[Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 200000 miners

[patrike]

update to 9.0.1 not solve the problem with default definition T-Rex mining software selection. AM still choose the first activated software for Profit profile in the list...

I've identified one more scenario that might have caused this issue. There will soon be a new release.

[sxemini]

Hi patrike,
after the last update i can´t see all hosts the miner properties. I have 15 hosts, but AM show me only 12 in the miner properties. In options - managed hosts i see all 15. I must delete the 3 and must add it again in miner properties - actions - new host.

The host list in the Miner Properties should display everything except Remote Proxy hosts. Would it be possible for you to send me your Awesome Miner configuration file (%appdata%\AwesomeMiner\ConfigData.xml) via e-mail and I will review? Thanks!

Yes i know, i had no problems with it in the past. It happens since the last update. Sure i can send you the config.

[patrike]

Awesome Miner version 9.0.2

 ASIC mining
  - Remote Proxy discovery feature has a configurable scan interval
 GPU mining
  - Improved feature to set password on Remote Agent for Linux
 Mining software
  - TeamBlackMiner 1.17
  - CpuMiner-Opt 3.18.2
 Corrections
  - Correction to T-Rex dual mining in combination with the profit switcher
  - Correction to mining software logging on Linux

[narousberg]

update to 9.0.1 not solve the problem with default definition T-Rex mining software selection. AM still choose the first activated software for Profit profile in the list...

I've identified one more scenario that might have caused this issue. There will soon be a new release.

Great! Now works well. And T-Rex no more show a second set of statistic for dual mining. Thanks.

[patrike]

update to 9.0.1 not solve the problem with default definition T-Rex mining software selection. AM still choose the first activated software for Profit profile in the list...

I've identified one more scenario that might have caused this issue. There will soon be a new release.

Great! Now works well. And T-Rex no more show a second set of statistic for dual mining. Thanks.

Thanks for the update and great that it's working better now.

[SS4DBZ]

Will T-Rex dual mine whenever it detects it is most profitable to do so, or do we manually have to configure it in the command line to always have dual mining on or off?

[Tigggger]

In the balance section I'm sure I used to have a bitcoin xpub key to show the total balance, but following a pc upgrade I'm starting from scratch and can't seem to get it to work anymore, just returns unable to get balance.

Tried tweaking it to use https://blockchain.info/balance?active=[address] but that didn't work either.

Can anyone help ?

[patrike]

Will T-Rex dual mine whenever it detects it is most profitable to do so, or do we manually have to configure it in the command line to always have dual mining on or off?

Awesome Miner must be aware of the dual hashrate to do the profit calculation. If specified and the profit switcher considers the dual mode to be more profitable, it will enable the dual mining mode.

See also the last section here:
https://support.awesomeminer.com/support/solutions/articles/35000188785-dual-mining-with-t-rex-miner

[patrike]

In the balance section I'm sure I used to have a bitcoin xpub key to show the total balance, but following a pc upgrade I'm starting from scratch and can't seem to get it to work anymore, just returns unable to get balance.

Tried tweaking it to use https://blockchain.info/balance?active=[address] but that didn't work either.

Can anyone help ?

Can you please send me your BTC address via a private message and I can give it a try to see if I can find the reason why the balance isn't possible to read.

[narousberg]

Hi Patrike, can you please improve a rule action "Set electricity price for profit profile" and add a profile name to action description in the actions list view"
I creating a action with set of this property settings and after a while its problematic to control for which profit profile was added or no. Need always click on action to see for which profile was this action defined. Regards.

[patrike]

Hi Patrike, can you please improve a rule action "Set electricity price for profit profile" and add a profile name to action description in the actions list view"
I creating a action with set of this property settings and after a while its problematic to control for which profit profile was added or no. Need always click on action to see for which profile was this action defined. Regards.

Good point - I will add this information.

