KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2438 blocks

[usernamehere]

Looks like we are up over 70PH and 1 BTC just surpassed $2300 USD!

[kano]

Looks like we are up over 70PH and 1 BTC just surpassed $2300!

Thread title updated ... in the hope that it stays over 70PHs
The pool shift graph says it's been continuously over 69PHs for 2 days

[vh]

Thanks. I meant difficulty. I wish it's luck because it's getting big and big

The Kanopool dashboard shows

        Shares:     1,079,508,120,218 (181.15%)


I wonder whether 181.15% is luck? Thanks.

That is Diff%...The lower the better.  The expected average is 100%...less than 100% comes in as green on the Block Statistics page and above 100% comes in as red.

Don't micro manage.. look at 50 block or 100 block sections  looking by block to block will drive you nuts.

I still like visiting the homepage here for a sanity check:
https://ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com/

Calculators will give you 0.00042196 for 1THs at the moment (100%).    There are 3/5/7 days below that.   Look out at 30 to stay sane.

[kano]

...
I still like visiting the homepage here for a sanity check:
https://ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com/

Calculators will give you 0.00042196 for 1THs at the moment (100%).    There are 3/5/7 days below that.   Look out at 30 to stay sane.

Although I had the "per Hour" value there already ... I added "per Day" now also
http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php

Edit: I've updated it to use PH/TH instead of TH/GH ... since yeah that's a little out of date

[DarKSm0ke]

Let's crack this block, so that we can get some massive payouts

[Newko]

Good day, fellow miners. Been couple weeks since I posted (as usual, too busy with other stuff). My eyes almost popped out of my head when I checked BTC price and saw it over $2k! I'm trying to remember why I didn't buy 10 bitcoins about a year or so ago when it was $400. Hmmmm...maybe same reason I sold my $3k of Intel stock in 1979 

Nice to see the pool growing - mine on 

[moe7865]

Pool has taken a slight dip under 70PH. But should be back over it once my hosting facility has more capacity and my down miners are brought back online. These S9's are so unreliable   

[HannRa]

Pool has taken a slight dip under 70PH. But should be back over it once my hosting facility has more capacity and my down miners are brought back online. These S9's are so unreliable  

2 of the 50x S9s I bought are hashing at 2/3 of manufacturer documented hash rate just two days after initial deployment

Luckily the warranty is there...

Btw, does anyone have anything to say about T9's - are they really substantially more reliable than S9s?

[Biffa]

Pool has taken a slight dip under 70PH. But should be back over it once my hosting facility has more capacity and my down miners are brought back online. These S9's are so unreliable  

2 of the 50x S9s I bought are hashing at 2/3 of manufacturer documented hash rate just two days after initial deployment

Luckily the warranty is there...

Btw, does anyone have anything to say about T9's - are they really substantially more reliable than S9s?

More everything.

Much hungrier but more reliable

[Norm49]

Pool has taken a slight dip under 70PH. But should be back over it once my hosting facility has more capacity and my down miners are brought back online. These S9's are so unreliable  

2 of the 50x S9s I bought are hashing at 2/3 of manufacturer documented hash rate just two days after initial deployment

Luckily the warranty is there...

Btw, does anyone have anything to say about T9's - are they really substantially more reliable than S9s?

For what it's worth...I bought 1 T9 new, it ran about 2 weeks, found a block, then the next day one of the hash boards died.  Sent it back for warranty.

[clgrissom3]

...
I still like visiting the homepage here for a sanity check:
https://ckpoolmonitor.zachmonroe.com/

Calculators will give you 0.00042196 for 1THs at the moment (100%).    There are 3/5/7 days below that.   Look out at 30 to stay sane.

Although I had the "per Hour" value there already ... I added "per Day" now also
http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php

Edit: I've updated it to use PH/TH instead of TH/GH ... since yeah that's a little out of date

This estimator is about as close to real life as you can get...I've always been impressed with it

Thanks Kano!

[4ever4apple]

too much stales(( what the matter? who knows?

[ComputerGenie]

Although I had the "per Hour" value there already ... I added "per Day" now also
http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php
...

Does the "BTC to expect per Day per TH/s" assume a given amount of tx fees?
Confused since the calculated result for 100TH = "0.04181591 BTC + t3"
Seems to be 0.0003797621 difference for 100TH or ~0.256 for the whole 67493TH.

[kano]

Although I had the "per Hour" value there already ... I added "per Day" now also
http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php
...

Does the "BTC to expect per Day per TH/s" assume a given amount of tx fees?
Confused since the calculated result for 100TH = "0.04181591 BTC + t3"
Seems to be 0.0003797621 difference for 100TH or ~0.256 for the whole 67493TH.

Read the text at the top

[CrazyRussianHackerBoom]

Pool has taken a slight dip under 70PH. But should be back over it once my hosting facility has more capacity and my down miners are brought back online. These S9's are so unreliable   

Which countrrry you host minerrrs in moe7865 if you don't mind that I am asking and when you think therrre will be morrrre capacity there?

[wmabern]

This stubborn block is beginning to annoy me.  
I thought our 413.102% diff block from 2 days ago would cover the nasty blocks for at least a week or so.  
Oh well, luck and variance are a MoFo!

COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!  

[wmabern]

I just lost connection to my miners for about 5 minutes. It looks like something happened on the pool also. Big hash drop. ?

[smutboy420]

wow holly drop in hashrate batman....... Its saying that pool rate is down at  41,965.36THs right now.

[kano]

The passthru at stratum.kano.is gave the boot to everyone not connected to a node, starting at 18:44 UTC
I reset it at 18:49 and it's all OK again.
Hash rate is back up.

Just an FYI about the 'almost complete' code I've been working on rewriting most of my DB code and mentioned a few times:
These changes are also necessary to allow me to remove the disconnect problem ckpool has, with a not too distant future update after these changes are complete.

Although there's also a newer "remote node" option in ckpool that's an enhanced version of the current "node" I use, it's poor design will lose shares, if ever there's a remote node disconnect followed by a remote node restart any time before it reconnects.
So I've opted not to implement any "remote nodes".
Among other things I'm also a database person, who understands the importance of transaction integrity and transaction replay to be able to avoid losing data.
I don't store tens of thousands of text files in a directory as a 'pretend' database, I use a proper relational database to ensure data stored, is stored properly and reliably, and also my DB code can replay the logs files created to resync up the current database content with the current ckpool, whenever my DB code restarts.

Anyway, the "node" idea will eventually become a thing of the 'stone age' past not too far down the track when I replace "nodes" with small pools and my DB code will handle all the distribution of data properly.

meanwhile, yeah another slow block, oh well, as I said the other day, with random statistics you gotta take the good with the bad, it all evens out in the long run, as we certainly have more than evened out often enough

[bronder]

What subforum do you think I could post in to check why my S7 has one board going over 70C at 612Mhz while the other two are at 63C. Do you think it might need internal cleaning?