chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3094
Merit: 1093
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 12:01:22 PM |
|
agreed on many points ... there would be many many reasons why ccminer devs would not want to work on sgminer code ... even wolf - who is a long time dev of opencl AND sgminer - has a great deal to say about sgminer's internal workings ... but all those stats at a glance - stats-candy  ... ive been watching multiminer for a very long time - even tried getting it running under fedora 20 x64 with no success ... havent toyed with it for a while now - too much on my plate ... but would definitely be worth a look-in to see whats happened with it ... only a small part of the farm is amd - gigabyte 7970 oc and 280x oc ... about 22 cards left i think from memory ... wasa great deal more than that until nvidia kicked serious butt with hashrate and power consumption ... which is why most of the farm is now nvidia ... but i do have a soft spot for amd still - which is why these cards are still running ... so i guess its a matter of workign what you have ( and forking your own builds ) or building from scratch and developing a 'new' miner ... cant wait for that to happen  ... #crysx I have done very little for AMD, but the small changes I did was directly in the .cl code of the kernals.. I plan to do some more later as I have quite a few cards I picked up cheap. Kachur bins does 13MHASH on quark on the 280x and 7.5MHASH x11. I use miner control software to avoid crashes and lost mining.. so does this mean you will be spending more time on opencl optimizations? ... these are the two main algos i am much more interested in also - so the higher the optimizations - the better ... #crysx
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 12:45:08 PM Last edit: July 31, 2015, 12:56:46 PM by pallas |
|
I'm working on neoscrypt speedup, currently around 5% hashrate increase. Beers appreciated ;-)
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 01:12:44 PM |
|
I'm working on neoscrypt speedup, currently around 5% hashrate increase. Beers appreciated ;-)
Yay...
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 01:13:32 PM |
|
I'm working on neoscrypt speedup, currently around 5% hashrate increase. Beers appreciated ;-)
that's what you need to beat: 850kh/s on 980 200kh/s (but if I have a bad 750ti) and 500kh/s on 780ti ps: on a bitter sweet note, usually when I submit updates, I usually don't get beers, just devs outsourcing my stuff and eventually getting beers 
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 01:19:36 PM |
|
I'm working on neoscrypt speedup, currently around 5% hashrate increase. Beers appreciated ;-)
that's what you need to beat: 850kh/s on 980 200kh/s (but if I have a bad 750ti) and 500kh/s on 780ti ps: on a bitter sweet note, usually when I submit updates, I usually don't get beers, just devs outsourcing my stuff and eventually getting beers  I do not have any of those cards, just a 970; what's your hashrate on that card? about beers, I got none of them: got BTCs only when selling.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 01:22:17 PM |
|
I'm working on neoscrypt speedup, currently around 5% hashrate increase. Beers appreciated ;-)
that's what you need to beat: 850kh/s on 980 200kh/s (but if I have a bad 750ti) and 500kh/s on 780ti ps: on a bitter sweet note, usually when I submit updates, I usually don't get beers, just devs outsourcing my stuff and eventually getting beers  I do not have any of those cards, just a 970; what's your hashrate on that card? about beers, I got none of them: got BTCs only when selling. yeah me too... (hopefully) don't have a 970, but it should scale according the perf of the 980 (considering it is the same mem bandwidth)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 01:30:56 PM |
|
Anyone upgraded to windows10 ? can you share your impression especially on the 900 serie.
So far I tested (and went back to win8.1) on 780ti, 750ti and 980 perf of the 750ti and 780ti didn't change much, but for the 980 got huge loss of performance (like 20% on neoscrypt and similar on cryptonight)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 01:58:12 PM |
|
Anyone upgraded to windows10 ? can you share your impression especially on the 900 serie.
So far I tested (and went back to win8.1) on 780ti, 750ti and 980 perf of the 750ti and 780ti didn't change much, but for the 980 got huge loss of performance (like 20% on neoscrypt and similar on cryptonight)
djm Was beta testing but here is what I am curious about since the new driver for DX12 is out. In the past if you SLI'd say 2 960 4Gb then Windows would only read them as a total of 4GB but now Windows 10 will recognize them as 8GB total memory. It has to be implemented on the developer end though to take effect. Would this help in the few memory heavy algos if ccminer could implement it?
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks 
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 02:21:42 PM |
|
Anyone upgraded to windows10 ? can you share your impression especially on the 900 serie.
So far I tested (and went back to win8.1) on 780ti, 750ti and 980 perf of the 750ti and 780ti didn't change much, but for the 980 got huge loss of performance (like 20% on neoscrypt and similar on cryptonight)
djm Was beta testing but here is what I am curious about since the new driver for DX12 is out. In the past if you SLI'd say 2 960 4Gb then Windows would only read them as a total of 4GB but now Windows 10 will recognize them as 8GB total memory. It has to be implemented on the developer end though to take effect. Would this help in the few memory heavy algos if ccminer could implement it? not sure it would help, unless you mine only with one card and even then, the performance in accessing the memory from the other card would be terrible... did you try mining with your cards ? did you noticed any difference ?
