shakesbear
Member
 Offline
Activity: 684
Merit: 10
|
 |
June 10, 2014, 03:00:34 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long  ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The block chain is the main innovation of Bitcoin. It is the
first distributed timestamping system.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:02:51 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. BTW, XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC is NOT my address. |
|
|
|
|
|
Artoodeetoo
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:04:46 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range... |
DASH #DashDC #DashIntoDigitalCash
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:07:34 PM |
|
No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
|
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:08:53 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? some people have no idea how huge XC will be in the near future, they are dumping for the best price they think they can get, they will probably hang themselves in 12 months..but that's there problem, let em dump. |
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:10:00 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? there is a whole XC unmoderated thread providing FUD and harsh critisism 24/7. Apart from that, dev is working and not trying to promote with fancy prictures and stupid hype which is a true paradise compared to 9/10 shitcoins which do exactly that and fluctuate in a week accordingly. The last 2 weeks price has been fluctuating steadily--- it is being used by traders as a means to make daily profit. Which is not bad imo if done in moderation. With some major release, like REV 2 or enc messages and such, or PR team taking over, we should see some kind of pump. I certainly w8 for PR team info from the team, so we have 2 main things going on for us, steady coding development by secure, and promotion by the rest of the team. Keep in mind that as stated by others, rich list is slowly accumulating more coins, if XC wasnt promising they d be the first to dump |
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:10:34 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range... We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin. |
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:14:11 PM |
|
Is this helpful for the dev? No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. |
|
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:18:14 PM
Last edit: June 10, 2014, 03:29:25 PM by chaeplin |
|
Is this helpful for the dev? No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. 100 % helpful. You misssed my comment. "did Mixer forgot to change address ?" Your TX is normal mixer tx, but mixer forgot something(I would call it bug). Dev will fix it. |
|
|
|
|
|
GameStarter
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:27:51 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range... We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin. Yesteday 2H EMA was close to break up , it could start a big moove, so they start to dump early in night hours to stop it when the market is the weaker. At one point they will be force to buy higher by the market when the buying pressure will be too strong to stop. |
XChat adress + Key: XVgjcg7tnFgkthL2hi4yvXiU66FWkZ
Key: bjmK3SsiNEUC2VJkcEGTMRBmqYx3rXhxRh39BvbtpAof
|
|
|
|
shockstar
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:30:03 PM |
|
Believe me, XC price will shock everyone once this thread reach up to 1000 pages. Keep discussing.
i hope so lol. i couldve sold at 400k, but i held on  |
|
|
|
|
|
shockstar
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:32:13 PM |
|
1. Darkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Bitcoin CoinJoin and not 100% anon as promised. Instamined half of current outstanding coins or about 2million within 24hrs. gmaxwell the creator of CoinJoin and Bitcoin dev believed this was a SCAM coin; https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=641178.402. Cloak (X13 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL 3. Mastiffcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Laundering through exchanges, LOL 4. Vericoin (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises 5. Pinkcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Centralized mixer 6. Cryptcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises 7. Libertycoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises 8. Honorcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises (SCAM) 9. Dreamcoin (X11 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises 10. Cinni: (Scrypt / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises 11. Boost: (X13 / PoW/PoS): Nothing to show for except promises 12. Anoncoin (PoW Scrypt): IP obfuscation 13. TIPS (PoW Scrypt): Centralized mixer 14. Bytecoin-BCN (PoW): 99% premine of circulating coins + problematic codebase coupled with good anonymity (+2 years in development and still in infancy regarding basic stuff like GUI) 15. Bytecoin clones (PoW): Increasing in numbers every day diluting that field. MRO gets a special mention due to being the first clone. BBR gets another special mention for having a good dev. Still they experience significant problems due to the new codebase. 16. Zerocoin: DOA (?) / delayed for months 17. NXT (PoS): In discussions relative to anonymous implementation vs XC: First anonymous coin with encrypt Android wallet/message, Blockchain 2.0 ... People do not see the real potential in this coin but rather drop in volume and price which really disappoints me. |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:39:11 PM |
|
