KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2438 blocks

[miner0007]

I would like to make a complaint that we are getting blocks tooooo fast.  Please stop it.  he he I hope that satisfies that user that was wondering how come no one complains when we get blocks fast.
However, having said that, lets keep the TH under 25,000TH as you can see we are lucky when we have lower TH 

[smutboy420]

Kano or any one else. im wondering I have a higher then should be number of invalids. ??

I was just looking at the workers info for my 2 S9s and its looking like one of them has a heck of a high amount of invalids for only being a few mins in this new block.     1.316% while my other is showing 0%

Workers (active during the last 7 days)
Show Details for Invalids:
Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
smutboy420.s92   10.300k   1s   186   1,915,800   15.21THs   9m 1s   0.535%   0.063%   13.68THs
smutboy420.s91   11.667k   1s   166   1,936,722   15.38THs   9m 1s   0.000%   0.063%   13.56THs
Total: 2 (2 miners)                    352    3,852,522   30.58THs       0.267%           0.126%   27.24THs


? is that a high amount of invalids and is there anything that could be causing one miner to have a high rate while the other has none so far??

[kano]

Kano or any one else. im wondering I have a higher then should be number of invalids. ??

I was just looking at the workers info for my 2 S9s and its looking like one of them has a heck of a high amount of invalids for only being a few mins in this new block.     1.316% while my other is showing 0%

Workers (active during the last 7 days)
Show Details for Invalids:
Worker Name:   Work Diff   :Last Share   Shares   :Diff   :Share Rate   «Elapsed   :Invalid   Block %   :Hash Rate
smutboy420.s92   10.300k   1s   186   1,915,800   15.21THs   9m 1s   0.535%   0.063%   13.68THs
smutboy420.s91   11.667k   1s   166   1,936,722   15.38THs   9m 1s   0.000%   0.063%   13.56THs
Total: 2 (2 miners)                    352    3,852,522   30.58THs       0.267%           0.126%   27.24THs


? is that a high amount of invalids and is there anything that could be causing one miner to have a high rate while the other has none so far??

Immediately after any network block change, your first share/shares will usually be stale shares.
A pool block change also resets all the stats to zero - so it will actually start at 100% invalid for all your stale shares.
Patience padwan - check again and it will be dropping.

[dance191]

Back to back blocks, very tasty!

[smutboy420]

Immediately after any network block change, your first share/shares will usually be stale shares.
A pool block change also resets all the stats to zero - so it will actually start at 100% invalid for all your stale shares.
Patience padwan - check again and it will be dropping.

Thanks jedi master kano.

and yes I also see now that the one that had none caught up and has about the same now as the one that seemed to have a bunch while the other had none.


I was almost wondering is it was like Rejected shares that show in my miners browser.   I always noticed I tend to get a few rejects right at the start of a new block of if I reconnect the first few  shares sometimes have had as high as 10% rejects. But after enough time and a lot of shares its always down to about .1 or so % which from what I think I understand. is not bad.  TO just have one reject for about every 1000 shares.

Tho I did have to reboot one rig last week when it seemed to just be blasting out rejects at a very high rate. and like an idiot I was trying to trace down the prob as if i had a net work prob. esp even when reconnecting did fix the high reject rate then I noticed i had some x's in place of o's and thought oh great burn chips already but super glad to see it come back after a reboot and all was back to normal.


But glad to know there is not a problem with the stales esp being that its the same rig that was giveing me the high reject rate till a reboot.

[clgrissom3]

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us!

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time

[Make-A-Buck]

Another Block!
by 16hN...

Is that some kind of record for quickest back-to-back blocks?
[4 min 11 seconds] (at least for the last year or so of mining - certainly since the last halving)
Consecutive blocks in the global blockchain - 456826 then 456827. NICE!

#   Height   Who   Block Reward   When UTC   Status   Diff   Diff%   CDF   100 Luck%   B
1751   456827   16hNunxPKj42L1…   13.23997482   2017‑03‑12 01:35:25   +6 Confirms   1,429,409,606   0.310%   0.003   97.96%   1
1750   456826   dance191.S7120   13.75985443   2017‑03‑12 01:31:14   +7 Confirms   197,300,277,376   42.820%   0.348   97.13%   2

Keep 'em comin'!

[Biodom]

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us!

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time

freaking catch-22...
we would have less lumpiness with more hashing power,
...every time we hit lower luck, newbs leave because they cannot handle it...and the cycle continues
...every time we hit high luck, newbs come like bees to honey, then leave as soon as we hit lower luck.

what kano needs is to get a serious farm committing and getting him over 50-75Ph.
we had above 40 at some point, but then hit a bump.
a non-mentioned pool, after getting over 40PH stably, accumulated more and more until 200PH

[kano]

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us!

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time

freaking catch-22...
we would have less lumpiness with more hashing power,
...every time we hit lower luck, newbs leave because they cannot handle it...and the cycle continues
...every time we hit high luck, newbs come like bees to honey, then leave as soon as we hit lower luck.

what kano needs is to get a serious farm committing and getting him over 50-75Ph.
we had above 40 at some point, but then hit a bump.
a non-mentioned pool, after getting over 40PH stably, accumulated more and more until 200PH

Well I did have someone looking at doing that, but I guess the ETF failure may have slowed that down, as it would appear has the supplier.

