Scientific proof that God exists?

[bl4kjaguar]

dream up more ways to attempt to humiliate me?

You are doing a great job of that all by yourself.

You prefer the Bible to a book actually written by Christ?

Then you reject the teachings of Christ.

Just like your friend BADecker.

No words can change this because it is pure deductive truth.

Just how are you going to prove that Christ's teachings are inferior to the Bible's teachings?

You place your book on such a pedestal that you reject Christ's authentic teachings. 

[1714672404]

1714672404

[1714672404]

1714672404

[1714672404]

1714672404

[BADecker]

dream up more ways to attempt to humiliate me?

You are doing a great job of that all by yourself.

You prefer the Bible to a book actually written by Christ?

Then you reject the teachings of Christ.

Just like your friend BADecker.

No words can change this because it is pure deductive truth.

Just how are you going to prove that Christ's teachings are inferior to the Bible's teachings?

You place your book on such a pedestal that you reject Christ's authentic teachings. 

Hi, blackjag. Nice to hear from you again. 

[Decksperiment]

BADecker.. you really expect me to read your pish, when after all that copy/pasting, you still have'nt answered a single fuckin question.. fuck off ya pussy, I have done all I need to here.. you epic fuckin arsehole.. You are now on perm ignore..ya fuckin shitbag.. copy and paste that ya twat.. feel sorry for ya? Nah.. it's one thing to be a jobby jabber, but to spout it out the wrong end say's it all for who you are.. copy and paste that ya wanker.. Fuck off and die.

Tonight I shall stop using this thread, but will put together a final post that will explain the scientific proof of god beyond resonable doubt, but I just got a call to do some wardrivin on a hacker.. bring em down!!

[bl4kjaguar]

You place your book on such a pedestal that you reject Christ's authentic teachings. 

Hi, blackjag. Nice to hear from you again. 

I only wish that I could hear from you too, my non-Christian brother. Christ's teachings call out to you, but you favor the teachings set forth by man.

Stay thirsty for the truth. 

[Cortex7]

[Decksperiment]

Ah, last time I saw three TITs in one place, was the arnold swarzenegger movie on mars...

[Decksperiment]

A true statement.. kindly remind yourself of the four who have continued from the beginning, (you included) to slander the truth bearer.. because tonights final post will make a laughin stock of y'all.. not the rest of the readers, but those to whom I mean.

[(oYo)]

A true statement.. kindly remind yourself of the four who have continued from the beginning, (you included) to slander the truth bearer.. because tonights final post will make a laughin stock of y'all.. not the rest of the readers, but those to whom I mean.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgSPaXgAdzE

[Decksperiment]

Vod/Oyo, YOu are proven to be using multiple accounts, and as syuch, are proven scammers, luagh all you want, but you two TITS are now on the ignore list. I hope other bitcointalk members see how I figured out our scam, for ou two TITS are so stupid, you just cant smell the fish comin out your mouth.. you are now costing bitcointalk.org's banning all over the world as entire continents do address blocking in blocks. Just to bann ou two TITS!!!!

[Decksperiment]

To finalise my proof that all I have shown is from the bible:

The first time I mentioned the magic squares, I showed the maths that is mentioned in the bible, when whoever it was, said "let he who hath understanding, reckon the number of the beast" - I did exactly that, missing out but one factor, although I left a hint re: joining the dots. Spoonfeeding is not my cup of tea. It's one thing to know the magic squares, another to join the dots, in particular, which dots to join. That is for those interested to find out. If your supposed to know, when the time is right, you will find what I typed. If not what I typed, then you'd find the watered down masonic versions splattered all over the web.. None of these scource's however, will tell you to join the dots. For then you gain a power they are not allowed to speak of. I AM, because I AM not obligated to anyone. These are not my secrets to keep. Notice how the losers throw their tantrums because they do not like this fact? I Love it.

