Scientific proof that God exists?

[bl4kjaguar]

Is that post supposed to be a joke? Would you message me in private with such questions?

It's not a joke at all.  I find you very hypocritical.  You ask that others try your god, but you won't even try sodomy.  You ask that others read your bible, but have you read the FSM scripture?

How is my mind closed if I have read your noodly book? That book was once my reference point for truth.

I never asked that anyone read my bible or try my God, so you cannot claim that I am a hypocrite, period.

[1715285825]

1715285825

[1715285825]

1715285825

[1715285825]

1715285825

[Vod]

I never asked that anyone read my bible or try my God, so you cannot claim that I am a hypocrite, period.

Of course you are a hypocrite.

You don't even follow your own god's commandments.   

Open and shut, period.

[X7]

I never asked that anyone read my bible or try my God, so you cannot claim that I am a hypocrite, period.

Of course you are a hypocrite.

You don't even follow your own god's commandments.   

Open and shut, period.

lol Vod well if you genuinely believe in a flying spaghetti monster that is your right - If you are being facetious then maybe it is worth examining the reasons why.

[Cortex7]

"do as I say, not as I do".   

Yes, this is an axiomatic point, very relevant to talk of "god".

All religions are created to establish a hierarchical structure.

[cryptodevil]

This thread is just another depressing example of the sheer magnitude of human ignorance, particularly that which is wilful.

[BADecker]

This thread is just another depressing example of the sheer magnitude of human ignorance, particularly that which is wilful.

Way stronger than anything else. In fact science is the weakest with all their "if"s.

[X7]

I don't subscribe to religion per say.. Just try to live life as lovingly as possible.
Also try to establish an emotional connection to whatever force or creator is out there, to better understand it.

[BADecker]

"do as I say, not as I do".   

Yes, this is an axiomatic point, very relevant to talk of "god".

All religions are created to establish a hierarchical structure.

"Hierarchical structure" is the way everything works. Think of how your body would function if there wasn't the hierarchical structure of your brain ruling over it. In fact, you'd be dead without hierarchical structure.

[cryptodevil]

Way stronger than anything else. In fact science is the weakest with all their "if"s.

Jesus fucking Christ, well done, another epic example of just how poisonous religion is, you are so far gone you cannot even see the absurdity of your statements.

Science: We don't have enough data yet to explain [insert subject here] fully.
You: Haha, science fail! Old men in silly hats have given me the answers to everything and I believe them because, well, they tell me God told them, so it must be true. I can haz all the answers!

[BADecker]

Way stronger than anything else. In fact science is the weakest with all their "if"s.

Jesus fucking Christ, well done, another epic example of just how poisonous religion is, you are so far gone you cannot even see the absurdity of your statements.

Science: We don't have enough data yet to explain [insert subject here] fully.
You: Haha, science fail! Old men in silly hats have given me the answers to everything and I believe them because, well, they tell me God told them, so it must be true. I can haz all the answers!

Poor baby. You're losing it. Take hold, man, and come to your senses before it is too late for you.

[cryptodevil]

Ooh, snappy comeback. You sure showed me.

[BADecker]

I did? You're so easy.   

[BADecker]

Ooh, snappy comeback. You sure showed me.

What's the matter? Don't you have a comeback that makes sense?

[cryptodevil]

Yeah, I especially like the part where you countered the facts laid before you about your precious Bible falling short on the whole 'word of god' shtick.

Henry VIII decides he wants to get divorced, voila! goodbye RC, say hello to the "Church of England", now, who do I have to behead to get a CofE Bible thrown together?

[BADecker]

Yeah, I especially like the part where you countered the facts laid before you about your precious Bible falling short on the whole 'word of god' shtick.

Henry VIII decides he wants to get divorced, voila! goodbye RC, say hello to the "Church of England", now, who do I have to behead to get a CofE Bible thrown together?

Just as I figured. You don't have anything else. So you go and pick on the failings of a human being. So, do you really think that your perfection is good enough?

[YanTheMan]

And as with all online discussions about religion, it ends with irrational flaming and potshots

[cryptodevil]

How dull, you are simply resorting to your usual dishonest response of asking a question about something else when faced with a fact you don't like.

[BADecker]

And as with all online discussions about religion, it ends with irrational flaming and potshots

Oh, we're just having fun.   

[the joint]

Yeah, I especially like the part where you countered the facts laid before you about your precious Bible falling short on the whole 'word of god' shtick.

Henry VIII decides he wants to get divorced, voila! goodbye RC, say hello to the "Church of England", now, who do I have to behead to get a CofE Bible thrown together?

Just as I figured. You don't have anything else. So you go and pick on the failings of a human being. So, do you really think that your perfection is good enough?

...Says he who claims science is "weakest" and then provides absolutely no reasoning behind the statement whatsoever.  It appears you're the one who has nothing else aside from two tactics:  1) Keep saying the Bible is right, and 2) attack people when they call you out on your bogus thinking.

Care to provide justification for your statements?  I remember how you completely failed to create a deductive argument for claims homosexuality is "bad" and "unnatural" even when I created a template for you.

Care to try again?

Premise 1: Insert here
Premise 2: Insert here
Premises 3, 4, etc.: Insert here
Therefore:  Science is the weakest with all of its "ifs"

There you go, sport. There's the template, all you need to do is fill in the premises to reach your conclusion.  If you succeed, I (and I'm sure many others) will concede to a superior argument.

Make my day

[BADecker]

How dull, you are simply resorting to your usual dishonest response of asking a question about something else when faced with a fact you don't like.

Well, you don't care about the facts. If you did, you'd become Christian.