[XCR] Crypti | Dapps | Sidechains | Dapp Store | OPEN SOURCE | 100% own code | DPoS

[Mandy1749]

Can we get some official word on what is going on with the network?  According to the Network Monitor we only have 60 Delegates online, and if you were running a Windows client, you are now offline.  Isn't this enough reason to vote up our non-Foundation delegates like China and get them forging?

http://cryptichain.me/networkMonitor

Thank you Mal
let me introduce my delegate "China" again.
this node setup at Beijing of China.
help to improve the network in China.
using servers from aliyun,which is a cloud server company run by Alibaba.

and this node is stable sync for about 2-3 weeks now.
i think it's prefect to be a forging delegate.

[1715686168]

1715686168

[1715686168]

1715686168

[1715686168]

1715686168

[1715686168]

1715686168

[1715686168]

1715686168

[crypti]

Can we get some official word on what is going on with the network?  According to the Network Monitor we only have 60 Delegates online, and if you were running a Windows client, you are now offline.  Isn't this enough reason to vote up our non-Foundation delegates like China and get them forging?

http://cryptichain.me/networkMonitor

I checked all my nodes and it's working. Look at explorer, there is offline almost windows nodes, but delegates using Linux.
I think it's issue in explorer, anyway i asked other guys to check him nodes.

[crypti]

Can we get some official word on what is going on with the network?  According to the Network Monitor we only have 60 Delegates online, and if you were running a Windows client, you are now offline.  Isn't this enough reason to vote up our non-Foundation delegates like China and get them forging?

http://cryptichain.me/networkMonitor

Thank you Mal
let me introduce my delegate "China" again.
this node setup at Beijing of China.
help to improve the network in China.
using servers from aliyun,which is a cloud server company run by Alibaba.

and this node is stable sync for about 2-3 weeks now.
i think it's prefect to be a forging delegate.

Hi Mandy, wait little more, someone will vote for you.
Thanks.

[Mandy1749]

Can we get some official word on what is going on with the network?  According to the Network Monitor we only have 60 Delegates online, and if you were running a Windows client, you are now offline.  Isn't this enough reason to vote up our non-Foundation delegates like China and get them forging?

http://cryptichain.me/networkMonitor

Thank you Mal
let me introduce my delegate "China" again.
this node setup at Beijing of China.
help to improve the network in China.
using servers from aliyun,which is a cloud server company run by Alibaba.

and this node is stable sync for about 2-3 weeks now.
i think it's prefect to be a forging delegate.

Hi Mandy, wait little more, someone will vote for you.
Thanks.

Thank you Crypti.
you helped me a lot.

the reason why i setup this node is not to forge XCR(you can see the fee is less then the cost of servers).
the main reason is that it's feeling awesome to be part of Crypti .
i am a Cryptier!!!

[crypti]

Can we get some official word on what is going on with the network?  According to the Network Monitor we only have 60 Delegates online, and if you were running a Windows client, you are now offline.  Isn't this enough reason to vote up our non-Foundation delegates like China and get them forging?

http://cryptichain.me/networkMonitor

Thank you Mal
let me introduce my delegate "China" again.
this node setup at Beijing of China.
help to improve the network in China.
using servers from aliyun,which is a cloud server company run by Alibaba.

and this node is stable sync for about 2-3 weeks now.
i think it's prefect to be a forging delegate.

Hi Mandy, wait little more, someone will vote for you.
Thanks.

Thank you Crypti.
you helped me a lot.

the reason why i setup this node is not to forge XCR(you can see the fee is less then the cost of servers).
the main reason is that it's feeling awesome to be part of Crypti .
i am a Cryptier!!!

After end of cycle votes will be applied.

[Mandy1749]

BTW,any one can send me some XCR in the testnet?
here is my account.4908996009439711121C

[crypti]

BTW,any one can send me some XCR in the testnet?
here is my account.4908996009439711121C

Sent.

[Mandy1749]

BTW,any one can send me some XCR in the testnet?
here is my account.4908996009439711121C

Sent.

Thank you crypti

[crypti]

BTW,any one can send me some XCR in the testnet?
here is my account.4908996009439711121C

Sent.

