|
Tehfiend
|
|
January 25, 2018, 11:01:49 PM |
|
B Grade - ETH and EOS. B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem. C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM. I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-
C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP. C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN. D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA. D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.
These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.
|
|
|
|
ruletheworld
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1045
|
|
January 26, 2018, 12:10:27 AM |
|
B Grade - ETH and EOS. B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem. C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM. I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-
C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP. C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN. D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA. D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.
These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment. If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)? These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.
|
|
|
|
Tehfiend
|
|
January 26, 2018, 01:03:08 AM |
|
If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?
These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.
The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
January 26, 2018, 01:04:51 AM |
|
The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets to that audience regardless of what we think.
I have not seen one positive reception to their ratings. There's been nothing but universal flabbergastiness. There no doubt is the desire for something thorough and credible. This is not it and credible ratings would be much, much uglier than these ones.
|
|
|
|
ruletheworld
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1045
|
|
January 26, 2018, 01:17:44 AM |
|
If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?
These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.
The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think. This is again not true. The "people" you're talking about aren't investors. No one with money who knows what they are doing ever pay any attention to these ratings. The worst thing you can do is to make your investment decisions based on these types of sell-side research. That's called dumb money on the street.
|
|
|
|
Tehfiend
|
|
January 26, 2018, 02:16:18 AM |
|
I have not seen one positive reception to their ratings. There's been nothing but universal flabbergastiness. There no doubt is the desire for something thorough and credible. This is not it and credible ratings would be much, much uglier than these ones.
You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings. The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.
This is again not true. The "people" you're talking about aren't investors. No one with money who knows what they are doing ever pay any attention to these ratings. The worst thing you can do is to make your investment decisions based on these types of sell-side research. That's called dumb money on the street. Not sure how you can be so confident on what is true or not in regards to how these ratings effect every single person out there haha. Wish I was omnipotent like you ;-). Don't confuse opinion for fact... You're thinking only of crypto enthusiasts or wall street investors. I'm talking about the people that have ignored Bitcoin because it was a scam or ponzi scheme. They aren't going to invest based on these ratings. The fact that they even researched and rated them might make them take a second look. I have a friend that stayed away for years until he heard about the futures contracts. He didn't purchase any but the fact that they existed made him reconsider his understanding and he started asking me for more info which led to me selling him $3300 worth of XEM. These ratings could have the same effect. Re: "dumb money", you don't think there's already a ton of it in these markets? You don't think these headlines could bring in more?
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
January 26, 2018, 02:21:52 AM |
|
You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.
I'm not bereft because of these ratings. They're blatant shite. Point me towards someone who is taking them seriously. The overall concept is sound and potentially helpful. The execution of this particular iteration is a steaming piss take.
|
|
|
|
nemwanderer
|
|
January 26, 2018, 02:41:02 AM |
|
You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.
I'm not bereft because of these ratings. They're blatant shite. Point me towards someone who is taking them seriously. The overall concept is sound and potentially helpful. The execution of this particular iteration is a steaming piss take. Yeah feels like the market is shrugging these off. Maybe some reaction in price but nothing earth shattering. Moving on...feels like cryptos are basing after the recent bludgeoning. What will be the catalyst for another gap higher in NEM (if any)?
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFriesOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 26, 2018, 05:11:13 AM |
|
B Grade - ETH and EOS. B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem. C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM. I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-
C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP. C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN. D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA. D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.
These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment. You mean the way they gave AAA ratings to subprime mortgages right before the great USA recession of 2008? Again, meaningless ratings from people who barely understand Bitcoin but want to manipulate the markets.
|
|
|
|
CryptoNeed
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 504
Merit: 137
Nope.
|
|
January 26, 2018, 05:21:36 AM |
|
B Grade - ETH and EOS. B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem. C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM. I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-
C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP. C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN. D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA. D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.
These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment. You mean the way they gave AAA ratings to subprime mortgages right before the great USA recession of 2008? Again, meaningless ratings from people who barely understand Bitcoin but want to manipulate the markets. +1 Not more than an already established rating company which does not want to miss the crypto train ... Reading their crypto rating is like watching videos from all the new experts on Youtube ...
|
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people. (Eleanor Roosevelt)
|
|
|
moli1
|
|
January 26, 2018, 06:38:09 AM |
|
NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline. This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days. If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks. We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages. A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.
|
|
|
|
MoneyJ
|
|
January 26, 2018, 07:07:02 AM |
|
Hoping that the price would be stable . NEM platform would be in full swing and should dapps adapt its platform , this would drive developers swoop down and use it.
|
|
|
|
Alohaboy?!
|
|
January 26, 2018, 07:25:41 AM |
|
NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline. This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days. If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks. We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages. A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.
You never know what the market brings, but in the long run nem never disappoints
|
|
|
|
gobbi
|
|
January 26, 2018, 08:04:48 AM |
|
NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline. This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days. If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks. We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages. A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.
You never know what the market brings, but in the long run nem never disappoints You are right, Iam checking nem for few years and it´s always been in top 10 coins, now what we are seeing, every day new coins try to overtake nem and other good projects, but on long term nem will always be there.
|
|
|
|
tuvok007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 26, 2018, 08:48:15 AM |
|
Nice healthy correction on polo in the last thirdy minutes,11 percent drop. Should I get in now or will it go few more sats lower? Fuck me,I"m gettin in on this dip.
|
|
|
|
|
fragout
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1279
Merit: 1018
|
|
January 26, 2018, 09:39:27 AM |
|
There always seems to be a hack that pops up at the worst possible time. Is this the cause of the btc drop too ? $600 million is headline news unfortunately if it is true
|
|
|
|
|
Thylemo
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
|
|
January 26, 2018, 09:53:23 AM |
|
So because of a Ripple Movement out of their Wallet they disable NEM Withdrawl? Can someone explain the relation between Ripple and NEM in this case? Edit: Ok, is should read till the end. 600mil worth of Nem.
|
|
|
|
|