uray
|
|
September 11, 2014, 11:41:33 AM |
|
omagad there are no uray's v1 : we have V1 Dev Official pool V2 Dev Official pool V2 Uray's Pool-1 V2 Uray's Pool-2
|
|
|
|
remulan
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:05:49 PM |
|
2 miners connected to uray should I create different accounts or only different plots as 1st miner (0-100) 2nd (101-200) ? (to avoid situation when 1st miner will looking nonce 110)
you can't have both account at different pool, since you need to choose where your account reward assignment will be but multiple miners on same account is accepted by pool Thank you for answer I mean 2 accounts(wallets) assigned to one pool, and each miner have own plots generated with different account, to avoid confusion from pool
|
|
|
|
tex81
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:06:42 PM |
|
uray, why don`t you set up a simple Prop pool? Deadline 100k would be good there.
|
Russia
|
|
|
THeZoiD
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:07:55 PM |
|
now what I'm getting this exact string of error text. I'm not sure why it's happening. what is your RAM usage? my system use 3 gb out of 4 but im ploting at the same time
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:14:37 PM |
|
This thread became epic
|
|
|
|
|
Sglasio
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:25:49 PM |
|
My story. I have Windows 8 and Radeon R9 280x Vapor-x After install driver 14.4 i has crash driver after start gpuplot run i reinstall at 13.9 and gpuplot working fine, but only in 1024 stagger and has 7000 nonces now i manualy resetup driver on my 7900 (in system managment) gpu driver from 14.4 catalys pack. has more 12000 nonces. and 3072 stagger!!!
|
|
|
|
Imro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:31:44 PM |
|
Not sure what's the problem with me, but this is all I get during mining. http://imgupload.sk/images/4/b/4bw7neq0yfe2sq8rwwso_thumb.jpgYes, I'm generating nonces and mining as well, though I've been doing so all night and there wasn't a single valid share obviously. May there be a problem with my configuration?
|
|
|
|
Sglasio
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:32:51 PM |
|
Not sure what's the problem with me, but this is all I get during mining. Yes, I'm generating nonces and mining as well, though I've been doing so all night and there wasn't a single valid share obviously. May there be a problem with my configuration? i don't know what you mean but you plots not complete... and miner is tell you what plots are incomplete
|
|
|
|
Sglasio
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:35:29 PM |
|
Setting OpenCL step3 kernel static arguments 0.0576701% (10652672/5326848 nonces), 8299.71 nonces/minutes... 0.11534% (10655744/5326848 nonces), 10400.3 nonces/minutes... 0.17301% (10658816/5326848 nonces), 11357.2 nonces/minutes... 0.230681% (10661888/5326848 nonces), 11893.5 nonces/minutes... 0.288351% (10664960/5326848 nonces), 12215.5 nonces/minutes... 0.346021% (10668032/5326848 nonces), 12467.4 nonces/minutes... 0.403691% (10671104/5326848 nonces), 12626.9 nonces/minutes... 0.461361% (10674176/5326848 nonces), 12742.9 nonces/minutes... 0.519031% (10677248/5326848 nonces), 12851.2 nonces/minutes... 0.576701% (10680320/5326848 nonces), 12947.5 nonces/minutes... 0.634371% (10683392/5326848 nonces), 13030.8 nonces/minutes... 0.692042% (10686464/5326848 nonces), 13093.8 nonces/minutes... 0.749712% (10689536/5326848 nonces), 13161.1 nonces/minutes... 0.807382% (10692608/5326848 nonces), 13223.1 nonces/minutes... 0.865052% (10695680/5326848 nonces), 13281.6 nonces/minutes... 0.922722% (10698752/5326848 nonces), 13347.3 nonces/minutes... 0.980392% (10701824/5326848 nonces), 13393.2 nonces/minutes... 1.03806% (10704896/5326848 nonces), 13444.7 nonces/minutes... 1.09573% (10707968/5326848 nonces), 13473.2 nonces/minutes... 1.1534% (10711040/5326848 nonces), 13509.5 nonces/minutes... 1.21107% (10714112/5326848 nonces), 13537.3 nonces/minutes... 1.26874% (10717184/5326848 nonces), 13566 nonces/minutes... gpuplotgenerator generate 0 0 G:\plots blablabla 10649600 5324800 3072 128 1024 r9 280x
|
|
|
|
LivsUA
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:36:17 PM |
|
Not sure what's the problem with me, but this is all I get during mining. Yes, I'm generating nonces and mining as well, though I've been doing so all night and there wasn't a single valid share obviously. May there be a problem with my configuration? i don't know what you mean but you plots not complete... and miner is tell you what plots are incomplete Its because your plots are not generated fully, -- > its show this errror reading file.. and "no valid share" means that you dont have shares to submit. Its normal for those who dont have 50 TB of plots.. Try to use this pools: http://burst-pool.cryptoport.io/http://burst-pool2.cryptoport.io/
|
|
|
|
Matt9301
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1009
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:39:05 PM |
|
Not sure what's the problem with me, but this is all I get during mining. Yes, I'm generating nonces and mining as well, though I've been doing so all night and there wasn't a single valid share obviously. May there be a problem with my configuration? You'll have problems with overplotting with those plots.. The second one need to start from 600001 not from 17000..
|
|
|
|
bipben
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:40:12 PM |
|
Uray is it networking problem or serwe hardware load ? Or maybe ddos ? Can you limit max miners manually ?
