Bitinvestor
|
|
October 07, 2014, 06:04:05 PM |
|
Thanks. Why do I need to do that but you didn't?
I did that as well. It should finish the compilation now and then you can start the daemon: It will start downloading the blockchain and after a while you can talk to the daemon like this:
|
Those who cause problems for others also cause problems for themselves.
|
|
|
jheaton
|
|
October 07, 2014, 06:48:44 PM |
|
Hello, having a slight wallet issue. I've made successful transaction since the beginning, the last was on 10/4, for some reason today it wont sink and in the "transactions" tab I noticed the last "confirmed" transaction was on 9/26 and every day since says "conflicted"? suggestions? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 07, 2014, 06:52:46 PM |
|
Thanks. Why do I need to do that but you didn't?
I did that as well. It should finish the compilation now and then you can start the daemon: It will start downloading the blockchain and after a while you can talk to the daemon like this: Making slow progress. Compiled ok but asking for BitcoinDark.conf I created the file using pico BitcoinDark.conf and pasted in the text in OP, substituting the rpcuser= and rpcpassword= with the ones it suggested. Also changed permissions to 700 as recommended. Next time around, I got the same message. Edit: wrong directory first time. Then put it in one back from src. Still no luck.
|
|
|
|
Bitinvestor
|
|
October 07, 2014, 06:53:54 PM |
|
Hello, having a slight wallet issue. I've made successful transaction since the beginning, the last was on 10/4, for some reason today it wont sink and in the "transactions" tab I noticed the last "confirmed" transaction was on 9/26 and every day since says "conflicted"? suggestions? Thanks!
You're on a fork. Backup your wallet.dat, delete your blockchain and download it again. Make sure you use the BitcoinDark.conf from the OP.
|
Those who cause problems for others also cause problems for themselves.
|
|
|
Bitinvestor
|
|
October 07, 2014, 06:57:50 PM |
|
Making slow progress. Compiled ok but asking for BitcoinDark.conf I created the file using pico BitcoinDark.conf and pasted in the text in OP, substituting the rpcuser= and rpcpassword= with the ones it suggested. Also changed permissions to 700 as recommended. Next time around, I got the same message.
Put your BitcoinDark.conf in .BitcoinDark in your home directory.
|
Those who cause problems for others also cause problems for themselves.
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 07, 2014, 07:01:47 PM |
|
Making slow progress. Compiled ok but asking for BitcoinDark.conf I created the file using pico BitcoinDark.conf and pasted in the text in OP, substituting the rpcuser= and rpcpassword= with the ones it suggested. Also changed permissions to 700 as recommended. Next time around, I got the same message.
Put your BitcoinDark.conf in .BitcoinDark in your home directory. That directory doesn't seem to exist. Edit: found hidden file with ls -a Steep learning curve for me today.
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
October 07, 2014, 07:36:48 PM |
|
Making slow progress. Compiled ok but asking for BitcoinDark.conf I created the file using pico BitcoinDark.conf and pasted in the text in OP, substituting the rpcuser= and rpcpassword= with the ones it suggested. Also changed permissions to 700 as recommended. Next time around, I got the same message.
Put your BitcoinDark.conf in .BitcoinDark in your home directory. That directory doesn't seem to exist. Edit: found hidden file with ls -a Steep learning curve for me today. when your build environment is working, you should go: cd git clone https://github.com/jl777/btcdcd btcd/libjl777 ./onetime <go into nacl directory, build, lib, until you find the randombytes.o and libnacl.a> cp randombytes.o libnacl.a ~/btcd/libjl777/libs cd ~/btcd ./m_unix <make a SuperNET.conf> ./BitcoinDarkd
|
|
|
|
cloudboy
|
|
October 07, 2014, 08:17:50 PM |
|
Making slow progress. Compiled ok but asking for BitcoinDark.conf I created the file using pico BitcoinDark.conf and pasted in the text in OP, substituting the rpcuser= and rpcpassword= with the ones it suggested. Also changed permissions to 700 as recommended. Next time around, I got the same message.
