[∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining USA/DE 255 blocks solved!

[Mikestang]

The IP address of solo.ckpool.org changes after a DDoS and perhaps these devices almost never look up the IP address using a cached result for ages. In which case a restart might be required, either of cgminer or the whole device.

I have restarted the whole device 3 times (one of those was power off for 20+ minutes) and it still is in failover, I'll see if I can't flush its dns cache or something, thanks.

I had the same bug a couple of weeks back, all I had to do was change the address I was mining to.

I could not locate any sort of dns reset in the S3 interface so I tried changing addresses and the pool was ALIVE again.  I changed back to the old address thinking maybe I had cleared up the issue, but the old address reports the pool as DEAD.  A new solo address for the US node it is then!  Problem solved, thanks.

[gupik65]

Hello!!! Please tell me you are working AntminerS1???

[-ck]

Hello!!! Please tell me you are working AntminerS1???

Does this pool work with the S1? Yes, it works with all stratum capable bitcoin miners.

[Prelude]

Makes no difference, there is no progress.

[Mikestang]

-  solo mine with multiple devices to one BTC address
-  solo mine with each device using it's own BTC address

Each of these choices increases your chances because you are mining with more machines.  More machines means more hash means you have a better chance of solving a block.  The address part doesn't matter, but the more machines [adding more hash rate] part does.

*Edit - missed the part about same hash rate, added [] above. 

[kano]

-  solo mine with multiple devices to one BTC address
-  solo mine with each device using it's own BTC address

Each of these choices increases your chances because you are mining with more machines.  More machines means more hash means you have a better chance of solving a block.  The address part doesn't matter, but the more machines part does.

Well if he had asked about more hash rate, yes, but he specifically said:

...
Assuming each scenario adds up to the same hash rate mining for the same length of time...
...

So, no, it makes no difference.

[silvie_S]

Hi Guys,
if all of my friends solo mine with their PC's (3GHz Intel CPU's) to the same address. Do we aver have a chance to get a block?
Would that be still a lottery or just wishful thinking?

thanks...

[zOU]

Hi Guys,
if all of my friends solo mine with their PC's (3GHz Intel CPU's) to the same address. Do we aver have a chance to get a block?
Would that be still a lottery or just wishful thinking?

thanks...

I believe you have less chances (a lot!) than with a cheap 333Mhs USB erupter.
Dream on

Exemple:

Core i5-2400 4cores 4.5Mhs / 3.1Ghz
Core i7 2600K   4cores/8threads   18.6Mhs/3.4Ghz

Source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparison

[sobe-it]

Hi Guys,
if all of my friends solo mine with their PC's (3GHz Intel CPU's) to the same address. Do we aver have a chance to get a block?
Would that be still a lottery or just wishful thinking?

thanks...

I believe you have less chances (a lot!) than with a cheap 333Mhs USB erupter.
Dream on

Exemple:

Core i5-2400 4cores 4.5Mhs / 3.1Ghz
Core i7 2600K   4cores/8threads   18.6Mhs/3.4Ghz

Source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Non-specialized_hardware_comparison

He never stated what cpu. It could be a p4 and it would be way less, but go post in mining speculation if you want advise. But I will say the only way you truely NEVER have a chance of hitting a block is by not solo mining.

[Mikestang]

Do we aver have a chance to get a block?

No.*


*technically you have "a chance", but there's a better chance a comet will hit the Earth and wipe out civilization before you solve a block.

[bubu22]

i am pozitive the next one will be mine  .....and good luck to you to

[o_solo_miner]

  congrats to 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY for the Block !!

[-ck]

Code:

[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 !
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"}
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0ac

[Nthused]

Wow that is nice, so he could have 127 x 1Th Miners roughly so 127 more chances

[bctmke]

I swear every time Kano finds a block solo.ckpool finds one shortly after!

[thedreamer]

Wow. He's a block magnet.

[-ck]

Wow. He's a block magnet.

Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo.

[hedgy73]

Wow. He's a block magnet.

Yes he's solved 11 blocks in the last 7 months with solo.

Good man . The 125-130TH seems pretty constant, I wonder if its his own farm or a lucky rental?

[AngusCanine]

Code:

[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 !
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"}
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0ac

so did the worker .81 find the block

[-ck]

Code:

[2016-01-22 15:46:38.689] Possible block solve diff 161774930091.062744 !
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] BLOCK ACCEPTED!
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Solved and confirmed block 394522 by 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] User 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY:{"hashrate1m": "127T", "hashrate5m": "128T", "hashrate1hr": "130T", "hashrate1d": "128T", "hashrate7d": "118T"}
[2016-01-22 15:46:38.863] Worker 3JhmANFUNJkBREYYfPPy8hdJ3cnrGvWKhY.81:{"hashrate1m": "1.05T", "hashrate5m": "1.19T", "hashrate1hr": "1.14T", "hashrate1d": "1.15T", "hashrate7d": "1.08T"}

https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/000000000000000006cbe3fefe96608e1f040f9f8159aff0490a5bb512b8e0ac

so did the worker .81 find the block

That is correct. The summary is which user and worker found the block.