Cryptozillah
|
|
August 21, 2015, 03:34:46 PM |
|
I got a bunch of Nvidia carde delivered today. First time mining with Nvidia.
I get the "msvcr120.dll is missing" error.
I am about to download the Visual Studio 2013 pack to resolve this. Is it really 6+Gb ?
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
systemx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2015, 03:42:06 PM |
|
I got a bunch of Nvidia carde delivered today. First time mining with Nvidia.
I get the "msvcr120.dll is missing" error.
I am about to download the Visual Studio 2013 pack to resolve this. Is it really 6+Gb ?
Try http://www.microsoft.com/en-US/download/details.aspx?id=40784 instead.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
August 21, 2015, 03:48:55 PM |
|
MegaByte-- Check out the link above. Get it from the MicroSoft site. 6+ MB. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Cryptozillah
|
|
August 21, 2015, 03:54:53 PM |
|
This was the first version i installed, i still have the "msvcr120.dll is missing" I saw that someone else solved it by downloading the Visual Studio 2013 pack. But it is 6+Gb Downloading as we speak but it is really slow.
|
|
|
|
systemx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
August 21, 2015, 04:19:12 PM |
|
This was the first version i installed, i still have the "msvcr120.dll is missing" I saw that someone else solved it by downloading the Visual Studio 2013 pack. But it is 6+Gb Downloading as we speak but it is really slow. Do you have MSVCP120.dll / MSVCR120.dll in C:\Windows\system32? If you do, please delete them, and re-run the 6 MB setup file again. Also, which setup did you install? 32 bit or 64 bit? Can you try installing both?
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 21, 2015, 04:36:53 PM |
|
Ethereum is still going strong. New pools make it possible for smaller miners now too. Still no interest in adding it to CCminer?
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
August 21, 2015, 04:59:48 PM |
|
Ethereum is still going strong. New pools make it possible for smaller miners now too. Still no interest in adding it to CCminer?
NON-STRATUM ALGO-- I am thinking that the difficulty lies in the communication protocol. SP_ modded the hashing protocol, and it is in the latest Ethminer build. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
Cryptozillah
|
|
August 21, 2015, 05:02:35 PM |
|
This was the first version i installed, i still have the "msvcr120.dll is missing" I saw that someone else solved it by downloading the Visual Studio 2013 pack. But it is 6+Gb Downloading as we speak but it is really slow. Do you have MSVCP120.dll / MSVCR120.dll in C:\Windows\system32? If you do, please delete them, and re-run the 6 MB setup file again. Also, which setup did you install? 32 bit or 64 bit? Can you try installing both? I uninstalled and installed the 32bit version. Now the miner is starting up. Thanks for the tip !
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
|
August 21, 2015, 06:04:32 PM |
|
Ethereum is still going strong. New pools make it possible for smaller miners now too. Still no interest in adding it to CCminer?
NON-STRATUM ALGO-- I am thinking that the difficulty lies in the communication protocol. SP_ modded the hashing protocol, and it is in the latest Ethminer build. --scryptr True, but Ethereum is here to stay and its volume can support a huge amount of miners and everybody know what Ethereum is by now and it's safe to say that it will get forked many times so while I can't code to save my life so I'm not sure about the difficulties, it might still worth implementing it long term. Most people with 750 Ti's on windows have a bug heavily gimping the hashrate for some reason (8.7 -> 1-2 mhs).
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 21, 2015, 06:52:41 PM |
|
Ethereum is still going strong. New pools make it possible for smaller miners now too. Still no interest in adding it to CCminer?
NON-STRATUM ALGO-- I am thinking that the difficulty lies in the communication protocol. SP_ modded the hashing protocol, and it is in the latest Ethminer build. --scryptr True, but Ethereum is here to stay and its volume can support a huge amount of miners and everybody know what Ethereum is by now and it's safe to say that it will get forked many times so while I can't code to save my life so I'm not sure about the difficulties, it might still worth implementing it long term. Most people with 750 Ti's on windows have a bug heavily gimping the hashrate for some reason (8.7 -> 1-2 mhs). Lasted longer then Axiom by a long shot. The Volume is definitely sticking around. I hope compatibility trickles into ccminer. AMD is quite a bit ahead of Nvidia on Ethereum. If I had my rig from a year ago I would have a higher hashrate with worse hardware.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
Schleicher
|
|
August 21, 2015, 07:17:19 PM Last edit: August 21, 2015, 09:19:04 PM by Schleicher |
|
EDIT: ccminer-lyra, the djm34 fork, should work with older cards but, afaik, only compute 3.5 and up.
