KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2435 blocks

[loshia]

^^ Not sure your opinion counts for anything on this one .....
It is ck who posted (during that good luck streak that coincided to an extent with the network test) that he'd made some changes to the code with the insinuation those changes were responsible for smoothing, aka improving the pool's luck during that storm. Someone else raised the query as to whether those same changes (whose announcement roughly coincided with the start of the bad luck streak) could be playing a part in the current bad luck streak.

I am sure they have looked at the code numerous times since then, doesnt stop me from pondering the question (and wondering whether the same bad luck affliction has befallen the solo pool which I assume also carries those changes).

Do not assume just check github and stop spreading nonce
if you do not have a clue how to check github and read and understand c code just shut up please
Thanks

[1714759617]

1714759617

[1714759617]

1714759617

[1714759617]

1714759617

[1714759617]

1714759617

[1714759617]

1714759617

[1714759617]

1714759617

[pekatete]

^^ Not sure your opinion counts for anything on this one .....
It is ck who posted (during that good luck streak that coincided to an extent with the network test) that he'd made some changes to the code with the insinuation those changes were responsible for smoothing, aka improving the pool's luck during that storm. Someone else raised the query as to whether those same changes (whose announcement roughly coincided with the start of the bad luck streak) could be playing a part in the current bad luck streak.

I am sure they have looked at the code numerous times since then, doesnt stop me from pondering the question (and wondering whether the same bad luck affliction has befallen the solo pool which I assume also carries those changes).

Not sure my "opinion" counts?  Well I'm not giving you an opinion, I'm stating facts.

You made the "smoothing" statement, not ck.  It's a couple pages back, I just found it.

Those pool changes were made July 10 right before the pool went on a 14 block <100% rampage.  How that coincides with the start of this "bad luck block" is beyond me, maybe you can explain?  Or not, because really I don't care about your speculation.

Luck is luck, nothing you can do changes it, stop pondering.

Actually, now I know your opinion does not count on this.
I may have made the statement about smoothing, but that wasn't the query (not directed at you) that you tried to give an answer to, which for brevity was: are those code changes actually affecting our luck? As you should obviously know, you can not answer that question.
If you simply want to take a pop at me like the troll that is Miketsang, you can always send me a PM (not that I read them ..) rather than clogging this otherwise clean thread with nonsense.

[pekatete]

Do not assume just check github and stop spreading nonce
if you do not have a clue how to check github and read and understand c code just shut up please
Thanks

You may be revered around here, but that counts for nought in my book. So I think YOU should shut your gob and find someone else to take the edge off your issues with whoever that is you have an issue with (everyone really!).

[loshia]

Do not assume just check github and stop spreading nonce
if you do not have a clue how to check github and read and understand c code just shut up please
Thanks

You may be revered around here, but that counts for nought in my book. So I think YOU should shut your gob and find someone else to take the edge off your issues with whoever that is you have an issue with (everyone really!).

REALY?
Do you have issues with github and c code?
I have no issues with this and with you also. I just can not be so polite like others when I read a total bullshit from incompetent people who think that math is like philosophy or literature but math is a math and 1+1=2
Peace

[PPOC]

Are you sure nothing is wrong? It started not solving right after the last update or whatever changes you've made.
I have not seen it this long in 4 months if I remember correctly.  

Not a blame, but with the hash I've been sending over the past few days, it's starting to hurt....  

Unfortunately, it's expected, on average to happen every so often on every pool.
1.83% of blocks are expected on average to be over 400%
That's an expected average, not an absolute value.

As I've mentioned on the previous page, so far, the longest block was 593.99%
Here's some info on all the ones above 400%
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=789369.msg11440377#msg11440377

So this is the 4th block on the pool to be above 400% since we started.

So here we are, just about 450% and 229B shares submitted. Interesting that Slush is over 24hours and 272B shares submitted. Looking at todays blocks, only a couple are from the non Chinese pools. Thats pretty interesting considering at 25% or more of the network is from outside China. Hmmmm

[pekatete]

Do not assume just check github and stop spreading nonce
if you do not have a clue how to check github and read and understand c code just shut up please
Thanks

You may be revered around here, but that counts for nought in my book. So I think YOU should shut your gob and find someone else to take the edge off your issues with whoever that is you have an issue with (everyone really!).

REALY?
Do you have issues with github and c code?
I have no issues with this and with you also. I just can not be so polite like others when I read a total bullshit from incompetent people who think that math is like philosophy or literature but math is a math and 1+1=2
Peace

Now you sound like a total idiot.
I have not taken the trouble to look through your last posts, but I receive a few alerts to several threads on this forum (mainly in the hardware sub-forum of bitcoin), and you have been posting to a few of those, needless to say, all you have been posting is diatribe and ranting, nothing of value whatsoever. If you do not want to be polite, I am sure you are well accustomed to people not being polite to you either, (so here you go) you accomplished twat!

[SergES]

The difficulty was lower than it is now.

[loshia]

Pekatete,
Please answer yes no please
Do you claim or assume that Latest code changes are causing  bad luck to both solo and kano pool

If the answer is yes you are a total idiot. PERIOD
If answer is no please do take my SINCERE excuse because my English is not native and I misunderstood your post
Anyway do not feel obliged to answer me especially if the answer is yes
Thanks

[pekatete]

Pekatete,
Please answer yes no please
Do you claim or assume that Latest code changes are causing  bad luck to both solo and kano pool

If the answer is yes you are a total idiot. PERIOD
If answer is no please do take my SINCERE excuse because my English is not native and I misunderstood your post
Anyway do not feel obliged to answer me
Thanks

OK now you have proved your lack of ANY worth.

