philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8830
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
April 10, 2017, 11:44:37 AM |
|
Too bad it was not adapted for BTC I know you are anti alt coin but a few alts took your idea and ran with it. One of those alts is doing very well. So here I am standing with a foot in the alt-coin camp and a foot in the btc camp. I have 22 gpus I have 60th for BTC and every day I have to decide how to change my mining ratios for alt to sha to sell coins to hold cash. Still life's pretty good for today in the world of mining.
|
|
|
|
tournamentdan
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
April 10, 2017, 02:30:57 PM |
|
It's an interesting idea. But we can't even get people to agree on a 2mb block. Imagine the fight to change block time and payout.
|
|
|
|
BannedDK
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
April 10, 2017, 08:12:36 PM |
|
@kano do you know if Anyone in this pool uses any of the pantech miners?
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
April 10, 2017, 09:05:22 PM Last edit: April 10, 2017, 09:17:38 PM by wmabern |
|
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-) Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 10, 2017, 09:18:23 PM Last edit: April 10, 2017, 10:15:23 PM by kano |
|
@kano do you know if Anyone in this pool uses any of the pantech miners?
I don't know anything about them or their software. Edit: and they probably clone something else so you can't tell the difference.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 10, 2017, 10:13:58 PM |
|
It's an interesting idea. But we can't even get people to agree on a 2mb block. Imagine the fight to change block time and payout.
Yeah I posted a few 'useful' ideas many years ago - but they were all rejected Faster block time, increased nonce size, multiple PoW I also discussed with Gavin back then about not repeating transaction processing, and only transferring the necessary transactions (since typically your mempool would have most of them) In general I steered clear of 'Core' other than making suggestions I did my own thing there.
|
|
|
|
wmabern
|
|
April 10, 2017, 10:30:05 PM |
|
Yay!! Block!! A juicy one too!
|
BITMIXER.IO Gone Baby, Gone.. ;-) Not any good sig campaigns out there that I want!
|
|
|
NotFuzzyWarm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 2700
Evil beware: We have waffles!
|
|
April 10, 2017, 10:32:59 PM |
|
Dang -- Cobramining is on a streak! that's 3 in a row for them
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
April 10, 2017, 10:33:08 PM |
|
Yay!! Block!! A juicy one too! Good one to break that 200%+ block! That's 3 in a row by cobramining!
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 10, 2017, 10:33:30 PM |
|
cobramining with an A7v2
|
|
|
|
tournamentdan
Member
Offline
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
|
|
April 10, 2017, 10:40:40 PM |
|
It's an interesting idea. But we can't even get people to agree on a 2mb block. Imagine the fight to change block time and payout.
Yeah I posted a few 'useful' ideas many years ago - but they were all rejected Faster block time, increased nonce size, multiple PoW I also discussed with Gavin back then about not repeating transaction processing, and only transferring the necessary transactions (since typically your mempool would have most of them) In general I steered clear of 'Core' other than making suggestions I did my own thing there. Yeah I think one of the only problems with the bitcoin white paper was not allowing a certain amout of btc to go to core programmers per block. That way they could earn a living and stay netruel. The ulterior motives behind both sides is sickening.
|
|
|
|
Sr.Urbanist
|
|
April 10, 2017, 11:29:57 PM |
|
Faster block time ...
That would be nice. I like to 2.5 min confirmation times on LTC.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 11, 2017, 12:00:08 AM |
|
Sorry, couldn't help myself This made me laugh so much, I didn't notice it before since their blog is the last web page I'd be spending time on: Bitmain being 'touchy' about infringement https://blog.bitmain.com/en/gigawatt-infringement-announcement/
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 11, 2017, 01:39:39 AM |
|
Block! by cobramining A7v2
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
April 11, 2017, 01:41:35 AM |
|
Block! by cobramining Dang! That is 4 in a row by cobramining
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8830
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
April 11, 2017, 01:42:43 AM |
|
I bow down to the great snake as he or she is the master of blocks for now.
|
|
|
|
kano (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
April 11, 2017, 03:06:09 AM |
|
Block! by ddefehr looks like it's an S7
|
|
|
|
clgrissom3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1032
Carl, aka Sonny :)
|
|
April 11, 2017, 03:07:26 AM |
|
Block!
That's number 2 today! ddefehr with 53.75TH/s, welcome to the Acclaim Board with your 1st Kano block!
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 8830
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
April 11, 2017, 03:30:01 AM |
|
I am likling these numbers
|
|
|
|
Sr.Urbanist
|
|
April 11, 2017, 06:34:28 AM |
|
I am likling these numbers Sure glad I jumped on the "BU" band-wagon about 20 blocks ago. You're welcome for the luck!
|
|
|
|
|