|
chaeplin
|
 |
June 11, 2014, 05:48:47 PM |
|
FYI: * ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx
* ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb
tx: 7 percent 95 value 2.2
*===> block reached
*===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1
*===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC
Details for Transaction
Hash 3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5
Blockheight 28617 (34 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:03:57
Total Output 21.49996 XC
Fee 1,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 762a501de829...:0 XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw 21.49997 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 4eba6dee5d2a... XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d 21.484411 XC
1 dd438f2fbd86... XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb 0.015549 XC
Hash 1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed
Blockheight 28618 (33 confirmations)
Date/Time 2014-06-11 16:04:47
Total Output 2.210008 XC
Fee 4,E-5.0 XC
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index Previous output Address Amount
0 2e4b75ef5a19...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
1 cd32a1861879...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
2 3ce0db590e12...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
3 02db662529db...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
4 447508bf02da...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
5 2d78dc9f56f4...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
6 11c03ded1646...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
7 621e30ceab64...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
8 94fdca2ed122...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
9 8b9b2670d7fe...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
10 9e0042d13a8c...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
11 3bf012c2084a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
12 88d3f916833b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
13 d3c04cd03e84...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
14 c2f94d8a07f7...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
15 6bf82a41a9ea...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
16 41a3ee9ac44a...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
17 5e4064a65a3b...:1 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.00002 XC
18 3dd4c6f4142d...:1 XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7 0.003 XC
19 0a17a0ab48af...:2 XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC 0.003 XC
20 2ef543f876d2...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.100593 XC
21 a5e213619ea1...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 0.003 XC
22 c933acb99fd0...:1 XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 0.003 XC
23 339cf1265d09...:1 XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN 2.094095 XC
24 b83aee2ba80c...:2 XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2 0.003 XC
Outputs
Index Redeemed in Address Amount
0 Not yet redeemed XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q 0.010018 XC
1 Not yet redeemed XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX 2.19999 XC
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2.. I will give you hard link for this. What is bounty for this ? I will NOT answer your XYpmyasn9gRZuaumqjkk9XFccrz24XL2bk thing. Mix 10times ? 10 * fee ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:48:55 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully |
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:49:25 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
Splatters
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:50:14 PM |
|
for who know better this coin, do you think it could have the same end like the DRK?
I mean there're only 5.5 Milion coin, and it could give to the money the possibility to gain a very high price.
I bought some when it was at 210k, and now I'm considering to take some coin at 140k, what do you believe is the destiny of this coin in the next few weeks?
|
I know why your pray will never be answered!
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:50:27 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Then bounty ? |
|
|
|
|
|
hoertest
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:50:32 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully its the same talk all over again and he never proved anything |
|
|
|
|
|
Profetu
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:51:01 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Please place a bounty so we can get to the bottom of this. |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:51:54 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Then bounty ? bounty for what? prove to me who sent the payment to XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k and you can get a bounty |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:52:06 PM |
|
 PW for Zip- OutgoingXCTransaction |
|
|
|
|
|
phosphorush
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:52:08 PM |
|
Give him a boumty if what he claims is not true, no need to fear and all is cleared...
|
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:52:53 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Cheaplin is a big DRK supporter. It's in his interests to try and create uncertainty. Whenever the price moves up, DRK people get scared and start trying to spread FUD. There is only one reason why they do this... they fear us  |
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:53:22 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Please place a bounty so we can get to the bottom of this. Comeone, we had a new release & ATC posted an TX. After marketing is in place & final release ready, start talking bounty. For now i hope we are all crypto enthousiast testing a new release |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:53:50 PM |
|
None of this really matters as again - he is not showing a direct link, rather that a single transaction occurred matching the provided send amount of 2.2..
well he keeps talking about design flaw, so unless he provides hard evidence we should just ignore him from now on, and if the design is flawed and u continue updating without tracing it, other prestigious members will eventually find it and report truthfully It is not a design flaw and nor does it apply to future release's.. it is just to create more FUD Then bounty ? bounty for what? prove to me who sent the payment to XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k and you can get a bounty hard link in evtrmm test. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:54:24 PM |
|
but now I try to unhash the MD5 and it can't  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:56:02 PM |
|
Then bounty ?
bounty for what? prove to me who sent the payment to XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k and you can get a bounty +1. Guys for now we should leave any challenges or bounties to the dev, who knows how to pose challenges in a way that cannot be cheated. |
|
|
|
|
acseric
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:59:12 PM |
|
I think it is time for atcsecure to back his claims with a real BTC bounty.
I understand some of the nuance of the technology (by no means am I an expert), but I know semantic games when I see them. Lay out a verifiable challenge, and see if chaeplin can deliver.
Stop with all of this "that is only part of the answer" bullshit. Set up a very concise challenge and see.
Anyone here should be demanding the same!
|
|
|
|
|
|
hoertest
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:59:43 PM |
|
Then bounty ?
bounty for what? prove to me who sent the payment to XWbKXuTjW65VhQ2yk7zhhUbiuPN4XMGE2k and you can get a bounty +1. Guys for now we should leave any challenges or bounties to the dev, who knows how to pose challenges in a way that cannot be cheated. +1 +2 +3 especially if you change conditions to chaps favour, plain stupid |
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2014, 05:59:53 PM |
|
did you find out sender address before evtrmm post the address? be straightforward |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 11, 2014, 06:00:00 PM |
|
The address he posted doesn't match your "guess".. regardless this was just a 1 off transaction .. we can organize a valid test with bounty |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