The question you are asking me is the very same question I was asking (well, that was until the trolls jumped in attempting to answer what they couldn't). Now how daft can you get?

[loshia]

Pekatete,
Please answer yes no please
Do you claim or assume that Latest code changes are causing  bad luck to both solo and kano pool

If the answer is yes you are a total idiot. PERIOD
If answer is no please do take my SINCERE excuse because my English is not native and I misunderstood your post
Anyway do not feel obliged to answer me
Thanks

OK now you have proved your lack of ANY worth.

The question you are asking me IS the question I was asking. Now how daft can you get?

The answer is no. Latest pool changes have nothing to do with bad luck.
I do apologize because I misunderstood you.
I am sorry I was thinking that you claim or assume that latest changes brought bad luck
I am REALY sorry
...

[pekatete]

The answer is no
I do apologize because I misunderstood you.
I am sorry I was thinking that you claim or assume that latest changes brought bad luck
I am REALY sorry
...

Apology accepted. You are still an idiot anyhow (and I won't be offering any apologies for that).

[loshia]

The answer is no
I do apologize because I misunderstood you.
I am sorry I was thinking that you claim or assume that latest changes brought bad luck
I am REALY sorry
...

Apology accepted. You are still an idiot anyhow (and I won't be offering any apologies for that).

I am glad you like me being an idiot. I am who I am. I am not asking for apology....I am the one Who is proven guilty in this case
Case closed

[-ck]

It is ck who posted (during that good luck streak that coincided to an extent with the network test) that he'd made some changes to the code with the insinuation those changes were responsible for smoothing, aka improving the pool's luck during that storm. Someone else raised the query as to whether those same changes (whose announcement roughly coincided with the start of the bad luck streak) could be playing a part in the current bad luck streak.

You made the "smoothing" statement, not ck.  It's a couple pages back, I just found it.

Those pool changes were made July 10 right before the pool went on a 14 block <100% rampage.  How that coincides with the start of this "bad luck block" is beyond me, maybe you can explain?  Or not, because really I don't care about your speculation.

The pool code was unchanged throughout all the good and bad luck. Bitcoind was tweaked in the middle of the good luck streak which then continued for quite a while. No changes immediately predate the bad luck.

I didn't think my response left any ambiguity about what effect those changes had on luck:

Wow guys - that's some blocktastic green run you've got going on there, well done!

Do you think it's because of your modifications -ck mentioned earlier?:

No

This is no more than a clustering illusion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clustering_illusion

[p3yot33at3r]

Relax guys, this is how it is when you're mining, always has been & always will be. If you're looking for a continuous, steady income - you're in the wrong game 

Good days & bad days, lucky & unlucky streaks, it's normal 

[Mikestang]

are those code changes actually affecting our luck? As you should obviously know, you can not answer that question.

I can answer, and the answer is a resounding "NO".

ck said the same thing a few pages back, and again a few posts up.

Kano chimed in and said the changes have an effect on long term % luck, but not what the pool reports.

You should obviously know that there is NOTHING you can do to affect luck.

And did you really call me a troll?  I'm the furthest thing from.

[pekatete]

are those code changes actually affecting our luck? As you should obviously know, you can not answer that question.

I can answer, and the answer is a resounding "NO".

What is the use of repeating something thats been answered by the person it was asked in the first place aside from the pleasure in trolling?
You signature campaign troll.

[pekatete]

I didn't think my response left any ambiguity about what effect those changes had on luck:

Wow guys - that's some blocktastic green run you've got going on there, well done!

Do you think it's because of your modifications -ck mentioned earlier?:

No

That the changes to bitcoind were "announced" coincidentally during the latter end of good luck streak coupled with the assertion that (and I vaguely quote here) "those changes were to give pools an advantage" when asked whether they'd be shared, may have led me (and anyone else bold enough to admit) to believe that they were responsible for the "improved luck". I am sure even the trolls, with the benefit of this hindsight would appreciate there's nothing out of the ordinary in that.

But again I failed to get the answer (to draw parallels) to the secondary question: has the bad luck streak also afflicted the solo pool? (or maybe I should do my research ...)

[WBF1]

I didn't think my response left any ambiguity about what effect those changes had on luck:

Wow guys - that's some blocktastic green run you've got going on there, well done!

Do you think it's because of your modifications -ck mentioned earlier?:

No

That the changes to bitcoind were "announced" coincidentally during the latter end of good luck streak coupled with the assertion that (and I vaguely quote here) "those changes were to give pools an advantage" when asked whether they'd be shared, may have led me (and anyone else bold enough to admit) to believe that they were responsible for the "improved luck". I am sure even the trolls, with the benefit of this hindsight would appreciate there's nothing out of the ordinary in that.

But again I failed to get the answer (to draw parallels) to the secondary question: has the bad luck streak also afflicted the solo pool? (or maybe I should do my research ...)

Ever since you started your recent line of witch hunt questioning we haven't solved a block. Seems this is no ordinary coincidence?!

[Digitalmocking]

First rule of trolls, don't feed the trolls.

[pekatete]

Ever since you started your recent line of witch hunt questioning we haven't solved a block. Seems this is no ordinary coincidence?!

I know ck and kano walk on hallowed ground in more ways than one, but asking a simple question a couple of times (mostly because some trolls who do not have a clue as to the answer keep doing their best to answer it or signature campaign posting), can not be construed to be a witch hunt .... surely not. Well, unless of course you are so thick you can not see the simplicity of the question for the love of trolling.