The second time I entertained the maths was to show the scource of these magic squares.. type SATOR square in google, and open your eye's. This is why I brought in the pyramids, for this was how I found them myself. After reading the first edition of T.I.R.O ( True and invisible Rosicrucian Order - 1927) All fell into place.. thanks to discovering that TARO cards are the oldest book known to man. They have lasted longer than any book. And always will.

Then, to disprove the bible's age, I decided, ok, no holds barred, they wanna make me look like a fool, I'll put all my cards on the table, so posted the passwords to the first three degree's of freemasonry, an important step, for as mentioned in this thread, all masonic passwords are derived from the bible. Now as I also stated, freemasonry claims to have held the first right of initiation in the pyramid 64000 years ago, the rite's in particular, are the rite's of mithras, which involved child sacrifice to the god BAAL, or to you, the egyptain devil. Proving the events concerning jesus are a load of croc, for the name they use in place of jesus is Hiram Abiff, and why they will never say the name jesus in or out of church. For them to use his name is blasphemy. But marvelous in their eye's..

Then I thought, before we can actually prove scientific proof of god, surely we need to first prove spirituality? I mean, what's the point of claiming you believe if you know nothing of the spiritual? So I posted the spiritual equation, which again I stated is built into every building we see, in particular, buildings with religious connections. So how does this fit in with the twin tower's? Because it was my plan. Lol, seriously, because I knew the maths as soon as I heard what was to be built in place of the origionals.. sometimes 1 + 1 does equal 1 (new one). Walk into any church and ask to see the holy of hollies. This is a symbol of the 216 digit number representing the word, which word I have yet to figure out, but try this: Hebrews have 72 names for this god, (found in tarot, count the cards ), and the mathematical interpretation is approx 216 digits. Freemasonry's first initiation's claim they are looking for a word, in praticular, a word last held by HIRAM ABIFF, the masonic remix of Jesus. He was killed by the three ruffians, or three wise men of the bible.. take your pick.. same story over and over. NOw you know why freemasons will NOT acknowledge Jesus. They have no right to sit in church, but BADecker dont mind I do mind.
 
Now a wise hacker would look for all the evidence throughout the thread, and peice it together to find using google, the plethora of evidence all over the world, that proves I have told the truth, the whole truth, and nothing BUT the truth.

Thanks to God. Do I look like I need saved?

Watch bitcointalk die. Thanks to vod, and oyo.. tata..

[(oYo)]

^^ Were you dropped on your head as an infant or just born stupid? ^^

[bl4kjaguar]

There is almost zero open debate in this thread, only opinions and ignorance.

All are encouraged to debate the things that I have posted in this thread, because so far they have NOT been openly discussed. Here are some of the things I posted:

aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml
first case....... chessplaying ghosts

Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.

Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?

Like domesticated plants and animals, humans stand well outside the classic Darwinian paradigm. Darwin himself made the observation that humans were surprisingly like domesticated animals.

What about the scientific anomalies that Darwinists, Creationists and Intelligent Design proponents alike are unable to explain?

Evidence for Creation by Outside Intervention

[Cortex7]

There is almost zero open debate in this thread, only opinions and ignorance.

All are encouraged to debate the things that I have posted in this thread, because so far they have NOT been openly discussed. Here are some of the things I posted:

aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml
first case....... chessplaying ghosts

Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.

Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?

Like domesticated plants and animals, humans stand well outside the classic Darwinian paradigm. Darwin himself made the observation that humans were surprisingly like domesticated animals.

What about the scientific anomalies that Darwinists, Creationists and Intelligent Design proponents alike are unable to explain?

Evidence for Creation by Outside Intervention

OK,

Opinions and ignorance are all that we all have I'm afraid, that may hurt your ego but it's the full truth.

Here's my opinion:

Domestication is a subset of evolution it is NOT mutually exclusive to it.

The point buried deep within one of the the texts you linked to is:

THE EMERGENCE OF DOMESTICATED ANIMALS

...we face the problem of trying to imagine those first herdsmen with enough vision to imagine a "final model", to start the breeding process during their own lifetimes and to have it carried out over centuries until the final model was achieved...

