[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[BrewCrewFan]

Lutz at darkcoin trolls FUdding in another coins topic. To me that means one thing, they are worried about market share .

[synechist]

That would defeat the purpose of "the troll." Their sole objective is to present a misrepresentation.

Ah well. I live in hope that trollishness can be exorcised by addressing them in good faith.

[adhitthana]

Lutz at darkcoin trolls FUdding in another coins topic. To me that means one thing, they are worried about market share .

What they don't understand is that by making so many enemies, if DRK has a problem some people are likely to return the favour.
Not that the trolls have any real association with DRK community

[battbot]

Honestly, I see the price fall as a blessing.  The general public (aka the masses) has no idea the significance / progress that atcsecure is making with this coin and its anon tech.  There will soon come a day when no amount of troll FUD can hold back the price.  Use this as an opportunity to stock up.  

[CryptoGretzky]

Honestly, I see the price fall as a blessing.  The general public (aka the masses) has no idea the significance / progress that atcsecure is making with this coin and its anon tech.  There will soon come a day when no amount of troll FUD can hold back the price.  Use this as an opportunity to stock up.  

+1

I have taken this opportunity to really load up on more XC... Think I added another 10k XC last night thanks to the drop into the 130k area.

[AlexGR]

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.

Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments.  Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.

Operative word: will.

Which means, as it is right now, with nodes being able to steal money, you don't want much attention because it can instantly snap the other way around to ...negative attention. Let's see the fix first...

[JesstersDead]

Honestly, I see the price fall as a blessing.  The general public (aka the masses) has no idea the significance / progress that atcsecure is making with this coin and its anon tech.  There will soon come a day when no amount of troll FUD can hold back the price.  Use this as an opportunity to stock up.  

How right you are sir

[Artoodeetoo]

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.

Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments.  Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.

Operative word: will.

Which means, as it is right now, with nodes being able to steal money, you don't want much attention because it can instantly snap the other way around to ...negative attention. Let's see the fix first...

You seem to spend most of your time on the DRK thread.. What a shock.. Apols in advance for giving you some competition.

[adhitthana]

How does "dynamic trust" work?

[synechist]

Operative word: will.

Which means, as it is right now, with nodes being able to steal money, you don't want much attention because it can instantly snap the other way around to ...negative attention. Let's see the fix first...

It's a little vexing to honour this with a reply, but I think you were asked to provide an argument for your claim that nodes can steal money.

And to state the context, if I recall correctly, ATCSecure speculated that it might somehow be possible for someone to figure out a way to do this. By implication, this is not a "problem", it's a strictly theoretical possibility. And it will be given due consideration when testing will begin. And proper testing will begin when the spec is fully implemented. Not now. So there's no need to raise this as some kind of live issue.

[AlexGR]

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.

Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments.  Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.

Operative word: will.

Which means, as it is right now, with nodes being able to steal money, you don't want much attention because it can instantly snap the other way around to ...negative attention. Let's see the fix first...

You seem to spend most of your time on the DRK thread.. What a shock.. Apols in advance for giving you some competition.

I've given the exact same advice regarding DRK marketing in the past. Finish the product, market later. No need to have broken functionality trigger people "ohhh this is broken" type of stuff.

[CryptoGretzky]

Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.

Atcsecure already said dynamic trust system will prevent bad actors from stealing. Are you more or as qualified as him to present an argument opposing this? If so, let's hear it. Because all I've seen you do is offer up ungrounded "thesis statements" with no supporting arguments.  Not trying to troll, but I'd like to see a solid argument of why you oppose atcsecures method. Until then, nothing you say holds any water.

Operative word: will.

Which means, as it is right now, with nodes being able to steal money, you don't want much attention because it can instantly snap the other way around to ...negative attention. Let's see the fix first...

You seem to spend most of your time on the DRK thread.. What a shock.. Apols in advance for giving you some competition.

I've given the exact same advice regarding DRK marketing in the past. Finish the product, market later. No need to have broken functionality trigger people "ohhh this is broken" type of stuff.

I agree with this too.... I think letting the polished product speak for itself.     The price of the coin will take care of itself.

[jasinlee]

That is just it, it functions now.

[zheratuul]

That is just it, it functions now.

Im new here, who are you?

[SushiChef]

That is just it, it functions now.

+1

[Teka]

That is just it, it functions now.

Im new here, who are you?

Our team spirit..

[mikemikemike]

Wow. Glad I woke up. Looks like we're going to test 0.001225 again, probably rebound @ 0.001. If we fall through 0.001 then I suggest everyone gets their buy orders in above 0.00075, anything lower than that is crazy.

[akula999]

I wish I can buy more. I bought a few when it was .0013 to .0018 - i'm all out of money. Cant buy anymore. This is an awesome coin. I believe in the coin , the dev, team and technology. GO XC!!!

[creamynebula]

The client reports my stake weight as bigger than the network weight itself, that doesnt make any sense to me, can anyone clarify?

[JakeThePanda]

Wow. Glad I woke up. Looks like we're going to test 0.001225 again, probably rebound @ 0.001. If we fall through 0.001 then I suggest everyone gets their buy orders in above 0.00075, anything lower than that is crazy.

I agree that it's trying to retest.  At first glance there is about 100btc of buy support between 12 and 125.  It's a clear support zone.  Hopefully it doesn't bust through it.