KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2437 blocks

[sorry2xs]

were is the solo.ckpool thread is located

[Thub]

were is the solo.ckpool thread is located

Should be here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=763510.msg8604106#msg8604106

[kano]

Sent last night (about 7 hours ago) just before I went to sleep, but it hadn't confirmed yet

Payout 355411 sent
9e5484282ff328f6f9694463fb4bbe3f67ff9c407fc4fbd3244bb60b780dd26d
and confirmed

[SergES]

The last 3 block every 3 days, sorrowfully.

[kano]

The last 3 block every 3 days, sorrowfully.

Indeed - and I'm the one who spends most of the day looking at it

* kano restarts the pool

[DevonMiner]

Indeed - and I'm the one who spends most of the day looking at it

* kano restarts the pool

Yeah, as a pool op that must be tough at times (also for miners on the pool) ... but we all know luck% might look mighty different in a couple of weeks, averages will come good and settle down ... just a pain in the *ass whilst we wait ...  

[thedreamer]

Indeed - and I'm the one who spends most of the day looking at it

* kano restarts the pool

Yeah, as a pool op that must be tough at times (also for miners on the pool) ... but we all know luck% might look mighty different in a couple of weeks, averages will come good and settle down ... just a pain in the *ass whilst we wait ...  

Although it's not getting better as people are pulling their miners off the pool again. 

[xZork]

Indeed - and I'm the one who spends most of the day looking at it

* kano restarts the pool

Yeah, as a pool op that must be tough at times (also for miners on the pool) ... but we all know luck% might look mighty different in a couple of weeks, averages will come good and settle down ... just a pain in the *ass whilst we wait ...  

Although it's not getting better as people are pulling their miners off the pool again. 

I try to think about how much better my payout is going to be when we bust a few quick blocks now that my % is higher 

[sorry2xs]

Yepy cayeh mf a Block 355773

[sorry2xs]

and i can smell another one rigth after this one
i guess my sense of smell it's a bit wack

[kano]

I did a few ckdb restarts earlier (no affect on mining)
There's now an Acclaim page under the pool menu showing the block finders

[sorry2xs]

Very nice Kano, i can see my username in the lights
Edit and i did within a few with 2th/s

[Mikestang]

There's now an Acclaim page under the pool menu showing the block finders

Fun feature, thanks for adding it!

[kano]

There's now an Acclaim page under the pool menu showing the block finders

Fun feature, thanks for adding it!

Yeah it's good to get an idea of where the blocks are going.

But it also displays more specifically for me so I can see more of what's going on to make sure the expected results are still ... expected

[tlhIlwI]

Is there anything unusual about the valentina and xenovia shifts?  My Avg Hs on Workers/Shifts looks about 25% short (as does winry by a smaller amount too):

4keyk yuno   2015-05-10 22:38:48+00   48m 0s   3.784M   5.64THs   2.928k   1,292.34
4kesx xenovia   2015-05-10 21:52:18+00   46m 30s   3.117M   4.80THs   2.395k   1,301.33
4kenh winry   2015-05-10 21:03:17+00   49m 0s   3.706M   5.41THs   2.853k   1,299.13
4kefr valentina   2015-05-10 20:15:54+00   47m 23s   3.052M   4.61THs   2.351k   1,298.34
4kea9 ur   2015-05-10 19:28:47+00   47m 7s   3.814M   5.79THs   2.923k   1,304.91
4ke4p tenshi   2015-05-10 18:41:47+00   47m 0s   3.827M   5.83THs   2.929k   1,306.62
4kdx6 sena   2015-05-10 17:53:17+00   48m 30s   3.951M   5.83THs   3.028k   1,304.92
4kdrg rika   2015-05-10 17:05:48+00   47m 30s   3.900M   5.88THs   2.992k   1,303.43
4kdkw quinn   2015-05-10 16:17:46+00   48m 1s   3.850M   5.74THs   2.948k   1,305.83

My miners don't show any failover and report hashing away at 5.8T-ish during that time, so I found the stats peculiar when I saw them.

[kano]

OK - looking into it ...

