[ANN][SUPERCOIN] Unique Most Advanced Anonymous Trustless Multisig Technology

[supercoindev]

It's good that dev will release the code, so supercoin goes back to the open source based coin. What worries me is that lacking of a qualified dev will not help supercoin in a lead position. Other hype coins can easily copy the code and sell their "stories". Only with a strong dev who is capable of taking over can keep the leading edge of the supercoin. I don't see any now. If none, then what's the point to release the code to other coins?? better keep the code secret.

I guess that is why the dev did so in the first place. Maybe the dev should not release the code until a new, preferably full-time developer/team takes over.

Or, the old team could step back up and take Super to the moon

Let's face it, the original devs are the most qualified to maintain & continue to develop the technology. The issue has always been lack of public awareness and refusal to accept options that bring more attention to Super.

On a positive note: The wallet is staking like crazy(I'm getting 30 Super per hour) and currently showing 7 anonymous nodes available for SuperSend anon transactions.

Well believe me, if I had time to continue developing, I would do it. No one has more affection to the coin, as I am the one who spent most time on this coin, not spent the time to talk, but countless hours to design and code and test the coin. But unfortunately I have my work and my responsibilities. So I can not continue developing the coin.

What I want:
1. make supercoin back to open source based coin
2. hope some qualified people from community can take over the code

As some people expressed the concerns about other coins copy-paste the code, I share the same concerns, that's why I did not publish yet the code.  I am in a dilemma now. If no qualified people to take-over, the publication of code will do no good to supercoin, but I also want the supercoin be open source, so community can maintain and develop the code.

So this is my decision:
a. I won't publish the code until community have someone qualified to take over the code.
b. If there's a qualified person (need to have a track record), I will send him the code 1 week before I make it publicly in git.

[Ticked]

It's good that dev will release the code, so supercoin goes back to the open source based coin. What worries me is that lacking of a qualified dev will not help supercoin in a lead position. Other hype coins can easily copy the code and sell their "stories". Only with a strong dev who is capable of taking over can keep the leading edge of the supercoin. I don't see any now. If none, then what's the point to release the code to other coins?? better keep the code secret.

I guess that is why the dev did so in the first place. Maybe the dev should not release the code until a new, preferably full-time developer/team takes over.

Or, the old team could step back up and take Super to the moon

Let's face it, the original devs are the most qualified to maintain & continue to develop the technology. The issue has always been lack of public awareness and refusal to accept options that bring more attention to Super.

On a positive note: The wallet is staking like crazy(I'm getting 30 Super per hour) and currently showing 7 anonymous nodes available for SuperSend anon transactions.

Well believe me, if I had time to continue developing, I would do it. No one has more affection to the coin, as I am the one who spent most time on this coin, not spent the time to talk, but countless hours to design and code and test the coin. But unfortunately I have my work and my responsibilities. So I can not continue developing the coin.

What I want:
1. make supercoin back to open source based coin
2. hope some qualified people from community can take over the code

As some people expressed the concerns about other coins copy-paste the code, I share the same concerns, that's why I did not publish yet the code.  I am in a dilemma now. If no qualified people to take-over, the publication of code will do no good to supercoin, but I also want the supercoin be open source, so community can maintain and develop the code.

So this is my decision:
a. I won't publish the code until community have someone qualified to take over the code.
b. If there's a qualified person (need to have a track record), I will send him the code 1 week before I make it publicly in git.

Tweet, Troll, or wholeheartedly inquire...spread the word crew, we're officially in search of a new dev. I wonder if the Open Bazaar guys would be interested...

Though, I would much rather supercoindev + new management team to take the coin to the next level. Dev, played out right, you may not be interested in your current job

[johnwest]

exciting times, im here to stay and building up my stack! =)

I am also waiting for developer force the source code and some talented developer takeover.

[erep]

We have again Nomad pic, who mostly time just post pic for supercoin,
but these pic don't impact on any investor or price of supercoin.

[nomad13666]

We have again Nomad pic, who mostly time just post pic for supercoin,
but these pic don't impact on any investor or price of supercoin.

I think I can see your point.

You should comb your hair over it or put a hat on.

[Fierce]

Somebody please find a dev team that can take this coin to the next level. The coin deserves to be at a higher value than darkcoin. How can I take over the official social media to promote the coin?

