Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 21, 2016, 06:07:08 AM |
|
The IP address of solo.ckpool.org changes after a DDoS and perhaps these devices almost never look up the IP address using a cached result for ages. In which case a restart might be required, either of cgminer or the whole device.
I have restarted the whole device 3 times (one of those was power off for 20+ minutes) and it still is in failover, I'll see if I can't flush its dns cache or something, thanks. I had the same bug a couple of weeks back, all I had to do was change the address I was mining to.
I could not locate any sort of dns reset in the S3 interface so I tried changing addresses and the pool was ALIVE again. I changed back to the old address thinking maybe I had cleared up the issue, but the old address reports the pool as DEAD. A new solo address for the US node it is then! Problem solved, thanks.
|
|
|
|
gupik65
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
January 21, 2016, 08:18:14 AM |
|
Hello!!! Please tell me you are working AntminerS1???
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1633
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 21, 2016, 08:36:12 AM |
|
Hello!!! Please tell me you are working AntminerS1???
Does this pool work with the S1? Yes, it works with all stratum capable bitcoin miners.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Prelude
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 21, 2016, 08:14:35 PM |
|
Makes no difference, there is no progress.
|
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 21, 2016, 11:11:10 PM Last edit: January 22, 2016, 06:55:06 AM by Mikestang |
|
- solo mine with multiple devices to one BTC address - solo mine with each device using it's own BTC address
Each of these choices increases your chances because you are mining with more machines. More machines means more hash means you have a better chance of solving a block. The address part doesn't matter, but the more machines [adding more hash rate] part does. *Edit - missed the part about same hash rate, added [] above.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4508
Merit: 1815
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
January 22, 2016, 01:18:13 AM |
|
- solo mine with multiple devices to one BTC address - solo mine with each device using it's own BTC address
Each of these choices increases your chances because you are mining with more machines. More machines means more hash means you have a better chance of solving a block. The address part doesn't matter, but the more machines part does. Well if he had asked about more hash rate, yes, but he specifically said: ... Assuming each scenario adds up to the same hash rate mining for the same length of time... ...
So, no, it makes no difference.
|
|
|
|
silvie_S
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2016, 12:07:40 PM |
|
Hi Guys, if all of my friends solo mine with their PC's (3GHz Intel CPU's) to the same address. Do we aver have a chance to get a block? Would that be still a lottery or just wishful thinking?
thanks...
|
|
|
|
zOU
|
|
January 22, 2016, 12:14:05 PM |
|
Hi Guys, if all of my friends solo mine with their PC's (3GHz Intel CPU's) to the same address. Do we aver have a chance to get a block? Would that be still a lottery or just wishful thinking?
thanks...
I believe you have less chances (a lot!) than with a cheap 333Mhs USB erupter. Dream on Exemple: Core i5-2400 4cores 4.5Mhs / 3.1Ghz Core i7 2600K 4cores/8threads 18.6Mhs/3.4Ghz Source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparison
|
|
|
|
sobe-it
|
|
January 22, 2016, 05:53:13 PM |
|
Hi Guys, if all of my friends solo mine with their PC's (3GHz Intel CPU's) to the same address. Do we aver have a chance to get a block? Would that be still a lottery or just wishful thinking?
thanks...
I believe you have less chances (a lot!) than with a cheap 333Mhs USB erupter. Dream on Exemple: Core i5-2400 4cores 4.5Mhs / 3.1Ghz Core i7 2600K 4cores/8threads 18.6Mhs/3.4Ghz Source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparisonHe never stated what cpu. It could be a p4 and it would be way less, but go post in mining speculation if you want advise. But I will say the only way you truely NEVER have a chance of hitting a block is by not solo mining.
|
|
|
|
Mikestang
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 22, 2016, 05:59:52 PM |
|
Do we aver have a chance to get a block?
No.* *technically you have "a chance", but there's a better chance a comet will hit the Earth and wipe out civilization before you solve a block.
|
|
|
|
bubu22
|
|
January 22, 2016, 06:20:45 PM |
|
i am pozitive the next one will be mine .....and good luck to you to
|
|
|
|
o_solo_miner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2453
Merit: 1476
-> morgen, ist heute, schon gestern <-
|
|
January 22, 2016, 09:48:23 PM |
|
congrats to 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY for the Block !!
|
from the creator of CGMiner http://solo.ckpool.org for Solominers paused: passthrough for solo.ckpool.org => stratum+tcp://rfpool.org:3334
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1633
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 22, 2016, 09:51:33 PM |
|
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 ! [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81 [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"} [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0ac
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Nthused
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 22, 2016, 09:53:05 PM |
|
Wow that is nice, so he could have 127 x 1Th Miners roughly so 127 more chances
|
|
|
|
bctmke
|
|
January 22, 2016, 10:02:49 PM |
|
I swear every time Kano finds a block solo.ckpool finds one shortly after!
|
|
|
|
thedreamer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002
Go Big or Go Home.....
|
|
January 22, 2016, 10:17:25 PM |
|
Wow. He's a block magnet.
|
Go Big or Go Home.
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1633
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 22, 2016, 10:42:29 PM |
|
Wow. He's a block magnet.
Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
hedgy73
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
|
|
January 22, 2016, 10:58:09 PM |
|
Wow. He's a block magnet.
Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo. Good man . The 125-130TH seems pretty constant, I wonder if its his own farm or a lucky rental?
|
|
|
|
AngusCanine
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
To weird to live To rare to die
|
|
January 23, 2016, 12:36:06 AM |
|
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 ! [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81 [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"} [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0acso did the worker .81 find the block
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 1633
Ruu \o/
|
|
January 23, 2016, 12:41:28 AM |
|
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 ! [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81 [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"} [2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0acso did the worker .81 find the block That is correct. The summary is which user and worker found the block.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|