KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks

[sorry2xs]

ten x the usual fee sound like the bitcoin network has learned an old human trait EXTORTION

[1715661678]

1715661678

[1715661678]

1715661678

[jonnybravo0311]

ten x the usual fee sound like the bitcoin network has learned an old human trait EXTORTION

LOL... I'm not so sure I'd call it extortion since nobody's actually forcing you to pay the extra fees.  I'd liken it more to the VIP line at a club.  Your regular club goers just want to pay the cover to get in.  They get to stand in line with everybody else.  The VIP paid more (either by getting bottle service, or throwing $100 at the bouncer) and so he gets to skip the line with the regular guys and get into the club.

[kano]

ten x the usual fee sound like the bitcoin network has learned an old human trait EXTORTION

LOL... I'm not so sure I'd call it extortion since nobody's actually forcing you to pay the extra fees.  I'd liken it more to the VIP line at a club.  Your regular club goers just want to pay the cover to get in.  They get to stand in line with everybody else.  The VIP paid more (either by getting bottle service, or throwing $100 at the bouncer) and so he gets to skip the line with the regular guys and get into the club.

No, I was simply trying to avoid the LONG delay of yesterday due to the amount of transactions.
It's not normally necessary.

I usually pay 1/10 of what I did today and it is often in the next block after I send out the transaction.
I prioritise it to be in the next block on our pool (no matter what the fee is) but that doesn't help anywhere else.

[kano]

... and just after that block we just found ... all the bitclub hashes were moved off the pool.
So we're back down below 2PH

Is the pool stats page working correctly? bitclub is still showing up on that page, but stuck at 1306.76.

It is never fun when such large hash leaves the pool. The blocks come slower and it takes forever for the N range to expand so that the payment amounts catch up.

As you will have seen, just takes a bit of time to disappear.
I can tell from the workers page by the lack of shares being submitted.

[sorry2xs]

 ;)yesterdays payout to over 16 hours to get confirmed today’s was like it has been since i have been at the pool,
As for vip stuff i should the status since i run a full node you think just asking

[sorry2xs]

well the vanishing hash helps my bottom line

[ZACHM]

ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com can now notify you is your hashrate drops below a set threshold and you also have the option of a secondary email address for notifications.

If anyone has any suggestions or feature requests, please let me know.

[xZork]

ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com can now notify you is your hashrate drops below a set threshold and you also have the option of a secondary email address for notifications.

If anyone has any suggestions or feature requests, please let me know.

I recently noticed the hours/minutes message is a little funky.

We found another block after -398936 Hours 21 Minutes ! Found @ 2015-07-08 08:58:18
Block # 364405

Thanks for using CKPoolMonitor

[ZACHM]

ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com can now notify you is your hashrate drops below a set threshold and you also have the option of a secondary email address for notifications.

If anyone has any suggestions or feature requests, please let me know.

I recently noticed the hours/minutes message is a little funky.

We found another block after -398936 Hours 21 Minutes ! Found @ 2015-07-08 08:58:18
Block # 364405

Thanks for using CKPoolMonitor

I think I fixed it, but I won't know until we find another block. 

[SergES]

SKPool Monitor and SKPool Workers - very different data, very much.

[ZACHM]

SKPool Monitor and SKPool Workers - very different data, very much.

I assume you meant CKPool?
But, I'm not sure I understand the problem.
Are you saying that the hashrate shown on ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com does not match what is shown on kano.is?

I checked hashrates on kano.is and ckpool monitor every five minutes for a little while and here is what I got:

Check	kano.is	ckpoolmonitor
1	4.79	4.79
2	4.69	4.91
3	4.83	4.84
4	4.90	4.85
5	4.61	4.61

I would say those numbers are pretty close. I will vary a little because CKPoolMonitor only grabs the info every 5 minutes and I believe that kano.is shows a rolling 5 minute average. But for the most part they should be pretty close.

[SergES]

SKPool Workers
SergES.2   8.192k   5s   2,144   17,563,648   0.649%   0.240%   4.08THs
SergES.4   4.096k   39s   484   1,982,464   0.206%   0.027%   393.80GHs
SergES.1   4.096k   3min   483   1,978,368   0.000%   0.027%   317.99GHs
SergES.3   1.024k   7s   820   839,680   0.122%   0.011%   159.18GHs



SergES.4 and SergES.1 - antminer S3, kano.is shows day 300-400 Ghs, SKPool Monitor shows 500-600 Ghs, i do not understand why.

[xZork]

Bitclub??? 1 block. Cheers,  don't come back.

Why would you say that?

[Mikestang]

Probably had his feelings hurt when their 2PH left.  

But I'm sure he knows everything about their situation and is not jumping to any conclusions or anything  .  Don't burn bridges.

[ZACHM]

SKPool Workers
SergES.2   8.192k   5s   2,144   17,563,648   0.649%   0.240%   4.08THs
SergES.4   4.096k   39s   484   1,982,464   0.206%   0.027%   393.80GHs
SergES.1   4.096k   3min   483   1,978,368   0.000%   0.027%   317.99GHs
SergES.3   1.024k   7s   820   839,680   0.122%   0.011%   159.18GHs

SergES.4 and SergES.1 - antminer S3, kano.is shows day 300-400 Ghs, SKPool Monitor shows 500-600 Ghs, i do not understand why.

What you are seeing on the worker page on kano.is is a 1 hour average.
The number on ckpoolmonitor is a 5 minute average.

[SergES]

Do not worry? Previously, kano.is "workers" show hashrate higher 5 Ths, now less 5 Ths and many "Inv Diff".

And what diff better for S1, S3, S5....Thanks

[ZACHM]

Leave the diff setting blank and let the pool auto adjust it for you, it knows what it is doing.

[os2sam]

well the vanishing hash helps my bottom line

I don't see how.  Fewer block solves means fewer payouts.

[ZACHM]

well the vanishing hash helps my bottom line

I don't see how.  Fewer block solves means fewer payouts.

Take a look at ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com and see what the average payouts work out to.
Yes if we get blocks fast enough then the higher hashrate helps, but overall the payout is higher with the lower pool hashrate. Really it all comes back to Luck.

[os2sam]

Yes if we get blocks fast enough then the higher hashrate helps, but overall the payout is higher with the lower pool hashrate. Really it all comes back to Luck.

Yes it comes back to LUCK.  But in the long haul the higher hash rate with more payouts, at a lower amount per payout, will win out over lower hash rate with fewer but larger payouts.  You can't count on good luck runs, even though they are very nice when they happen.