Bitcoin Forum
November 01, 2024, 05:27:50 AM *
News: Bitcoin Pumpkin Carving Contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 ... 176 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][TAC] TalkCoin  (Read 266726 times)
nonocoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 10:18:10 AM
 #2401

fuck voting system , lokk at heavycoin! dev is a idiot

Dude, you're embarrassing yourself with bad English.

If you wan't to be taken seriously as a Troll, you need to speak properly.

Everyone has a right to buy, sell or hold.  If you sell, and want to state your reasons for exiting that's fine, sell, leave and come back later if you want to.  Or, leave and don't come back.

But you don't hang around and try to discredit everything the hard working dev's are trying to achieve.  Most of the dev's here I know and they are very talented people
+1,great.fuck zxbball out of here.

 ███ ███ ███    WMCoin ▮▮▮▮▮   - Real Games Accepted - High Rewards Signature Campaign
                                <<  ● $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ >>   ███ ███ ███
nonocoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 10:21:55 AM
 #2402

there is too much tac supply,20 sec a block. dev is a idiot ,djm34 is a fool,voting system is a bullshit! new vision is a hopeless!
how foolish you are! Crazy!

 ███ ███ ███    WMCoin ▮▮▮▮▮   - Real Games Accepted - High Rewards Signature Campaign
                                <<  ● $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ >>   ███ ███ ███
Talkcoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10

Talkcoin Dev


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 11:08:45 AM
 #2403

1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored.
-- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.

As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code.

2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.

No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat from scratch, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency...

3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.

The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason.

Here's some comparisons:

TAC in circulation: ~7 million
LTC in circulation: ~30 million
NXT in circulation: ~1 billion
DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion

A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project.
crimealone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 11:15:16 AM
 #2404

1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored.
-- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.

As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code.

2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.

No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency...

3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.

The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason.

Here's some comparisons:

TAC in circulation: ~7 million
LTC in circulation: ~30 million
NXT in circulation: ~1 billion
DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion

A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project.

why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext?

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses 100% original codebase
  Superfast with 30 seconds instant finality
  Tested 5000 tx per block on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
zxbball
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 311
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 11:25:49 AM
 #2405

1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored.
-- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.

As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code.

2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.

No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency...

3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.

The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason.

Here's some comparisons:

TAC in circulation: ~7 million
LTC in circulation: ~30 million
NXT in circulation: ~1 billion
DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion

A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project.

why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext?

TAC is defintly not LTC, voting system is a fuck
MineP.it
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 11:26:39 AM
 #2406

1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored.
-- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.

As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code.

2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.

No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency...

3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.

The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason.

Here's some comparisons:

TAC in circulation: ~7 million
LTC in circulation: ~30 million
NXT in circulation: ~1 billion
DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion

A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project.

why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext?

TAC is defintly not LTC, voting system is a fuck

Can we not get him banned from this thread or something?

https://www.minep.it - secure, stable mining pools | 0.75% fees | chat | forums | one login for 40+ pools | unique interface
Pools: Bitcoin | BitMark | ConspiracyCoin | CryptCoin | CureCoin | DarkCoin | Digit | DogeCoin | Dvorakoin | FeatherCoin | FractalCoin | Hiro | IsraelCoin | KarmaCoin | Kryptonite | LimeCoinX | Litecoin | MultiWalletCoin | Negotium | NewWorldOrder | OzzieCoin | PyramidsCoin | RootCoin | SaveCoin | Shade | SurvivorCoin | SysCoin | TalkCoin | TitCoin | Trinity | UseCoin | UtopiaCoin | VertCoin | ViaCoin | VirtualCoin | VirtualMiningCoin | WankCoin | WorldCoin | ZetaCoin
Talkcoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 114
Merit: 10

Talkcoin Dev


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 11:39:24 AM
 #2407

1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored.
-- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.

As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code.

2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.

No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency...

3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.

The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason.

Here's some comparisons:

TAC in circulation: ~7 million
LTC in circulation: ~30 million
NXT in circulation: ~1 billion
DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion

A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project.

why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext?

TAC is defintly not LTC, voting system is a fuck

Can we not get him banned from this thread or something?

It's an unmoderated thread which lead to it's inevitable take over by trolls. But trolls are useful to help maintain a dynamic thread  Cheesy
catchcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 03:31:11 PM
 #2408

Sorry for the recent departure,the price is quite low now.  Sad

nonocoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 109
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 03:37:16 PM
 #2409

@catchcoin where were you these days .we need your promotion .
the QQ group also low active now.

 ███ ███ ███    WMCoin ▮▮▮▮▮   - Real Games Accepted - High Rewards Signature Campaign
                                <<  ● $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ - $$$ >>   ███ ███ ███
catchcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 333
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 04:39:16 PM
 #2410

@catchcoin where were you these days .we need your promotion .
the QQ group also low active now.
I will be back soon. Grin

Judaz49
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 07:26:59 PM
 #2411

what happened with this PR? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=714777
Hodor_keeper_of_the_light
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 07:42:55 PM
 #2412


she didn't answer. maybe if everyone will PM her and post in that thread, she'll see demand

daigitinasam
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 07:55:30 PM
 #2413

Got two questions.

1. Is the TAC chat romms are now fully anonymous?

2. Is it possible to make anon conversation with voices? Like phone call thru the coin using internet.
Hodor_keeper_of_the_light
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2014, 08:03:05 PM
 #2414

Got two questions.

1. Is the TAC chat romms are now fully anonymous?

it has always been fully anon, with rooms and before rooms

Jacksp
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 189
Merit: 100



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 09:22:57 PM
 #2415

1 tac per message is too expensive, and the price will dump if total supply is higher
Litejavichu
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 693
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 04, 2014, 11:26:00 PM
 #2416

voting system is a shit!!!!fuck fuck fuck !

DonQuijote
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002


♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 12:37:06 AM
 #2417

why are dumping the price?

THE INGENIOUS GENTLEMAN DON QUIXOTE OF LA MANCHA
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚♝♞♜ BTC tip: 39gUUFdJBdKWXnLoh3PMNX9eUz3DwakBKq
hascoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 178
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:44:09 AM
 #2418

1 tac per message is not too expensive. Smiley

Learnning blockchain  !
crimealone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:50:48 AM
 #2419

why are dumping the price?
Cause Dev think they are the only smart guys and never listen to the community.
The biggest reason is that the altcoin world is going from bad to worse and people don't have confidence in this kind of coins.

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses 100% original codebase
  Superfast with 30 seconds instant finality
  Tested 5000 tx per block on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
crimealone
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 251



View Profile
August 05, 2014, 01:56:15 AM
 #2420

why are dumping the price?

Oh, forget to say that you know why dev stand their ground so firmly? Cause every block they get "donations".

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses 100% original codebase
  Superfast with 30 seconds instant finality
  Tested 5000 tx per block on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
Pages: « 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 [121] 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 ... 176 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!