louiseth1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Bitfarms.io
|
|
July 27, 2014, 03:22:38 PM |
|
Im talking with Dedicatedpool , those guys know there shit !
Hashharder knows their stuff even more in my opinion, their whole pool has been coded by themselves. And afaik, hashrate reporting close to what it is.
|
Bitfarms.io - Powering Blockchains with Sustainable Energy
|
|
|
HardwarePal
|
|
July 27, 2014, 03:29:14 PM |
|
Im talking with Dedicatedpool , those guys know there shit !
Hashharder knows their stuff even more in my opinion, their whole pool has been coded by themselves. And afaik, hashrate reporting close to what it is. Its the only pool that has been stable throughout , damn me and my ideas of switching
|
|
|
|
r0b1nuk
|
|
July 27, 2014, 03:48:27 PM |
|
hashharder.com now showing full hash rate and working like a dream! well done guys if your reading this
|
Bitrated user: r0b1nuk.
|
|
|
minerpools
|
|
July 27, 2014, 03:53:32 PM Last edit: July 27, 2014, 04:05:26 PM by minerpools |
|
Good morning, I wanted to inform you that I've setup a new server and it's already running and mining (it's only my rig there but hey), all your accounts were migrated which means all you have to do is change the stratum IP address, workers are added automatically. New server: http://iocoin.minerpools.comStratum for IoCoin: stratum+tcp://192.155.89.136:4116 -u Weblogin.WorkerName -p WorkerPassword Old server is located at http://io.minerpools.com, you won't be able to mine or withdraw funds there anymore but I urge you to enter your wallet address in order for me to send your funds directly. Dev, please update the OP with the new pool, tx
|
|
|
|
|
UGETHIT
|
|
July 27, 2014, 04:22:16 PM |
|
Not exactly getting a warm welcome on cryptsy is it.
|
|
|
|
goblynn
|
|
July 27, 2014, 04:46:15 PM |
|
yay pools working again!
|
|
|
|
czvezda
|
|
July 27, 2014, 04:51:51 PM |
|
I lost 50K from pool.mn Only hashharder is ok I think There was a fork in the network. Ask the dev why has this happened. Pools didn't cause this fork.
|
|
|
|
surestrike
|
|
July 27, 2014, 05:15:41 PM |
|
Good morning, I wanted to inform you that I've setup a new server and it's already running and mining (it's only my rig there but hey), all your accounts were migrated which means all you have to do is change the stratum IP address, workers are added automatically. New server: http://iocoin.minerpools.comStratum for IoCoin: stratum+tcp://192.155.89.136:4116 -u Weblogin.WorkerName -p WorkerPassword Old server is located at http://io.minerpools.com, you won't be able to mine or withdraw funds there anymore but I urge you to enter your wallet address in order for me to send your funds directly. Dev, please update the OP with the new pool, tx Having very good results now from this updated pool, thank you for the update. Hope all goes as well as it is now here.
|
|
|
|
IO Dev Team (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 270
Merit: 150
iOC Development Team
|
|
July 27, 2014, 06:04:03 PM |
|
Hey guys, turbulent night, but let me explain exactly what happened. We had uploaded the updated clients, which actually prevent the coin from forking, but not everyone upgraded, or if people upgraded, they didn’t wipe out their previous block chain, and kept hashing on the old chain.
It seems, that a pool, although upgraded their wallet, they did not remove and refresh their block chain information, and were therefore hashing on the wrong chain. This caused a lot of problems for us, because the pool started re-broadcasting the wrong block chain to people, and this caused a chain effect of bad blockhains being broadcast. This caused a domino effect, as new people who were downloading the client, were saturated with bad block chain information, and then re-distributing it.
Now, in regards to the Hashharder stuff, and the reason we “picked” their chain. First of all, no chain was “picked” as there was no wallet update— we don’t magically get to decide which chain is the official one. The chain that Hashharder was using, was also the same chain that our Seeders were seeding, and all of our machines were using, as well as what was hardcoded in to the client, not to mention the chain was about 6-700 blocks ahead of the other one, and as you know, the longest chain always wins.
We are working today to bring more seed nodes online, and increasing the capacity of our current seed servers as well as seeing what we can do to improve the stability of the coin via wallet updates.
Lead Dev I/O Coin
|
|
|
|
mkjohnson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
July 27, 2014, 07:31:33 PM |
|
Hey guys, turbulent night, but let me explain exactly what happened. We had uploaded the updated clients, which actually prevent the coin from forking, but not everyone upgraded, or if people upgraded, they didn’t wipe out their previous block chain, and kept hashing on the old chain.
It seems, that a pool, although upgraded their wallet, they did not remove and refresh their block chain information, and were therefore hashing on the wrong chain. This caused a lot of problems for us, because the pool started re-broadcasting the wrong block chain to people, and this caused a chain effect of bad blockhains being broadcast. This caused a domino effect, as new people who were downloading the client, were saturated with bad block chain information, and then re-distributing it.
Now, in regards to the Hashharder stuff, and the reason we “picked” their chain. First of all, no chain was “picked” as there was no wallet update— we don’t magically get to decide which chain is the official one. The chain that Hashharder was using, was also the same chain that our Seeders were seeding, and all of our machines were using, as well as what was hardcoded in to the client, not to mention the chain was about 6-700 blocks ahead of the other one, and as you know, the longest chain always wins.
We are working today to bring more seed nodes online, and increasing the capacity of our current seed servers as well as seeing what we can do to improve the stability of the coin via wallet updates.
