fenomenhaa
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 11:33:23 AM |
|
750ti cards have a coreclock of around 1100-1400 and the hashrate depends on the clock.
Optimal settings(oc) (core of around 1390)
Quark: 7mhash Qubit: 5mhash Lyra2v2: 5.3 mhash X11: 3.45mhash X13:2.6mhash X15:2.4Mhash Lyra2re: 1.2mhash Neoscrypt: 240mhash (cuda 6.5 build) Decred: 640mhash Vcash: 1000mhash Pentablake:32 mhash
The algos use from 40-60 watt per card if you have a platinum powersupply. You can run a 6x 750ti rig on a 500w psu, but I recomend 700+. To get the best hashrates you need to increase the tdp of your card from 38w to 65w. In the Bios or use the nvsmi tool I normally don't release linux versions, only windows. But the decred and vcash sourcecode is available for a extra fee
@sp could u send me private 5 again. All algo's at least %10 worser then this in my miner. What hashrates are you getting? Here my hashrates,with 1400-1450 core clock Quark: 6.3mhash Qubit: 5mhash Lyra2v2: 5.1 mhash X11: 3.30mhash X13: X15: Lyra2re: Neoscrypt: 190mhash Decred: 670mhash Vcash: Pentablake:
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 12:07:37 PM |
|
Quark: 6.3mhash Neoscrypt: 190mhash
These algos use the most power. I get quark@6.3 on default clocks. around 1200 core. Can you test different clocks please. And check gpu-z to check if the card is trottling. You can also compare with release "2,#3 or #4 since I think these are bether on the 750ti for quark. What drivers are you using? Upgrade to the latest.
|
|
|
|
Velgelm
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 01:15:31 PM |
|
SP are you planning to update the Private miner #5(.78) to version #6 (based on .79 version) ?
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 06:47:57 PM |
|
PROS AND CONS OF LINUX--
With linux you loose 20-30% of your profit because you cannot run the fastest x86 private miners. You cannot run claymores decred+etherum miner. You cannot overclock.(Perhaps if you mess with the Cool bits). The 64bit build is using more power. Actually, you can OC, change voltage, and more quickly and simply do your OWN dev on *nix. Just because YOU can't learn how to flash your cards doesn't mean no one can. You shouldn't need to flash your cards in the first place. Once again Nix making things immensely more complicated so you can get so called 'stability' and brag about not rebooting your machine in three years. Windows isn't perfect, but going to nix is like using Windows 3.11. Almost everything you have to do in the CLI and occasionally you use the UI to pretend you're modern.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
joblo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1114
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 07:25:45 PM |
|
PROS AND CONS OF LINUX--
With linux you loose 20-30% of your profit because you cannot run the fastest x86 private miners. You cannot run claymores decred+etherum miner. You cannot overclock.(Perhaps if you mess with the Cool bits). The 64bit build is using more power. Actually, you can OC, change voltage, and more quickly and simply do your OWN dev on *nix. Just because YOU can't learn how to flash your cards doesn't mean no one can. You shouldn't need to flash your cards in the first place. Once again Nix making things immensely more complicated so you can get so called 'stability' and brag about not rebooting your machine in three years. Windows isn't perfect, but going to nix is like using Windows 3.11. Almost everything you have to do in the CLI and occasionally you use the UI to pretend you're modern. It's not that much diferent on Windows. Anything you can do with a GUI you can do better with the CLI, even on Windows. It's just that Windows has put more focus on GUIs because of the demographic they market to.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 07:35:48 PM |
|
SP are you planning to update the Private miner #5(.78) to version #6 (based on .79 version) ?
Version #6 will be integrated in the sp-mod ultimate release. I think I will do 2 seperate exefiles . One for 750ti and one for compute 5.2. 1.7.5 refork.
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 08:31:35 PM |
|
PROS AND CONS OF LINUX--
With linux you loose 20-30% of your profit because you cannot run the fastest x86 private miners. You cannot run claymores decred+etherum miner. You cannot overclock.(Perhaps if you mess with the Cool bits). The 64bit build is using more power. Actually, you can OC, change voltage, and more quickly and simply do your OWN dev on *nix. Just because YOU can't learn how to flash your cards doesn't mean no one can. You shouldn't need to flash your cards in the first place. Once again Nix making things immensely more complicated so you can get so called 'stability' and brag about not rebooting your machine in three years. Windows isn't perfect, but going to nix is like using Windows 3.11. Almost everything you have to do in the CLI and occasionally you use the UI to pretend you're modern. It's not that much diferent on Windows. Anything you can do with a GUI you can do better with the CLI, even on Windows. It's just that Windows has put more focus on GUIs because of the demographic they market to. I AM NOT BRAGGING-- . I never wrote or assembled a Linux Distro. I do have a Linux image for mining Ethereum with Genoil's CUDA Ethminer, but it is currently for my own personal use. It is stable because of the work of other people, not me. And, there is no license fee. --scryptr
|
|
|
|
thevictimofuktyranny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 10:40:01 PM |
|
750ti cards have a coreclock of around 1100-1400 and the hashrate depends on the clock.
