[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved!

[AngusCanine]

Code:

[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 !
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"}
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0ac

so did the worker .81 find the block

That is correct. The summary is which user and worker found the block.

cool

[AngusCanine]

http://solo.ckpool.org/users/1FzwYgwC28gtFumbB7VtUVDGjubJcHyC7o


Closest I've came so far

[Nthused]

http://solo.ckpool.org/users/1FzwYgwC28gtFumbB7VtUVDGjubJcHyC7o


Closest I've came so far

Here's mine, yet I don't use much hashpower above 10TH.... usually

{"hashrate1m": "7.38T", "hashrate5m": "7.64T", "hashrate1hr": "5.26T", "hashrate1d": "2.1T", "hashrate7d": "3.06T", "lastupdate": 1453510596, "workers": 9, "shares": 1190680817, "bestshare": 6391970.0773073174, "bestever": 771178516}

[nhminer]

Moved to solo pool as well ...

hashrate1m": "8.97T", "hashrate5m": "8.09T", "hashrate1hr": "8.29T", "hashrate1d": "7.06T", "hashrate7d": "1.96T", "lastupdate": 1453511556, "workers": 7, "shares": 315500874, "bestshare": 14630115.839388914, "bestever": 3407297962}


~nh

[wmtomlinso]

Wow. He's a block magnet.

Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo.

Thats amazing!  that's not supposed to happen, right?   

what are the odds of hitting 11 blocks at 127 Th?   I assume its his farm since he has workers at 1 Th. 

To the winner: I bet you never dreamed your investment would pay off so well.  At this rate you'll be a wealthy miner very soon.  I wish you continued Best of luck in solving your next 11

[sobe-it]

Wow. He's a block magnet.

Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo.

Damn him..... I have had 2 s5s and 3 underclocked s3s on the pool for months even back to last winter had a hf yoli and some other gear. With a dabble of rented hash here and there, hit this only 2 diff changes late (bestever": 81536523136)

[-ck]

With the recent expansion in server infrastructure, ddos protection, rising difficulty, impending reward halving, and otherwise static hashrate on this pool, I finally have to reconsider the fee this pool has. I know many of you have said it would be fine if I raised the fee in the past, and the generous donations from block solvers have meant that I didn't need to raise the fees, but with the combined effect of the above, I seriously have to reconsider it now. What I'm considering is to raise the fee to 0.75% now and then to 1% when the next halving hits, or just raise it to 1% now with a view to just leaving it at that for the foreseeable future. Comments?

[Nthused]

With the recent expansion in server infrastructure, ddos protection, rising difficulty, impending reward halving, and otherwise static hashrate on this pool, I finally have to reconsider the fee this pool has. I know many of you have said it would be fine if I raised the fee in the past, and the generous donations from block solvers have meant that I didn't need to raise the fees, but with the combined effect of the above, I seriously have to reconsider it now. What I'm considering is to raise the fee to 0.75% now and then to 1% when the next halving hits, or just raise it to 1% now with a view to just leaving it at that for the foreseeable future. Comments?

The first option of 0.75% now and then 1% Next BTC halving seems fair but maybe have a grace period before the change to 0.75%

[-ck]

With the recent expansion in server infrastructure, ddos protection, rising difficulty, impending reward halving, and otherwise static hashrate on this pool, I finally have to reconsider the fee this pool has. I know many of you have said it would be fine if I raised the fee in the past, and the generous donations from block solvers have meant that I didn't need to raise the fees, but with the combined effect of the above, I seriously have to reconsider it now. What I'm considering is to raise the fee to 0.75% now and then to 1% when the next halving hits, or just raise it to 1% now with a view to just leaving it at that for the foreseeable future. Comments?

The first option of 0.75% now and then 1% Next BTC halving seems fair but maybe have a grace period before the change to 0.75%

Wasn't planning on doing it immediately - there would be plenty of notice. Additionally if there's great dissatisfaction with me doing it by the users I won't raise the fee...

[pikachuy]

i say flat 2% right now, you are so worth it with all what you have done. The 2% is worth it for the block solvers of maintaining a pool and all those protections you add. If someone is really picky about that 2%, just have them run their own solo pool. =)

[citronick]

With the recent expansion in server infrastructure, ddos protection, rising difficulty, impending reward halving, and otherwise static hashrate on this pool, I finally have to reconsider the fee this pool has. I know many of you have said it would be fine if I raised the fee in the past, and the generous donations from block solvers have meant that I didn't need to raise the fees, but with the combined effect of the above, I seriously have to reconsider it now. What I'm considering is to raise the fee to 0.75% now and then to 1% when the next halving hits, or just raise it to 1% now with a view to just leaving it at that for the foreseeable future. Comments?

With the additions of international nodes - the higher fee is justified for the additional investments. The better hosting sites usually are also more pricey. You have my vote on the 1-2%. In the long term, getting more solo miners to join ckpool should also increase our overall ability to hit more blocks, hence investing in more nodes globally. Would love to see ckpool hitting blocks on daily basis. Any plans for JP node like Kano?

[-ck]

Any plans for JP node like Kano?

All the Asian nodes I've tried so far never had more than 3.5TH max. There are precious few people mining solo and not enough to sustain an Asian node.

[yxt]

With all the time that you have invested in/for this community,
and you still invest, I think 1% is very fair. Thank you ck

[kipper01]

I would say 1% is fair.

[hodedowe]

I vote to keep it at 0.5%. If it goes above that you risk pushing miners to other solo pools or solo mining themselves.

[RozoTheMiner]

Wow. He's a block magnet.

Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo.

Good man . The 125-130TH seems pretty constant, I wonder if its his own farm or a lucky rental?

Wow absolutely incredible!! I wish I was ever so lucky to get at least one.

[thedreamer]

1% IMO is good.

Or.. Setup a donation based scheme like other pools. Start at 0.5% for basic, 1% for one with more nodes or something, or remote access/mobile monitoring of the miner's address, etc..

[jonnybravo0311]

With the recent expansion in server infrastructure, ddos protection, rising difficulty, impending reward halving, and otherwise static hashrate on this pool, I finally have to reconsider the fee this pool has. I know many of you have said it would be fine if I raised the fee in the past, and the generous donations from block solvers have meant that I didn't need to raise the fees, but with the combined effect of the above, I seriously have to reconsider it now. What I'm considering is to raise the fee to 0.75% now and then to 1% when the next halving hits, or just raise it to 1% now with a view to just leaving it at that for the foreseeable future. Comments?

Raise it to 1%.  Not only are you the pool admin, you are also the author of the pool's code and the mining software that the vast majority of miners use.  If people are truly going to complain about 0.125BTC, then let them setup their own solo mining operation.  Pretty sure they'll realize very quickly doing so costs considerably more.

[chiguireitor]

0.5-1% is ok with me too... don't get fanciful stuff btw, keep it barebones as it doesn't adds unnecessary fluff

[philipma1957]

 Well I always matched the fee as a tip whenever I hit a block here.

3 times I think is has been.

but -ck has done lots for the community.  so if I hit a block here again :

I commit to .2 + .2 = .40

Vs .125 + .125 = .25

and if -ck wants fee to be .25 

I commit to .25 + .25 = .5