its hashing problem, its heavy to check nonce submission to produce deadline value, when new block is announced, all miners at the same time submit their nonce to pool, then pool need to check their nonce one by one, some miner will say its submission error while they are waiting for deadline result, but actually the deadline is submitted but more than 15 seconds later Does your pool servers have one or more available GPUs? Nonce submission check could be hardware accelerated. I can work on that part if you want.
|
Burst: BURST-YA29-QCEW-QXC3-BKXDL
|
|
|
marcus556
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:43:18 PM |
|
Mined about 7.2 TB on two PCs with Dedicated GPU (R9 290) so a total of 14.4 TB. In average of 14K Burst per day so it is about 0.0497 BTC per day at 0.00000355 BTC rate. Plotting will continue until 37 TB (8 HDD combined) should be another 1-2 days to complete. POC is FREE money I have an R9 290 and cant seem to get it to work. When i run the plotter it doesnt even recognize my GPU and i have tried multiple drivers as well
|
|
|
|
pimytron
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:43:29 PM |
|
gpuPlotGenerator.exe generate <platform> <deviceID> <plot_folder_location> <starting_nonce> <number_of_plots> <stagger_size(size of vram, ie 3GB=3072)> <threads(64,128 or 256)> <hashes(1 to 8160)>
What affects the parameter <hashes> in generating plots? And it affects the mined?
|
|
|
|
jzhoulon
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:43:52 PM |
|
Not sure what's the problem with me, but this is all I get during mining. Yes, I'm generating nonces and mining as well, though I've been doing so all night and there wasn't a single valid share obviously. May there be a problem with my configuration? You'll have problems with overplotting with those plots.. The second one need to start from 600001 not from 17000.. yes, the second plot need to be delete and replot, or you will be regret if you continue plot this file, and these error message are fine, don't worry about it, it will work fine.
|
|
|
|
fudge
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:45:31 PM Last edit: September 11, 2014, 12:57:49 PM by fudge |
|
Cкaжитe, кaкaя кoммaнднaя cтpoкa лyчшe бyдeт для R9 280x ?
Toжe интepecyeт ! For 7970: gpuPlotGenerator.exe generate <id> <start> <number> 4096 128 8169 ~11000 n/m Catalyst 14.4 App SDK 2.9.1
|
Haшa гpyшa нaйpoзкopчyмaкyвaтiшa!
|
|
|
Avaahnaa
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:47:32 PM |
|
Mined about 7.2 TB on two PCs with Dedicated GPU (R9 290) so a total of 14.4 TB. In average of 14K Burst per day so it is about 0.0497 BTC per day at 0.00000355 BTC rate. Plotting will continue until 37 TB (8 HDD combined) should be another 1-2 days to complete. POC is FREE money I have an R9 290 and cant seem to get it to work. When i run the plotter it doesnt even recognize my GPU and i have tried multiple drivers as well Post your .bat
|
|
|
|
bipben
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 11, 2014, 12:49:27 PM |
|
Thanks Bipben for the GPU generator and your hard work! I've gone ahead and doubled your burst wallet balance for you. Wow! Thanks a lot for your support I will continue to enhance the plot generator. The next version will be centered on performance. Some people pointed out that it would be great to be able to split the work between many graphic cards. I will add this feature to the roadmap. v.2.0.0 seems solid, thanks.... Also, could you explain the relationship of the stagger size/hashes ratio? It was kind of vague to understand it. There is no relationship between the two. The <staggerSize> parameter is used to order the scoops into the resulting plots file. The greater the stagger, the more RAM will be required to generate the nonces. The <hashesSize> parameter is a value between 1 and 8160 used to split the step2 global work in chunks. Those chunks of workload are then queued to your graphic card one after another. Example : ./gpuPlotGenerator 0 0 <path> <address> 0 100 10 64 400 -> Creating generation buffer ((PLOT_SIZE + 16) * staggerSize) -> Creating result buffer (PLOT_SIZE * staggerSize) -----> Generating 10 (staggerSize) nonces (from 0 to 9) -> Step1: Buffer initialisation spread on <threadsNumber=64> threads -> Step2: -> Computing 400 hashes spread on <threadsNumber=64> threads (from 0 to 399) -> Computing 400 hashes spread on <threadsNumber=64> threads (from 400 to 799) -> ... -> Step3: reordering scoops : moving them from the generation buffer to the result buffer -> Writing nonces to disk -----> Generating 10 (staggerSize) nonces (from 10 to 19) ... and so on
As you can see, without the reordering process, we should be able to reduce the amount of memory needed by the plot generation (or at least scaling it as we want without any impact in the mining) and greatly enhance its parallelization. Postponing this step could greatly improve the whole generation process but will increased I/O operations. I will make different versions to test some ideas on that matter. Also, I will try to lighten has much as possible the step2 kernel processing to increase the nonces/minutes.
|
Burst: BURST-YA29-QCEW-QXC3-BKXDL
|
|
|
Crescendoo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
September 11, 2014, 01:02:08 PM |
|
omagad there are no uray's v1 : we have V1 Dev Official pool V2 Dev Official pool V2 Uray's Pool-1 V2 Uray's Pool-2 lol right, sorry. Which one gives stable payouts ? Would you guys suggest me stop plotting v1 official ? There are delays with payouts so i wonder is this pool gonna die or smth
|
|
|
|
|