Is this helpful for the dev? No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. 100 % helpful. You misssed my comment. "did Mixer forgot to change address ?" Your TX is normal mixer tx, but mixer forgot something(I would call it bug). Dev will fix it. What was sender address |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:42:39 PM |
|
Is this helpful for the dev? No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. this transaction was not mixed, but rather just passed through |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:52:01 PM |
|
Is this helpful for the dev? No, the sender address is not correct. Well follow link. XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da You sent 0.1 to yourself, isn't ? do validateaddress XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC No, none of them (XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da == XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC == XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da) are the sender address. I can provide the transaction ID to prove if necessary. Please provide Here are two transaction IDs from my wallet: ID #1Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.056831 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.056841 XC
Transaction ID: ccd856d41fcfecd497d09c35d8187573db5b91ab43d8c512fbb96b2bbc3ee387 Status: 31 confirmations, broadcast through 4 node(s)
Date: 2014/6/10 20:34
To: XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is
Debit: -0.043169 XC
Transaction fee: -0.00001 XC
Net amount: -0.043179 XC
Transaction ID: 60bb17bbf3d5fd411795870e11601ed0543a625802d3f88ef73eb01f9e882a07
I link it http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28131.htmCheck. you don't know how to read block explorer. Have you heard change address ? Details for Block #28131
Hash 375823c27127d20d0e5db2b9dbe815cd50aa593bd24b48f1a9ab4c87a247a75f
Date/Time 2014-06-10 12:36:04 extracted by Proof of Stake
Transactions 4
Value Out 1,020.352284 XC
Difficulty 0.00113073
Outstanding 5,512,395.57576338 XC
Transactions
Raw Block
Hash Value Out From (amount) To (amount)
600409af81... 0.0 XC
Generation + Fees
Included in following transaction(s) 0.823265 XC
3ecaeebbbf... 1,000.809285 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 999.986 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.4 XC
XNTnSCLrszMTEi4fj29yq6qoMT5gzuJJ3a 500.409285 XC
ccd856d41f... 9.79992 XC
XQK2mnjgVxjhcBc5TocS23srVZ3TzddDeC 9.79993 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.056831 XC
60bb17bbf3... 9.743079 XC
XaXyGnCb5BKrtt5MN7PW62QKNM2sQSp6bs 9.743089 XC
XF9GYs4Xhir9eQ9DLyApeLxhv8H4i9dnge 9.69991 XC
XEzxKvqABQY3mzxMx1J13Sd3Pn92eqw2is 0.043169 XC
Proved. this transaction was not mixed, but rather just passed through I used sendfrommixer command, not sure why not mixed. |
|
|
|
|
|
phosphorush
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:54:26 PM |
|
Ok will someone do it properly?  |
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
|
chaeplin
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:54:41 PM |
|
this transaction was not mixed, but rather just passed through
Yes, so I comment it. "did Mixer forgot to change address ?" |
|
|
|
|
|
bbr
|
|
June 10, 2014, 03:58:18 PM |
|
For those running as xnode - have you received any credits to your wallet and how long did it take? I have been running for about 24 hours and not seen anything so not sure if it is working or not.
I have seen this in my debug log a lot: AddPortMapping(0, 0, 192.168.178.26) failed with code 403 (UnknownError)
I have forwarded port 32348 in my router and allowed it in windows firewall but still the same. Could that error be the issue or am i just being impatient?
|
|
|
|
|
hunterwolf
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 10, 2014, 04:12:02 PM |
|
Why the price are so low for so long ? Why we drop from 0.004 to under 0.001 ? Why people constantly dumping ? Every time price break 0.0011 , there will be a huge sell order to take all the buys from 0.0009 up. It's like some one is waiting for you to put up a buy order in order to dump their coins at this price range. This has been going on for 5 days now. Anybody else notice this ? How do you explain it ? Have noticed it, no idea, I do think there is accumulation going on, if we get real momentum and push through 0.0011 then my view is we will take off.. I have faith.... It is frustrating though to keep going there and coming back down again.... Current prices / newsflow / potential should attract some large buyers though which is what we need to get through.. It may well gap up fast then into the 0.002 range... We were doing well yesterday then someone came along and dumped like 20k+ in a short amount of time just destroying the 100K wall instantly. It creeps back up over 100 and then gets shoved right back down. Frustrating seeing this. It makes me wonder if someone is willing to lose money in order to keep the price down and investors not interested in the coin. Yesteday 2H EMA was close to break up , it could start a big moove, so they start to dump early in night hours to stop it when the market is the weaker. At one point they will be force to buy higher by the market when the buying pressure will be too strong to stop. I am not worried about this price. Every time it goes below 100k I buy more. When Rev2 is out it will surely go up.
yes you not worried and buy more under 100K, i'm not worried and buy under 100K, he is same etc. because who write this thread, all say same thing. So who sell that much coin. if most people think grown and buy, how can price down steadily. thats it i cant understant. sorry for my bad english. similar fear, similar answers and price only going down. |
|
|
|
|
|
520Bit
|
|
June 10, 2014, 04:16:33 PM |
|
I sent 9 XC by sendfrommixer command to another address, but only 2 XC sent out, the rest are still in my wallet, why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