[rudarSRB]

Somebody please find a dev team that can take this coin to the next level.

How is that possible when nobody else is competent enough? 

[abel1337]

I know C programming and I am sure I can find people here at my university in Orlando that would love to help out the development of this coin

[remistevens]

Great news!  Hopefully someone suitable is found soon.

If the price goes up its easy to make it profitable for the original devs and convince them to commit to the project again. No doubt they're the most qualified.

[iram3130]

Somebody please find a dev team that can take this coin to the next level.

How is that possible when nobody else is competent enough? 

Very true, Supercoin developer don't think anyone are competent enough to take over this coin.

[HappyHogan]

Somebody please find a dev team that can take this coin to the next level.

How is that possible when nobody else is competent enough? 

Very true, Supercoin developer don't think anyone are competent enough to take over this coin.

Crypto is a fucking nightmare, every stinking day....

[Grgechkapitalac]

Sometimes it is.

[HappyHogan]

Sometimes it is.

Dante's 10th circle of hell.

[Fierce]

Who is taking over this coin? Is there a capable person that can gather a dev team and get the code from the orig devs

[RCan06]

Hey guys,

So I think we need to get the word out there that we ARE looking for a new dev. Right now 95% of people in the crypto-world aren't aware of Supercoins predicament.

Obviously the new dev needs to be competent and able to lead the coin. There are Devs out there that are capable, but we either don't know of them, or they don't know of us. I think a problem is that Devs we would consider capable are busy with their own projects. So basically we would need to find a dev that is able to put the majority of his time into SUPER, and not see it as a side project.

Perhaps we should get the word out there as best as we can, and hopefully someone will come to us, and then we can discuss his credentials and why he feels he can Dev the coin. I don't think we will find anyone if we pick and choose 1 or 2 potential devs a month, and they are busy with projects.

Maybe Supercoin twitter can tweet that we are accepting applications for new developer to take over coin, and if interested he(or she, who knows..) should come to this thread and discuss with us. Right now we will be at a stalemate until we find someone!

[Fierce]

nobody seems to know how to get on the twitter and facebook, i have left them messages and gotten no response. It also reflects bad on the coin because it looks like the coin is dead if there is no activity in social media

[pak]

No news yet?
We need a new professional dev!
Source available from old pro dev.

[Fierce]

does anyone know how sync two wallet addresses together? I have 2 addresses in my wallet, I receive pos coins in both but I want to consolidate them so I can increase my rank on the rich list. Is this possible and should I do this?

[supercointeam]

It's good that dev will release the code, so supercoin goes back to the open source based coin. What worries me is that lacking of a qualified dev will not help supercoin in a lead position. Other hype coins can easily copy the code and sell their "stories". Only with a strong dev who is capable of taking over can keep the leading edge of the supercoin. I don't see any now. If none, then what's the point to release the code to other coins?? better keep the code secret.

I guess that is why the dev did so in the first place. Maybe the dev should not release the code until a new, preferably full-time developer/team takes over.

Or, the old team could step back up and take Super to the moon

Let's face it, the original devs are the most qualified to maintain & continue to develop the technology. The issue has always been lack of public awareness and refusal to accept options that bring more attention to Super.

On a positive note: The wallet is staking like crazy(I'm getting 30 Super per hour) and currently showing 7 anonymous nodes available for SuperSend anon transactions.

Well believe me, if I had time to continue developing, I would do it. No one has more affection to the coin, as I am the one who spent most time on this coin, not spent the time to talk, but countless hours to design and code and test the coin. But unfortunately I have my work and my responsibilities. So I can not continue developing the coin.

What I want:
1. make supercoin back to open source based coin
2. hope some qualified people from community can take over the code

As some people expressed the concerns about other coins copy-paste the code, I share the same concerns, that's why I did not publish yet the code.  I am in a dilemma now. If no qualified people to take-over, the publication of code will do no good to supercoin, but I also want the supercoin be open source, so community can maintain and develop the code.

So this is my decision:
a. I won't publish the code until community have someone qualified to take over the code.
b. If there's a qualified person (need to have a track record), I will send him the code 1 week before I make it publicly in git.

+1

[*Sakura*]

Just bought 21k on trex. It is my support for the nice coin.