synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 21, 2014, 10:21:55 PM |
|
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
July 21, 2014, 10:29:00 PM |
|
Holla! https://twitter.com/infinitecrypto7/status/491341925379608576I was looking around the crypto markets today and I'm seeing so many once-prominent coins splattered in red. Today I feel proud to be an XC holder. We seem capable of bouncing back from anything, be it FUD or unanticipated dumps. Most importantly, though, we have some amazing technology at our disposal and it's just getting better. It feels good to go long on XC.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 21, 2014, 10:30:44 PM |
|
Holla! https://twitter.com/infinitecrypto7/status/491341925379608576I was looking around the crypto markets today and I'm seeing so many once-prominent coins splattered in red. Today I feel proud to be an XC holder. We seem capable of bouncing back from anything, be it FUD or unanticipated dumps. Most importantly, though, we have some amazing technology at our disposal and it's just getting better. It feels good to go long on XC. Solid. Retweeted.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
July 21, 2014, 10:46:06 PM |
|
That looks a bit dated, IMO. How about something more modern like this?
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
July 21, 2014, 10:48:37 PM |
|
Holla! https://twitter.com/infinitecrypto7/status/491341925379608576I was looking around the crypto markets today and I'm seeing so many once-prominent coins splattered in red. Today I feel proud to be an XC holder. We seem capable of bouncing back from anything, be it FUD or unanticipated dumps. Most importantly, though, we have some amazing technology at our disposal and it's just getting better. It feels good to go long on XC. Yikes, just as I tweet this someone dumps all over the buy support on MP. Time to rally back again...
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
July 21, 2014, 10:52:18 PM |
|
Holla! https://twitter.com/infinitecrypto7/status/491341925379608576I was looking around the crypto markets today and I'm seeing so many once-prominent coins splattered in red. Today I feel proud to be an XC holder. We seem capable of bouncing back from anything, be it FUD or unanticipated dumps. Most importantly, though, we have some amazing technology at our disposal and it's just getting better. It feels good to go long on XC. Yikes, just as I tweet this someone dumps all over the buy support on MP. Time to rally back again... Normal. Swing will be up again soon enough. Just mad I did not set my buy low enough lol.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:01:30 PM |
|
That looks a bit dated, IMO. How about something more modern like this? Very minimal. Nice and elegant. Cool suggestion.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:03:35 PM |
|
Like the clean modern chat most, as much as i dislike Facebook/whatsapp ... there chat looks great
But the main question for me would be, how about the chat-addressbook? Addresses clearly wil not work, so what the team plans to use in the contact list? Just my label (recipient) will be a break from going chat conventions because all others uses the name specified by the (address) owner. But being anon and all, having multiple aliases sound great to me.
But what i really want to see (let me dream) is the option to send more than just text, if one day XC let it users send a file, broken down in several parts over the same multipath tech the next Snowden can stay anonymous. Charge some XC for that transfer & we can all profit big time from running our XC app 24/7
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:05:20 PM |
|
Like the clean modern chat most, as much as i dislike Facebook/whatsapp ... there chat looks great
But the main question for me would be, how about the chat-addressbook? Addresses clearly wil not work, so what the team plans to use in the contact list? Just my label (recipient) will be a break from going chat conventions because all others uses the name specified by the (address) owner. But being anon and all, having multiple aliases sound great to me.
But what i really want to see (let me dream) is the option to send more than just text, if one day XC let it users send a file, broken down in several parts over the same multipath tech the next Snowden can stay anonymous. Charge some XC for that transfer & we can all profit big time from running our XC app 24/7
Indeed. Sending files would be incredible. If we do it, it'll be after Rev 3. The blockchain 2.0 stuff will make it perfectly feasible.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:07:00 PM |
|
Like the clean modern chat most, as much as i dislike Facebook/whatsapp ... there chat looks great
But the main question for me would be, how about the chat-addressbook? Addresses clearly wil not work, so what the team plans to use in the contact list? Just my label (recipient) will be a break from going chat conventions because all others uses the name specified by the (address) owner. But being anon and all, having multiple aliases sound great to me.
But what i really want to see (let me dream) is the option to send more than just text, if one day XC let it users send a file, broken down in several parts over the same multipath tech the next Snowden can stay anonymous. Charge some XC for that transfer & we can all profit big time from running our XC app 24/7
Indeed. Sending files would be incredible. If we do it, it'll be after Rev 3. The blockchain 2.0 stuff will make it perfectly feasible. That would be a game changing event, not just some whistleblower but more than enough business traffic is waiting for something like that.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:09:28 PM |
|
Like the clean modern chat most, as much as i dislike Facebook/whatsapp ... there chat looks great
But the main question for me would be, how about the chat-addressbook? Addresses clearly wil not work, so what the team plans to use in the contact list? Just my label (recipient) will be a break from going chat conventions because all others uses the name specified by the (address) owner. But being anon and all, having multiple aliases sound great to me.