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
antonio8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1000
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 02:26:47 PM |
|
Anyone upgraded to windows10 ? can you share your impression especially on the 900 serie.
So far I tested (and went back to win8.1) on 780ti, 750ti and 980 perf of the 750ti and 780ti didn't change much, but for the 980 got huge loss of performance (like 20% on neoscrypt and similar on cryptonight)
djm Was beta testing but here is what I am curious about since the new driver for DX12 is out. In the past if you SLI'd say 2 960 4Gb then Windows would only read them as a total of 4GB but now Windows 10 will recognize them as 8GB total memory. It has to be implemented on the developer end though to take effect. Would this help in the few memory heavy algos if ccminer could implement it? not sure it would help, unless you mine only with one card and even then, the performance in accessing the memory from the other card would be terrible... did you try mining with your cards ? did you noticed any difference ? No difference at all. Slight (very) gain with some algos and slight loss on others. I don't have a 980 though it was with 960 and 750ti's. At the time Windows 10 was having wifi issues so I would only test it on Sundays and the driver for DX12 was not out yet so they all where still buggy drivers. Will run this Sunday since it is my first day off to be home with the release.
|
If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks 
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 03:30:49 PM |
|
Does anyone happen to know the current speed for Neo-scrypt on a 750ti, 960, and 970?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 04:16:37 PM |
|
Anyone upgraded to windows10 ? can you share your impression especially on the 900 serie.
So far I tested (and went back to win8.1) on 780ti, 750ti and 980 perf of the 750ti and 780ti didn't change much, but for the 980 got huge loss of performance (like 20% on neoscrypt and similar on cryptonight)
djm Was beta testing but here is what I am curious about since the new driver for DX12 is out. In the past if you SLI'd say 2 960 4Gb then Windows would only read them as a total of 4GB but now Windows 10 will recognize them as 8GB total memory. It has to be implemented on the developer end though to take effect. Would this help in the few memory heavy algos if ccminer could implement it? not sure it would help, unless you mine only with one card and even then, the performance in accessing the memory from the other card would be terrible... did you try mining with your cards ? did you noticed any difference ? No difference at all. Slight (very) gain with some algos and slight loss on others. I don't have a 980 though it was with 960 and 750ti's. At the time Windows 10 was having wifi issues so I would only test it on Sundays and the driver for DX12 was not out yet so they all where still buggy drivers. Will run this Sunday since it is my first day off to be home with the release. could be only the 980 (heard that the 980ti wasn't even recognized...). I think epsylon didn't notice notice any problem either... could also be the sli bridge (the sli wasn't activated, but the bridge is always in place... and it was less trouble to downgrade than opening the tower... so...) well I guess I will make another try when nvidia release a new driver...
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1024
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 04:19:05 PM |
|
I'm working on neoscrypt speedup, currently around 5% hashrate increase. Beers appreciated ;-)
that's what you need to beat: 850kh/s on 980 200kh/s (but if I have a bad 750ti) and 500kh/s on 780ti ps: on a bitter sweet note, usually when I submit updates, I usually don't get beers, just devs outsourcing my stuff and eventually getting beers  Maybe if you poopoo'd less and got drunk more, you'd get more beers. Anyone upgraded to windows10 ? can you share your impression especially on the 900 serie.
So far I tested (and went back to win8.1) on 780ti, 750ti and 980 perf of the 750ti and 780ti didn't change much, but for the 980 got huge loss of performance (like 20% on neoscrypt and similar on cryptonight)
Doesn't change anything. If there is a performance difference there, it needs to be unlocked. At least it doesn't hurt hashrates. W8.1 x64 to W10 x64. I have a 970 and mining Neo. If anything it looks like it minimized GPU utilization spikes. Almost all my GPUs across the board have no fluctuation what so ever. The overall hashrate hasn't really changed though. GPU usage and Power is just flat. I also have problems remoting into the W10 PC. I may revert it. BTW looks like Bytecoin is almost worth mining, if only Cryptonote performed better. 
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 04:35:51 PM Last edit: July 31, 2015, 09:42:18 PM by scryptr |
|
Does anyone happen to know the current speed for Neo-scrypt on a 750ti, 960, and 970?
