|
Tittiez
|
 |
April 23, 2012, 03:55:31 PM |
|
When I was intensity 9 my dead rate was ~11% after switching to intensity 5 my rate was ~5%. My average ping time is ~110ms to p2pmining.com(I'm on West coast).I did notice my AVG Mh/s did drop a little bit, but I've been playing around with my fan temp and clock speeds so i'm unable to tell how big of a difference it made.
Loosing a couple Mh/s isn't as bad as loosing 6% of your earnings. Oh, and 5% is lower then the average p2pool stalerate, 8.4%, so that's good too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can see the statistics of your reports to moderators on the "Report to moderator" pages.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
April 23, 2012, 04:10:04 PM |
|
When I was intensity 9 my dead rate was ~11% after switching to intensity 5 my rate was ~5%. My average ping time is ~110ms to p2pmining.com(I'm on West coast).I did notice my AVG Mh/s did drop a little bit, but I've been playing around with my fan temp and clock speeds so i'm unable to tell how big of a difference it made.
Loosing a couple Mh/s isn't as bad as loosing 6% of your earnings. Oh, and 5% is lower then the average p2pool stalerate, 8.4%, so that's good too. Don't confuse DOA w/ orphans but yea getting DOA rate down is more important. A higher MH/s rate and high DOA rate simply means more electricity, heat, noise for "nothing". |
|
|
|
|
eroxors
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Think. Positive. Thoughts.
|
|
April 23, 2012, 06:06:05 PM |
|
So, I set intensity on all my gpus to 7 and I still have roughly ~10% dead rate. When I set intensity lower, my gpus only mine at like 95%... I'm on Win7, cgminer.
Try changing threads per GPU to 1. I have that set to 1 thread per gpu. I run cgminer with -I 7 -g 1 Intensity 7 mines at 97% GPU, 8 mines at 98% gpu, 5 mines at 94% and 3 mines at 90% |
|
|
|
|
iopq
|
|
April 23, 2012, 06:17:27 PM |
|
can I mine from p2pool myself and somehow submit hashes to this pool for NMC? I don't feel like my luck is good enough to be solo-mining NMC
|
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
April 23, 2012, 06:48:23 PM
Last edit: April 23, 2012, 08:09:24 PM by DeathAndTaxes |
|
can I mine from p2pool myself and somehow submit hashes to this pool for NMC? I don't feel like my luck is good enough to be solo-mining NMC
Simple answer is ... no. Complex answer is that when you "mine" you are solving a specific block. All the inputs of the block including the merkle tree (which includes the coinbase which include both the reward address and merged chain hash) plus the nonce form the block header. A hash which solves that block only solves that exact block header. There is no method to both solo and pool mine at the same time. |
|
|
|
|
rdponticelli
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 325
Merit: 250
Our highest capital is the Confidence we build.
|
|
April 23, 2012, 07:33:13 PM |
|
Nice work!
|
|
|
|
|
eroxors
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Think. Positive. Thoughts.
|
|
April 23, 2012, 09:04:46 PM |
|
Can someone with < 5% dead rate please share their secret? I'm at ~10% ~2200ghs with ~200mhash dead
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
pyroim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2012, 10:57:39 PM |
|
2716 shares.. agression 6... no stales
no pay outs yet but ill get back and post when that happens
so far seems rewards are very fair and the 0.5% fee is actually logical! thanks for running it!
current set
7850 underclocked due to this weird heat wave on the west coast, 223 MH/s
noticed my MH/s rate is showing up at around 390 Mh/s on the "current miners" page discrepancy between the numbers my miner is putting out and the actual MH/s rate?
BTC address: 1HHsNGs7xeMQSae2tc9VDF3qvGmskT8ofe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
April 23, 2012, 11:05:46 PM |
|
2716 shares.. agression 6... no stales
no pay outs yet but ill get back and post when that happens
so far seems rewards are very fair and the 0.5% fee is actually logical! thanks for running it!
current set
7850 underclocked due to this weird heat wave on the west coast, 223 MH/s
noticed my MH/s rate is showing up at around 390 Mh/s on the "current miners" page discrepancy between the numbers my miner is putting out and the actual MH/s rate?