Optimal settings(oc) (core of around 1390)
Quark: 7mhash Qubit: 5mhash Lyra2v2: 5.3 mhash X11: 3.45mhash X13:2.6mhash X15:2.4Mhash Lyra2re: 1.2mhash Neoscrypt: 240mhash (cuda 6.5 build) Decred: 640mhash Vcash: 1000mhash Pentablake:32 mhash
The algos use from 40-60 watt per card if you have a platinum powersupply. You can run a 6x 750ti rig on a 500w psu, but I recomend 700+. To get the best hashrates you need to increase the tdp of your card from 38w to 65w. In the Bios or use the nvsmi tool
I normally don't release linux versions, only windows. But the decred and vcash sourcecode is available for a extra fee
Just out of curiosity, when overclocking the 750TI's, is this the core overclock of 1390 mhz without Nvidia boost or is this after Nvidia boost. And, if the latter, what is the final speed with Nvidia boost included?
|
|
|
|
DragonSlayer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 25, 2016, 11:27:28 PM |
|
Once the new update for win10 rolls out, you can have best of both worlds hopefully. Bash console and ability to run Linux with in win10 without a vm.
|
|
|
|
Vegetablepin
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 05:34:59 AM |
|
decred ccminer crash for anyone else? happening on 750ti as well so has nothing to do with specific card
|
|
|
|
bensam1231
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 05:45:24 AM |
|
PROS AND CONS OF LINUX--
With linux you loose 20-30% of your profit because you cannot run the fastest x86 private miners. You cannot run claymores decred+etherum miner. You cannot overclock.(Perhaps if you mess with the Cool bits). The 64bit build is using more power. Actually, you can OC, change voltage, and more quickly and simply do your OWN dev on *nix. Just because YOU can't learn how to flash your cards doesn't mean no one can. You shouldn't need to flash your cards in the first place. Once again Nix making things immensely more complicated so you can get so called 'stability' and brag about not rebooting your machine in three years. Windows isn't perfect, but going to nix is like using Windows 3.11. Almost everything you have to do in the CLI and occasionally you use the UI to pretend you're modern. Nope, it's not, actually. It's far more flexible and usable than you think - and the only reason you DO have to flash your cards is because the driver devs can't be fucked to add proper support. And it's closed, so no one else can. You sure love talking about shit you know nothing about. Yeah, woop dee do... You can literally do anything in it. That doesn't mean it's worth your time to try to do anything in it. That was my point. Just like with W3.11, your productivity tanks because you spend most of your time tinkering around with your OS and doing things it should be doing for you... Yeah, I wonder why driver developers also see very little reason to add proper support outside render farms because literally no one uses it except for corporations who hire people who essentially have degrees in it. I do love talking about shit I know plenty about. Sorry if your up turned nose can't be bothered looking at things from the common pleb perspective. It's not that much diferent on Windows. Anything you can do with a GUI you can do better with the CLI, even on Windows. It's just that Windows has put more focus on GUIs because of the demographic they market to.
With Windows you can fix your OS almost entirely with the UI. Sometimes you have to do really specialized things and dig through the registry or use a CLI parameter to make things work, but almost all of the time you can putter around the OS and fix things. Most of the time the OS and the UI itself is intuitive enough where you can learn from it. With nix that doesn't exist. Almost nothing advanced you can change from inside the UI and most of the time if anything breaks you have to go right to the command line. Doing so also means you need to know exact commands to make things work and the OS doesn't offer much in the way of ways to help you to figure things out. So you have to spend 90% of your time on google or talking to dick holes on a support forum somewhere which will make sure to point out how superior nix is to everything else and drag you through the mud before telling you what you want to hear. It's no surprise there are degrees specifically for use of nix and normal people don't touch it with a 10ft pole.
|
I buy private Nvidia miners. Send information and/or inquiries to my PM box.
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 08:16:24 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 08:23:07 AM |
|
SP, just a FYI, your version is still not getting as good hash as DJMs Neoscrypt kernel.
Also another FYI, after DJM updated his kernels, it increased power usage by about 15%.