Ya works with quark but no luck getting to run lyra2rev2 on the 760. I'm working quark on the 660 as well with it. Heck one 660 or 760 out does 2x R270's time and half with the latest sgminer for those. I have 4xR270. and a few 5850 and 6870 setting doing nothing. Pair of GTX480 collecting dust on the shelf. @ --scryptr I've already looked around and already have the most updated ones I could find. downloaded, thanks. In my fork Lyra2REv2 works with compute 3.0 cards, but it's not speed optimized: If you want to try it: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/34410241/ccminer.exe
|
|
|
|
|
Vita1ico
|
|
August 21, 2015, 10:43:19 PM |
|
GTX 960 100me--1.5.60(sp-MOD)--SAK(quark)--10.7Mh/s
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
August 21, 2015, 11:52:52 PM |
|
Did someone have the chance testing GTX950 capabilities ?
|
|
|
|
int3ractivodular
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
TECHNOLOGY, BABY!
|
|
August 22, 2015, 12:36:51 AM Last edit: August 22, 2015, 12:48:18 AM by int3ractivodular |
|
As others have reported, I am getting higher local quark hashrate reports but nicehash shows I'm down by a lot.
Also having an issue now where when mining Lyra2REv2 where the miner will say its launching 6 threads for my 6 cards, but only 1 card starts hashing. Dunno what's causing that, doesn't happen with other algorithms.
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
August 22, 2015, 01:38:49 AM |
|
As others have reported, I am getting higher local quark hashrate reports but nicehash shows I'm down by a lot.
Also having an issue now where when mining Lyra2REv2 where the miner will say its launching 6 threads for my 6 cards, but only 1 card starts hashing. Dunno what's causing that, doesn't happen with other algorithms.
sp said he'll look into it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=826901.msg12201021#msg12201021
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
|
August 22, 2015, 04:34:23 AM |
|
Ethereum is still going strong. New pools make it possible for smaller miners now too. Still no interest in adding it to CCminer?
NON-STRATUM ALGO-- I am thinking that the difficulty lies in the communication protocol. SP_ modded the hashing protocol, and it is in the latest Ethminer build. --scryptr I support the shark (quark) http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sharkcoin/Quark opensource on the AMD (280x 2048 shaders): 2MHASH Quark opensource on the NVIDIA (980ti 3078 shaders): 30MHASH (sp-mod 60++) How much morphine were you on when you wrote that? ~_~ And thanks for your continued support of ccminer. Not sure if it's relevant as you don't really seem interested, but the low CPU overhead changes you made to ethminer reduce hashrate by like 20% when you have 2+ GPUs. https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/2227/cuda-miner/p8
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
sambiohazard
|
|
August 22, 2015, 04:44:01 AM |
|
Today's share sent djm34: 80a7312ce2cee21c102c2a91cddbb77b24762e6b9bbc659fd88994db1f957ef0 pallas: a3f2d9ebc1275f00c281ec645d8fa09e17d9c0f43e971d105382c5b690c43507 sp_: 391aeb3a62c788ad633f3601e2cc056b7d739b7da15d82235e4852e2b419cb45 Remain awesome!!
|
|
|
|
dominuspro
|
|
August 22, 2015, 06:24:55 AM |
|
I have no problems in Win7x64 with 3x970+1x960. I'm using the sp-mod binary provided by genoil with: ethminer -F ... -U --gpu-mining-buffers 1 --gpu-workgroup-size 128 --gpu-batch-size 21 --gpu-devices 0 1 2 3 The minning buffers=1 seems better on ethpool, on the others should be probably removed. Maybe there is some more headroom playing with the other 2 parameters...
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
August 22, 2015, 06:52:42 AM |
|
Today's share sent djm34: 80a7312ce2cee21c102c2a91cddbb77b24762e6b9bbc659fd88994db1f957ef0 pallas: a3f2d9ebc1275f00c281ec645d8fa09e17d9c0f43e971d105382c5b690c43507 sp_: 391aeb3a62c788ad633f3601e2cc056b7d739b7da15d82235e4852e2b419cb45 Remain awesome!! Thanks again for the support!
|
|
|
|
|