Lead Dev I/O Coin
That actually makes sense. Thank you for the explanation.
|
|
|
|
FamousRocky
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
RTFM ;D
|
|
July 27, 2014, 07:56:32 PM |
|
with the actual moneysupply "6.2M" it seems that we will only reach a estimated total coins after PoW of "10.5M" ... could that be right?
|
|
|
|
IO Dev Team (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 270
Merit: 150
iOC Development Team
|
|
July 27, 2014, 08:15:30 PM |
|
with the actual moneysupply "6.2M" it seems that we will only reach a estimated total coins after PoW of "10.5M" ... could that be right?
Total POW blocks will be 12815 - POS Blocks are irrelevant to this number. The total "blocks" : 9484, showing in the wallet are a mix of POW and POS blocks as the coin is a Hybrid.
|
|
|
|
FamousRocky
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
RTFM ;D
|
|
July 27, 2014, 08:21:43 PM |
|
Total POW blocks will be 12815 - POS Blocks are irrelevant to this number. The total "blocks" : 9484, showing in the wallet are a mix of POW and POS blocks as the coin is a Hybrid.
ok thx.... maybe you should change the Subject to something like "....[I/O Coin] .... LIVE ON CRYPTSY"
|
|
|
|
goblynn
|
|
July 27, 2014, 08:29:05 PM |
|
with the actual moneysupply "6.2M" it seems that we will only reach a estimated total coins after PoW of "10.5M" ... could that be right?
Total POW blocks will be 12815 - POS Blocks are irrelevant to this number. The total "blocks" : 9484, showing in the wallet are a mix of POW and POS blocks as the coin is a Hybrid. so we are only about 2/5 through POW...which means its likely POW will continue until about saturday? thats good though..gives more people a chance to mine
|
|
|
|
a447513372
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
DLISK - Next Generation Coin
|
|
July 27, 2014, 08:52:07 PM |
|
now in cryptsy LOL
|
|
|
|
pnosker
|
|
July 27, 2014, 09:00:14 PM |
|
with the actual moneysupply "6.2M" it seems that we will only reach a estimated total coins after PoW of "10.5M" ... could that be right?
Total POW blocks will be 12815 - POS Blocks are irrelevant to this number. The total "blocks" : 9484, showing in the wallet are a mix of POW and POS blocks as the coin is a Hybrid. It doesn't look like you're right. According to https://github.com/IOCoin/iocoin/blob/c455c69964849a03189deb50de79b7c099c4efae/src/main.hThe last block that will be POW mined is 12815, no matter what origin the prior blocks are. It looks like the coin will have just about 8M total supply at the end of PoW. It's possible I'm wrong, but I looked over the source when you launched. Looks neat! Essentially a BC POS 2.0/VRC hybrid but with an interest rate that will never go above 2.8%-- probably closer to 2.3%.
|
Support the VeriFund Endowment. VRC: VFEndownxxnHea9mv59kZx8c7TysGbndYx
|
|
|
IO Dev Team (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 270
Merit: 150
iOC Development Team
|
|
July 27, 2014, 09:28:24 PM |
|
with the actual moneysupply "6.2M" it seems that we will only reach a estimated total coins after PoW of "10.5M" ... could that be right?
Total POW blocks will be 12815 - POS Blocks are irrelevant to this number. The total "blocks" : 9484, showing in the wallet are a mix of POW and POS blocks as the coin is a Hybrid. It doesn't look like you're right. According to https://github.com/IOCoin/iocoin/blob/c455c69964849a03189deb50de79b7c099c4efae/src/main.hThe last block that will be POW mined is 12815, no matter what origin the prior blocks are. It looks like the coin will have just about 8M total supply at the end of PoW. It's possible I'm wrong, but I looked over the source when you launched. Looks neat! Essentially a BC POS 2.0/VRC hybrid but with an interest rate that will never go above 2.8%-- probably closer to 2.3%. https://github.com/IOCoin/iocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2262,L2270It’s based on the POW height only, not POS block height
|
|
|
|
pnosker
|
|
July 27, 2014, 09:43:27 PM |
|
with the actual moneysupply "6.2M" it seems that we will only reach a estimated total coins after PoW of "10.5M" ... could that be right?
Total POW blocks will be 12815 - POS Blocks are irrelevant to this number. The total "blocks" : 9484, showing in the wallet are a mix of POW and POS blocks as the coin is a Hybrid. It doesn't look like you're right. According to https://github.com/IOCoin/iocoin/blob/c455c69964849a03189deb50de79b7c099c4efae/src/main.hThe last block that will be POW mined is 12815, no matter what origin the prior blocks are. It looks like the coin will have just about 8M total supply at the end of PoW. It's possible I'm wrong, but I looked over the source when you launched. Looks neat! Essentially a BC POS 2.0/VRC hybrid but with an interest rate that will never go above 2.8%-- probably closer to 2.3%. https://github.com/IOCoin/iocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2262,L2270It’s based on the POW height only, not POS block height Ah, interesting. Thanks for the pointer in the code. I guess you're using the SuperCoin PoW block counting technique? (You forgot to change the comments in the code)
|
Support the VeriFund Endowment. VRC: VFEndownxxnHea9mv59kZx8c7TysGbndYx
|
|
|
Chiggins
|
|
July 27, 2014, 11:10:42 PM |
|
Good morning, I wanted to inform you that I've setup a new server and it's already running and mining (it's only my rig there but hey), all your accounts were migrated which means all you have to do is change the stratum IP address, workers are added automatically. New server: http://iocoin.minerpools.comStratum for IoCoin: stratum+tcp://192.155.89.136:4116 -u Weblogin.WorkerName -p WorkerPassword Old server is located at http://io.minerpools.com, you won't be able to mine or withdraw funds there anymore but I urge you to enter your wallet address in order for me to send your funds directly. Dev, please update the OP with the new pool, tx Thanks for the update.
|
|
|
|
|