fcmatt
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
|
 |
August 17, 2011, 01:34:08 AM |
|
and things were going so smoothly for a bit there. appears to be a problem with a colo server.
very intermittent mining until i switched to uscentral in texas. pool speed has been cut almost in half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Nesetalis
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:34:54 AM |
|
yeah they were mining on the testnet all night.. it wasnt until 3pm (eastern US time) that i0coin went live
|
ZOMG Moo!  |
|
|
fcmatt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:37:41 AM |
|
well i was referring to btc mining.. not i0gaycoin. but hey, nothing wrong with that if that is what they are into. less btc miners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nesetalis
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:45:11 AM |
|
i was replying to the guy above you :p
|
ZOMG Moo! |
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
August 17, 2011, 01:57:40 AM |
|
US West has been fixed. I0 Guild is running on the same physical hardware and it was thrashing the disks very badly. Just modified some bits of I0 Guild to be less HDD dependent, which immediatley got US West responding again, and I0 Guild. This was likely the culprit for disconnects/stales last night as well on US West, I had no idea I'd wake up to our TEST MODE going at 200+ GH/s on I0 Guild.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
|
BrimStone
|
|
August 17, 2011, 02:20:25 PM |
|
I don't know where we are going with I0Coin but we are sure getting there fast!  I was reading a lot of complaints about solo miners not being able to "cash in" to I0Coin fast enough before BTC Guild took off. There is no substitute for horsepower gentlemen. lol. |
BitCoin Addr: 1GvcrpJmvC9wsdAndVnMFLc7dD9Yeo1ggU
|
|
|
dyngnosis
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
August 17, 2011, 03:39:20 PM |
|
There is no substitute for horsepower gentlemen. lol.
Actually, in the beginning there was no substitute for very very very low latency... horsepower was NOT the issue for the first few hours. |
|
|
|
|
|
PcChip
|
|
August 17, 2011, 04:57:37 PM |
|
i0guild said -0.089 confirmed rewards after I withdrew
Just lettin ya know.
|
Legacy signature from 2011:
All rates with Phoenix 1.50 / PhatK
5850 - 400 MH/s | 5850 - 355 MH/s | 5830 - 310 MH/s | GTX570 - 115 MH/s | 5770 - 210 MH/s | 5770 - 200 MH/s
|
|
|
hugolp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol
|
|
August 18, 2011, 11:38:24 AM |
|
7 hours now.
Are we trying to break a record again or a script went rogue again?
|
|
|
|
|
mike85123
|
|
August 18, 2011, 12:13:29 PM |
|
Something is wrong. I did a stats reset yesterday and since my number have been working backwards. Hopefully we didn't lose 8+ hours of mining!
|
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4466
Merit: 1798
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
August 18, 2011, 01:02:20 PM |
|
7 hours now.
Are we trying to break a record again or a script went rogue again?
9 hours and 15 mins now and counting ... subtracting the 1 hour delay: at least 8 hours and 15 mins for this block wow  13th Aug was the worst since May and another one already - ouch. Edit: nope it just the stats weren't working - it's fixing itself now - phew! |
|
|
|
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
|
|
August 18, 2011, 01:38:51 PM |
|
Had an approximately 2 second block solve, US West didn't catch it in time. I updated the aggression for server sync'ing already, but it still has a 5 second pause if a sync fails. Since the round was so short, US West ended up sync'ing after the round was already over. As usual, if a server shows 0 shares during a round, the calculation script stops for manual inspection in case something really bad happened. When I woke up, I forced it to calculate the round and it caught up with the backlog after a few minutes.
