[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[flashbit]

MACD for 1 day just crossed over into the green after over 2 weeks in the red. Very good sign folks.

[1715087502]

1715087502

[1715087502]

1715087502

[knowbrainar]

So now keycoin is up to 200k (200%) after a code review??? lol, crypto is a strange world indeed.

[ssmc2]

So now keycoin is up to 200k (200%) after a code review??? lol, crypto is a strange world indeed.

When the dust settles, this will only be a good thing for XC. 

[Driv3n]

MACD for 1 day just crossed over into the green after over 2 weeks in the red. Very good sign folks.

It's about time... I dont really check the price much these days but it is good to see some decent volume and an increase today.

Also the announcement today was great, I cant wait for the pr campaigns on finished rev 2 and rev 2.5.

[pbremen01]

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

[policymaker]

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

ofc we r going to have to w8 on an official response from the team, but even if we neglect the fact the same dude states in his OP that "The purpose of this program is to demonstrate that the anonymity of KeyCoin and similar coins may be broken. This is not production-ready code that covers all possible cases" , XC is so far ahead in rev/tech terms that I wouldn't hold my breath.

Not to mention XC is not mirrored directly anywhere in there. If id take a guess, its probably another FUD to trigger the keycoin dump. Again, nothing personal against keycoin, just taking a wild guess.

[mecc]

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

[pbremen01]

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

It doesn't mean that it has to be sender's wallet. Any wallet will suffice. It seems that the program is using RPC API to get info about transactions.

[_evolution_]

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

It doesn't mean that it has to be sender's wallet. Any wallet will suffice. It seems that the program is using RPC API to get info about transactions.

Stop the blatant FUD. That's the whole "algorithm" of the moron who is trying to influence the market price:

               foreach (Vout vout in vouts)
                {
                    // addresses sometimes don't exists in vout JSON returned from client, we just ignore this case
                    if (vout.address != null)
                    {
                        if (coinsReceived.ContainsKey(vout.address))
                        {
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = coinsReceived[vout.address] + vout.amount;
                        }
                        else
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = vout.amount;
                    }
 
                }
 
                foreach (string addr in coinsReceived.Keys)
                {
                    decimal c = coinsReceived[addr];
                    if (c >= receivedAmount && c <= receivedAmount + 0.0003M)
                    {
                        return addr;
                    }
                }

As anyone can see, there is absolutely no logic, it's just a piece of shit, probably copy & paste from some M$ost department...

[shfc]

nice dev.
 

[synechist]

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

It doesn't mean that it has to be sender's wallet. Any wallet will suffice. It seems that the program is using RPC API to get info about transactions.

Stop the blatant FUD. That's the whole "algorithm" of the moron who is trying to influence the market price:

               foreach (Vout vout in vouts)
                {
                    // addresses sometimes don't exists in vout JSON returned from client, we just ignore this case
                    if (vout.address != null)
                    {
                        if (coinsReceived.ContainsKey(vout.address))
                        {
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = coinsReceived[vout.address] + vout.amount;
                        }
                        else
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = vout.amount;
                    }
 
                }
 
                foreach (string addr in coinsReceived.Keys)
                {
                    decimal c = coinsReceived[addr];
                    if (c >= receivedAmount && c <= receivedAmount + 0.0003M)
                    {
                        return addr;
                    }
                }

As anyone can see, there is absolutely no logic, it's just a piece of shit, probably copy & paste from some M$ost department...

Yes, I can't see how this will have any effect on XC. Multipath obscures the amount sent and so using block height is no way to identify the sender.

[reebokasss]

nice buy wall at 153 it seems that we are going up slowly but steady

[CryptoGretzky]

nice buy wall at 153 it seems that we are going up slowly but steady

Wo.. 35 btc.   Guess someone got sick of waiting to get their buy order filled when no one with large amount of XC is selling. 

[smoothie]

125,000 XC premine?

That is quite a hefty premine if you ask me.

2.27% of all coins to exist in the form of a premine.

Sorry gonna pass on this one.

[Artoodeetoo]

Its stated on the op and it is used for the good of the coin... And that's your call.. (and loss Imo)

[CryptoGretzky]

125,000 XC premine?

That is quite a hefty premine if you ask me.

2.27% of all coins to exist in the form of a premine.

Sorry gonna pass on this one.

Have you even seen what the team is like and the plans that they have for the delivery?

I am actually surprised they will do so much for so little premine.   This is not like other coins where the premine just gets dumped.   The XC team has so many things going on, I kinda wish they have more premine so the coin's success will be a bigger motivator for them....

[Teka]

125,000 XC premine?

That is quite a hefty premine if you ask me.

2.27% of all coins to exist in the form of a premine.

Sorry gonna pass on this one.

Well thanks for your consideration. The premine has been used for hirining talented indviduals that contribute towards the coin. You can find the team here (http://xc-official.com/the-xc-team/) and i'm not sure about you but I think that's a great use of the money. Further it will be used for future development.

I hope that you have considered more aspects of the coin and not just looked at the premine. However, we all have fundementals and if your not willing to invest in a coin with proven superior tech as well as a dedicated team because of a premine then it's your choice.

[dadon]

125,000 XC premine?

That is quite a hefty premine if you ask me.

2.27% of all coins to exist in the form of a premine.

Sorry gonna pass on this one.

Don't understand why you would say that..it's like you think somebody cares...

[shakesbear]

125,000 XC premine?

That is quite a hefty premine if you ask me.

2.27% of all coins to exist in the form of a premine.

Sorry gonna pass on this one.

But it's...it's easy ... to, to talk about... It's easy to sum it up when you're just talking about premine. We're sitting in here, and XC supposed to be the industry-leading technology, and we in here talking about premine. I mean, listen, we're talking about premine, not the anonymous technology, we talking about premine. Not the technology. Not, not ... Not the technology that Dan spend endless day and nights building. Not the technology that is going to change the future but we're talking about premine, man. I mean, how silly is that? But we're talking about premine man. What are we talking about? premine? We're talking about premine, man. [laughter from the media crowd] We're talking about premine. We're talking about premine. We ain't talking about the technology. [more laughter] We're talking about premine, man.

For how hard Dan has work on this project I don’t mind him premine 3 times more than what he did !!!!!!!!

[leigh2k14]

For all I care, Dan could blow the entire premine on hookers and blow!

Because he's earnt it.

Be hell of a weekend though.