On the 970 I'm getting 700 kh/s. sp 5 private. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) = to 3.5 750ti. The best one you have so far sp for ALL algo's. It seems the hashrate of all implementation of Neoscrypt in ccminer (sp, djm, ghostlander) heavily relies on the CPU. I get 657 kh/s per 970 (4 in total) at around 1460 Mhz on a dualcore pentium g3420. Same cards, same OC, came settings but with an i3-4130 I get around 90-350 kh/s with a super oscillated GPU usage graph and I have no idea why. The only version that works properly for me across all rigs is a pretty old sp version (1.5.72). I hate neoscrypt with all the miner, wallet and orphan issues so much. ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) problem is this commented line in neoscrypt.cu: // cudaSetDeviceFlags(cudaDeviceScheduleBlockingSync); remove the comment and your cpu usage will drop :-) hashrate will also lower just a little bit. It happens on quark too.
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3178
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 08:23:43 AM |
|
SOMEBODY PUT OUT THE COMMAND IN THE BUILD YOU MUST CHANGE AND I CANT FIND IT.
IT MAY HAVE BEEN PALLAS
DONT GO AROUND THE PROBLEM FIX THE BUILD
BOTH 2 CORE RIGS OFF ALL NIGHT CRASH AND CRASHING 50 TIMES A DAY.
SP FIX THE BUILDI tried 5 different drivers fix the damn build.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 08:29:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
fenomenhaa
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 10:03:37 AM |
|
Quark: 6.3mhash Neoscrypt: 190mhash
These algos use the most power. I get quark@6.3 on default clocks. around 1200 core. Can you test different clocks please. And check gpu-z to check if the card is trottling. You can also compare with release "2,#3 or #4 since I think these are bether on the 750ti for quark. What drivers are you using? Upgrade to the latest. Updated the driver ,Some cards thortlling with VOP reason some not, but noone can hash with much more then 220 k/kash max 205-210kh/s in neo algo.another rig with not any thotteling issue has the same result.With diffrenk core clock still the same.
|
▄▄█▄█▄[/color] ▄▀▀▀▄ ██ ██ ▄▀▀▀▄ █ █▀▀[color=#2C97
|
|
|
bathrobehero
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 11:10:18 AM |
|
problem is this commented line in neoscrypt.cu:
// cudaSetDeviceFlags(cudaDeviceScheduleBlockingSync);
remove the comment and your cpu usage will drop :-) hashrate will also lower just a little bit.
Thanks, will give it a try but for now I can't compile (killed my windows SDK somehow). ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F8ghBiS1.jpg&t=665&c=w9Tub3is3c_1ZA) WHEN THAT CRASH REPORT COMES UP... I WONDER HOW TO GET AROUND THAT ALL IT NEEDS I TO CLOSE THEN IT WILL MINE AUTOMATICALLY You can disable error reporting as a whole but that means you don't get any errors so what I do isntead is killing the task creating the error message periodically while mining: The name of the process is werfault so create a bat and let it run in the background: _werfault-kill.bat :start title werfault-kill cls timeout -t 3 taskkill -t -f /im werf* goto start And of course then you have to run your ccminer in a loop so it restarts. I haven't had to use this since cudaminer though.
|
Not your keys, not your coins!
|
|
|
Stein
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 02:39:39 PM |
|
Guys I have been trying to mine Myriadcoin here https://myriadcoin-groestl.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=dashboardThis is my commandline ccminer -a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12005 -u name.worker -p x I keep getting "reject reason: low difficulty share of 0.0002636140169147193" etc etc.. Any idea how to fix it ? Dooesn't happen on any other algo so far..
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 02:43:11 PM |
|
Guys I have been trying to mine Myriadcoin here https://myriadcoin-groestl.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=dashboardThis is my commandline ccminer -a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12005 -u name.worker -p x I keep getting "reject reason: low difficulty share of 0.0002636140169147193" etc etc.. Any idea how to fix it ? Dooesn't happen on any other algo so far.. try adding --diff-factor=0.0039062500 or --diff-multiplier, don't remember...
|
|
|
|
Stein
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 26, 2016, 02:58:10 PM |
|
Guys I have been trying to mine Myriadcoin here https://myriadcoin-groestl.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=dashboardThis is my commandline ccminer -a myr-gr -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12005 -u name.worker -p x I keep getting "reject reason: low difficulty share of 0.0002636140169147193" etc etc.. Any idea how to fix it ? Dooesn't happen on any other algo so far.. try adding --diff-factor=0.0039062500 or --diff-multiplier, don't remember... ccminer -a myr-gr -f 0.0039062500 -o stratum+tcp://hub.miningpoolhub.com:12005 -u Name.worker -p x That worked.. So why the number 0.0039062500 ?? I don't even understand it lol How did you come up with that number ?
|
|
|
|
|