Thank you crypti

For future, don't use your real account on testnet.

[Litoshi]

BTW,any one can send me some XCR in the testnet?
here is my account.4908996009439711121C

Sent.

Thank you crypti

For feature, don't use your real account on testnet.

Boris means FUTURE, not feature.

[MalReynolds]

I would consider any coins or fiat sent to CoinoMat as potential loses.  My scam detector is running yellow.

Here's something interesting to consider, ending in a few questions.  

I did a little research.  Coinomat is a "Certified Exchanger" with a larger currency exchange network called Perfect Money.

https://www.perfectmoney.com/

PM has around 200 "Certified Exchangers":

https://perfectmoney.is/business-partners.html

These all have a "Trust Score" assigned to them by Perfect Money.  Coinomat is in the middle of the pack with a trust score of 226.  See the orange shaded line in this spreadsheet I made of the data above, sorted by trust score:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14Y-yJV-yZmWlbcYEak78BUCAj3C4AEFKLq6BAn1EbX8/edit#gid=0

Questions:  Would it benefit Crypti to get integrated with more of these Certified Exchangers, just as we are trying to do with Coinomat, maybe even with Perfect Money itself?  Perhaps an organized Crypti campaign starting with the most trusted Exchangers first?  If so, what is our sales point on why they would want to include us alongside Bitcoin?

[Bigcabrito]

I would consider any coins or fiat sent to CoinoMat as potential loses.  My scam detector is running yellow.

Here's something interesting to consider, ending in a few questions.  

I did a little research.  Coinomat is a "Certified Exchanger" with a larger currency exchange network called Perfect Money.

https://www.perfectmoney.com/

PM has around 200 "Certified Exchangers":

https://perfectmoney.is/business-partners.html

These all have a "Trust Score" assigned to them by Perfect Money.  Coinomat is in the middle of the pack with a trust score of 226.  See the orange shaded line in this spreadsheet I made of the data above, sorted by trust score:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14Y-yJV-yZmWlbcYEak78BUCAj3C4AEFKLq6BAn1EbX8/edit#gid=0

Questions:  Would it benefit Crypti to get integrated with more of these Certified Exchangers, just as we are trying to do with Coinomat, maybe even with Perfect Money itself?  Perhaps an organized Crypti campaign starting with the most trusted Exchangers first?  If so, what is our sales point on why they would want to include us alongside Bitcoin?

This is handy, but I'd say focus on blockchain tech for current problems.

[Wulfcastle]

@Passion_ltc

Have you guys taken a look at some of the feedback that we've provided you with for the new UI? When you guys put up the BETA on TestNet, you asked for feedback, and other community members and myself have come out and given you feedback on UI, and you guys have seem to have done nothing about it, let alone even discuss some of the points that other members and myself have put forward (colors, etc.).

Please do not think, that I am now crying foul, because you've said no to the changes that I proposed to the current UI. While I would like to see those changes being made, that's not what I'm concerned about. What I'm concerned about is the fact that we have provided you with feedback, I've provided three posts FULL of analysis to back up the points/arguments that myself and others have put forward to support our view on the current UI, and you guys don't seem to care enough to even discuss the matter with us.

You said that you guys have "your vision for Crypti", if you guys have your vision for the UI, well then please let us hear it. Please provide at least something concrete to say what you have for or against our points that we've put forward, so that we can at least discuss it, but please do not post asking for feedback only to say when we actually do give you feedback that it's essentially worthless.

[Litoshi]

I would consider any coins or fiat sent to CoinoMat as potential loses.  My scam detector is running yellow.

Here's something interesting to consider, ending in a few questions.  

I did a little research.  Coinomat is a "Certified Exchanger" with a larger currency exchange network called Perfect Money.

https://www.perfectmoney.com/

PM has around 200 "Certified Exchangers":

https://perfectmoney.is/business-partners.html

These all have a "Trust Score" assigned to them by Perfect Money.  Coinomat is in the middle of the pack with a trust score of 226.  See the orange shaded line in this spreadsheet I made of the data above, sorted by trust score:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14Y-yJV-yZmWlbcYEak78BUCAj3C4AEFKLq6BAn1EbX8/edit#gid=0

Questions:  Would it benefit Crypti to get integrated with more of these Certified Exchangers, just as we are trying to do with Coinomat, maybe even with Perfect Money itself?  Perhaps an organized Crypti campaign starting with the most trusted Exchangers first?  If so, what is our sales point on why they would want to include us alongside Bitcoin?

