|
platti
|
 |
August 01, 2013, 05:03:04 PM |
|
You're obviously not taking into account the massive increase in hashrate that p2pool has seen in the past week. The average block time was longer before.
I wrote from the whole bitcoin-network. when all miners together produce 7,7 blocks per hour, that means 128% . and then 120% quote of p2pool is to less |
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
August 01, 2013, 05:09:03 PM |
|
I wrote from the whole bitcoin-network. when all miners together produce 7,7 blocks per hour, that means 128% . and then 120% quote of p2pool is to less
That's not what he meant. He just meant that on average for the past week, p2pool has found blocks 20% faster than expected. You can see the luck here. |
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
August 01, 2013, 05:12:28 PM
Last edit: August 01, 2013, 05:23:51 PM by platti |
|
luck is calculated with 6 Blocks per hour, not with 7.7 Blocks per hour
with 7.7 block per hour the estimated time to block is 11h:33m and not 12h:55m which is shown in this moment on p2pool website. so they calculate with 6 blocks per hour, and this is to less in the moment
|
|
|
|
|
Krak
|
|
August 01, 2013, 07:35:53 PM |
|
luck is calculated with 6 Blocks per hour, not with 7.7 Blocks per hour
with 7.7 block per hour the estimated time to block is 11h:33m and not 12h:55m which is shown in this moment on p2pool website. so they calculate with 6 blocks per hour, and this is to less in the moment
Once again, you need to educate yourself on this more before making ill-informed statements. |
BTC: 1KrakenLFEFg33A4f6xpwgv3UUoxrLPuGn
|
|
|
Akka
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 01, 2013, 07:52:08 PM
Last edit: August 01, 2013, 08:16:04 PM by Akka |
|
No, luck is calculated with current hash rate and current difficult. Blocks per hour of the whole network have nothing to do with this calculation.
But, this really was not the important part. Luck will also go down again. Basically it just doesn't matter on which pool you mine. On Average the payout will always be the same.
And P2Pool makes mining absolute decentralized and allows you to pool mine without giving a 3rd party the ability to abuse you hash power, supporting this is a bonus.
|
All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
|
|
|
GoodStuff
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
August 02, 2013, 08:29:43 PM |
|
Can't wait for the next 1.7TH/s to drop on the network.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
August 05, 2013, 11:35:50 AM |
|
p2pool hashrate on all-time-high
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2013, 11:47:44 AM |
|
in the last days the avr. block generation is 7.7 Blocks per hour. normal is 6 blocks per hour. the whole bitcoinnetwork makes 128% of blocks . so the 120% of the p2pool is not b etter than other pools
Excuse me, but how could you relate P2Pool performances with how many blocks the whole bitcoin network is it generating? The first is a number derived by "pool luck", the second depends on the total hashing power of the network. |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2013, 11:49:03 AM |
|
Any news?
Installing a new batch of hardware, arrived today! |
|
|
|
|
|
platti
|
|
August 05, 2013, 12:01:58 PM |
|
in the last days the avr. block generation is 7.7 Blocks per hour. normal is 6 blocks per hour. the whole bitcoinnetwork makes 128% of blocks . so the 120% of the p2pool is not b etter than other pools
Excuse me, but how could you relate P2Pool performances with how many blocks the whole bitcoin network is it generating? The first is a number derived by "pool luck", the second depends on the total hashing power of the network. I checked the formula for the pool-luck. it seems, you are right and i am wrong |
|
|
|
|
pyromaniac
|
|
August 05, 2013, 02:25:47 PM |
|
Any news?
Installing a new batch of hardware, arrived today! That's awesome! Thanks! We wait.  |
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2013, 06:38:46 PM |
|
New batches are getting cheaper and cheaper! :-)
|
|
|
|
|
seot
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
August 05, 2013, 06:52:51 PM |
|
New batches are getting cheaper and cheaper! :-)
|
|
|
|
|
oxideNL
Member
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
|
August 05, 2013, 07:42:36 PM |
|
Any news?
Installing a new batch of hardware, arrived today! Would you mind telling us what the total Gh/s is of the brand new toys arrived today ? I'm curious |
|
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2013, 07:54:40 PM |
|
Would you mind telling us what the total Gh/s is of the brand new toys arrived today ?
I'm curious
A bit less than 200GH/s. |
|
|
|
|
Akka
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:03:26 PM |
|
How about some miner pr0n  The FPGA-Farm was awesome (cleanest setup I've seen so far). Can't wait to see this one. |
All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2013, 08:17:47 PM |
|
How about some miner pr0n The FPGA-Farm was awesome (cleanest setup I've seen so far). Thanks! Can't wait to see this one.
I will do it soon, like last time, view upon request. Instructions will come when it will be ready. To everybody: please be a little more patient! Thanks! :-) |
|
|
|
|
|
chrcoe01
|
|
August 05, 2013, 10:03:56 PM |
|
so I was curious, since the ASIC pre-order period is over, can we still deposit to accounts that took part in the ASIC deposits, or will all new deposits still be counted towards FPGA infrastructure?
|
"You may delay, but time will not, and lost time is never found again." -Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
pyramining (OP)
|
|
August 05, 2013, 10:08:57 PM |
|
so I was curious, since the ASIC pre-order period is over, can we still deposit to accounts that took part in the ASIC deposits, or will all new deposits still be counted towards FPGA infrastructure?
All the deposits become ASIC deposits for default. It makes no more sense to add FPGA infrastructure at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
