ClutchThese
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 10:11:16 PM |
|
Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create. Luckely this is a moderated thread. Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches. Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July. FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid? People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value. It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion. There are two ways to address a problem; the right way, and the wrong way. If the community collectively dismisses something as FUD, chances are it's FUD. If there is a legit problem, wouldn't it behoove the person with said problem to address it in a respectful manner to not be considered a FUDDER? Again, there are two ways to address an issue. If you want to be taken seriously, act serious all the time.
|
Signature for Rent - PM if Interested
|
|
|
Coolstoryteller
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 10:17:48 PM |
|
Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create. Luckely this is a moderated thread. Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches. Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July. FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid? People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value. It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion. +1 Healthy criticism sparks intelligent debate and makes the coin's community stronger.
|
|
|
|
psjbeisler
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 10:27:52 PM |
|
Honestly it's best if it doesn't get media coverage until the bugs are worked out. That way the devs can work without the pressure that inevitable FUDders will create. Luckely this is a moderated thread. Yeah it's moderated but some fudders are just relentless, they don't care about discussion they just want to watch the world burn as long as they can sell a few matches. Keep in mind that FUD doesn't stay in a thread, it's like a sickness that goes around. Devs don't need to deal with that, at least not until they finish the PoSA come July. FUD accusations have been used so many times in these altcoin threads, it's the boy that cried wolf fallacy. If you dismiss everything as FUD, how would you know when a genuine concern or problem is actually valid? People were being labeled trolls and fudders when they warned that SilkCoin was having internal problems with it's dev team. Those that dismissed it as FUD are now bagholding a coin that is half the value. It's not all black and white....your ideology leaves no room for rational discussion. +1 Healthy criticism sparks intelligent debate and makes the coin's community stronger. +1
|
Website: psjb.meDonations: 1N6iADU4xrQRGaxjTY9PcJKkEQDRkBVUC3
|
|
|
Givatoshi_Moremoto
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 10:47:33 PM |
|
Can someone explain to me what is POSA please? I'm new to cryptos sry ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Proof of stake anon. if you read the white paper on OP, you'll understand. it's kinda hard to explain in few words. basically, decentralized anonymous transaction is achieved via proof of stake.
|
|
|
|
StephenJH
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 10:53:38 PM |
|
"giving this coin marketing were many of it's features are still being tried out is in my mind unnecessary" - broseph
*golf clap*
What's that one about the old bull, the young bull and the herd of heifers in the field below?
|
| ███████████████████████████ ███████████████████████████ ████████▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀████████ ██████▀▄██▀▀▄▄ ████▄▀██████ █████ ███ ████ ▀▀████ █████ ████ █████ ███▀▀▀▄████ ████ ████ ███▀▀▀▄▄▄████████ ████ ████ ██▄▄▀▀███████▀▄▄█ ████ █████ █████ █▀██▀▄███ █████ ██████▄▀███▀▄█▀▄███▀▄██████ ████████▄▄▀▀▀ ▀▀▀▄▄████████ ██████████▀▄███████████████ █████████▄█████████████████ | . .FortuneJack. | │ | ▄█▄ █ ▄ ▄████▄▄ ▄▄▀▀██▄▄ ▄███ █▄██▄██████▄▄██████▄▄▄█████ █▄████████▌▀▄▄███▀▄▄▄▀▀██ ▄▀███████ █▄██▄██▄▄▄▄▀██▀ ▀▀▄▀███▀▀▄▄▀▀█▀▀█████▀▄ ████▄▀▀█▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄███▄█ ▐▌▄█████▀ ▄▄▄█▄▄ ███ ▀█▄▀█▀▀▄ ████▀███▄▀ ▐▌█▄ ▄█▄█▀██▌ ▀▄ █▄████▀▀ ▄▄▄█▄ ▀▄▄█▀▄▄▄▀▀▀██▄▄██ ▀▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀ | | | | . ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ BY
HACKSAW G A M I N G | ▄▀▀▀▄ ▄▄▀▀███▄▄██▄▄ ▄█▀████████▄▀▀██▄ ▄▀▀▀▀▀▄█▄███████▐███▄ ██▀█████▄▀█▀▀▀▀███▀▀▐▌ █▄█▄██▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀██▄██▐▌ ▐▀▀▄▀▀▀▀ ▀ ▀█▀████▀ ▀█▀ ▐▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▀ ▄▀██▄ █ ▄██████████▄ ▄██▄ ▐▌▀▀██████████████████ ▐▌ ▐ ▀▌ ▀ ▀██▀█▄█ ▀▄▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█▄▄▀▀ ▀▀▄▄█▀▀█▄▄▄▄█▀▀ | | | | ....OVER $2,000,000!.... ALREADY GIVEN AWAY IN LESS THAN 2 WEEKS | │ | . ....PLAY NOW.... | |
|
|
|
BitcoinFX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2646
Merit: 1722
https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 11:33:26 PM |
|
BitcoinFX - "Bringing you tomorrow's technology, today!" ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Herewith, 2 Cloakcoin .onion Tor nodes: jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662 dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662 Example Tor cloakcoin.conf gen=0 socks=5 proxy=127.0.0.1:9150 maxconnections=8 addnode=jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662 addnode=dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662