Well Mal, I personally would stay away from any official association with a organization that I have 0 control of, and 100% liability  from.  CoinoMat is supposed to be an "instant Exchange", meaning they dont hold balances. 

So what happens when a fiat to XCR purchase goes wrong?  They blame Crypti. 

Ditto for any other coin to coin exchange. 

Best to let them live and die on their own efforts or lack thereof. 

If they want to have XCR as an available coin, that is their right.  Boris will be wiling to keep them updated with the latest wallets and provide any other help they need. 

[Passion_ltc]

@Passion_ltc

Have you guys taken a look at some of the feedback that we've provided you with for the new UI? When you guys put up the BETA on TestNet, you asked for feedback, and other community members and myself have come out and given you feedback on UI, and you guys have seem to have done nothing about it, let alone even discuss some of the points that other members and myself have put forward (colors, etc.).

Please do not think, that I am now crying foul, because you've said no to the changes that I proposed to the current UI. While I would like to see those changes being made, that's not what I'm concerned about. What I'm concerned about is the fact that we have provided you with feedback, I've provided three posts FULL of analysis to back up the points/arguments that myself and others have put forward to support our view on the current UI, and you guys don't seem to care enough to even discuss the matter with us.

You said that you guys have "your vision for Crypti", if you guys have your vision for the UI, well then please let us hear it. Please provide at least something concrete to say what you have for or against our points that we've put forward, so that we can at least discuss it, but please do not post asking for feedback only to say when we actually do give you feedback that it's essentially worthless.

Hello Wulfcastle,

I promise you I will answer you in detail tomorrow. Can you create a thread over at forum.crypti.me? Here it would go under.

Edit: As you not posted at our forum until now. Please write when you have, then I will answer you.

[Sparky_eMunie]

@Grexx

I don't think Wulfcastle's post was aggressive at all, but yours definitely is.

[50cent_rapper]

@Grexx

I don't think Wulfcastle's post was aggressive at all, but yours definitely is.

He is extremly busy.

[Passion_ltc]

Ok nice move.  It will be nice if I can be voted as one of the delegates keep up the good work

Thanks. We will work on it!

Who are you?

[bubbletea789]

Ok nice move.  It will be nice if I can be voted as one of the delegates keep up the good work

Thanks. We will work on it!

Who are you?

He is a joker : ))

[luckygenough56]

i have a few questions about delegates and DPOS

Only the first 101 delegates are harvesting ? Average joe can't forge sheet ?

The 10 000 xcr fees for delegate registration are distributed to the 101 ? Why can't we just lock 10 000 and unlock them instead after a while

As it is, it just looks like a ponzi/pyramid scheme/gifting circle  You pay to get in, money goes to the top and so on 

Hello luckygenouogh56,

yes, only the first 101 delegates (also called top 101 or top delegates) are harvesting/forging. The other ones are continuously striving to make their nodes better, so the community vote for them. This adds a social security layer to the consensus mechanism, just like Bitshares does it.

Average joe need to provide a better service and node than the top 101 to get voted for. He also need to be a valuable and trustworthy member of the community. Only this way he will get enough votes.

The delegate fee is 100 XCR, we changed it recently. Can you tell me, where you read 10,000 XCR? So we can change it, maybe we forgot a place to update. The 100 XCR is a fee just like the fee when you send money. It gets distributed equally(!) to the 101 delegates, yes.

I agree that it looks a bit strange at the beginning, the foundation gets all the fees. However, you have to see the big picture. Once the most delegates are provided by the community, it will be a fair system. It's the chicken-egg problem, same "isn't it unfair that satoshi mined the first bitcoin block?".

Also, we currently have a few plans to get more community members involved. You will hear more regarding this matter soon.

I hope this answers your questions, just ask.

it was on the on the new UI testnet :


glad to hear it is a mistake. Thanks for your answer