Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2016, 10:43:41 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Poll
Question: ...
. - 0 (0%)
.. - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 0

Pages: « 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 [107] 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Gigamining / Teramining  (Read 201685 times)
ashitaka
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31



View Profile
April 02, 2013, 11:05:05 PM
 #2121

Has anybody sold his shares to another user privately with success? I have 85 shares and want to do it, I really don't want to make that verification process  Sad

Wouldn't be very smart to say this in public, would it? Wink

Sounds logical
So I'll correct myself, I don`t have 184 shares that I'm not willing to sell them so someone that has already verified himself. Don't PM me
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
April 02, 2013, 11:09:43 PM
 #2122

Has anybody sold his shares to another user privately with success? I have 85 shares and want to do it, I really don't want to make that verification process  Sad

Wouldn't be very smart to say this in public, would it? Wink

Sounds logical
So I'll correct myself, I don`t have 184 shares that I'm not willing to sell them so someone that has already verified himself. Don't PM me

Amazing how there is only 1 person with 184 contracts.  Tongue

Please use the official claims process to have your claim verified and paid.
randomguy7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528


View Profile
April 02, 2013, 11:12:31 PM
 #2123

Has anybody sold his shares to another user privately with success? I have 85 shares and want to do it, I really don't want to make that verification process  Sad

Wouldn't be very smart to say this in public, would it? Wink

Sounds logical
So I'll correct myself, I don`t have 184 shares that I'm not willing to sell them so someone that has already verified himself. Don't PM me

Amazing how there is only 1 person with 184 contracts.  Tongue

Please use the official claims process to have your claim verified and paid.

How should this matter? You won't know if it's ashitaka who made the claim or somebody else.
randomguy7
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 528


View Profile
April 02, 2013, 11:13:57 PM
 #2124

Btw, gigavps, maybe I missed it but is there any news regarding the claims process and the FinCEN news?
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
April 02, 2013, 11:17:12 PM
 #2125

Btw, gigavps, maybe I missed it but is there any news regarding the claims process and the FinCEN news?

VPS is reviewing the FINCEN guidelines with our attorneys.
herzmeister
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764



View Profile WWW
April 03, 2013, 12:22:07 AM
 #2126

with our attorneys.

...who won't put themselves out of business of course  Cheesy

https://localbitcoins.com/?ch=80k | BTC: 1LJvmd1iLi199eY7EVKtNQRW3LqZi8ZmmB
boonies4u
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826



View Profile
April 03, 2013, 02:17:11 AM
 #2127

Has anybody sold his shares to another user privately with success? I have 85 shares and want to do it, I really don't want to make that verification process  Sad

Wouldn't be very smart to say this in public, would it? Wink

Sounds logical
So I'll correct myself, I don`t have 184 shares that I'm not willing to sell them so someone that has already verified himself. Don't PM me


Amazing how there is only 1 person with 184 contracts.  Tongue

Please use the official claims process to have your claim verified and paid.

How should this matter? You won't know if it's ashitaka who made the claim or somebody else.

It doesn't matter! Giga can't tell people they can have someone else claim their contracts, but there's nothing stopping you from doing this privately. The only way he will know if that you do this is if he already had your private information and/or one of the parties announces it publicly.

Do I really have to be so blunt?
Naelr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231


View Profile WWW
April 04, 2013, 01:28:43 PM
 #2128

I still don't understand why this is so difficult.  James knows via payout address who has his contracts.  If 2 parties agree on a price and through the blockchain we pay in BTC.  James will know who it came from and who it went too and he can transfer the contracts to the buying party.  The party that is unable/unwilling to go through the claims process is satisfied, the person buying the claims is satisfied and james keeps his name on the positive side of this whole GLBSE shitstorm we are all caught up in.  No different then what we were doing on GLBSE just an extra step.  I can only see 2 reasons James doesn't agree to this.

1. Some legal mumbo jumbo.

2. He stands to make more BTC by keeping the unclaimed contracts for himself.

I really hope it is the former and not the latter.  We see the writing on the wall and know what kind of BTC he is bringing in right now.  I would hope he would want to do the right thing.

How bout it James at least an answer as to why you choose not to try to do something.  I have posted this very scenario before.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=75802.msg1606524#msg1606524

Naelr

Join me in hosted mining.  And always use 2 Factor Auth whenever possible.
CEX.IO hosting mining
jamesg
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


AKA: gigavps


View Profile
April 04, 2013, 01:34:49 PM
 #2129

How bout it James at least an answer as to why you choose not to try to do something.  I have posted this very scenario 3 times at least.

Knowingly allowing the trading of Gigamining contracts under my control would put Gigamining in a classification where I would need to register with a bunch of three letter agencies and would need to spend an exorbitant amount of fiat on lawyers and government fees.

This is the same reason that Coinlab does not allow the buying and selling of their loyalty points between miners.
Naelr
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231


View Profile WWW
April 04, 2013, 01:38:51 PM
 #2130

How bout it James at least an answer as to why you choose not to try to do something.  I have posted this very scenario 3 times at least.

Knowingly allowing the trading of Gigamining contracts under my control would put Gigamining in a classification where I would need to register with a bunch of three letter agencies and would need to spend an exorbitant amount of fiat on lawyers and government fees.

