CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[alrami]

Claymores mines does
980ti: 20MHASH etherum
190MHASH SIA.

But

if you add -dcri 40 or -dcri 64 you get more SIA.

980ti + OC will give 32Mh at ETH

in any way stock 20Mh/eth + 190Mh/sia is not great if compare with my rubbish stock 280x which 18Mh/eth + 350Mh/sia at a same power
Mean same profit, same power, but one 980ti costs as 3pcs 280x :-(

[antantti]

Claymores mines does
980ti: 20MHASH etherum
190MHASH SIA.

But

if you add -dcri 40 or -dcri 64 you get more SIA.

My 970's do more than your 980ti?

Do you have weak cpu on that rig?

[alrami]

My 970's do more than your 980ti?

Do you have weak cpu on that rig?

It's just a data from Claymores users
looks a Dual miner needs in a large bugfix

[scryptr]

Claymores mines does
980ti: 20MHASH etherum
190MHASH SIA.

But

if you add -dcri 40 or -dcri 64 you get more SIA.

980ti + OC will give 32Mh at ETH

in any way stock 20Mh/eth + 190Mh/sia is not great if compare with my rubbish stock 280x which 18Mh/eth + 350Mh/sia at a same power
Mean same profit, same power, but one 980ti costs as 3pcs 280x :-(

WHAT KIND OF OVERCLOCK ARE YOU USING? --

980ti cards don't do as well as expected on Ethereum (ETH) with Genoil's miner, either.  I haven't tried to OC my card yet, what rates of OC do you suggest?  My 280X cards run with lower heat and fewer problems mining ETH/DCR, so I am mining ETH and Decred (DCR).

I don't remember any reports of 32MH/s for Dagger-Hashimoto with a 980ti on Genoil's miner.  If what you say is true, what is the secret?       --scryptr

[alrami]

WHAT KIND OF OVERCLOCK ARE YOU USING? --

980ti cards don't do as well as expected on Ethereum (ETH) with Genoil's miner, either.  I haven't tried to OC my card yet, what rates of OC do you suggest?  My 280X cards run with lower heat and fewer problems mining ETH/DCR, so I am mining ETH and Decred (DCR).

I don't remember any reports of 32MH/s for Dagger-Hashimoto with a 980ti on Genoil's miner.  If what you say is true, what is the secret?       --scryptr

ETH needs in a Memory bandwidth and memory OC
980ti is less good for OC so i was able to push it to 1493/8000 at a private bios (more DTP and voltmod)
8000 for a memory - is a key
GPU overclocking gives almost nothing for ETH (but useful for other algos)

same for 970
- 1506/7000 = 20Mh
- 1506/8000 = 22Mh

just tested 970 OC 1506/7000 with Claymore = 20Mh eth + 200 Mh sia (-dcri 60 adds +200Mh sia more)
my max OC for 970 is 1531/8000, but it makes ccminer unstable (think due to high mem OC)
brands: EVGA 980ti and MSI Gaming 970

[bensam1231]

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

You can just start the ETH miner - open a new windows and start SPR miner without a problem ?!

Yup and it works like shit

Next time try something before suggesting it. If a dual miner were as easy as loading two different miners up at the same time people wouldn't ask for it. Miners don't always cooperate well. You'll get, maybe, hopefully 50% for one and 50% for the other, more then likely you'll lose 10% and have very sporadic results... A good dual miner takes advantage of resources the first one doesn't use without losing performance. You can't get those results just by loading two miners up... It's been tried.

For instance the Claymore one gives you about 20Mh on Eth while 190 on DCR for a 970, that means you net a extra 150 DCR, because the second miner doesn't actually use resources the first one does.

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

Really good news, but think Claymore is little late
one my rig (4x 970 oc 1531/8000) gives 88 Mh at ETH
not sure that it will be more profitable with SIA than just LRBY
in any way Claymore's need to be tested

P.S. and Claymore's miner don't like high OC, so not sure that i will be able to run it without underclock

Lbry is a sinking ship. Value probably will not increase till the block mining phase is over, at which point you'll need something else to mine... let alone if it reaches equilibrium with Eth before then, which very much could happen

Not sure why people always compare things to Lbry when it's lost 2/3 it's value in the last two weeks.

[klondike_bar_recovery]

Lbry is a sinking ship. Value probably will not increase till the block mining phase is over, at which point you'll need something else to mine... let alone if it reaches equilibrium with Eth before then, which very much could happen

Not sure why people always compare things to Lbry when it's lost 2/3 it's value in the last two weeks.

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

[bensam1231]

Lbry is a sinking ship. Value probably will not increase till the block mining phase is over, at which point you'll need something else to mine... let alone if it reaches equilibrium with Eth before then, which very much could happen

Not sure why people always compare things to Lbry when it's lost 2/3 it's value in the last two weeks.

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

$/MH has dropped dramatically. Reward model isn't directly correlative to how much money you make as a miner. It isn't linearly following the coin distribution.

Investors aren't going to heavily invest in the coin till it hits max block reward as I already mentioned. You snipped that part though.

Conveniently check: http://yiimp.ccminer.org/stats

It's about at 40% of it's initial value if you go all the way back to the beginning. If you snip the big spike at the beginning, it's about 50% of it's value and still declining. It depends if the 400MH farm decides to hop on or not. On days when they do, it earns about as much as Eth.

