xbc supporters want exactly that. So with that said, take your whining to the XBC thread where it belongs.

'
XBC has its issues big time, the double spend attack, the fact 1400 XBC WAS STOLEN from poloniex all recently.  These are not things the dev would do, thats the community doing that.  If WC is dying because of double spend attack I dont know why XBC would live on with the same problem plus having coins stolen.  Yet XBC committee are blaming the guy who left the dysfunctional team.. LOL ok.


XBc bagholders should be up 1000% and if you are not, you are in here bashing the thread/coin and dev.  

[TwinWinNerD]

There will be a big announcement soon

[NWO]

Polo said they wont accept XLC on their exchange.

Nice selective quoting here, that is NOT what busoni said at all. He said, as I asked him directly, that he was skeptical about adding it in because he like yourself and the rest of the lemmings think the dev SHOULDNT be allowed to make money on his coin by selling his premine.  A lot of you people are just plain selfish.  He then went on saying he would have to monitor it closely.  Thats all I have to say about your quote the rest is my comment in general.




I seriously doubt most of you even know who is behind both of these coins that IS playing you both against each other like a fiddle.  Keep dancing to the beat it profits us.

Seriously most of your XBC fan boys cant accept any competition at all, foaming at the mouth. Where is the proof hat the previous dev had to do what YOU ALL wanted with HIS premine ? and let he real 100% was premined.  It seems in this world only YOU the invester is allowed to make money screw the dev,

You guys demanded that they destroy the coins, and he did, all for the purpose so you could all cash out - which if you were SMART (as I doubt most of you are) you would have made bank when XBC peaked at 0.04.

 You all forgot the first IPO of xbc was a complete and utter disaster, a failure of epic proportions.  Poloniex trollbox became a frenzy of XBC support and anyone with an opinion was trolled and shut down hard.  Now they are up in arms about another coin

You cant have your cake and eat it too but it seems this group of xbc supporters want exactly that.






You should be up 1000% and if you are not, you are in here bashing the thread/coin and dev. 

No one brings any proof to the threads anymore ? is it "lets see if I can drum up support from the sheep to follow me - screw facts we dont need those if I can get more people believing my shit than your shit"

LOL I just read this thread and I was thinking this EXACT thing. It is like coin devs are not allowed to make any money on their creation and no one will ever be happy no matter what the dev does (even if he destroys the entire dev fund which was like over $200,000 USD for the community).

1000+ to you sir. Stupid sheep.

[jiapetz]

LOL I just read this thread and I was thinking this EXACT thing. It is like coin devs are not allowed to make any money on their creation and no one will ever be happy no matter what the dev does (even if he destroys the entire dev fund which was like over $200,000 USD for the community).

1000+ to you sir. Stupid sheep.

No one said he couldn't make money. Would it be awesome if he were willing to do this just to be a part of the growth especially since he owned personal coins? Yes.

But if he wants to make money, fine. I just don't see how it's fair the dev gets the overwhelming majority of the IPO funds while the community left behind gets barely enough to get by.

Talk about the one-percenters.

[TwinWinNerD]

LOL I just read this thread and I was thinking this EXACT thing. It is like coin devs are not allowed to make any money on their creation and no one will ever be happy no matter what the dev does (even if he destroys the entire dev fund which was like over $200,000 USD for the community).

1000+ to you sir. Stupid sheep.

No one said he couldn't make money. Would it be awesome if he were willing to do this just to be a part of the growth especially since he owned personal coins? Yes.

But if he wants to make money, fine. I just don't see how it's fair the dev gets the overwhelming majority of the IPO funds while the community left behind gets barely enough to get by.

Talk about the one-percenters.

But the thing here is that the Dev offered the funds. There is a massive amount of FUD around. Seriouscoin was offered parts of the funds.

[XBCplus]

LOL I just read this thread and I was thinking this EXACT thing. It is like coin devs are not allowed to make any money on their creation and no one will ever be happy no matter what the dev does (even if he destroys the entire dev fund which was like over $200,000 USD for the community).

1000+ to you sir. Stupid sheep.

No one said he couldn't make money. Would it be awesome if he were willing to do this just to be a part of the growth especially since he owned personal coins? Yes.

But if he wants to make money, fine. I just don't see how it's fair the dev gets the overwhelming majority of the IPO funds while the community left behind gets barely enough to get by.

Talk about the one-percenters.

But the thing here is that the Dev offered the funds. There is a massive amount of FUD around. Seriouscoin was offered parts of the funds.

Everyone knew that the XBC WAS the DEV FUND. They are now mad at their selfish decision (because at the time, they were looking at doubling their net worth with half of the supply gone) and now they are coming after me.

So to sum it up. They wanted me to destroy $200,000+ USD worth of XBC for their own greed (which was the dev fund). A lot of members expressed concern about this (the true supporters), but they were out voted. I suggested to seriouscoins to set up a donation address as we will not have anything. Few people donated, dev fund ran dry, so people started having to spend their own BTC and now the hatred has turned to me. They are now demanding all of the BTC I made from XBC.

So everyone wins and I end up with nothing. If you think this sounds fair, you really need to get a reality check. To put it politely.

[unhooked]

Dam all this publicity for free. Where do I sign up

[qiwoman]

I also meditated on the problem and yes there is a valid argument here that needs to discussed around a table and a good solution found for everyone and the Coin. I do believe though that if we can mend this broken relationship between DEV AND COMMUNITY it is better than having this sour aftertaste. I am more  in preference to diplomacy than ww3. . I do strongly feel though that this coin should be postponed until the XBC Brand and work is fully functional and established.
I have sent pm and email to both XBCPLUS AND SERIOUS and hope we can come to a viable Cooperaton and understanding. All the fighting in the Poloniex trollbox left an aftertaste I didn't feel happy about at all with everyone fighting. It's not what we should all be about.

[TwinWinNerD]

Just staked my first XLC coins

POS rocks. And it is working!!!!