[thedreamer]

Is there anything unusual about the valentina and xenovia shifts?  My Avg Hs on Workers/Shifts looks about 25% short (as does winry by a smaller amount too):

4keyk yuno   2015-05-10 22:38:48+00   48m 0s   3.784M   5.64THs   2.928k   1,292.34
4kesx xenovia   2015-05-10 21:52:18+00   46m 30s   3.117M   4.80THs   2.395k   1,301.33
4kenh winry   2015-05-10 21:03:17+00   49m 0s   3.706M   5.41THs   2.853k   1,299.13
4kefr valentina   2015-05-10 20:15:54+00   47m 23s   3.052M   4.61THs   2.351k   1,298.34
4kea9 ur   2015-05-10 19:28:47+00   47m 7s   3.814M   5.79THs   2.923k   1,304.91
4ke4p tenshi   2015-05-10 18:41:47+00   47m 0s   3.827M   5.83THs   2.929k   1,306.62
4kdx6 sena   2015-05-10 17:53:17+00   48m 30s   3.951M   5.83THs   3.028k   1,304.92
4kdrg rika   2015-05-10 17:05:48+00   47m 30s   3.900M   5.88THs   2.992k   1,303.43
4kdkw quinn   2015-05-10 16:17:46+00   48m 1s   3.850M   5.74THs   2.948k   1,305.83

My miners don't show any failover and report hashing away at 5.8T-ish during that time, so I found the stats peculiar when I saw them.

I always thought it was normal for the shifts to show less than the machines show? It's not!?

[kano]

Is there anything unusual about the valentina and xenovia shifts?  My Avg Hs on Workers/Shifts looks about 25% short (as does winry by a smaller amount too):

4keyk yuno   2015-05-10 22:38:48+00   48m 0s   3.784M   5.64THs   2.928k   1,292.34
4kesx xenovia   2015-05-10 21:52:18+00   46m 30s   3.117M   4.80THs   2.395k   1,301.33
4kenh winry   2015-05-10 21:03:17+00   49m 0s   3.706M   5.41THs   2.853k   1,299.13
4kefr valentina   2015-05-10 20:15:54+00   47m 23s   3.052M   4.61THs   2.351k   1,298.34
4kea9 ur   2015-05-10 19:28:47+00   47m 7s   3.814M   5.79THs   2.923k   1,304.91
4ke4p tenshi   2015-05-10 18:41:47+00   47m 0s   3.827M   5.83THs   2.929k   1,306.62
4kdx6 sena   2015-05-10 17:53:17+00   48m 30s   3.951M   5.83THs   3.028k   1,304.92
4kdrg rika   2015-05-10 17:05:48+00   47m 30s   3.900M   5.88THs   2.992k   1,303.43
4kdkw quinn   2015-05-10 16:17:46+00   48m 1s   3.850M   5.74THs   2.948k   1,305.83

My miners don't show any failover and report hashing away at 5.8T-ish during that time, so I found the stats peculiar when I saw them.

I always thought it was normal for the shifts to show less than the machines show? It's not!?

No this is just those 3 shifts - that it would seem my ckdb restarts this morning affected.

I did notice an unexpected shift summarisation during each of the restarts (it's not planned to do that and hasn't before) but I'll have to make the code more 'forceful' about that and also do more checking to be sure that's the exact cause.

I'm looking into the cause and then will have to fix it (for everyone)

Glad you found it so soon after, since to regenerate a small amount of data (less than a day) is way better than having to do it much after the fact.
Of course it will only be those 3 shifts in the middle, but from ckdb's point of view it's easiest to just push the shift processing back to before the problem and have it regenerate everything from then forward.

There is a full log of all shares and I've found for those 3 shifts the totals don't add up for you and of course will be the same for everyone.
This may take me a bit to sort out ... working on it

[Mikestang]

I got a fake Block Found notice, it almost worked...

I've received two fake notices over the weekend, always a bummer.

[kano]

I got a fake Block Found notice, it almost worked...

I've received two fake notices over the weekend, always a bummer.

Probably when I restart ckdb?
There a period of time when I restart ckdb, when it won't reply or gives back nothing useful - maybe the app forgets the last block when that happens?