CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[bathrobehero]

SOLO-MINING PHOENIXCOIN--
Good luck mining!    And, as an additional note, Ghostlander has written code for NSGminer, "The World's Fastest NeoScrypt Miner".  It is supposedly capable of 275KH/s on an 750ti via OpenCL.  I haven't been able to succesfully launch it yet on my 750ti rig, but sp_'s CCminer mines at about 220KH/s on my 750ti cards.  NSGminer is based on SGminer.  Ghostlander also developed the first CGminer-based NeoScrypt mining software.       --scryptr

The opencl does around 190 and not 275. My private can do 240-250 with proper oc on the 750ti

Ghostlander claims he's getting 282KH/s @ 1400MHz per 750 Ti under Windows XP with his miner. I got nowhere that high though in win 7 with his miner.

I was able to solo-mine PXC this week.  The solo-mining configuration depends on GetWork, not Stratum, and the mining URL should be prefixed with "http", not "stratum+tcp".  A good CCminer batch file with launch-line follows:

Only pools use stratum, solomining always use getwork (afaik).

[pallas]

..or getblocktemplate

[scryptr]

..or getblocktemplate

--NO-GBT  --

Launch lines given by Ghostlander have the "--no-gbt" flag set.  This specifies "No GetBlockTemplate".       --scryptr

[scryptr]

SOLO-MINING PHOENIXCOIN--
Good luck mining!    And, as an additional note, Ghostlander has written code for NSGminer, "The World's Fastest NeoScrypt Miner".  It is supposedly capable of 275KH/s on an 750ti via OpenCL.  I haven't been able to succesfully launch it yet on my 750ti rig, but sp_'s CCminer mines at about 220KH/s on my 750ti cards.  NSGminer is based on SGminer.  Ghostlander also developed the first CGminer-based NeoScrypt mining software.       --scryptr

The opencl does around 190 and not 275. My private can do 240-250 with proper oc on the 750ti

Ghostlander claims he's getting 282KH/s @ 1400MHz per 750 Ti under Windows XP with his miner. I got nowhere that high though in win 7 with his miner.

I was able to solo-mine PXC this week.  The solo-mining configuration depends on GetWork, not Stratum, and the mining URL should be prefixed with "http", not "stratum+tcp".  A good CCminer batch file with launch-line follows:

Only pools use stratum, solomining always use getwork (afaik).

NSGMINER LAUNCH LINE--

Apologies, but I can't even get NSGminer to launch on Win 7 x64 with my GTX 960.  What is your launch line for NSGminer?       --scryptr

[bensam1231]

SP, just a FYI, your version is still not getting as good hash as DJMs Neoscrypt kernel.
Also another FYI, after DJM updated his kernels, it increased power usage by about 15%.

What cards are you testing on?. How much faster? My kernal does around 1MHASH on the 980ti.
15% more power is a waste.

970s... Various manufacturers. Weirdly enough I ran into a voltage limitation on one of the cards. Like the TDP was maxed, but the card was using so much juice it was throttling based on vOP.

Getting 670~ with DJMs and 620~ with same rig. Using version .79

Also going to echo the high CPU utilization in CCMiner with Neo... running at about 20% which is enough to keep the processors fully powered up.

The cryptomining blog seems to be getting 610khash with djms cuda 7.5 build on the gtx 970

http://cryptomining-blog.com/6450-new-ccminer-fork-from-djm34-with-faster-neoscrypt/

Different clockrates I'm sure. I'm using the 6.5nosync version. 7.5 is slower and runs about that speed.

[Liquid71]

what pool you guys are using for neoscrypt, they seems all trash tons of orphan or invalid, and solo mining does not work....

givemecoins works great for me, blocksfactory is also good for FTC

[Amph]

what pool you guys are using for neoscrypt, they seems all trash tons of orphan or invalid, and solo mining does not work....

givemecoins works great for me, blocksfactory is also good for FTC

i don't like blockfactory, 10% or more of invalid, the other you mentioned seems to have a very low hashrate

[fenomenhaa]

SOLO-MINING PHOENIXCOIN--
Good luck mining!    And, as an additional note, Ghostlander has written code for NSGminer, "The World's Fastest NeoScrypt Miner".  It is supposedly capable of 275KH/s on an 750ti via OpenCL.  I haven't been able to succesfully launch it yet on my 750ti rig, but sp_'s CCminer mines at about 220KH/s on my 750ti cards.  NSGminer is based on SGminer.  Ghostlander also developed the first CGminer-based NeoScrypt mining software.       --scryptr

The opencl does around 190 and not 275. My private can do 240-250 with proper oc on the 750ti

With Sp private 5 750ti's (with o/c)190-200kh/s and 970 650-660kh/s(with o/c). İs it normal or i 'm using wrong version of private miner.? ))

[bensam1231]

what pool you guys are using for neoscrypt, they seems all trash tons of orphan or invalid, and solo mining does not work....

givemecoins works great for me, blocksfactory is also good for FTC

I used to mine on GMC all the time back when I was heavy into Neo, they did a update to their service and now occasionally some blocktimes take suuupppper long to go through. I contacted support and they didn't ever fix it. Look at block times, on occasion you'll see a 9999% luck one... or a couple, which is wasted hashing time. I'm sure somethings fucked up on their backend, because the rate at which they appear and the amount rounds like that appear on other mining pools.

Now I mine exclusively at TBF.