[NomadGroup]

That's funny as soon as people started leaving the pool again we hit the green road again hahaha!  I don't think they even stay long enough to get the 5 day average!   

[NomadGroup]

Looks like we recovered nicely after Mr. 415% got done blistering us!

It's awesome having 4 blocks confirming at one time

freaking catch-22...
we would have less lumpiness with more hashing power,
...every time we hit lower luck, newbs leave because they cannot handle it...and the cycle continues
...every time we hit high luck, newbs come like bees to honey, then leave as soon as we hit lower luck.

what kano needs is to get a serious farm committing and getting him over 50-75Ph.
we had above 40 at some point, but then hit a bump.
a non-mentioned pool, after getting over 40PH stably, accumulated more and more until 200PH

You got that right!   

[dance191]

I really don't get the need for lots of daily payouts.  A payout ever day, even every few days or so is fine.  Do people really need 10 small payouts a day?  I would rather get 1 large payout a day than 10 small ones.  If nothing else, it makes less work for the accounting. 

[smutboy420]

reaking catch-22...
we would have less lumpiness with more hashing power,
...every time we hit lower luck, newbs leave because they cannot handle it...and the cycle continues
...every time we hit high luck, newbs come like bees to honey, then leave as soon as we hit lower luck.

what kano needs is to get a serious farm committing and getting him over 50-75Ph.
we had above 40 at some point, but then hit a bump.
a non-mentioned pool, after getting over 40PH stably, accumulated more and more until 200PH

people are funny like that and if they want to hope to hop in and grab some good luck on a pool. if they wait till they see a lucky streak going on and think oh wow they HAVE been haveing good luck lately and hope in.  Even tho its a matter of odds that luck aways turns around. no steak of luck stays one way or the other.  So getting in when the luck HAS been great for a short span is going to have a balance to it. and seem like it would actually be the time to not hop in to that pool.  Tho if ones showing a few real long blocks and trys to get in before some fast ones come up.  

 
But what sucks if there is any way a person can just be a real unlucky fellow or gal thats just a jinx like Mr. 415% kill joy.. Gosh lol that guy made me wonder if I could talk to any of my hippi friends to see if there some incense or sage i could burn to keep that guys bad karma from affecting everyone else like when he come in and jixes us.      

[GWhisper]

I really don't get the need for lots of daily payouts.  A payout ever day, even every few days or so is fine.  Do people really need 10 small payouts a day?  I would rather get 1 large payout a day than 10 small ones.  If nothing else, it makes less work for the accounting.  

I'm with you bro, no hurry for the payout I'm hording BTC anyways - though I'm not even in the same league as a miner such as yourself.

[kano]

...
But what sucks if there is any way a person can just be a real unlucky fellow or gal thats just a jinx like Mr. 415% kill joy..
...

a 415% or longer is expected, on average, once every 63.4 blocks ...

[bitsink]

Hopefully a some simple questions:

Under Account - > Rewards:
Why is the "Your N Avg" about half that of the actual hashrate (as reported in the header and as per the worker graph)? Why is the "Your BTC" about half that expected if comparing the actual hashrate (as before) with the pool hashrate?

Is it possible to set a payout threshold, to collect less dust?

Thanks.

[kano]

Hopefully a some simple questions:

Under Account - > Rewards:
Why is the "Your N Avg" about half that of the actual hashrate (as reported in the header and as per the worker graph)? Why is the "Your BTC" about half that expected if comparing the actual hashrate (as before) with the pool hashrate?

Coz it's the average over "N Range"

Is it possible to set a payout threshold, to collect less dust?

Thanks.

No.

[bitsink]

Coz it's the average over "N Range"

What is the reason for using the N range? It does disadvantage miners who cannot perpetually mine. Or do they also get rewards for blocks they had no contribution in as long as it is within the N range?

Is it possible to set a payout threshold, to collect less dust?

No.

Would be a nice feature. What happens if the payout address is not set or removed?

[bitsink]

Coz it's the average over "N Range"

What is the reason for using the N range? It does disadvantage miners who cannot perpetually mine. Or do they also get rewards for blocks they had no contribution in as long as it is within the N range?

RTFM...I see this is explained quite well here: https://kano.is/index.php?k=payout therefore sorry for the rhetoric question...

Is it possible to set a payout threshold, to collect less dust?

No.

Would be a nice feature. What happens if the payout address is not set or removed?

Still interested in this.

[kano]

...
What happens if the payout address is not set or removed?

You can't remove it.

Payouts are done per block.
You earn a part of a block and that is sent to you in a transaction using the block coinbase transaction (as long as you earn more than dust)
It's called ... transparency.

If you don't set an address then it isn't sent to you ... obviously ... coz there's nowhere to send it.

If you later request I send it to you, then I bitch and complain about the fact you ignored the big red letters at the top of the page and that I have to do a manual transaction to send it to you
I guess if someone does this on porpoise then I may charge them a fee for it.