Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 03:04:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 [255] 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 ... 1240 »
  Print  
Author Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.  (Read 2347498 times)
Slava_K
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 677
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 09:00:35 AM
 #5081

Great improvements on all my 750 Ti's, thanks for the awesome work!

But you should check the results on the pool.

Looks like I have to rollback the last commit.

Nicehash seems to have problems, because all my rigs are showing a lower rate. With the new miner and the old miner. Perhaps another difficulty issue.
With commit 929 on nicehash my 4 rigs (960, 2x750ti, 2x750ti, 2x980gtx+960) working good.
PS. With last commit any changes to --diif make only 50% nooo.

                                 
                  █████████████████████████████▒
               ▒███████████████████████████████▓░
             ▒████▓                         ░▓███▒░
         ░▒▓████▓                             ░▓███▓▓▒▒░
▓▓▓▓▓████████▓▒               ░░░▒▒▒▒▒░         ░▒█████████▓▓▓▓▓
████████▓▒                ░▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▒         ░░▒▒████████
▓██▓                   ░▒▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓███▒░             ███▓
▒███                 ░▓█▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓█████▒░         ▓▓█░
░█▓█                ▓█▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▓▓▓█████▓██░     ▓███
 ▓██▓             ▒██▒▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒░  ░▓█▓      ███▓
 ▒█▓█            ▓█▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░░░░░▒▒░ ░▒░░▓███▓      ▒███▒
  █▓█▓          ▓█▓▒▓▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▓▒▒░░▒▒▓█████░      ███▓
  ▒█▓█░        ░██▓▓▒░░░░░░░░░▒▓▒░ ░░░ ░░▒▒▓▓▓▓▓█▒█░     ▓███▒
   ▓▓▓▓        ███▒░░░░░▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ █░    ▒███▒
   ░▓▓▓▓   ░▒▒ █▓▒▒▒▒▒▓▓▓▒░▒░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒▒▓ ▒█    ░████
    ░▓▒▓▒ ░▓████▓▓▓▒▒▒▓▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒  ██   ░████
     ▒▓▓██  ▓████▓▒▒░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒▒░ ░██▒  ░████▒
      ▓████  ░██████▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░  ░███▓  ░████░
       ▒████   ▓█▓░█████▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▓████░  ▒████▒
        ░████▒  ▒░   ▒██████▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓██████▓░   ▓████▒
          ████▓         ░▒▓██████████████▓░░    ░████▓
           ▒████▒                              ▓████░
             ▓████░                          ▒████▒
              ░████▓░                      ▒████▓
                ░████▓░                  ▒████▓░
                  ░████▓░              ▒████▓
                     ░▓████▒          ▓████▒
                       ░▒████▓░    ▒████▓
                          ░▓████▓▓████▓░
                             ▒█████▓░
                               ░▒▒░
✬✬✬✬✬















[/cen
1714662242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714662242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714662242
Reply with quote  #2

1714662242
Report to moderator
1714662242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714662242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714662242
Reply with quote  #2

1714662242
Report to moderator
1714662242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714662242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714662242
Reply with quote  #2

1714662242
Report to moderator
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714662242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714662242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714662242
Reply with quote  #2

1714662242
Report to moderator
1714662242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714662242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714662242
Reply with quote  #2

1714662242
Report to moderator
1714662242
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714662242

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714662242
Reply with quote  #2

1714662242
Report to moderator
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 09:55:32 AM
 #5082

Great improvements on all my 750 Ti's, thanks for the awesome work!

But you should check the results on the pool.

Looks like I have to rollback the last commit.

Nicehash seems to have problems, because all my rigs are showing a lower rate. With the new miner and the old miner. Perhaps another difficulty issue.

I'm monitoring my hashrate on hashpower.co, it currently averages at about 70% the expected value.
Will keep it going for some more time to see if it's just bad luck.

scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2015, 09:56:21 AM
 #5083

Great improvements on all my 750 Ti's, thanks for the awesome work!

But you should check the results on the pool.

Looks like I have to rollback the last commit.

Nicehash seems to have problems, because all my rigs are showing a lower rate. With the new miner and the old miner. Perhaps another difficulty issue.

