[ANN][TRK] ★ Truckcoin ★ Pure PoS up to 200% per year ★ Cryptopia

[4x13]

seems to be stuck downloading block 221276 says was from 2 hours ago. and I only have 1 network connection

[1714163864]

1714163864

[noise23]

it says it is version 0.9.8.0 beta.

edit: I just redownloaded the latest wallet and it is the same version

Did you manage to import data to a new wallet?
Your ip address might get banned by trk network because of misbehaving wallet.

[4x13]

I was going to wait to import until wallet synced

[4x13]

ok, finally synced, and imported looks like all is good for now. Wonder why that happened..

[*Sakura*]

I noticed that in the last month transactions are ultra fast. It seems that the max PoS reward limit was the right decision.

[m33]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

[Biomech]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

A lot of different people have contributed to TEK over it's history. I think Noise didn't do anything with the staking engine, though I'm not entirely certain of that. The part he was having me test had to do with checkpointing and excluding older clients from the chain to prevent forking issues.

Of course, I could be wrong

[*Sakura*]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

This is due to the difference in networks difficulty and because of the PoS reward/block limit in TRK.

1. TRK network difficulty is currently 0.4, whereas TEK network difficulty is 0.0004.
2. TRK has PoS reward/block limit: 200 TRK per block. Therefore, the recommended size of the blocks here is 2000-3000 coins. TEK hasn't such limitation. Therefore, the TEK block size may be even 200k coins.

Also here diffent min coinages: 9 days in TRK and 30 days in TEK.

Now think: which one will stake first:
1. 2000TRK block with 9 days age and difficulty 0.4
or
2. 200000TEK block with 30 days age and difficulty 0.0004?

Do not answer, a rhetorical question.

These are two different systems and compare them is wrong. But, in my opinion, the TRK network has become more secure after the PoS reward limitation.

[m33]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

This is due to the difference in networks difficulty and because of the PoS reward/block limit in TRK.

1. TRK network difficulty is currently 0.4, whereas TEK network difficulty is 0.0004.
2. TRK has PoS reward/block limit: 200 TRK per block. Therefore, the recommended size of the blocks here is 2000-3000 coins. TEK hasn't such limitation. Therefore, the TEK block size may be even 200k coins.

Also here diffent min coinages: 9 days in TRK and 30 days in TEK.

Now think: which one will stake first:
1. 2000TRK block with 9 days age and difficulty 0.4
or
2. 200000TEK block with 30 days age and difficulty 0.0004?

Do not answer, a rhetorical question.

These are two different systems and compare them is wrong. But, in my opinion, the TRK network has become more secure after the PoS reward limitation.

but the truck wallet will split the block after stake , correct cause it over the limit size of 220.
that means we must do it manually , and glue the block to larger size?

[*Sakura*]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

This is due to the difference in networks difficulty and because of the PoS reward/block limit in TRK.

1. TRK network difficulty is currently 0.4, whereas TEK network difficulty is 0.0004.
2. TRK has PoS reward/block limit: 200 TRK per block. Therefore, the recommended size of the blocks here is 2000-3000 coins. TEK hasn't such limitation. Therefore, the TEK block size may be even 200k coins.

Also here diffent min coinages: 9 days in TRK and 30 days in TEK.

Now think: which one will stake first:
1. 2000TRK block with 9 days age and difficulty 0.4
or
2. 200000TEK block with 30 days age and difficulty 0.0004?

Do not answer, a rhetorical question.

These are two different systems and compare them is wrong. But, in my opinion, the TRK network has become more secure after the PoS reward limitation.

but the truck wallet will split the block after stake , correct cause it over the limit size of 220.
that means we must do it manually , and glue the block to larger size?

Starting from v.0.9.7 TRK wallet has -splitthreshold option, which allows you to set a splitthreshold. So, do not need to do anything manually. Just set a splitthreshold to 300(once) and enjoy:

New features:

# On Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 20:23:23 GMT a hard fork will occur:
    - PoS reward limit per block will be set to 200 TRK.
.............
# -splitthreshold option - staking engine will not split blocks with size below splitthreshold amount. default 30 , max. 300
    Can be used as command line option or setting in .conf file or can be set in Qt wallet gui in Settings > Options > Main

[m33]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

This is due to the difference in networks difficulty and because of the PoS reward/block limit in TRK.

