|
cryptico
|
 |
July 23, 2014, 01:50:33 PM |
|
Wow that took a whole two days! I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you. What we do need is a whitepaper. Synec just write this guy to Correct this article they do not Improve Shit he is stating that XC anonimity is at the moment pre Rev 1.5 and that Key coin is Improving Xc anonimity and what they are using is our 1.5 REV this is super crazy fucking hell Responded to the article. This is nothing to worry about. Of course people will use our last-gen mixing tech. That's the whole point. Thank you I posted in their thread also |
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 23, 2014, 01:52:01 PM |
|
Wow that took a whole two days! I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words We are paying attention, but I respectfully disagree with you. What we do need is a whitepaper. Synec just write this guy to Correct this article they do not Improve Shit he is stating that XC anonimity is at the moment pre Rev 1.5 and that Key coin is Improving Xc anonimity and what they are using is our 1.5 REV this is super crazy fucking hell Responded to the article. This is nothing to worry about. Of course people will use our last-gen mixing tech. That's the whole point. Just think about this for a moment: - some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it - we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology - people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead. It's too easy. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
July 23, 2014, 01:52:43 PM |
|
Just think about this for a moment:
- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it
- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and is implemented last-gen technology
- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.
It's too easy.
It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to. What do we point them to now? Our word? |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
July 23, 2014, 01:53:25 PM |
|
I, for one, like the fact that old revisions are released as the path moves forward. Sure, it isn't what is currently being used, but it allows XC to be one-step ahead of all the other clones out there that will attempt to adopt old code. I agree that a whitepaper should be a major priority when 2.5 gets finished, but I'd also say that functionality-wise, 2.5 has to be able to easily do anon-transfers with no issues (some of you probably seen me posting pages back about not being able to private send over a dozen transactions).
|
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 23, 2014, 01:53:50 PM |
|
Just think about this for a moment:
- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it
- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology
- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.
It's too easy.
It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to. I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:00:20 PM |
|
Just think about this for a moment:
- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it
- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology
- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.
It's too easy.
It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to. I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list. Not until REV3? There should be whitepapers for each major revision. REV2 --> and then REV3 to explain how it ADDS to the privacy that REV2 offered. New "anon" coins are added weekly to the markets. People cannot tell one solution from the other anymore. This is the last I'll post about it, but as far as I'm concerned, Dan needs to stop whatever coding is he is doing, and spend however long it takes to publish a well documented whitepaper explaining XC's current tech. |
|
|
|
|
|
merk475
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:02:15 PM |
|
Wow that took a whole two days! I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words Meh, its the previous version. Now open sourcing the current version (which still is not getting as much praise and attention as it should) would be stupid IMO. LOL....copycat shitcoins are ruthless. I'm glad the devs aren't releasing the new technology for this exact reason. This was a good science experiment. |
|
|
|
|
|
prospect
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:05:46 PM |
|
Haha. Crypto community at it finest. 10% litterally takes money from the other 90%. If there was not a 4000 BTC sale/ipo in ethereum a small number of people actually could have made some money. When half of the holders (yes half, they do not care about the tech) will dump 2000 BTC worth of ethereum we will see how many of them will get profit;) jesus fucking christ
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:06:28 PM |
|
Just think about this for a moment:
- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it
- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology
- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.
It's too easy.
It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to. I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list. Not until REV3? There should be whitepapers for each major revision. REV2 --> and then REV3 to explain how it ADDS to the privacy that REV2 offered. New "anon" coins are added weekly to the markets. People cannot tell one solution from the other anymore. This is the last I'll post about it, but as far as I'm concerned, Dan needs to stop whatever coding is he is doing, and spend however long it takes to publish a well documented whitepaper explaining XC's current tech. I think I Agree on this we need detailed Explanation From Dan On How REV2-2.5 Improve the anonimity of XC and makes it the market leader at the moment so that we can give people a quick source where they can get Informed and make their best decision to invest in. I mean fuking Bitcoindark is ahead of us in price at the moment we should have smashed DARKCOIN Records already after REV 2 for fuck sake. |
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:06:44 PM |
|
Wow that took a whole two days! I told synechist that is a stupid move but nobody is paying attention to my words Meh, its the previous version. Now open sourcing the current version (which still is not getting as much praise and attention as it should) would be stupid IMO. LOL....copycat shitcoins are ruthless. I'm glad the devs aren't releasing the new technology for this exact reason. This was a good science experiment. Yeah, we don't release new code. Here's our statement on open source:
XC is committed to the open source model. Open source code is vital for the health and advancement of cryptographic technologies, and it is a privilege to share our technical breakthroughs with a community such as this. We believe that XC's code embodies several world-firsts enabling anonymity that is scalable, mobile-friendly, POS-integrated, and is ultimately a platform upon which a broad range of Blockchain 2.0 technologies will be built. However we have been under severe attack from competing projects. Furthermore people’s faith in altcoins is significantly hindered by clones. Therefore we believe that the ethical way to engage with the community is to make code available on a delayed timeline. This way, the community will still benefit from our work, while we'd reduce the incentive for developers to flood the marketplace with clones that lack a long term future and reduce the trustworthiness of the altcoin phenomenon. XC represents several market-leading innovations, and we are honoured to make these available to the community in the near future. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
prospect
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:07:25 PM |
|
Just think about this for a moment:
- some dumb coin copies XC's old tech and gets an article published about it
- we kindly inform the coin's followers that their dev is several steps behind XC and has implemented last-gen technology
- people rationally head on over to the exchanges and buy XC instead.
It's too easy.