In other news, after more comparing it seems that .79 gets ~10% less hashrate then DJM and uses ~10% less power.

[sp_]

With Sp private 5 750ti's (with o/c)190-200kh/s and 970 650-660kh/s(with o/c). İs it normal or i 'm using wrong version of private miner.? ))

I think the different models perform different. It has to do with Samsung/elpida/hynix memory. I think you need to overclock the memory to get a boost, and not only the coreclock. And you need to make sure your card isn't trottleing. Most 750ti's comes with a default tdp of 38W, and you should increase to 65W (NVIDIA SMI tool or bios change)

[fenomenhaa]

@Sp all cards configure 65w via bios.15 of 750Ti's have samsung memory,2of them elpida and just one hynix.let's try o/cthe memory.

edit: gave +200 memory and no gain in hash.

[sp_]

Maybe I remember wrong. I need to check it out. But 190-200 is too low.

[fenomenhaa]

Maybe I remember wrong. I need to check it out. But 190-200 is too low.

Ok, looking forwrd to see your anwer,nowadays feather is profitable...

[Amph]

there is a photo of the new 1080 nvidia http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/92207-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-seen-new-photograph/

who will program the new ccminer for those beast if sp want to retire?

anyway from what it seems on the web one of this should consume like a 970 and probably do 2x the performance on the hashrate, i don't think it will do more, as usual the 2x boost, is a good conservative estimate

[pallas]

there is a photo of the new 1080 nvidia http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/92207-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-seen-new-photograph/

who will program the new ccminer for those best if sp want to retire?

anyway from what it seems on the web one of this should consume like a 970 and probably do 2x the performance on the hashrate, i don't think it will do more, as usual the 2x boost, is a good conservative estimate

I really hope so, but I think 1.5x is more likely.

[bensam1231]

there is a photo of the new 1080 nvidia http://hexus.net/tech/news/graphics/92207-nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-seen-new-photograph/

who will program the new ccminer for those best if sp want to retire?

anyway from what it seems on the web one of this should consume like a 970 and probably do 2x the performance on the hashrate, i don't think it will do more, as usual the 2x boost, is a good conservative estimate

I really hope so, but I think 1.5x is more likely.

If that... people like quoting best possible scenarios, especially with initial marketing.

[tbearhere]

SP is there an  cpu  priority  0        ?

I notice that every since you have this intensity  and X in the build.. that maybe is what is  causing my  2 core rigs to crash on changing algo's every 6 minutes or every hour doing one algo.
If I have to put intensity settings in then the hashrate goes back down to where it was before the improvements.
It only happens on my 2 core

is there an  cpu  priority  0 setting ? thx

How the fck do I get ccminer stabilized on a 2 core ?

crash  ccminer crashed 10:38
11:08

[scryptr]

SP is there an  cpu  priority  0        ?

I notice that every since you have this intensity  and X in the build.. that maybe is what is  causing my  2 core rigs to crash on changing algo's every 6 minutes or every hour doing one algo.
If I have to put intensity settings in then the hashrate goes back down to where it was before the improvements.
It only happens on my 2 core

is there an  cpu  priority  0 setting ? thx

How the fck do I get ccminer stabilized on a 2 core ?

crash  ccminer crashed 10:38
11:08

ARE YOU RUNNING AN AUTO-SWITCH BATCH FILE? --

And, is NeoScrypt the problem algo?  My best solution was to lower the intensity to 14, 15, or 15.3 .  Neoscrypt would often run at lower performance, but Quark or X11 would run at good speed.  I normally run NeoScrypt at "-i 15.7" on my headless, non-switching rigs.       --scryptr

[tbearhere]

SP is there an  cpu  priority  0        ?

I notice that every since you have this intensity  and X in the build.. that maybe is what is  causing my  2 core rigs to crash on changing algo's every 6 minutes or every hour doing one algo.
If I have to put intensity settings in then the hashrate goes back down to where it was before the improvements.
It only happens on my 2 core

is there an  cpu  priority  0 setting ? thx

How the do I get ccminer stabilized on a 2 core ?

crash  ccminer crashed 10:38
11:08

ARE YOU RUNNING AN AUTO-SWITCH BATCH FILE? --

And, is NeoScrypt the problem algo?  My best solution was to lower the intensity to 14, 15, or 15.3 .  Neoscrypt would often run at lower performance, but Quark or X11 would run at good speed.  I normally run NeoScrypt at "-i 15.7" on my headless, non-switching rigs.       --scryptr

Yes and it shouldn't matter..... but I'm trying one last thing.... I set the time to 10 seconds between algo's .... see if that works... so far it is... will see by tomorrow if it lasts that long then it needed that for ?  Clearing the registers sound good.   Or memory.  Right now as I'm typing this it's switching again for the 4th time and...... it worked again. maybe problem solved but why on the 2 core only?
Ps setting intensities shouldn't be what I have to do they should not be set that high by default  creating instabilities ..dont need them at all never used them except for this computer to lower so I can use it  4 core... but why? It's got me ?  
I'm running a bat file so it can take up to 40 seconds to change algo's ... but I'm moving it to MC conf then will only take 10 seconds to switch.

thx scrypt
EDIT: Sp should list every algos default intensities.

[joblo]

EDIT: Sp should list every algos default intensities.

Agreed. In his efforts to advertise higher hashrates for certain algos on certain cards he has detsabilized
other algos and other cards.