POOL RESULTS--

NiceHash pool results miniing Quark are ~20% less, although locally my 750ti cards report higher hash rates.

--scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT    DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
          SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
          GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 10:03:54 AM
 #5084

yes, it looks like the last quark commit is breaking the hashrate. I will take a look tonight after work.

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 150



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 10:11:51 AM
Last edit: August 21, 2015, 10:24:44 AM by zTheWolfz
 #5085

Note takes 25 accepts and above to see top hash with R61, -X 15 out of memory on my 960 14.9 works 5835 h,

w/ no -i/-X set 5811

-i 19.4 is the sweet spots for my card and R61 gets best top hash 5860.
anything -i 19.7 or above get lower hash rate 19.9 out of memory.

All test where done with 100 or more accepts. Edit: Stock clocks on the GTX960 SSC. W7 64bit.
Algo: lyra2rev2
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 10:37:32 AM
 #5086

can you test release 60 on the gtx 960(lyra2v2)? Wich is the fastest?

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 150



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 10:40:02 AM
Last edit: August 21, 2015, 10:58:34 AM by zTheWolfz
 #5087

can you test release 60 on the gtx 960(lyra2v2)? Wich is the fastest?

61 is a little faster for me, 60 5831, 61 5860

r60 command line:  -d 0 -l 16x24 --api-bind 0 --cpu-priority 2 --diff 2
r61:  -d 0 -l 16x24 --api-bind 0 --cpu-priority 2 -i 19.4

Off topic but what is 10k of PXC worth these days?

Edit: I test 61 now without  -l 16x24 to see what is better.
Edit2: Looks like I lose .005 to .008 without that line.
now .020 must put back lol


Edit: again, any help to run my GTX760 on lyra2rev2?
also have 660Ti these older miner software just doesn't cut it anymore.
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2015, 10:57:34 AM
 #5088

can you test release 60 on the gtx 960(lyra2v2)? Wich is the fastest?

61 is a little faster for me, 60 5831, 61 5860

r60 command line:  -d 0 -l 16x24 --api-bind 0 --cpu-priority 2 --diff 2
r61:  -d 0 -l 16x24 --api-bind 0 --cpu-priority 2 -i 19.4

Off topic but what is 10k of PXC worth these days?

Edit: I test 61 now without  -l 16x24 to see what is better.
Edit2: Looks like I lose .005 to .008 without that line.
now .020 must put back lol

PHOENIXCOIN (PXC)--

A Neoscrypt coin, 10,000 PXC was worth 0.0088 BTC when I checked 5 minutes ago on Cryptsy.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT    DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
          SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
          GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 150



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 10:59:37 AM
 #5089

can you test release 60 on the gtx 960(lyra2v2)? Wich is the fastest?

61 is a little faster for me, 60 5831, 61 5860

r60 command line:  -d 0 -l 16x24 --api-bind 0 --cpu-priority 2 --diff 2
r61:  -d 0 -l 16x24 --api-bind 0 --cpu-priority 2 -i 19.4

Off topic but what is 10k of PXC worth these days?

Edit: I test 61 now without  -l 16x24 to see what is better.
Edit2: Looks like I lose .005 to .008 without that line.
now .020 must put back lol

PHOENIXCOIN (PXC)--

A Neoscrypt coin, 10,000 PXC was worth 0.0088 BTC when I checked 5 minutes ago on Cryptsy.       --scryptr
well I have 330,000 should be worth a couple beers huh?  Grin

Thanks!

Hanging on maybe worth something some day. Lots of solo mining for those.  Wink

329936.83108882 PXC  Roll Eyes
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087

Team Black developer


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:04:44 AM
 #5090

Edit: I test 61 now without  -l 16x24 to see what is better.