Put your BitcoinDark.conf in .BitcoinDark in your home directory. That directory doesn't seem to exist. Edit: found hidden file with ls -a Steep learning curve for me today. when your build environment is working, you should go: cd git clone https://github.com/jl777/btcdcd btcd/libjl777 ./onetime <go into nacl directory, build, lib, until you find the randombytes.o and libnacl.a> cp randombytes.o libnacl.a ~/btcd/libjl777/libs cd ~/btcd ./m_unix <make a SuperNET.conf> ./BitcoinDarkd Do you need to have a NXT wallet running? Yes
|
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 07, 2014, 08:19:53 PM |
|
Making slow progress. Compiled ok but asking for BitcoinDark.conf I created the file using pico BitcoinDark.conf and pasted in the text in OP, substituting the rpcuser= and rpcpassword= with the ones it suggested. Also changed permissions to 700 as recommended. Next time around, I got the same message.
Put your BitcoinDark.conf in .BitcoinDark in your home directory. That directory doesn't seem to exist. Edit: found hidden file with ls -a Steep learning curve for me today. when your build environment is working, you should go: cd git clone https://github.com/jl777/btcdcd btcd/libjl777 ./onetime <go into nacl directory, build, lib, until you find the randombytes.o and libnacl.a> cp randombytes.o libnacl.a ~/btcd/libjl777/libs cd ~/btcd ./m_unix <make a SuperNET.conf> ./BitcoinDarkd Thanks. Why? What goes in the SuperNET.conf file and where? Also, I didn't realise you needed a NXT wallet running at the same time. Any particular requirements for that?
|
|
|
|
Cassius
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
|
|
October 07, 2014, 08:37:51 PM |
|
Enough for me for today.
|
|
|
|
Normandoyle
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
meow
|
|
October 07, 2014, 08:50:02 PM |
|
Anyone think BTCD will surpass BTC in value?? I'm a proud supporter of BTCD so I'd love to see this happen.
|
|
|
|
RichardT
|
|
October 07, 2014, 09:29:09 PM |
|
Anyone think BTCD will surpass BTC in value?? I'm a proud supporter of BTCD so I'd love to see this happen.
Short term, absolutely not. In 5-10 years, maybe. That's assuming BTC doesn't also significantly go up. It's rather hard to say though, I don't think there are too many people these days who are willing to hold on to a single coin (other than bitcoin) for that long. So in other words, I think the chances are slim.
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
October 07, 2014, 10:45:10 PM |
|
Anyone think BTCD will surpass BTC in value?? I'm a proud supporter of BTCD so I'd love to see this happen.
with the BTC network effect so big, it will take some massive aggregation of smaller user bases to rival BTC with 10x more BTC than BTCD, it is not inconceivable for the price of 1 BTCD >= 1 BTC, but this is 100x from here so we are talking years. Possible, but will require years of hard work and growing the network size and everything going right. In any case, do not worry about such things. All we can do is keep working hard to increase the utility of BTCD. James
|
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
October 07, 2014, 11:46:40 PM |
|
We are getting almost 100 BTCD per month from the staking of the SuperNET funds. I propose that these funds be used to fund ~100 VPS I simply need to have ~100 servers to be able to properly test things and the lack of this is causing delay.
These servers can be providing HDD for cloud storage, public routing, public access points, etc.
The funding is part of the problem that can be solved. We also need someone that can manage these servers and keep them updated with new releases, etc.
I need your help to complete the SuperNET, which is needed for Teleport.
James
P.S we can certainly start with less than 100 servers, but I cant do any meaningful testing with half a dozen servers
|
|
|
|
Zer0Sum
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1588
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 08, 2014, 01:21:19 AM |
|
Anyone think BTCD will surpass BTC in value?? I'm a proud supporter of BTCD so I'd love to see this happen.
with the BTC network effect so big, it will take some massive aggregation of smaller user bases to rival BTC with 10x more BTC than BTCD, it is not inconceivable for the price of 1 BTCD >= 1 BTC, but this is 100x from here so we are talking years. Possible, but will require years of hard work and growing the network size and everything going right. In any case, do not worry about such things. All we can do is keep working hard to increase the utility of BTCD. James I love the realism in the SuperNET Space. It inspires confidence. Hard work and realism will take you a lot further than hype.
|
|
|
|
pvnamk19
|
|
October 08, 2014, 01:48:39 AM |
|
We are getting almost 100 BTCD per month from the staking of the SuperNET funds. I propose that these funds be used to fund ~100 VPS I simply need to have ~100 servers to be able to properly test things and the lack of this is causing delay.
These servers can be providing HDD for cloud storage, public routing, public access points, etc.