[alrami]

Lbry is a sinking ship. Value probably will not increase till the block mining phase is over, at which point you'll need something else to mine... let alone if it reaches equilibrium with Eth before then, which very much could happen

Not sure why people always compare things to Lbry when it's lost 2/3 it's value in the last two weeks.

Sinking or Flying - no any difference
Just mine, sell, and forgot

Coins value is less useful - just a numbers for exchange
But if you have a really helpful advice for mining profit - think all of us will be full of attention.

Edit: In any way i'm sure with you - LBRY must lost profitability very soon

[Amph]

there was not that a big drop in profit/hash, right now it's 0.05 versus 0.08(with my setup, so take this as an example) from the past still very profitable, it was just overkill before, the profit was crazy high

was obvious that with that profit, it would not last

[antantti]

Sinking or Flying - no any difference
Just mine, sell, and forgot

Coins value is less useful - just a numbers for exchange
But if you have a really helpful advice for mining profit - think all of us will be full of attention.

Edit: In any way i'm sure with you - LBRY must lost profitability very soon

Order sell 941.41140000 ETHEUR @ limit 1.24889

[alrami]

Order sell 941.41140000 ETHEUR @ limit 1.24889

Looks like as a profit fixing, but not large summ
What will be a lesson for us?

i'm will be thankfull for learning

[bathrobehero]

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

You can just start the ETH miner - open a new windows and start SPR miner without a problem ?!

It's not going to work that way. The reasources of the cards can't be shared equally simply by having two different instances. Instead, you get one algo completely dominating the other - if it even decides to work and not crash.

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

Exactly.

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

[antantti]

Order sell 941.41140000 ETHEUR @ limit 1.24889

Looks like as a profit fixing, but not large summ
What will be a lesson for us?

i'm will be thankfull for learning

If a lollipop@1.80 everyday makes you happy then this kindergarten is for you.

If you start to feel like that some candymans visits too often and you always end up with lollipop and strange feeling you maybe need to overclock.

[klondike_bar_recovery]

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

should be called BAGHODLcoin - but its great for mining!

[sp_]

I am working on an update on the spreadcoin private miner #10. It's been 1.5 years since the last update. testing with cuda 8.0 now.

Great news, thank you.

The first tests shows that when my spreadcoin #9 is compiled with cuda 7.5 and cuda 8.0 I loose 4.5-7.25% (tested on maxwell 960M)

cuda 7.5: -7,25%
cuda 8.0: -4,47%

[Amph]

I am working on an update on the spreadcoin private miner #10. It's been 1.5 years since the last update. testing with cuda 8.0 now.

Great news, thank you.

The first tests shows that when my spreadcoin #9 is compiled with cuda 7.5 and cuda 8.0 I loose 4.5-7.25% (tested on maxwell 960M)

cuda 7.5: -7,25%
cuda 8.0: -4,47%

can you fix the unstable fb usage? if this is fixable... i find it strange because it happen only on spreadcoin, the wattage fluctuates from 120w to 200 some times, pretty annoying...

[bathrobehero]

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

You can just start the ETH miner - open a new windows and start SPR miner without a problem ?!

It's not going to work that way. The reasources of the cards can't be shared equally simply by having two different instances. Instead, you get one algo completely dominating the other - if it even decides to work and not crash.

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

Exactly.

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

Weird only because we're used to P & D shitcoins. In general, you want more coins emitted as you get wider adoption, not a large concentration of coins in few entities.

True, but I think the increased emission rate should also come with increased demand for the coin (like utility) at roughly the same rate to try at least keeping the value of a single coin the same (which is not met). Otherwise people will not invest in it and you'll get a large concentration of coins in few entities just the same.

And there will be massive amounts of coins eventually getting into circulation without mining (https://explorer.lbry.io/richlist) further discouraging people from investing.

[alrami]

If a lollipop@1.80 everyday makes you happy then this kindergarten is for you.

If you start to feel like that some candymans visits too often and you always end up with lollipop and strange feeling you maybe need to overclock.

yes, lollipops were tasty, but i'm trying to look at a steakes now
have no instruments and knowledge
will look for..

thank you for a kick. ;-)

[bensam1231]

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

You can just start the ETH miner - open a new windows and start SPR miner without a problem ?!

It's not going to work that way. The reasources of the cards can't be shared equally simply by having two different instances. Instead, you get one algo completely dominating the other - if it even decides to work and not crash.

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

Exactly.

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

Weird only because we're used to P & D shitcoins. In general, you want more coins emitted as you get wider adoption, not a large concentration of coins in few entities.

True, but I think the increased emission rate should also come with increased demand for the coin (like utility) at roughly the same rate to try at least keeping the value of a single coin the same (which is not met). Otherwise people will not invest in it and you'll get a large concentration of coins in few entities just the same.

And there will be massive amounts of coins eventually getting into circulation without mining (https://explorer.lbry.io/richlist) further discouraging people from investing.

Aye... there are a lot of coins that literally could just have a flat distribution model... Meaning block reward is always the same and never changes. I guess it doesn't make it as 'exciting', but often times there is no point for putting out a fuck ton of coins at the beginning or end.