You can also add the nodes from the OP. Note that the Tor Relay and Exit Bundle's use port :9050 instead of :9150 Ensure that: Cloakcoin - Wallet > Settings > Network > Connect through SOCKS proxy: is ticked and restart the wallet. maxconnections=8 is recommended for a good balance between connectivity vs anonymity - obviously the more connections you make through Tor the less anonymous you might be to an adversary. 8 connections is enough to ensure sufficient broadcast of network transactions. If you need a guide on how to get this working - See: http://darkproxy.eu/darknet.php - which is a similar guide for my darkcoin Tor .onion nodes. The following additions will be useful in your torrc file for increased connectivity: ClientOnly 1
EnforceDistinctSubnets 0
ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0
LongLivedPorts 21,22,80,443,706,1863,5050,5190,5222,5223,6523,6667,6697,8080,8300,9001,9030,29662
NumEntryGuards 8
UseNTorHandshake 1
Note that the current 'default' cloakcoin p2p port 29662 has been added to LongLivePorts - which helps a lot with connectivity. I'd recommend that the dev team look to change the port number in a future wallet release to make connectivity more Tor friendly. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637704.msg7465395#msg7465395Reasons for other suggested settings can be found via the Tor manual - https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.htmlAlso see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=331077.msg3562794#msg3562794 - which I'll get around to updating sometime. N.B. This is an 'unofficial' - although fully working guide for Cloakcoin connectivity via Tor. The dev teams implementation of Tor into the Clockcoin wallet in future updates will in theory render this guide mostly obsolete. However, having fully functional Cloakcoin .onion addresses is always useful moving forward - especially as the PoSA implementation seems to be making good progress. I'll look to add a further 2 nodes in the next couple of days. Any donations towards upkeep of these Clockcoin .onion nodes would be appreciated: CAXVRFjvddzd9d3QTaxTY6zbTZbgX1shHG Cheers!
|
|
|
|
andakinas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 11:33:37 PM |
|
Multipool payouts need to remain consistently every 24 hours or else people will quickly stop mining...The x11 hashrate has dropped 1/3rd since the time when payment was supposed to come. Please find a way to get this working!
|
|
|
|
cryptmebro
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 25, 2014, 11:49:39 PM |
|
BitcoinFX - "Bringing you tomorrow's technology, today!" ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Herewith, 2 Cloakcoin .onion Tor nodes: jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662 dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662 Example Tor cloakcoin.conf gen=0 socks=5 proxy=127.0.0.1:9150 maxconnections=8 addnode=jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662 addnode=dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662
You can also add the nodes from the OP. Note that the Tor Relay and Exit Bundle's use port :9050 instead of :9150 Ensure that: Cloakcoin - Wallet > Settings > Network > Connect through SOCKS proxy: is ticked and restart the wallet. maxconnections=8 is recommended for a good balance between connectivity vs anonymity - obviously the more connections you make through Tor the less anonymous you might be to an adversary. 8 connections is enough to ensure sufficient broadcast of network transactions. If you need a guide on how to get this working - See: http://darkproxy.eu/darknet.php - which is a similar guide for my darkcoin Tor .onion nodes. The following additions will be useful in your torrc file for increased connectivity: ClientOnly 1
EnforceDistinctSubnets 0
ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0
LongLivedPorts 21,22,80,443,706,1863,5050,5190,5222,5223,6523,6667,6697,8080,8300,9001,9030,29662
NumEntryGuards 8
UseNTorHandshake 1
Note that the current 'default' cloakcoin p2p port 29662 has been added to LongLivePorts - which helps a lot with connectivity. I'd recommend that the dev team look to change the port number in a future wallet release to make connectivity more Tor friendly. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637704.msg7465395#msg7465395Reasons for other suggested settings can be found via the Tor manual - https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.htmlAlso see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=331077.msg3562794#msg3562794 - which I'll get around to updating sometime. N.B. This is an 'unofficial' - although fully working guide for Cloakcoin connectivity via Tor. The dev teams implementation of Tor into the Clockcoin wallet in future updates will in theory render this guide mostly obsolete. However, having fully functional Cloakcoin .onion addresses is always useful moving forward - especially as the PoSA implementation seems to be making good progress. I'll look to add a further 2 nodes in the next couple of days. Any donations towards upkeep of these Clockcoin .onion nodes would be appreciated: CAXVRFjvddzd9d3QTaxTY6zbTZbgX1shHG Cheers! Translation: Moon
|
|
|
|
orco#2
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:13:17 AM |
|
THE PRICE!!! WHY?!?!
|
|
|
|
ozkraut
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:17:19 AM |
|
Guys,
having constant issues loosing sync. Either wallet (1.9.4 / 1.9.5). Is it the same out there for you guys or? If this is a common issue it will cause some FUD and will hold us back until resolved or at least understood
|
Monero - Wir sind die Leute vor denen uns unsere Eltern gewarnt haben!
|
|
|
shfc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:20:56 AM |
|
Why my wallet can't connect the network, how to add nodes?
|
|
|
|
davisgreen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:23:07 AM |
|
Why my wallet can't connect the network, how to add nodes?