|
RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
|
|
|
|
mike85123
|
|
August 18, 2011, 10:11:02 PM |
|
What is the deal with all of the stales? since this morning, I am at 4.5% on 110,000 shares. What kind of stales is everyone else seeing? I used to be at around .6% - .7%. Why does nobody talk on this thread anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
d.james
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Firstbits: 12pqwk
|
|
August 19, 2011, 12:48:52 AM
Last edit: August 19, 2011, 01:48:09 AM by d.james |
|
What is the deal with all of the stales? since this morning, I am at 4.5% on 110,000 shares. What kind of stales is everyone else seeing? I used to be at around .6% - .7%. Why does nobody talk on this thread anymore? Having exactly the same problem here, used to be <1% stales now all my nodes are showing 4%-5%... Edit: It's getting even worse now, my stales are at 7-10%....... |
You can not roll a BitCoin, but you can rollback some.  Roll me back: 1NxMkvbYn8o7kKCWPsnWR4FDvH7L9TJqGG |
|
|
fcmatt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 19, 2011, 01:54:55 AM |
|
What is the deal with all of the stales? since this morning, I am at 4.5% on 110,000 shares. What kind of stales is everyone else seeing? I used to be at around .6% - .7%. Why does nobody talk on this thread anymore? i am at .67% stales when discussing 7 video cards and about 47000 shares. Very reasonable to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
mike85123
|
|
August 19, 2011, 01:57:32 AM |
|
@ d.james & fcmatt, which server are you using? I am using central. Thinking of switching a few to west to see if it is a server issue...
|
|
|
|
|
fcmatt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 19, 2011, 02:07:20 AM |
|
@ d.james & fcmatt, which server are you using? I am using central. Thinking of switching a few to west to see if it is a server issue...
uscentral.btcguild.com is what i am using. |
|
|
|
|
|
mike85123
|
|
August 19, 2011, 02:42:15 AM |
|
What mining software are you using? I split my miners btw central and west and getting the same results. Any tips el?
|
|
|
|
|
|
mike85123
|
|
August 19, 2011, 03:21:33 AM |
|
Just did a tracert to uswest and this came back... Doesn't look good to me, but not really sure if the timeouts are causing all of my stales or not (I did xxxx a couple things out). I am on ATT Uverse at 30+ mbps. Could ATT have some network issues that are causing my stales? 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 21 ms 21 ms 22 ms 76-216-52-2.lightspeed.xxxxx.sbcglobal.net [xx.16.52.2]
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 21 ms 21 ms 20 ms 151.164.103.236
8 31 ms 29 ms 29 ms cgcil02jt.ip.att.net [12.122.81.17]
9 47 ms 47 ms 48 ms ae3.chi10.ip4.tinet.net [173.241.128.29]
10 78 ms 79 ms 80 ms ge-7-0-0.lax22.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.185.222]
11 213 ms 203 ms 202 ms aiix-gw.ip4.tinet.net [173.241.129.186]
12 78 ms 78 ms 78 ms aiix-10ge5-1.cr1.lax3.awknet.com [67.220.95.14]
13 79 ms 78 ms 78 ms 69.42.216.173 |
|
|
|
|
freedenizen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
August 19, 2011, 03:27:23 AM |
|
Just did a tracert to uswest and this came back... Doesn't look good to me, but not really sure if the timeouts are causing all of my stales or not (I did xxxx a couple things out). I am on ATT Uverse at 30+ mbps. Could ATT have some network issues that are causing my stales? 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 * * * Request timed out.
3 21 ms 21 ms 22 ms 76-216-52-2.lightspeed.xxxxx.sbcglobal.net [xx.16.52.2]
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 * * * Request timed out.
7 21 ms 21 ms 20 ms 151.164.103.236
8 31 ms 29 ms 29 ms cgcil02jt.ip.att.net [12.122.81.17]
9 47 ms 47 ms 48 ms ae3.chi10.ip4.tinet.net [173.241.128.29]
10 78 ms 79 ms 80 ms ge-7-0-0.lax22.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.185.222]
11 213 ms 203 ms 202 ms aiix-gw.ip4.tinet.net [173.241.129.186]
12 78 ms 78 ms 78 ms aiix-10ge5-1.cr1.lax3.awknet.com [67.220.95.14]
13 79 ms 78 ms 78 ms 69.42.216.173 You do realize that you just told everyone that your IP is 76.216.52.2 right? First of all your hostname from lightspeed has your IP as part of it. Second you should x out the 3rd and 4th, or 2nd, 3rd, and 4th octets of the IP, not the first. Now as for the timeouts, that is normal, those hosts just don't reply to ICMP packets. Really you need to do a ping, on windows ping -t, let it run for an hour, see what sort of PL you have. |
|
|
|
|
|
