Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2017, 10:09:28 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: Where would you prefer the VRC/VRM exchange pair be?
Bittrex
Poloniex
Both
Other

Pages: « 1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 [246] 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 ... 963 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][VRC] VeriCoin Proof of Stake-Time Currency | New Roadmap Released  (Read 1342251 times)
pnosker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 02:52:17 AM
 #4901

I am so confused. Did our openness somehow win Barabbas over?

Support the VeriFund Endowment.
VRC: VFEndownxxnHea9mv59kZx8c7TysGbndYx
1512986968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512986968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512986968
Reply with quote  #2

1512986968
Report to moderator
1512986968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512986968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512986968
Reply with quote  #2

1512986968
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1512986968
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1512986968

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1512986968
Reply with quote  #2

1512986968
Report to moderator
onsightit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280


truth=(true?true:false);


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 02:57:07 AM
 #4902

VRC is the 3rd highest volume in the past 24 hours!

https://coinmarketcap.com/volume.html#vrc

VRC: VMTMcvFjZHAshmVNLY5KYVHCTqcfEnH6Bd  SLR: 8W7D6D7rortYp51BK9MSrfripSoZWyVPVr  BTC: 1LbgAsTDtyWEGjiSaguJhJbaHBPgcMnHfP  BCC: 1Ta39PK67VXTD2xnmPNo5J9KJyBVHdYmy
darkproton
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672



View Profile
June 28, 2014, 02:58:31 AM
 #4903

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 02:59:10 AM
 #4904

I am so confused. Did our openness somehow win Barabbas over?

As you and Douglas very well know, your openness, even milder then, had won me over from the get go. The only reason you were not listed in THE WALL OF HONOR is the censorship in the IRC channel. And that was before douglas and david came out of the closet, so I don't understand the surprise. Yes, transparency and honesty will win me over every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Now, that said, The Black Hand involvement as well as the actual, real involvement of Joel Bosch, remain in cloudy territory for the time being.

But I like what I am seeing of late and along with criticism I don't hide praise when I believe it's due. Your openness is deserving of all praise in my book.
Always has been.
pratico
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:02:52 AM
 #4905

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.
lootz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 810


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:03:40 AM
 #4906

Approaching 50,000 satoshis. How long do you think it will take for us to reach 250,000 satoshis or 500,000 satoshis?

New wallet tomorrow
New wallet July 4th with fiat USD
VRC from credit card wallet afterwards
New wallet July 19th

to the moon when an awesome android/iphone wallet with all the functions fiat,credit,conversion....etc. Wallet is a big deal it allows cave men/women who are not tech savvy to just push a button from there wallet. Problem with crypto is cave people who only know fiat cannot adapt to it easy. Most of the world are not tech savvy.  Once we get that main part of the formula.....UTILITY then we start reinforcing value
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:06:10 AM
 #4907

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

I believe it is a feature most people in the community wanted as the fad that it is.

There are all kinds of opinions about it of course, all respectable but mine is that there's no place for anon, nor use, on a crypto currency that hopes to break the confines of the very reduced crypto community. All coins will eventually have the best one out there as an option... an option that practyically nobody will use.
lootz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 810


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:06:27 AM
 #4908

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

They are working on decentralizing it, didnt you watch the video ? or read this thread.
pratico
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:10:05 AM
 #4909

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

They are working on decentralizing it, didnt you watch the video ? or read this thread.

Even then - it would still be trusted, and NOT trustless... and my original question stands: what's the point?  It's still only a gimmick to fool those who don't know any better.
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:15:10 AM
 #4910

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

I believe it is a feature most people in the community wanted as the fad that it is.

There are all kinds of opinions about it of course, all respectable but mine is that there's no place for anon, nor use, on a crypto currency that hopes to break the confines of the very reduced crypto community. All coins will eventually have the best one out there as an option... an option that practyically nobody will use.

Woah, barabbas I actually agree with you on something! Anon is nothing but a gimmick- I won't make any exact estimates but I imagine the vast majority of people currently involved in crypto will never ever use this feature. Even more so, if cryptocurrencies are to ever gain mass adoption (as I hope we all strive for) the percentage of people who would use anon features would drastically diminish further. Additionally, and I believe we have seen this with bitcoin already, it is possible that anon actually inhibits mass adoption...
barabbas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:18:20 AM
 #4911

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

I believe it is a feature most people in the community wanted as the fad that it is.

There are all kinds of opinions about it of course, all respectable but mine is that there's no place for anon, nor use, on a crypto currency that hopes to break the confines of the very reduced crypto community. All coins will eventually have the best one out there as an option... an option that practyically nobody will use.

Woah, barabbas I actually agree with you on something! Anon is nothing but a gimmick- I won't make any exact estimates but I imagine the vast majority of people currently involved in crypto will never ever use this feature. Even more so, if cryptocurrencies are to ever gain mass adoption (as I hope we all strive for) the percentage of people who would use anon features would drastically diminish further. Additionally, and I believe we have seen this with bitcoin already, it is possible that anon actually inhibits mass adoption...

Don't worry, there's no chance it'll become a habit.
MasterMined710
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1171



View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:18:43 AM
 #4912

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
not. plus darksend works now.

DASH = Digital Cash         FAQ          DASHTALK        DashForceNews
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:19:47 AM
 #4913

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
not. plus darksend works now.

Yeah.. And supersend works now too (and they made it easy to use) so really if anything it is Darksend > Supersend > Verisend
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:20:36 AM
 #4914

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

I believe it is a feature most people in the community wanted as the fad that it is.

