joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 07:06:43 PM |
|
is there a gtx 760 kepler kernel code for this miner?
You can change the config to compile for sm3.5. I tried that, it didnt work. ccminer just told me that the compute version is incompatible. 760 is 3.0. Ooops.
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 07:38:30 PM |
|
is there a gtx 760 kepler kernel code for this miner?
You can change the config to compile for sm3.5. I tried that, it didnt work. ccminer just told me that the compute version is incompatible. actually it could be 3.0 (not sure when the 760 has been released... but 3.5 is only for the titan/780/780ti)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
BOBAN
Member

Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 07:43:03 PM |
|
is there a gtx 760 kepler kernel code for this miner?
You can change the config to compile for sm3.5. I tried that, it didnt work. ccminer just told me that the compute version is incompatible. actually it could be 3.0 (not sure when the 760 has been released... but 3.5 is only for the titan/780/780ti) the gtx 760 was released on june 25th, 2013
|
|
|
|
BOBAN
Member

Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 07:45:12 PM |
|
is there a gtx 760 kepler kernel code for this miner?
You can change the config to compile for sm3.5. I tried that, it didnt work. ccminer just told me that the compute version is incompatible. actually it could be 3.0 (not sure when the 760 has been released... but 3.5 is only for the titan/780/780ti) the gtx 760 was released on june 25th, 2013 and, when I try and mine with my gtx 760, the sm 3.0 model of ccminer with neoscrypt support says that the algorithm cannot be mined in sm 3.0 devices. I have the latest cuda and drivers installed (automatically installs).
|
|
|
|
Vaccomondus
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 08:18:13 PM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download?
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 08:52:52 PM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download? Release 9 it is, send 0.1 BTC and pm to sp_
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
March 15, 2016, 08:57:18 PM Last edit: March 16, 2016, 12:20:46 PM by djm34 |
|
is there a gtx 760 kepler kernel code for this miner?
You can change the config to compile for sm3.5. I tried that, it didnt work. ccminer just told me that the compute version is incompatible. actually it could be 3.0 (not sure when the 760 has been released... but 3.5 is only for the titan/780/780ti) the gtx 760 was released on june 25th, 2013 and, when I try and mine with my gtx 760, the sm 3.0 model of ccminer with neoscrypt support says that the algorithm cannot be mined in sm 3.0 devices. I have the latest cuda and drivers installed (automatically installs). yeah, that's normal (sort of... I never been able to get a pre-3.5 implementation working...) , only 3.5 and higher are supported for neoscrypt. Actually you could get it to work with opencl and sgminer
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 12:24:34 AM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download? Release 9 it is, send 0.1 BTC and pm to sp_ Huh, are you sure? I only received up to release 7. Spreadminer 7 with source (linux support) - Fixed the hash - fixed the makefile (linux) - Rewrote Blake - some small tuning 0.6% faster than build 6 (750ti)
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1024
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 02:58:28 AM |
|
also if ethereum go pos, another big coin will emerge, probably decred, so a pump there is not so unexpected in the near future the money will always move in way or another and diff will follow
Investors don't just decide to invest in a new coin when one goes PoS in order to feed miners money. If Eth dies, either by bottoming out or PoS, miners are more then likely SoL. Decred and Vanilla are the next closest things. Before Eth it was Dash and Dash has been private kernels/ASIC for quite some time... three months ago we were making $.50 profit on a 970, today it's $6... This is definitely a high point and it shouldn't be expected it'll stay this way. money does not vanish, they always float one way or another, there will be always a strong altcoin, like it was litecoin, then doge, then darkcoin, then blackcoin, then ethereum, then it will be decred or a ethereum clone or a new thing, this section will never die, this what i've understand Putting aside how unlikely it is that money will always be static in cryptos... It doesn't stay the same between 'altcoins'. Investors don't decide to invest based on the needs of miners. It's based on profitability and how much they believe in the coin. Believe it or not, there are a lot of coins that aren't GPU mineable... including this coin called Bitcoin. Looking at the past, your logic completely breaks as three months ago there wasn't anything close to as profitable as it is right now in the GPU mining sector. Before that, there were about six months ago (still not as profitable, but profitable), before that more so. As I mentioned before, GPU mining hash has grown about 30% in the last two weeks... Maybe closer to 50% as Eth has gained another 300Mh since then.