1. TRK network difficulty is currently 0.4, whereas TEK network difficulty is 0.0004.
2. TRK has PoS reward/block limit: 200 TRK per block. Therefore, the recommended size of the blocks here is 2000-3000 coins. TEK hasn't such limitation. Therefore, the TEK block size may be even 200k coins.

Also here diffent min coinages: 9 days in TRK and 30 days in TEK.

Now think: which one will stake first:
1. 2000TRK block with 9 days age and difficulty 0.4
or
2. 200000TEK block with 30 days age and difficulty 0.0004?

Do not answer, a rhetorical question.

These are two different systems and compare them is wrong. But, in my opinion, the TRK network has become more secure after the PoS reward limitation.

but the truck wallet will split the block after stake , correct cause it over the limit size of 220.
that means we must do it manually , and glue the block to larger size?

Starting from v.0.9.7 TRK wallet has -splitthreshold option, which allows you to set a splitthreshold. So, do not need to do anything manually. Just set a splitthreshold to 300(once) and enjoy:

New features:

# On Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 20:23:23 GMT a hard fork will occur:
    - PoS reward limit per block will be set to 200 TRK.
.............
# -splitthreshold option - staking engine will not split blocks with size below splitthreshold amount. default 30 , max. 300
    Can be used as command line option or setting in .conf file or can be set in Qt wallet gui in Settings > Options > Main

Please see your last post you said 2000 unit block size , which is still over 300, so it would split into 7 blocks or 2?

[m33]

@noise23 , before the above happen my block size was from 180-220. Now I understand why some of my blocks with 25k plus confirms still can't stake , the 300 max you set . Ppl are going round it , I also understand that it can't be control . Changing block size to 1 big block, would I get more coins or it fix like HYP max 1000 coins

[*Sakura*]

@noise23 , may i know why the 2 wallets , trk and tek both done by you . but stake diffently. tek wallet now flawless stakes in mins. but trk still need hours ? thanks for the wonderful work on the tek wallet

This is due to the difference in networks difficulty and because of the PoS reward/block limit in TRK.

1. TRK network difficulty is currently 0.4, whereas TEK network difficulty is 0.0004.
2. TRK has PoS reward/block limit: 200 TRK per block. Therefore, the recommended size of the blocks here is 2000-3000 coins. TEK hasn't such limitation. Therefore, the TEK block size may be even 200k coins.

Also here diffent min coinages: 9 days in TRK and 30 days in TEK.

Now think: which one will stake first:
1. 2000TRK block with 9 days age and difficulty 0.4
or
2. 200000TEK block with 30 days age and difficulty 0.0004?

Do not answer, a rhetorical question.

These are two different systems and compare them is wrong. But, in my opinion, the TRK network has become more secure after the PoS reward limitation.

but the truck wallet will split the block after stake , correct cause it over the limit size of 220.
that means we must do it manually , and glue the block to larger size?

Starting from v.0.9.7 TRK wallet has -splitthreshold option, which allows you to set a splitthreshold. So, do not need to do anything manually. Just set a splitthreshold to 300(once) and enjoy:

New features:

# On Thursday, 18 Dec 2014 20:23:23 GMT a hard fork will occur:
    - PoS reward limit per block will be set to 200 TRK.
.............
# -splitthreshold option - staking engine will not split blocks with size below splitthreshold amount. default 30 , max. 300
    Can be used as command line option or setting in .conf file or can be set in Qt wallet gui in Settings > Options > Main

Please see your last post you said 2000 unit block size , which is still over 300, so it would split into 7 blocks or 2?

No matter what size will your blocks: 100 or 2000. With the current difficulty even the units with 100 coins will catch stake within 30 days. Yes, it takes more than 9 days, but you will get the same percentage per annum. I also have a blocks with 150 coins and they catch stake every 15-20 days.

However, when the network difficulty will increase, it will take longer and blocks will reach the limit of 200 PoS  coins. The same thing is happening with HyperStake right now. This is called an inflation control.
Also, this increases the speed and security of the network. The more small blocks will be involved in the PoS-minting, the higher the difficulty, security and speed of the network.