[patrike]

Awesome Miner version 9.0.3

 Features
  - Miner list can be configured to prefix the miner description with the configured Remote Proxy
 User interface
  - Updated configuration pages for Managed Miners and Managed Hosts to indicate if the miners and hosts are cloud connected. Indicate if a host is configured as a Remote Proxy.
  - Updated configuration page for External Miners to indicate if using a Remote Proxy
  - Improved configuration description for the rule action to set electricity price
 Changes
  - Ideal hashrate for miner groups will exclude any disabled miners
  - Groups without any miners will no longer be visible when a filter is applied
 Mining software
  - TeamBlackMiner 1.19
  - T-Rex Miner 0.24.5
  - PhoenixMiner 5.8c
  - Nanominer 3.4.1
 Corrections
  - Correction to the wizard for setting up Managed Profit Miners for the very first time
  - Correction to upgrade of cloud connected Remote Agents
  - Correction to setting notes on miner via the HTTP API
  - Correction to display of Profit Profile name in the rule action Apply Profit Profile
  - Correction to Remote Proxy and IP scan when using multiple distributed sites with overlapping IP addresses

[Firstblackhaw]

Hi Patrick

I have add new custom coin is raptorenium. But I can get dynamic updated price by use API of Coingecko follow : https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/simple/price?vs_currencies=usd&ids=raptoreum. I test in web browser is ok, but in AweSome Miner alway notification :  Unable to read value.

Please help me

Thanks

[sxemini]

Hi Patrick

I have add new custom coin is raptorenium. But I can get dynamic updated price by use API of Coingecko follow : https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/simple/price?vs_currencies=usd&ids=raptoreum. I test in web browser is ok, but in AweSome Miner alway notification :  Unable to read value.

Please help me

Thanks

You can use it in this way:

https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/simple/price?ids=raptoreum&vs_currencies=btc

and in the field
JSON property expression: raptoreum.btc

Or if you want it in USD:

https://api.coingecko.com/api/v3/simple/price?ids=raptoreum&vs_currencies=USD

JSON property expression: raptoreum.usd


But i think BTC price is more important, and USD can be calculated over the BTC price.

[nordmann666]

after the last (or maybe last 2 updates) my network scan shows me allready added miners again as new miners
there are a handfull "existing" miners and he found many many miners that if i add them, i find them as duplicate in the "find miners" tab via IP

[patrike]

after the last (or maybe last 2 updates) my network scan shows me allready added miners again as new miners
there are a handfull "existing" miners and he found many many miners that if i add them, i find them as duplicate in the "find miners" tab via IP

The network scan can be configured to either include only new or all miners. Can you verify this via the "Settings" button on the Network scan page, where you will find "Scan for new miners only"?

We do have another network scan correction in the pipeline, but that's related to when you use a cloud connected Remote Proxy.

[sxemini]

after the last (or maybe last 2 updates) my network scan shows me allready added miners again as new miners
there are a handfull "existing" miners and he found many many miners that if i add them, i find them as duplicate in the "find miners" tab via IP

The network scan can be configured to either include only new or all miners. Can you verify this via the "Settings" button on the Network scan page, where you will find "Scan for new miners only"?

We do have another network scan correction in the pipeline, but that's related to when you use a cloud connected Remote Proxy.

I can verify the same problem, Scan for new miners only is checked. But it only happens if we scan for external miners.

Scan for Awesomeminer Remote Agents works normal.

[nordmann666]

after the last (or maybe last 2 updates) my network scan shows me allready added miners again as new miners
there are a handfull "existing" miners and he found many many miners that if i add them, i find them as duplicate in the "find miners" tab via IP

The network scan can be configured to either include only new or all miners. Can you verify this via the "Settings" button on the Network scan page, where you will find "Scan for new miners only"?

We do have another network scan correction in the pipeline, but that's related to when you use a cloud connected Remote Proxy.

it is set to only new - and 7 miners out of 87 external are ignored cause existing

[patrike]

Awesome Miner version 9.0.4

 User interface
  - Improved text colors for dark mode
 Mining software
  - NbMiner 39.6
  - TeamBlackMiner 1.21
 Corrections
  - Correction to duplication issue with network scan and auto miner discovery

[patrike]

after the last (or maybe last 2 updates) my network scan shows me allready added miners again as new miners
there are a handfull "existing" miners and he found many many miners that if i add them, i find them as duplicate in the "find miners" tab via IP

The network scan can be configured to either include only new or all miners. Can you verify this via the "Settings" button on the Network scan page, where you will find "Scan for new miners only"?

We do have another network scan correction in the pipeline, but that's related to when you use a cloud connected Remote Proxy.

it is set to only new - and 7 miners out of 87 external are ignored cause existing

Thanks for the details. Can you please verify if the changes to the network scan in the new v9.0.4 resolves this?