[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[myelbow4]

This is just the beginning. Prepare for .01

[1714477912]

1714477912

[atcsecure]

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

do they show up in the block explorer?  if not you may need to rescan w/ fresh wallet using private key imports

[JakeThePanda]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

[atcsecure]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

[520Bit]

Do I lost all of my below unconfirmed transactions, almost 10 XC? I used to have 10 XC in my wallet. I have performed repairwallet for many times, not recovered. Not FUD.

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 19:36
To: XRM2qeBigPykpxLkS11ttxU73iVEdvZZg7
Debit: -0.056125 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056135 XC
Transaction ID: 3cbf080024c736ab36f7b5c8fbf675f55552f2ecc6f518613a0fc0d2e0824373

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:32
Debit: -7.75316 XC
Credit: 7.75316 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 55f8a7daaaf032180489fd63c46bc20f7478825cedad3c67cb37435659f747bb

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:39
Debit: -8.46374 XC
Credit: 8.46374 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.00001 XC
Transaction ID: 1211e6b906d890671e592a9e28ebeaf95e30288d055e246cd62a06dad105001a

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:48
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -8.46373 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -8.46374 XC
Transaction ID: 41e20493cabf34c42fea3fbac5f4791a70c5735da324988708d84c791f9ee6f0

Code:

Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 2014/6/11 23:56
To: XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz
Debit: -0.71058 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.71059 XC
Transaction ID: bb5311e8f93f21f0472b258b1f3bdded2715536663f8d0c2bc37c2832ea152a0

do they show up in the block explorer?  if not you may need to rescan w/ fresh wallet using private key imports

And every time I sent my XC, there is an error:

Code:

Error: The transaction was rejected. 
This might happen if some of the coins in your wallet were already spent, 
such as if you used a copy of wallet.dat and 
coins were spent in the copy but not marked as spent here.

[phosphorush]

someone looking for a transaction would have the md5 or sha? if not that's part of the privacy features and should not be required to track it if it's possible to do so? Am I wrong? (I'm very ignorant on these things )

[Profetu]

snip

No, we can't move on.  Trolls from the DRK thread have been all over the fact that Chaeplin can backtrace the address.  I won't stop until someone folds.

I wasn't suggesting like other speculators here to burrow our heads and move on like there is no issue here. I was suggesting that dev should do whatever so there is proof before submission. If not, there will always be a doubt and that's all what a FUDer needs.

[illodin]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

Agree. Let's stop all testing and wait until it's finalized and in actual use. More exciting to find holes then.

[cyberhacker]

I wasn't suggesting like other speculators here to burrow our heads and move on like there is no issue here. I was suggesting that dev should do whatever so there is proof before submission. If not, there will always be a doubt and that's all what a FUDer needs.

did you see that, dev will disclose transaction detail after Chaeplin post address.

simple. if dev do not post transaction details after that. most ppl will lose patience and confidence.

[brother3]

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

your theory apply to any coin. btc ltc xc drk  and any coin

Herd mentality...

Same with stocks too

Edit: I actually got 1K of XCs at ~ 93K level and people have always been buying - Otherwise we would not be at this level now

[520Bit]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

Agree. Let's stop all testing and wait until it's finalized and in actual use. More exciting to find holes then.

This is just REV1 release, REV2 release will be more exciting.

[Artoodeetoo]

Expecting this to leg up again tonight... Great progress dev, thanks for the further updates today... Remember this is a young coin...

[addergebroed]

Should we be worried about X11 mining in the near future and the XC price (let's say it will work) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7252546#msg7252546

[SushiChef]

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

[phosphorush]

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Blacksteel

[hunterwolf]

XC is a great coin. I've got lots, but want more. 

When do you think is a good time to buy more?

Do you think it will drop in price a little?

best time is now.

yes best time. You are kidding i think. Coin more than 1week 93K-95K and no body buy it.
now 140K and good time for buy, really?

You can always wait to see if it goes down but I suggest you buy now and keep an eye on it, plus we been in the 90ks for to long even with some good progress from ATC. Lets not forget that right now there is no marketing done so when that kicks in we should make some progress price wise.  

no, you wrong. İ bought 400K, i bought 20K a lot. And i sold  145K a part now. if go down i buy again. if  go up, i sell again, you understand?
but wee need truth. No good time for buy, i dont like scam. is my opinion offcourse.

 

[Thrash]

While we are awaiting Cheaplin to give sender adress why don't we give our insight into the logo

http://forum.xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/49-xc-logo-development/

Just wanted to let everyone know I am still around and we are working hard on the branding to go with the XC logo. While it takes some time to get it right, it will be worth it in the long run. Our goal is to provide the branding at a professional level that matches the work that atcsecure has been bringing to the table. 

It is great to be invested in a coin that delivers what they promise. I look forward to what the future holds for XC. 

[yoo10]

ATCSecure?

do whatever md5, sha, anything.

like this 'tuuiuauiyduayidsyauiydsaiuydsiuayd_[real_address]_lkjlkajslkdjalksjdalskdjalkjdsalkdjalks'


and post result.




Then when I submit address, Dev should tell input of whatever hash.

Again, I'm not doing that, if he knows the address then he should post it

I think we all need to face this test.

dev can give a md5(real_address_A + salt), salt can be any string and needn't post here. Just md5 hash C

the tester give address B

then dev give A and salt, the rest can verify it.

because if B=A, dev cannot find a A',  md5(A' + salt') = C

Hey, if chaeplin could trace the address, what we need to do is just fix it before the boat sails to the sea, isn't it?

[evtrmm]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

[SushiChef]

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??


EDIT: Being that there seems to be a conflict on BOTH sides here, I have included an MD5 in a PW protected zipfile that is uploaded to my sharepoint site.

How I understand it. They NEED the md5 to make a connection. They can't without.