The funding is part of the problem that can be solved. We also need someone that can manage these servers and keep them updated with new releases, etc.
I need your help to complete the SuperNET, which is needed for Teleport.
James
P.S we can certainly start with less than 100 servers, but I cant do any meaningful testing with half a dozen servers
+ 1x500 UNITY If you need us to vote, we are ready.
|
|
|
|
crackfoo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3556
Merit: 1126
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:29:26 AM |
|
We are getting almost 100 BTCD per month from the staking of the SuperNET funds. I propose that these funds be used to fund ~100 VPS I simply need to have ~100 servers to be able to properly test things and the lack of this is causing delay.
These servers can be providing HDD for cloud storage, public routing, public access points, etc.
The funding is part of the problem that can be solved. We also need someone that can manage these servers and keep them updated with new releases, etc.
I need your help to complete the SuperNET, which is needed for Teleport.
James
P.S we can certainly start with less than 100 servers, but I cant do any meaningful testing with half a dozen servers
for 100 VPS's it would probably be in the neighbourhood of $700-1000 a month, for 100 low end 1 CPU 1GB ram and maybe 10-15gb space?
|
ZPOOL - the miners multipool! Support We pay 10 FLUX Parallel Assets (PA) directly to block rewards! Get paid more and faster. No PA fee's or waiting around for them, paid instantly on every block found!
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:38:22 AM |
|
We are getting almost 100 BTCD per month from the staking of the SuperNET funds. I propose that these funds be used to fund ~100 VPS I simply need to have ~100 servers to be able to properly test things and the lack of this is causing delay.
These servers can be providing HDD for cloud storage, public routing, public access points, etc.
The funding is part of the problem that can be solved. We also need someone that can manage these servers and keep them updated with new releases, etc.
I need your help to complete the SuperNET, which is needed for Teleport.
James
P.S we can certainly start with less than 100 servers, but I cant do any meaningful testing with half a dozen servers
for 100 VPS's it would probably be in the neighbourhood of $700-1000 a month, for 100 low end 1 CPU 1GB ram and maybe 10-15gb space? yes, that should be enough, so we can start with ~50 I am assuming we can change the hardware specs as needed?
|
|
|
|
crackfoo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3556
Merit: 1126
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:55:14 AM |
|
We are getting almost 100 BTCD per month from the staking of the SuperNET funds. I propose that these funds be used to fund ~100 VPS I simply need to have ~100 servers to be able to properly test things and the lack of this is causing delay.
These servers can be providing HDD for cloud storage, public routing, public access points, etc.
The funding is part of the problem that can be solved. We also need someone that can manage these servers and keep them updated with new releases, etc.
I need your help to complete the SuperNET, which is needed for Teleport.
James
P.S we can certainly start with less than 100 servers, but I cant do any meaningful testing with half a dozen servers
for 100 VPS's it would probably be in the neighbourhood of $700-1000 a month, for 100 low end 1 CPU 1GB ram and maybe 10-15gb space? yes, that should be enough, so we can start with ~50 I am assuming we can change the hardware specs as needed? yeah I think most offer scalability on the fly.
|
ZPOOL - the miners multipool! Support We pay 10 FLUX Parallel Assets (PA) directly to block rewards! Get paid more and faster. No PA fee's or waiting around for them, paid instantly on every block found!
|
|
|
jl777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1134
|
|
October 08, 2014, 02:59:05 AM |
|
We are getting almost 100 BTCD per month from the staking of the SuperNET funds. I propose that these funds be used to fund ~100 VPS I simply need to have ~100 servers to be able to properly test things and the lack of this is causing delay.
These servers can be providing HDD for cloud storage, public routing, public access points, etc.
The funding is part of the problem that can be solved. We also need someone that can manage these servers and keep them updated with new releases, etc.
I need your help to complete the SuperNET, which is needed for Teleport.
James
P.S we can certainly start with less than 100 servers, but I cant do any meaningful testing with half a dozen servers
for 100 VPS's it would probably be in the neighbourhood of $700-1000 a month, for 100 low end 1 CPU 1GB ram and maybe 10-15gb space? yes, that should be enough, so we can start with ~50 I am assuming we can change the hardware specs as needed? yeah I think most offer scalability on the fly. what would it take to go ahead with this? @Azeh, maybe a poll to get community approval for this, we can make it for 3 months and then revisit it after that James
|
|
|
|
|