There are all kinds of opinions about it of course, all respectable but mine is that there's no place for anon, nor use, on a crypto currency that hopes to break the confines of the very reduced crypto community. All coins will eventually have the best one out there as an option... an option that practyically nobody will use.

Woah, barabbas I actually agree with you on something! Anon is nothing but a gimmick- I won't make any exact estimates but I imagine the vast majority of people currently involved in crypto will never ever use this feature. Even more so, if cryptocurrencies are to ever gain mass adoption (as I hope we all strive for) the percentage of people who would use anon features would drastically diminish further. Additionally, and I believe we have seen this with bitcoin already, it is possible that anon actually inhibits mass adoption...

Don't worry, there's no chance it'll become a habit.

I certainly hope not.
Investing123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157


CryptoCalc.org - Altcoin Profit/Loss Calculator


View Profile WWW
June 28, 2014, 03:20:50 AM
 #4915

I've got to say this VRC faucet is awesome.  http://vrcfaucet.visitbit.com/

Receive VRC in less than a second, every hour.

lootz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 810


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:24:44 AM
 #4916

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

I believe it is a feature most people in the community wanted as the fad that it is.

There are all kinds of opinions about it of course, all respectable but mine is that there's no place for anon, nor use, on a crypto currency that hopes to break the confines of the very reduced crypto community. All coins will eventually have the best one out there as an option... an option that practyically nobody will use.

Woah, barabbas I actually agree with you on something! Anon is nothing but a gimmick- I won't make any exact estimates but I imagine the vast majority of people currently involved in crypto will never ever use this feature. Even more so, if cryptocurrencies are to ever gain mass adoption (as I hope we all strive for) the percentage of people who would use anon features would drastically diminish further. Additionally, and I believe we have seen this with bitcoin already, it is possible that anon actually inhibits mass adoption...

That may be agreeable for now till the dollar collapses and we have a civil revolution and every person will reclaim their god given rights but we all would like the option for privacy for certain transaction with a push of the button from a wallet. Yes, No ? Also anon is not a feature that adds the value to this coin because all wallets can be connected to the tor network ... I could be wrong but maybe not. You need to look at the features that gives this coin UTILITY but any way dont listen to me I mean you sound like an ITIL expert Tongue What would a shlup that can only afford 4k of coin like me know
pnosker
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:25:32 AM
 #4917

VeriBit changes: halved the fee to 1 VRC. Raised the max to 1 BTC instead of 0.15. Lowered the time window to send to 15 minutes (instead of 20). Enjoy!

Support the VeriFund Endowment.
VRC: VFEndownxxnHea9mv59kZx8c7TysGbndYx
lootz
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 810


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:27:16 AM
 #4918

VeriBit changes: halved the fee to 1 VRC. Raised the max to 1 BTC instead of 0.15. Lowered the time window to send to 15 minutes (instead of 20). Enjoy!

Awesome you da man
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:30:27 AM
 #4919

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

I believe it is a feature most people in the community wanted as the fad that it is.

There are all kinds of opinions about it of course, all respectable but mine is that there's no place for anon, nor use, on a crypto currency that hopes to break the confines of the very reduced crypto community. All coins will eventually have the best one out there as an option... an option that practyically nobody will use.

Woah, barabbas I actually agree with you on something! Anon is nothing but a gimmick- I won't make any exact estimates but I imagine the vast majority of people currently involved in crypto will never ever use this feature. Even more so, if cryptocurrencies are to ever gain mass adoption (as I hope we all strive for) the percentage of people who would use anon features would drastically diminish further. Additionally, and I believe we have seen this with bitcoin already, it is possible that anon actually inhibits mass adoption...

That may be agreeable for now till the dollar collapses and we have a civil revolution and every person with reclaim their god given rights but we all would like the option for privacy for certain transaction with a push of the button from a wallet. Yes, No ? Also anon is not a feature that adds the value to this coin because all wallets can be connected to the tor network ... I could be wrong but maybe not. You need to look at the features that gives this coin UTILITY but any way dont listen to me I mean you sound like an ITIL expert Tongue What would a shlup that can only afford 4k of coin like me know

I study biochemistry and am really quite a newb when it comes to IT/comp sci and pretty much every thing I know about it I've learned since I got into crypto only a few months back. But, I'm pretty good at binge-learning... I agree with you, I originally bought this coin when it was below 1k satoshis because of the anon promises (not because I care about anon but because I know the market does), but it is the features such as veribit and SMS and the talk of being able to purchase through the wallet with credit cards etc that has me interested in the long term.
RW-Stott
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308


View Profile
June 28, 2014, 03:32:41 AM
 #4920

Verisend > Darksend

It's proven.
While verisend is cool, it is neither trustless nor decentralized. The devs have even said that this is not their main priority.

If it's not trustless + decentralized... then whats the point?  It's only a gimmick then... well, I guess that's the point.

They are working on decentralizing it, didnt you watch the video ? or read this thread.

Even then - it would still be trusted, and NOT trustless... and my original question stands: what's the point?  It's still only a gimmick to fool those who don't know any better.

I apologize.  Admittedly, I was being overly optimistic with my previous statement.  However, someone on IRC did tell me that verisend was both trustless and decentralized.  But if it is neither, then it is certainly not a good anonymity solution, in the least.  
Pages: « 1 ... 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 [246] 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 ... 963 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!