No vision was needed, the final model itself evolved:

The animals were already breeding fine in nature. The herdsmen then had to hunt them down, expending energy and time to do so.

As soon as human brain thought "if I could stop these animals running away it would be easier." ... it began ...

This thought may have first been acted upon by using nets or portable fences made of sticks bound together.

A farm is just a permanent large net around an animal.

Thoughts and ideas are just information, this is memetic information and it propogates and evolves over generations in a very similar fashion to genetic information.

Perhaps the first "farm" was a geographically quite contained area where animals came for water. A place that could be closed in with only a modest fence or wall. The herdsmen could fence a herd or animals in that area and then just supply food into the area or if the area were big enough with a water source flowing through it then it may have even been a perfect few acres of self replenishing hunting ground, where animals could be corralled to the edges in order to catch, kill and then eat.

A domesticated animal is still operating within evolution, be it a domesticated cat or ape (human).

Even if humans gain complete understanding and control of the genome then we have not stepped outside of evolution, the only way a species can leave the evolutionary game is by going extinct.

You see it's fun to speculate on possible mechanisms to fill in the gaps, rather than saying.... DUH! GOD DID IT!

[Cortex7]

I am happy to debate with you BlackJaguar, but you only need to post links if I ask you for them, I would prefer it if you could distill the salient points of any texts into easy reading posts, it will speed things up that way.

[Cortex7]

A true statement.. kindly remind yourself of the four who have continued from the beginning, (you included) to slander the truth bearer.. because tonights final post will make a laughin stock of y'all.. not the rest of the readers, but those to whom I mean.

But I'm the truth bearer!

[cooldgamer]

There is almost zero open debate in this thread, only opinions and ignorance.

All are encouraged to debate the things that I have posted in this thread, because so far they have NOT been openly discussed. Here are some of the things I posted:

aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml
first case....... chessplaying ghosts

Yes. Correspondence with the dead proven by Prof. Eisenbeiss.

Who from the non-god position will correlate the simplest explanation with the observations?

Like domesticated plants and animals, humans stand well outside the classic Darwinian paradigm. Darwin himself made the observation that humans were surprisingly like domesticated animals.

What about the scientific anomalies that Darwinists, Creationists and Intelligent Design proponents alike are unable to explain?

Evidence for Creation by Outside Intervention

Do you realize who you're citing as a credible source?  This guy is a fucking lunatic, not even going to bother reading that wall of text.  http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Lloyd_Pye

I got a WOT warning just trying to go to that site, that says something

[bl4kjaguar]

Opinions and ignorance are all that we all have I'm afraid, that may hurt your ego but it's the full truth.

There are many points in that article; you would do well to address all of them if you want a well-substantiated opinion. Of course, you are free to speculate, but don't try to pass that off as "the full truth". Speak for yourself. Opinions and ignorance is all that YOU have...

[bl4kjaguar]

In comes cooldgamer with... ignorance

I got a WOT warning just trying to go to that site, that says something

The whale.to site is controversial, that is for sure.

You can read Pye's article elsewhere, like here.

If something is indeed a "proof" then it shouldn't matter the source.  Especially in the case of abstract proofs, there is often a verifiable "best" answer which cannot be possibly be improved.  If the source needs to be called into question, then it is either not actually proof at all, or the proof has been misunderstood.

[bl4kjaguar]

I am happy to debate with you BlackJaguar, but you only need to post links if I ask you for them, I would prefer it if you could distill the salient points of any texts into easy reading posts, it will speed things up that way.

I am happy to post the truth here (in full) and let truth-seekers investigate for themselves.

Students have to ask good questions, teachers only need to show the path.

You may debate with me but I prefer that you ask good questions and read it ALL so that you can judge in wisdom of knowledge.

[BADecker]

Ah, last time I saw three TITs in one place, was the arnold swarzenegger movie on mars...

And before that there was Francisco Scaramanga (Christopher Lee) in Ian Fleming's The Man with the Golden Gun, along with James Bond (Roger Moore) who donned an extra tit temporarily, just to make his way through the bad guys' world.