[noise23]

@noise23 , before the above happen my block size was from 180-220. Now I understand why some of my blocks with 25k plus confirms still can't stake , the 300 max you set . Ppl are going round it , I also understand that it can't be control . Changing block size to 1 big block, would I get more coins or it fix like HYP max 1000 coins

Truckcoin max PoS reward is limited to 200 TRK per block. With current difficulty you have too keep blocks size somewhere below 3k to get a full reward.
If you join all blocks to 1 big block you will hit 200 TRK reward cap.

[apoloo]

good I have 2110 coins in my wallet, my question is this, the reward of the portfolio will be less than or equal to if I have groups of 200 coins and whether to put groups of 200 coins as I do to divide these 2110 coins that I have in groups 200 ??

[noise23]

good I have 2110 coins in my wallet, my question is this, the reward of the portfolio will be less than or equal to if I have groups of 200 coins and whether to put groups of 200 coins as I do to divide these 2110 coins that I have in groups 200 ??

Reward amount will be the same, there is no need to split 2110 coins manually.

[lq2157282]

Nice coin, it always strong

[tevasu]

Totally agree. Decided today to buy another 100,000-200,000 more before truck starts to move up again. I think trk will hit 1000 this year. Maybe more. With bitcoin moving up again and any number of social triggers that could launch a buying frenzy, I want to be sitting on top of a lot of high interest POS coins like trk to maximize my roi.

[Dexter12]

Need help.. using wallet v0.9.8.0 beta and i am stuck on block 213066 for days now and i do not get any connection to the network.. i ve already deleted blk0001.dat, but it didnt help..
Thank you in advance for some instructions to get rid off the problem.

[Lightsplasher]

Need help.. using wallet v0.9.8.0 beta and i am stuck on block 213066 for days now and i do not get any connection to the network.. i ve already deleted blk0001.dat, but it didnt help..
Thank you in advance for some instructions to get rid off the problem.

In general stuff I've tried with coins: You can try restarting the computer and router if you haven't already.  Sometimes even waiting 24 hours can fix problems or toggling on/off uPnP.  Here's my current nodes you can also try adding some with the addnode command in the debug console.  Good luck!

Code:

[
{
"addr" : "108.61.18.91:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425922169,
"lastrecv" : 1425921998,
"conntime" : 1425866210,
"bytessent" : 187194,
"bytesrecv" : 230063,
"blocksrequested" : 17,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 251754,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "69.197.161.122:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425922167,
"lastrecv" : 1425922167,
"conntime" : 1425866242,
"bytessent" : 257798,
"bytesrecv" : 264787,
"blocksrequested" : 17,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 251754,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "104.218.234.124:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425921998,
"lastrecv" : 1425922169,
"conntime" : 1425866292,
"bytessent" : 291545,
"bytesrecv" : 175923,
"blocksrequested" : 17,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 251756,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "199.233.245.36:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425922168,
"lastrecv" : 1425921998,
"conntime" : 1425866637,
"bytessent" : 220317,
"bytesrecv" : 206042,
"blocksrequested" : 16,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 251760,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "104.193.43.106:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425921998,
"lastrecv" : 1425922169,
"conntime" : 1425867980,
"bytessent" : 163267,
"bytesrecv" : 195510,
"blocksrequested" : 17,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 251774,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "98.71.203.162:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425922168,
"lastrecv" : 1425921999,
"conntime" : 1425909644,
"bytessent" : 94071,
"bytesrecv" : 85900,
"blocksrequested" : 3,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 252248,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "62.228.8.254:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425922168,
"lastrecv" : 1425922018,
"conntime" : 1425912199,
"bytessent" : 48572,
"bytesrecv" : 61768,
"blocksrequested" : 2,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 252277,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "84.29.49.102:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425921998,
"lastrecv" : 1425922168,
"conntime" : 1425916734,
"bytessent" : 39193,
"bytesrecv" : 140528,
"blocksrequested" : 0,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 252325,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "189.176.66.38:18775",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1425922235,
"lastrecv" : 1425922235,
"conntime" : 1425921895,
"bytessent" : 2600169,
"bytesrecv" : 3001171,
"blocksrequested" : 16,
"version" : 75002,
"subver" : "/Truckcoin:0.9.8/",
"inbound" : false,
"releasetime" : 0,
"startingheight" : 156568,
"banscore" : 0
}
]