Did you try closing it and starting again!! nodes are added in cloakcoin.conf in appdata/roaming - you will have to create this file- for more help go to irc channel and ask for help
|
|
|
|
Coolstoryteller
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:25:54 AM |
|
BitcoinFX - "Bringing you tomorrow's technology, today!" ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Herewith, 2 Cloakcoin .onion Tor nodes: jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662 dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662 Example Tor cloakcoin.conf gen=0 socks=5 proxy=127.0.0.1:9150 maxconnections=8 addnode=jm5qligbzm2a5hmn.onion:29662 addnode=dtqtz4rxwewp4jgh.onion:29662
You can also add the nodes from the OP. Note that the Tor Relay and Exit Bundle's use port :9050 instead of :9150 Ensure that: Cloakcoin - Wallet > Settings > Network > Connect through SOCKS proxy: is ticked and restart the wallet. maxconnections=8 is recommended for a good balance between connectivity vs anonymity - obviously the more connections you make through Tor the less anonymous you might be to an adversary. 8 connections is enough to ensure sufficient broadcast of network transactions. If you need a guide on how to get this working - See: http://darkproxy.eu/darknet.php - which is a similar guide for my darkcoin Tor .onion nodes. The following additions will be useful in your torrc file for increased connectivity: ClientOnly 1
EnforceDistinctSubnets 0
ExcludeSingleHopRelays 0
LongLivedPorts 21,22,80,443,706,1863,5050,5190,5222,5223,6523,6667,6697,8080,8300,9001,9030,29662
NumEntryGuards 8
UseNTorHandshake 1
Note that the current 'default' cloakcoin p2p port 29662 has been added to LongLivePorts - which helps a lot with connectivity. I'd recommend that the dev team look to change the port number in a future wallet release to make connectivity more Tor friendly. See: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637704.msg7465395#msg7465395Reasons for other suggested settings can be found via the Tor manual - https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.htmlAlso see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=331077.msg3562794#msg3562794 - which I'll get around to updating sometime. N.B. This is an 'unofficial' - although fully working guide for Cloakcoin connectivity via Tor. The dev teams implementation of Tor into the Clockcoin wallet in future updates will in theory render this guide mostly obsolete. However, having fully functional Cloakcoin .onion addresses is always useful moving forward - especially as the PoSA implementation seems to be making good progress. I'll look to add a further 2 nodes in the next couple of days. Any donations towards upkeep of these Clockcoin .onion nodes would be appreciated: CAXVRFjvddzd9d3QTaxTY6zbTZbgX1shHG Cheers! Bravo FX! Well Done!
|
|
|
|
Coolstoryteller
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:26:26 AM |
|
THE PRICE!!! WHY?!?!
Last minute smash and grabs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
heartastack
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:27:39 AM |
|
THE PRICE!!! WHY?!?!
Last minute smash and grabs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) With 8 days till PoSA we could drift way lower over that time. Accumulate if you're smart.
|
|
|
|
Coolstoryteller
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:30:22 AM |
|
THE PRICE!!! WHY?!?!
Last minute smash and grabs ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) With 8 days till PoSA we could drift way lower over that time. Accumulate if you're smart. Someone is hungry for more. Once he's hit his mark the price will go back up - not something to be worried about. He's been at it all day more power to him xD He's doing us all a favor by shaking down the weakhanded.
|
|
|
|
alvarorecoba
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:51:22 AM |
|
everything goes to plan but the price ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
shfc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:52:30 AM |
|
Why my wallet can't connect the network, how to add nodes?
Did you try closing it and starting again!! nodes are added in cloakcoin.conf in appdata/roaming - you will have to create this file- for more help go to irc channel and ask for help thanks now my wallet ok
|
|
|
|
shfc
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 12:56:16 AM |
|
How many people are there in CLOAK development team?
There are 6 people on CLOAK team. 4 full time. Very powerful. However, I would like to know, 4 full time staff in how to receive wages?
|
|
|
|
youngmike
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 26, 2014, 01:10:47 AM |
|
Price will remain low until wallet bugs are fixed and it's made more user friendly. We just have to wait, this dev team definitely can handle it!
|
|
|
|
|