BTC address: 1HHsNGs7xeMQSae2tc9VDF3qvGmskT8ofe
Its a shitty estimate, don't worry about it. |
|
|
|
|
pyroim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 23, 2012, 11:10:16 PM |
|
was just making sure that it wasn't a client side / miner software issue! thanks for clarifying
|
|
|
|
|
|
RandomQ
|
|
April 23, 2012, 11:51:42 PM |
|
anyone else notice higher ping times and pool not providing work fast enough messages? I verified with a completely different ISP,ping times seem to be going up like 100,200,300,400,500,400,300,200,100 and then back down.I'm getting the message maybe ever other min. I thought it was a problem with my ISP until I verified ping times on another ISP. I'm still getting lower stale shares 5.8%.
|
|
|
|
|
pyroim
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
April 24, 2012, 12:48:11 AM |
|
potently pool side though i am getting work very fast and the " waiting on new work" line is only popping up for maybe a second every 10-20 shares and NO STALES,
check your 9332 port to see if mabey you are limiting traffic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TravisE
|
|
April 24, 2012, 03:41:24 AM |
|
I did experience some connectivity problems with p2mining.com for a little while a couple of days ago. That's when I also discovered that my local p2pool fallback wasn't working due to my neglecting to upgrade p2pool (which also required me to upgrade bitcoin) since the last mandatory update. Kind of a frustrating day since it wasn't immediately obvious to me what the problem was.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
April 24, 2012, 03:57:50 AM |
|
Only 2.5% stales for me!
|
|
|
|
|
check_status
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Web Dev, Db Admin, Computer Technician
|
|
April 24, 2012, 04:16:59 AM |
|
My settings for my 6850:
cgminer -o pool:port -k phatk -v2 -w 128 -g 1 -I 8 --auto-fan --temp-target 65 --gpu-engine 850 --gpu-memclock 1000
I get 15/1 longpoll/accepted and my DOA 8%
|
For Bitcoin to be a true global currency the value of BTC needs always to rise. If BTC became the global currency & money supply = 100 Trillion then ⊅1.00 BTC = $4,761,904.76. P2Pool Server List | How To's and Guides Mega List | 1 EndfedSryGUZK9sPrdvxHntYzv2EBexGA |
|
|
|
|
|
JayCoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2012, 11:01:34 PM |
|
Just went from VPS to dedicated server. All the daemons for the currencies ate up too much memory for a VPS. I couldn't even compile on the VPS. Had to compile at home and upload the binary. Everyone probably saw some connection issues during the change over and testing. Thanks for the heads up on the other suppliers. I am paying $120 a month for the following: Hardware 2.33Ghz Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 2GB DDR2 500GB SATAII Remote Reboot Network 3TB (3,000GB) Transfer / 100Mbps Port Software Ubuntu 11.10 64 Bit |
Hello There!
|
|
|
|
JayCoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2012, 11:17:29 PM |
|
DUE TO POOL HOPPING I'LL WILL BE SWITCHING TO PPLNS INSTEAD OF PROPORTIONAL. This will occur in the next day or two. There will be a bump (30 seconds of all rejected shares) in the server when I restart P2Pool. Should be interesting mathmatically. A PPLNS pool (p2pmining) mining to a PPLNS pool (p2pool). Double Whammy Any suggestions on time for a PPLNS. Should it be 24hrs like p2pool, 12hrs, 48hrs, 1 week, etc.? |
Hello There!
|
|
|
|
Tittiez
|
|
April 24, 2012, 11:38:29 PM |
|
DUE TO POOL HOPPING I'LL WILL BE SWITCHING TO PPLNS INSTEAD OF PROPORTIONAL. This will occur in the next day or two. There will be a bump (30 seconds of all rejected shares) in the server when I restart P2Pool. Should be interesting mathmatically. A PPLNS pool (p2pmining) mining to a PPLNS pool (p2pool). Double Whammy Any suggestions on time for a PPLNS. Should it be 24hrs like p2pool, 12hrs, 48hrs, 1 week, etc.? I'm guessing this guy is the culprit? http://p2pmining.com/?method=miner&data=173Qmir9hTmvkb3Cmvgj78AV2CjL5azZYS |
|
|
|
|
|
JayCoin (OP)
|
|
April 24, 2012, 11:40:54 PM |
|
I get 3.4% DOA and I have the biggest miner on P2Pmining.com. If we can all get to 3.4% we would be making a killing. We would be making more per hash than any other pool, fee included.
I am running CGMiner 2.2.5 with -g 1 . That's it. I don't set the intensity. I let the dynamic intensity do its job. I am in Northern Michigan and the server is in Southern Florida and My mining rigs are on a crappy AT&T DSL. I use Linuxcoin on thumb drives and have 7 5970s and 2 5870s and 2 5770s. The 5770s are mining on windows 7 64bit. That's all there is to it.
|
Hello There!
|
|
|
|