The x11 algo used to have 500GHASH. The Quark algo used to have 200-300 GHASH the lyra2v2 algo used to have 100GHASH etc.. People move their rigs to mine etherum. If etherum go pos, they will move their rigs back to what they used to mine. ps. The quark algo is now paying above 0.5BTC/GHASH @ http://www.zpool.ca (0,015234BTC / Day ($6.4)) The 980ti should do 30MHASH with my buyable private miner on the 980ti with a little overclock. (0.1BTC) The quark opensource kernal does 2.5MHASH on the r9 280x Yup and they'll get smooshed. There is definitely a increase in hashrate due to Ethereum, the 50% increase in hash isn't just people moving away from other coins. That's what happened at first. Now it's people buying new hardware.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 03:18:27 AM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download? Release 9 it is, send 0.1 BTC and pm to sp_ Huh, are you sure? I only received up to release 7. Spreadminer 7 with source (linux support) - Fixed the hash - fixed the makefile (linux) - Rewrote Blake - some small tuning 0.6% faster than build 6 (750ti) Yes, July 2015: Just a tiny increase from release 8 this time
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 03:20:51 AM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download? Release 9 it is, send 0.1 BTC and pm to sp_ Huh, are you sure? I only received up to release 7. Spreadminer 7 with source (linux support) - Fixed the hash - fixed the makefile (linux) - Rewrote Blake - some small tuning 0.6% faster than build 6 (750ti) Release #7 is from 25-12-2014 release #8,is from may-2015. Pm me
|
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 10:57:25 AM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download? Release 9 it is, send 0.1 BTC and pm to sp_ Huh, are you sure? I only received up to release 7. Spreadminer 7 with source (linux support) - Fixed the hash - fixed the makefile (linux) - Rewrote Blake - some small tuning 0.6% faster than build 6 (750ti) Release #7 is from 25-12-2014 release #8,is from may-2015. Pm me I apologize, I just realized that I did receive release 8 and 9 back when they were distributed but I missed it for some reason.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
Vaccomondus
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 11:48:51 AM |
|
@Sp any updates of this kernels,I'm donator of this algo's  )) decred i have rev3. don't remember others  )) 3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) 4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-7% 5. 0.1BTC: decred +10-21% The may 2015 release(release 9 or 8 ) does around 5mhash with oc on the 970 Release 7 which I assume you're talking about does 4.35 Mh/s on stock (970 WF3OC) and 4.8 Mh/s with +150 Mhz OC (1465-1478 Mhz). Above that it's bound to crash in a few hours. where to download? Release 9 it is, send 0.1 BTC and pm to sp_ ah i was thinking it was free, no money for it
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 12:24:55 PM |
|
is there a gtx 760 kepler kernel code for this miner?
You can change the config to compile for sm3.5. I tried that, it didnt work. ccminer just told me that the compute version is incompatible. actually it could be 3.0 (not sure when the 760 has been released... but 3.5 is only for the titan/780/780ti) the gtx 760 was released on june 25th, 2013 and, when I try and mine with my gtx 760, the sm 3.0 model of ccminer with neoscrypt support says that the algorithm cannot be mined in sm 3.0 devices. I have the latest cuda and drivers installed (automatically installs). yeah, that's normal (sort of... I never been able to get a post-3.5 implementation working...) , only 3.5 and higher are supported for neoscrypt. Actually you could get it to work with opencl and sgminer I might be able to help. Is it the fucked global memory accesses in the ugly, retarded homebrew KDF thing? hmm ? actually in the nvidia version it is the whole "long" rotation which I haven't been able to rewrite with the 3.0 command (even though it should have worked, it always failed to produce a result... that was the case before the optimized code already)
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
alitech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 04:41:20 PM |
|
Hi guys
I have a GTX 960. What is the expected hash rate? Also, which version should I download for Windows 10 and where can I get it? I have been looking at this thread for a long time, but can only see download links in the first couple of posts.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1003
|
 |
March 16, 2016, 11:12:40 PM Last edit: March 17, 2016, 02:23:51 PM by tbearhere |
|
Etherum will hardfork, but dwarfpool has 57% of the network hashrate. What if they refuse to upgrade the wallet. Then there will be no hardfork..
Etherum
Nethashrate: 1 303 320 GHASH Dwarfpool: 740 872 GHASH
In the early Dash days (darkcoin) many pools refused to upgrade their wallets, because the payouts to the miners was reduced.
Where are the list of pools sp?thx
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1024
Dragonslots | +13k Slots & Casino Games
|
 |
March 17, 2016, 07:40:18 AM |
|
Hi guys
I have a GTX 960. What is the expected hash rate? Also, which version should I download for Windows 10 and where can I get it? I have been looking at this thread for a long time, but can only see download links in the first couple of posts.
Thanks.
hashrate for what algo? i think you cna do fine with etheruem and 15mega or decred around 1GB, and windows 10 is not recomended, because even if they fixed the lower hashrate, still it's not on par with windows 7 hashrate, for ethereum i'm talking
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 17, 2016, 11:58:33 AM Last edit: March 17, 2016, 01:20:30 PM by sp_ |
|
I have done some tests. I expect the final decred mod #4 will be able to do 3.1 ghash on the 980ti. The 750ti will gain around +30mhash +37MHASH from release #3
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
March 17, 2016, 12:53:19 PM |
|
Ok. I have found away to do the optimal decred kernal now. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15842507/passing-the-ptx-program-to-the-cuda-driver-directlySo I will generate the ptx assembly with the midstate data included in the instructions. Then for every time the midstate is changing, I recompile the kernal runtime with the API calls described in the article. To estimate the speedgain you can replace all the constant mem access with contstants in the 1.7.4 code.. Release #4 will be optimal.. Interesting technique. But I doubt you'll gain even 1% from it, likely less. you will, because some of the first rounds will be gone.. (instructions are removed since they work on constant data..) You can try it. replace the d_data[0]...d_data[23] with constant data 0x01234567 etc; make sure every constant is different from each other.. Compile,read the ptx, and count the lines before and after. Then you don't have 14 round blake kernal. but a 12 rounds blake kernal that only works for one midstate. And solves the 14 round blake problem for one given midstate. I just perfomed the test in cuda 7.5 The self modified code decred kernal is only using 28 registers. (Down from 80). The ptx Assembly linecount is Down 200 lines from sp-mod #3 (10%) On the gtx960M(release #4 is 8% faster than release #3) Edit: I think I can tune it bether, because the register Count has dropped. 512Threads per Block instead of 256 --->+25mhash etc If the cubin files are Equal on Windows and Linux I could make a Linux Version of release #4
|
|
|
|
Velgelm
|
 |
March 17, 2016, 01:34:41 PM |
|
Nice news! i`ll be waiting #4 ...
|
|
|
|
|