GTX HASH RATES-- I get 180kh/s, 320kh/s, and 510kh/s, respectively, for NeoScrypt. I do not have a GTX 980. --scryptr P.S. Anyone who wants a game code for "BATMAN: ARKHAM KNIGHT", please PM me. The code EXPIRES TODAY, July 31! I only have one code to give away, and it only works once. So, the first PM in my message box gets the code. If it is after midnight, it is too late. ONE RULE: You must have posted in this particular thread prior to this post. The game code is a legitimate promotional code, I earned it, but cannot sell it. Please send me a PM with "BATMAN" in the subject line. Thanks! I'll check my messages at least once an hour today. --scryptr EDIT: WINNER! hashbrown9000! I have already sent off the code.  --scryptr
|
|
|
|
lawrencelyl
Member

Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
 |
July 31, 2015, 04:44:56 PM |
|
Does anyone happen to know the current speed for Neo-scrypt on a 750ti, 960, and 970?
GTX HASH RATES-- I get 180kh/s, 320kh/s, and 510kh/s, respectively, for NeoScrypt. I do not have a GTX 980. --scryptr P.S. Anyone who wants a game code for "BATMAN: ARKHAM KNIGHT", please PM me. The code EXPIRES TODAY, July 31! I only have one code to give away, and it only works once. So, the first PM in my message box gets the code. If it is after midnight, it is too late. ONE RULE: You must have posted in this particular thread prior to this post. The game code is a legitimate promotional code, I earned it, but cannot sell it. Please send me a PM with "BATMAN" in the subject line. Thanks! I'll check my messages at least once an hoour today. --scryptr I get around 650kH/s for NeoScrypt on GTX980. But that's with TDP limited to 150W. I figure out it's more efficient to run at lower wattage.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
August 01, 2015, 01:32:46 AM |
|
Does anyone happen to know the current speed for Neo-scrypt on a 750ti, 960, and 970?
GTX HASH RATES-- I get 180kh/s, 320kh/s, and 510kh/s, respectively, for NeoScrypt. I do not have a GTX 980. --scryptr P.S. Anyone who wants a game code for "BATMAN: ARKHAM KNIGHT", please PM me. ok can we have the card instead ? 
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1798
Merit: 1028
|
 |
August 01, 2015, 03:22:24 AM Last edit: August 01, 2015, 04:30:37 AM by scryptr |
|
Does anyone happen to know the current speed for Neo-scrypt on a 750ti, 960, and 970?
GTX HASH RATES-- I get 180kh/s, 320kh/s, and 510kh/s, respectively, for NeoScrypt. I do not have a GTX 980. --scryptr P.S. Anyone who wants a game code for "BATMAN: ARKHAM KNIGHT", please PM me. ok can we have the card instead ?  No, sorry, the hash it generates goes for bread, beer, and occasional donations. Yours took 7 days to confirm last time; blockchain traffic issues. Pallas might be in line for one if the Axiom algo gets hammered out between the movers and shakers in the Cuda world...  I wish I could code better. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
zTheWolfz
|
 |
August 01, 2015, 04:48:40 AM |
|
This speed look about normal for a GTX960SSC under these conditions ? Command line as followed: ccminer.exe -a Quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.ua.nicehash.com:3345 -i 22 -u zxxxxz -p x -d 0 -l 16x24 I set -i to 22 to make the system more use friendly, default was causing a bit of lag while doing other things, like surfing or open GPUZ tabs. 
|
|
|
|
Fuzzbawls
|
 |
August 01, 2015, 04:50:12 AM |
|
This speed look about normal for a GTX960SSC under these conditions ? Command line as followed: ccminer.exe -a Quark -o stratum+tcp://quark.ua.nicehash.com:3345 -i 22 -u zxxxxz -p x -d 0 -l 16x24 I set -i to 22 to make the system more use friendly, default was causing a bit of lag while doing other thing, like surfing or open GPUZ tabs.  -l 16x24 shouldn't be necessary? thought that was just for scrypt based algos
|
|
|
|
zTheWolfz
|
 |
August 01, 2015, 05:05:34 AM Last edit: August 01, 2015, 07:11:44 AM by zTheWolfz |
|
Its probably not, I had just gotten use to adding it so it didn't run the 2min. benchmark each time it was started. I've removed it to see if there will be any improvement without it. So far looks about the same, starts out with a little higher khash rate but settles in after its been running a good long while to what you see above, will see if that is the same now without it. I worked with it a good while last night and at first was getting some booo's as you can see that has been corrected by the accepted counts. Edit: These are the numbers I am seeing without it but was also seeing these same numbers last night/early morning. The above number could have been changed by the heat of the day and didn't think to look at the clock speeds to see if maybe it had down clocked a little and didn't ramp back up after it cooled back down. Note that for some reason the memory clock is not being pushed to its full speed. Should be 1753Mhz, but the core clock is at 1392Mhz and stock clock for core is 1279Mhz for this card. Boost at work there but not for the memory? 
|
|
|
|
|