But what i really want to see (let me dream) is the option to send more than just text, if one day XC let it users send a file, broken down in several parts over the same multipath tech the next Snowden can stay anonymous. Charge some XC for that transfer & we can all profit big time from running our XC app 24/7
Indeed. Sending files would be incredible. If we do it, it'll be after Rev 3. The blockchain 2.0 stuff will make it perfectly feasible. That would be a game changing event, not just some whistleblower but more than enough business traffic is waiting for something like that. Indeed it would. And it's well within our capacity. As for contact management, I suppose public addresses / QR codes will be like phone numbers: not things you actually have to remember anymore, just indices for people you know. My guess is you'd just name an address in the app and go for it. Maybe we'll add a "contacts" feature in future, but to my mind it makes more sense to integrate it into the contacts database on your phone/PC.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:11:33 PM |
|
Anyway folks, I'm gonna take a nap.
But by all means, keep discussing / posting XChat ideas. These conversations can be very fruitful.
Also you could influence the future of XC profoundly.
I'll read up on the thread later.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 21, 2014, 11:52:35 PM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
|
|
|
|
ForReal
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
July 22, 2014, 12:02:48 AM |
|
Interesting perspectives coming out here.
I agree that endorsements from controversial figures or groups is risky and probably a mixed bag.
That said, when XC takes off you're going to find people like that using it, so we'd better be prepared one way or another.
(I personally think it's pretty awesome.)
Speaking of which... If you could make XChat look like anything at all, what would it be? WhatsApp? Snapchat? Post pics! One suggesting.... Please makes Xchat two color text, one represents you, one represents other person. It's easier to read. If i can make xChat look anything at all, it will look like a standard text message from my phone. one option for iphone, one option for android. so people look at it and feel very familiar yet feel very safe that the conversation is private
|
|
|
|
policymaker
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Crypto Currency Supporter
|
|
July 22, 2014, 12:29:17 AM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
id just suggest you read the guides and try again slowly, cause its been tested and confirmed working flawlessly, id check your router's ports/ software firewall again.
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 22, 2014, 12:53:52 AM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
id just suggest you read the guides and try again slowly, cause its been tested and confirmed working flawlessly, id check your router's ports/ software firewall again. I have read the guide and followed it step by step, my Asus RT has the right ports open. Still no dice. I'm sure it works, just don't see why it isn't when everything is set up how it should be. I'm going to keep trying obviously, but was curious if anyone else had issues that they resolved.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
July 22, 2014, 12:58:05 AM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
id just suggest you read the guides and try again slowly, cause its been tested and confirmed working flawlessly, id check your router's ports/ software firewall again. I have read the guide and followed it step by step, my Asus RT has the right ports open. Still no dice. I'm sure it works, just don't see why it isn't when everything is set up how it should be. I'm going to keep trying obviously, but was curious if anyone else had issues that they resolved. Windows Firewall?
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 22, 2014, 01:02:23 AM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
id just suggest you read the guides and try again slowly, cause its been tested and confirmed working flawlessly, id check your router's ports/ software firewall again. I have read the guide and followed it step by step, my Asus RT has the right ports open. Still no dice. I'm sure it works, just don't see why it isn't when everything is set up how it should be. I'm going to keep trying obviously, but was curious if anyone else had issues that they resolved. Windows Firewall? App is allowed.
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
July 22, 2014, 01:06:24 AM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
id just suggest you read the guides and try again slowly, cause its been tested and confirmed working flawlessly, id check your router's ports/ software firewall again. I have read the guide and followed it step by step, my Asus RT has the right ports open. Still no dice. I'm sure it works, just don't see why it isn't when everything is set up how it should be. I'm going to keep trying obviously, but was curious if anyone else had issues that they resolved. Windows Firewall? App is allowed. But is the port allowed and the conf file is edited?
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 22, 2014, 01:13:20 AM |
|
I have tried 8 times to send a private transaction of 10 or less coins to a wallet on a different computer. No dice. What gives? Both computers are running the latest wallet (2.45) with the host wallet with the coins to be sent with port forwarding open (TCP: 32348)--also opened UDP. Suggestions?
id just suggest you read the guides and try again slowly, cause its been tested and confirmed working flawlessly, id check your router's ports/ software firewall again. I have read the guide and followed it step by step, my Asus RT has the right ports open. Still no dice. I'm sure it works, just don't see why it isn't when everything is set up how it should be. I'm going to keep trying obviously, but was curious if anyone else had issues that they resolved. Windows Firewall? App is allowed. But is the port allowed and the conf file is edited? I should have clarified, yes, port is open in Windows Firewall as well as granting app network access. As for the config, your standard config: addnode=west01.xcnode.xc-official.com addnode=west02.xcnode.xc-official.com addnode=east01.xcnode.xc-official.com listen=1 dnsseed=1 irc=1
|
|
|
|
|