It would be 100x easier if we had a whitepaper to point them to. I couldn't agree more. A white paper is on the Rev 3 to-do list. Not until REV3? There should be whitepapers for each major revision. REV2 --> and then REV3 to explain how it ADDS to the privacy that REV2 offered. New "anon" coins are added weekly to the markets. People cannot tell one solution from the other anymore. This is the last I'll post about it, but as far as I'm concerned, Dan needs to stop whatever coding is he is doing, and spend however long it takes to publish a well documented whitepaper explaining XC's current tech. I think I Agree on this we need detailed Explanation From Dan On How REV2-2.5 Improve the anonimity of XC and makes it the market leader at the moment so that we can give people a quick source where they can get Informed and make their best decision to invest in. I mean fuking Bitcoindark is ahead of us in price at the moment we should have smashed DARKCOIN Records already after REV 2 for fuck sake. Did we not have some PR-guy from adidas? Where is he ?  |
|
|
|
|
|
merk475
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:08:34 PM |
|
my first staked coins. it took like 7 days to get it since i started staking
I'm still patiently waiting for my first stake in the new wallet. I realize it can take a few weeks, but I haven't normally had to wait this long. |
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:09:00 PM |
|
I think I Agree on this we need detailed Explanation From Dan On How REV2-2.5 Improve the anonimity of XC and makes it the market leader at the moment so that we can give people a quick source where they can get Informed and make their best decision to invest in. I mean fuking Bitcoindark is ahead of us in price at the moment we should have smashed DARKCOIN Records already after REV 2 for fuck sake.
Let's all remember that XC is only a few weeks old. Sometimes our pace of development obscures this fact. We'll have a white paper. It'll come out when the core code is completed and we can actually talk about it without spilling a pile of very valuable ideas. For now, the new OP is going to clarify things quite satisfactorily until a white paper comes out. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:13:30 PM |
|
I think I Agree on this we need detailed Explanation From Dan On How REV2-2.5 Improve the anonimity of XC and makes it the market leader at the moment so that we can give people a quick source where they can get Informed and make their best decision to invest in. I mean fuking Bitcoindark is ahead of us in price at the moment we should have smashed DARKCOIN Records already after REV 2 for fuck sake.
Let's all remember that XC is only a few weeks old. Sometimes our pace of development obscures this fact. We'll have a white paper. It'll come out when the core code is completed and we can actually talk about it without spilling a pile of very valuable ideas. For now, the new OP is going to clarify things quite satisfactorily until a white paper comes out. XC is a few months old, not weeks. |
|
|
|
|
|
merk475
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:14:26 PM |
|
There are already more than 8000000 coins Sold at 0.0005 that is Super scam at its purest how people think they will make their money back. Anyone knows how many coins will be minted anyway? I did not find this info anywhere. They have just a promises and nothing that will be delivered before 2015... this is just nuttiness at its purest.. XC will have Blockchain 2.0 impemented and working already by then. For sure they did know how to market their shit anyway. Looks like ETH stopped the presale. Sold out in 24 hours....for a coin slated to be on presale for 42 days. I didn't know if they were capping the presale, or they were going to let it go the full 42 days. I ended up not investing myself. The agreement criteria was a little scary, and then having your BTC tied up until the Genesis release just did not appeal to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
rhkazani1
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:14:45 PM |
|
I had coins in my X11 wallet, but when i download the new wallet (XCurrency) I don't see my coins, can someone please help?
EDIT:
I can't even send out coins to an exchange?
|
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:17:01 PM |
|
I had coins in my X11 wallet, but when i download the new wallet (XCurrency) I don't see my coins, can someone please help?
EDIT:
I can't even send out coins to an exchange?
Your old wallet is in /appdata/x11coin Copy it to /appdata/XCurrency Sorted. And of course you can send to an exchange. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
merk475
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:17:57 PM |
|
Haha, cheers mate. Yeah guess I was wishing for a magical answer but it's all pure gambling really ay! I can't really afford to lose anything right now. I'm pretty much all in on XC. Got 1 BTC left!
As of last night......same here with XC. I have a little less than 1 BTC left (0.89). Trying to decide what to do with that. Hmmmm...... |
|
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:18:11 PM |
|
I had coins in my X11 wallet, but when i download the new wallet (XCurrency) I don't see my coins, can someone please help?
EDIT:
I can't even send out coins to an exchange?
From "MUSTREAD.txt" in the latest wallet zip "Wallet has Been udpated to match branding... so has your %appdata% - backup wallet.dat This means if you run the wallet, it will create a new directory called XCurrency under %appdata%. Fist run wallet to create directory[then close] or mkdir %appdata%\XCurrency then to copy copy %appdata%\X11Coin\*.* %appdata%\XCurrency\ For Seed Nodes Copy the enclosed XCurrency.conf to your %appdata%\XCurrency\" |
|
|
|
|
|
rhkazani1
|
|
July 23, 2014, 02:20:43 PM |
|
I had coins in my X11 wallet, but when i download the new wallet (XCurrency) I don't see my coins, can someone please help?
EDIT:
I can't even send out coins to an exchange?
From "MUSTREAD.txt" in the latest wallet zip "Wallet has Been udpated to match branding... so has your %appdata% - backup wallet.dat This means if you run the wallet, it will create a new directory called XCurrency under %appdata%. Fist run wallet to create directory[then close] or mkdir %appdata%\XCurrency then to copy copy %appdata%\X11Coin\*.* %appdata%\XCurrency\ For Seed Nodes Copy the enclosed XCurrency.conf to your %appdata%\XCurrency\" Thanks, |
|
|
|
|
|
