nonocoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
August 04, 2014, 10:18:10 AM |
|
fuck voting system , lokk at heavycoin! dev is a idiot
Dude, you're embarrassing yourself with bad English. If you wan't to be taken seriously as a Troll, you need to speak properly. Everyone has a right to buy, sell or hold. If you sell, and want to state your reasons for exiting that's fine, sell, leave and come back later if you want to. Or, leave and don't come back. But you don't hang around and try to discredit everything the hard working dev's are trying to achieve. Most of the dev's here I know and they are very talented people +1,great.fuck zxbball out of here.
|
|
|
|
nonocoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
August 04, 2014, 10:21:55 AM |
|
there is too much tac supply,20 sec a block. dev is a idiot ,djm34 is a fool,voting system is a bullshit! new vision is a hopeless!
how foolish you are! Crazy!
|
|
|
|
Talkcoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
Talkcoin Dev
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:08:45 AM |
|
1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored. -- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.
As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code. 2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.
No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat from scratch, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency... 3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.
The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason. Here's some comparisons: TAC in circulation: ~7 million LTC in circulation: ~30 million NXT in circulation: ~1 billion DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project.
|
|
|
|
crimealone
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:15:16 AM |
|
1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored. -- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.
As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code. 2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.
No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency... 3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.
The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason. Here's some comparisons: TAC in circulation: ~7 million LTC in circulation: ~30 million NXT in circulation: ~1 billion DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project. why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext?
|
|
|
|
zxbball
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:25:49 AM |
|
1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored. -- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.
As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code. 2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.
No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency... 3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.
The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason. Here's some comparisons: TAC in circulation: ~7 million LTC in circulation: ~30 million NXT in circulation: ~1 billion DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project. why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext? TAC is defintly not LTC, voting system is a fuck
|
|
|
|
MineP.it
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:26:39 AM |
|
1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored. -- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.
As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code. 2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.
No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency... 3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.
The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason. Here's some comparisons: TAC in circulation: ~7 million LTC in circulation: ~30 million NXT in circulation: ~1 billion DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project. why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext? TAC is defintly not LTC, voting system is a fuck Can we not get him banned from this thread or something?
|
https://www.minep.it - secure, stable mining pools | 0.75% fees | chat | forums | one login for 40+ pools | unique interface Pools: Bitcoin | BitMark | ConspiracyCoin | CryptCoin | CureCoin | DarkCoin | Digit | DogeCoin | Dvorakoin | FeatherCoin | FractalCoin | Hiro | IsraelCoin | KarmaCoin | Kryptonite | LimeCoinX | Litecoin | MultiWalletCoin | Negotium | NewWorldOrder | OzzieCoin | PyramidsCoin | RootCoin | SaveCoin | Shade | SurvivorCoin | SysCoin | TalkCoin | TitCoin | Trinity | UseCoin | UtopiaCoin | VertCoin | ViaCoin | VirtualCoin | VirtualMiningCoin | WankCoin | WorldCoin | ZetaCoin
|
|
|
Talkcoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 114
Merit: 10
Talkcoin Dev
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:39:24 AM |
|
1) it's not that talkcoin sucks, my deepest regret is investing in the dev team. why? there was an official vote last month initiated by tac team, the community spoke with its desires, and yet the community was ignored. -- this automatically became a red flag for me. it was really frustrating because ive been a strong supporter of this coin for many months now.
As AizenSou has explained, the voting system will be modified but it requires time to create our new system, it's more complicated than changing 2 or 3 variables in the code. 2) Chat, whether encrypted or not, is easily being implemented on all popular coins. Sooner or later a coin will have it implemented on the blockchain, depending on community desire. Once that occurs, I guarantee you talkcoin will become obsolete. It's not about being first or anything, it's about answering and responding to community desires. That's what drives a coin.
No, it's not easily being implemented. If you want create a secure p2p chat, it requires much time and work. And cloning talkcoin or any code is not a good idea if you don't know what you are doing (see chatcoin). That's why there is no alternative, there are only easier solutions (chat on centralized IRC channel) but what is the point to use central servers in a P2P cryptocurrency... 3) the market is growing heavily inflated even with low block reward.
The market is not growing heavily inflated, the voting system was invented for that reason. Here's some comparisons: TAC in circulation: ~7 million LTC in circulation: ~30 million NXT in circulation: ~1 billion DOGE in circulation: ~100 billion A pretended scarcity (see 365coins, 42coins, mincoin, bitbar etc) have demonstrated clearly enough that scarcity is just a gitzmo/scam that never works in long term. Talkcoin is a long-term project. why you guys always compare yourself to LTC, NXT, DOGE? Who are you? Are you bcnext? TAC is defintly not LTC, voting system is a fuck Can we not get him banned from this thread or something? It's an unmoderated thread which lead to it's inevitable take over by trolls. But trolls are useful to help maintain a dynamic thread
|
|
|
|
catchcoin
|
|
August 04, 2014, 03:31:11 PM |
|
Sorry for the recent departure,the price is quite low now.
|
|
|
|
nonocoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
August 04, 2014, 03:37:16 PM |
|
@catchcoin where were you these days .we need your promotion . the QQ group also low active now.
|
|
|
|
catchcoin
|
|
August 04, 2014, 04:39:16 PM |
|
@catchcoin where were you these days .we need your promotion . the QQ group also low active now.
I will be back soon.
|
|
|
|
Judaz49
|
|
August 04, 2014, 07:26:59 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Hodor_keeper_of_the_light
|
|
August 04, 2014, 07:42:55 PM |
|
she didn't answer. maybe if everyone will PM her and post in that thread, she'll see demand
|
|
|
|
daigitinasam
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
August 04, 2014, 07:55:30 PM |
|
Got two questions.
1. Is the TAC chat romms are now fully anonymous?
2. Is it possible to make anon conversation with voices? Like phone call thru the coin using internet.
|
|
|
|
Hodor_keeper_of_the_light
|
|
August 04, 2014, 08:03:05 PM |
|
Got two questions.
1. Is the TAC chat romms are now fully anonymous?
it has always been fully anon, with rooms and before rooms
|
|
|
|
Jacksp
|
|
August 04, 2014, 09:22:57 PM |
|
1 tac per message is too expensive, and the price will dump if total supply is higher
|
|
|
|
Litejavichu
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:26:00 PM |
|
voting system is a shit!!!!fuck fuck fuck !
|
|
|
|
DonQuijote
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1551
Merit: 1002
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦ < ♛♚&#
|
|
August 05, 2014, 12:37:06 AM |
|
why are dumping the price?
|
THE INGENIOUS GENTLEMAN DON QUIXOTE OF LA MANCHA
|
|
|
hascoin
|
|
August 05, 2014, 01:44:09 AM |
|
1 tac per message is not too expensive.
|
Learnning blockchain !
|
|
|
crimealone
|
|
August 05, 2014, 01:50:48 AM |
|
why are dumping the price?
Cause Dev think they are the only smart guys and never listen to the community. The biggest reason is that the altcoin world is going from bad to worse and people don't have confidence in this kind of coins.
|
|
|
|
crimealone
|
|
August 05, 2014, 01:56:15 AM |
|
why are dumping the price?
Oh, forget to say that you know why dev stand their ground so firmly? Cause every block they get "donations".
|
|
|
|
|