The -l 16x24 is only for the scrypt algorithm. Should not make any difference on lyra2v2

Team Black Miner (ETHB3 ETH ETC VTC KAWPOW FIROPOW MEOWPOW + dual mining + tripple mining.. https://github.com/sp-hash/TeamBlackMiner
antho281
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:05:51 AM
 #5091

What's the problem with your 760 TheWolf? I think I missed that part Sad
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 150



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:12:58 AM
 #5092

What's the problem with your 760 TheWolf? I think I missed that part Sad
No good software to mine with that I can find, well that does them justice.
Most of these new coins the old miners will not work those and no one is keeping them updated that I can see.
antho281
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:32:17 AM
 #5093

The compute capability of the 760 is only 3.0 according to https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus
I don't think any mining software still support that low :S
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 150



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:41:50 AM
 #5094

The compute capability of the 760 is only 3.0 according to https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus
I don't think any mining software still support that low :S

And there really is not reason not to, there not really that old and can still do some good days work.
Even the 660Ti could still work well if we had some support.
antho281
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:46:25 AM
 #5095

Does it work if you try that change in makefile.am

From :
Quote
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"

to :

Quote
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"

EDIT: that's the mod I found a few page ago to make my 750ti (Compute 5.0) to work again with the new releases
pallas
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094


Black Belt Developer


View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:50:54 AM
 #5096

Does it work if you try that change in makefile.am

From :
Quote
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"

to :

Quote
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_52,code=\"sm_52,compute_52\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_50,code=\"sm_50,compute_50\"
#nvcc_ARCH += -gencode=arch=compute_35,code=\"sm_35,compute_35\"
nvcc_ARCH = -gencode=arch=compute_30,code=\"sm_30,compute_30\"

I don't think it'll work.
There is specific code for compute 5.0 and up in this fork (assembly, launch configs, etc.).
You can try it, some algo may even work, but most won't.

EDIT: ccminer-lyra, the djm34 fork, should work with older cards but, afaik, only compute 3.5 and up.

antho281
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 11:55:53 AM
 #5097

That's what I thought, but couldn't figure out where I read it haha! Thanks for the info pallas!!
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028



View Profile WWW
August 21, 2015, 12:03:23 PM
 #5098

The compute capability of the 760 is only 3.0 according to https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-gpus
I don't think any mining software still support that low :S

And there really is not reason not to, there not really that old and can still do some good days work.
Even the 660Ti could still work well if we had some support.

CUDAMINING--

First, there is a repository of CudaMiner and of the original CCminer builds and variants at "www.cudamining.co.uk".  Also, check Epsylon3's github.  He attempts to maintain compatiblity with older nVidia chipset architecture.

I think Bombadil's CCminer v1.02 supports Cuda 2.0 and up.  You will find it at the CudaMining website, linked above.  The author of the CudaMining website is going to let the domain expire, so you better check it out soon.

The old builds won't have all the latest algos, but as SP_ and tpruvot (Epsylon3) have done, you or another coder could fork and improve upon the old code base.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT    DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
          SCRYPTR'S NOTEBOOK: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5035515.msg46035530#msg46035530
          GITHUB: "github.com/scryptr"  MERIT is appreciated, also.  Thanks!
zTheWolfz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 150



View Profile
August 21, 2015, 12:04:07 PM
Last edit: August 21, 2015, 12:16:58 PM by zTheWolfz
 #5099




EDIT: ccminer-lyra, the djm34 fork, should work with older cards but, afaik, only compute 3.5 and up.
Ya works with quark but no luck getting to run lyra2rev2 on the 760.
I'm working quark on the 660 as well with it.
Heck one 660 or 760 out does 2x R270's time and half with the latest sgminer for those.
I have 4xR270. and a few 5850 and 6870 setting doing nothing. Pair of GTX480 collecting dust on the shelf.

@ --scryptr I've already looked around and already have the most updated ones I could find. downloaded, thanks.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
August 21, 2015, 12:42:41 PM
 #5100




EDIT: ccminer-lyra, the djm34 fork, should work with older cards but, afaik, only compute 3.5 and up.
Ya works with quark but no luck getting to run lyra2rev2 on the 760.
I'm working quark on the 660 as well with it.
Heck one 660 or 760 out does 2x R270's time and half with the latest sgminer for those.
I have 4xR270. and a few 5850 and 6870 setting doing nothing. Pair of GTX480 collecting dust on the shelf.

@ --scryptr I've already looked around and already have the most updated ones I could find. downloaded, thanks.
it wouldn't be too difficult to get it to work with compute 3.0 and lower, just need to get rid of shuffle instruction and ldg ones...


djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
Pages: « 1 ... 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 [255] 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 ... 1240 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!