This is the same reason that Coinlab does not allow the buying and selling of their loyalty points between miners.

Thank you that is an answer I can live with and much better then silence.  You will hear no more from me on this subject.  I hate that is has to be this way then.  If you posted something similar earlier on in this thread I apologize for missing it.   

Naelr

Join me in hosted mining.  And always use 2 Factor Auth whenever possible.
CEX.IO hosting mining
TiuraZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101


View Profile
April 04, 2013, 03:19:55 PM
 #2131

How bout it James at least an answer as to why you choose not to try to do something.  I have posted this very scenario 3 times at least.

Knowingly allowing the trading of Gigamining contracts under my control would put Gigamining in a classification where I would need to register with a bunch of three letter agencies and would need to spend an exorbitant amount of fiat on lawyers and government fees.

This is the same reason that Coinlab does not allow the buying and selling of their loyalty points between miners.

So you don't want to allow trading of Gigamining contracts because of these three letter agencies, but you demand us, your customers, to go through your ridiculous claiming process because of those same agencies?
boonies4u
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826



View Profile
April 04, 2013, 03:29:28 PM
 #2132

How bout it James at least an answer as to why you choose not to try to do something.  I have posted this very scenario 3 times at least.

Knowingly allowing the trading of Gigamining contracts under my control would put Gigamining in a classification where I would need to register with a bunch of three letter agencies and would need to spend an exorbitant amount of fiat on lawyers and government fees.

This is the same reason that Coinlab does not allow the buying and selling of their loyalty points between miners.

So you don't want to allow trading of Gigamining contracts because of these three letter agencies, but you demand us, your customers, to go through your ridiculous claiming process because of those same agencies?

If the 3 letter agencies get involved so you can transfer your contracts both you and the buyer will have to submit information. Both of you will likely have to submit more information than just going through this claims process as well.
creativex
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420



View Profile
April 04, 2013, 03:43:43 PM
 #2133

How does any of this jive with recent FinCEN guidance?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=130982.msg1401799#msg1401799 - [BTC-TC]bASIC-MINING
http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,886.0.html - [LTC-GLOBAL]LTC-DMF
http://forum.litecoin.net/index.php/topic,817.msg3279.html#msg3279 - [CRYPTOSTOCKS]AGLTC

BTC: 1Hfp99tugY4H5FYEoM3hj4JDLzShzZ9ifB

You have zero chance of changing others and only a slim chance at changing yourself. Be the change you want to see and others may follow.
Jimmy2011
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 566



View Profile
April 05, 2013, 01:33:11 PM
 #2134

It's said that I need to go to US Embassy for the notary if I want to claim my shares.
And the cost is $50, Right?
Who will cover the cost?
The customer? James? Or both of them?

Bitcoin:1EBxhCQp2bUdQDZoQsix6vnivtr3EodCdP       Peercoin:PEjCk5P7FDTFbt3ZwtLPqsGpnQSRSTYRJX
PsychoticBoy
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456


Parental Advisory Explicit Content


View Profile
April 05, 2013, 01:46:43 PM
 #2135

It's said that I need to go to US Embassy for the notary if I want to claim my shares.
And the cost is $50, Right?
Who will cover the cost?
The customer? James? Or both of them?


Uhhhh YOU!
Lucidize
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2013, 02:39:32 PM
 #2136

It's said that I need to go to US Embassy for the notary if I want to claim my shares.
And the cost is $50, Right?
Who will cover the cost?
The customer? James? Or both of them?


That's cheap!

In the UK I had to pay £115 which works out at around $175

Newar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


https://gliph.me/hUF


View Profile
April 05, 2013, 02:56:36 PM
 #2137

It's said that I need to go to US Embassy for the notary if I want to claim my shares.
And the cost is $50, Right?
Who will cover the cost?
The customer? James? Or both of them?


That's cheap!

In the UK I had to pay £115 which works out at around $175
At the US embassy?

OTC rating | GPG keyid 1DC91318EE785FDE | Gliph: lightning bicycle tree music | Mycelium, a swift & secure Bitcoin client for Android | LocalBitcoins
001sonkit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784


Casper - A failed entrepenuer who looks like Zhou


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2013, 05:04:34 PM
 #2138

So I should take a flight back and forth Hong Kong and US to claim my 2 shares, GENIUS

BTW, if anyone like to have my share, drop me a PM. Legal? BAH!

Lucidize
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61


View Profile WWW
April 05, 2013, 06:00:59 PM
 #2139

It's said that I need to go to US Embassy for the notary if I want to claim my shares.
And the cost is $50, Right?
Who will cover the cost?
The customer? James? Or both of them?


That's cheap!

In the UK I had to pay £115 which works out at around $175
At the US embassy?

Not sure if you're being serious but the answer is no. It had to be sent to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office to be apostille stamped. This is a very rare request and is the reason for the high cost.

TiuraZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101


View Profile
April 05, 2013, 06:15:31 PM
 #2140

That's how Giga gets to keep all the small investors money for himself. Those who have invested big money have claimed their contracts, because it's profitable for them. It's also good to keep the big investors somewhat happy, because they would have the money and interest to go after him but he doesn't have to care about those who own only few gigamining bonds. They don't have the money to sue him either.
Pages: « 1 ... 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 [107] 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!