CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[giagge]

I have download this https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ , use this .bat

ccminer -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u USERWORKER -p PASS -d 0

i have error :

Unknown algo parameter 'lyra2Z'

And i try to download this : https://github.com/Tourgasm/xzc-ccminer/releases/tag/1.8.4 , use this the same .bat

ccminer -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u USERWORKER -p PASS -d 0

but have this error :

Code:

[2017-02-10 16:44:40] Starting on stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569
[2017-02-10 16:44:40] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-02-10 16:44:40] 1 miner thread started, using 'lyra2Z' algorithm.
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xzc.suprnova.cc port 1569: Connection refused
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] API bind to port 4068 failed - using port 4069

Help me pls .

[ioglnx]

I have download this https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ , use this .bat

ccminer -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u USERWORKER -p PASS -d 0

i have error :

Unknown algo parameter 'lyra2Z'

And i try to download this : https://github.com/Tourgasm/xzc-ccminer/releases/tag/1.8.4 , use this the same .bat

ccminer -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u USERWORKER -p PASS -d 0

but have this error :

Code:

[2017-02-10 16:44:40] Starting on stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569
[2017-02-10 16:44:40] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-02-10 16:44:40] 1 miner thread started, using 'lyra2Z' algorithm.
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xzc.suprnova.cc port 1569: Connection refused
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] API bind to port 4068 failed - using port 4069

Help me pls .

Omg why nobody reads...XZC new algo just from 20500 block and only then ocminer will enable the pool.
You should do your homework.

[grrrgrrr]

I have download this https://github.com/djm34/ccminer-msvc2015/releases/ , use this .bat

ccminer -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u USERWORKER -p PASS -d 0

i have error :

Unknown algo parameter 'lyra2Z'

And i try to download this : https://github.com/Tourgasm/xzc-ccminer/releases/tag/1.8.4 , use this the same .bat

ccminer -a lyra2Z -o stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569 -u USERWORKER -p PASS -d 0

but have this error :

Code:

[2017-02-10 16:44:40] Starting on stratum+tcp://xzc.suprnova.cc:1569
[2017-02-10 16:44:40] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2017-02-10 16:44:40] 1 miner thread started, using 'lyra2Z' algorithm.
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xzc.suprnova.cc port 1569: Connection refused
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] ...retry after 30 seconds
[2017-02-10 16:44:42] API bind to port 4068 failed - using port 4069

Help me pls .

@ocminer made a typo about the port. Port number should be 1596 instead of 1569.

[giagge]

This coin will change it's algo (again) at Block 20500 - the new port will be 1569 and the old port will be shutdown. The new Algo is called lyra2z. Only new miners will work on that new port, you cannot mine with the old miners anymore. You can download the new miners here. The Pool will auto-switch.

[Nikolaj]

I never use cheap CPU..never.
My miners are either Xeon Hexa Core or i7 Quad.
My next baby will be Kaby-Lake and Skylake-EP :-D X299 FTW.

Rephrase what I always noticed and see in this forum: Who buys cheap buys twice! Or cry because weak cpu is not capable of running the miner. Pfff tired of this.

.. no offense but an expensive cpu for mining purposes it's useless.

Plenty of experience in matter .

If you need to use these machinery for something else ok then, but don't generalize.

A good xeon V3/V4 could have earned a lot the first days of zcash mining, when amd/nvidia gpu had lower performance than a high end cpu... (50h/s on a 5960x against 20h/s on the GTX 1080 with the first nicehash cuda miner).
You may buy a QS/ES version on ebay for a reasonable price.

Sorry but this doesen't make sense at all.

1) CPU mining it's totally useless in the crypto scene: density (1 CPU vs 7 VGAs), control (configure them in a VGA farm, good luck), availability (ES, really?), benefits (Not a single one. If you put an heavy load on the CPU, you'll cripple the VGAs performance)

2) High end CPUs are useless in opposition to cheap - decent - ones, due the total absence of a CPU bottleneck in the mining process (Bandwidth)

[ioglnx]

I never use cheap CPU..never.
My miners are either Xeon Hexa Core or i7 Quad.
My next baby will be Kaby-Lake and Skylake-EP :-D X299 FTW.

Rephrase what I always noticed and see in this forum: Who buys cheap buys twice! Or cry because weak cpu is not capable of running the miner. Pfff tired of this.

.. no offense but an expensive cpu for mining purposes it's useless.

Plenty of experience in matter .

If you need to use these machinery for something else ok then, but don't generalize.

A good xeon V3/V4 could have earned a lot the first days of zcash mining, when amd/nvidia gpu had lower performance than a high end cpu... (50h/s on a 5960x against 20h/s on the GTX 1080 with the first nicehash cuda miner).
You may buy a QS/ES version on ebay for a reasonable price.

Sorry but this doesen't make sense at all.

1) CPU mining it's totally useless in the crypto scene: density (1 CPU vs 7 VGAs), control (configure them in a VGA farm, good luck), availability (ES, really?), benefits (Not a single one. If you put an heavy load on the CPU, you'll cripple the VGAs performance)

2) High end CPUs are useless in opposition to cheap - decent - ones, due the total absence of a CPU bottleneck in the mining process (Bandwidth)

Bullshit³³ you have no idea but it's okay but stop talking about something you have no idea about instead of giving you bla bla

[Slava_K]

In xzc ccminer total power 50%, i think it could be faster. 

[giagge]

In xzc ccminer total power 50%, i think it could be faster. 

Its 3 gtx 1070 with system Celeron g1840 coolermaster 750w bronze 80 :

Code:

[2017-02-11 11:34:42] accepted: 395/395 (diff 0.984), 3917.91 kH/s yes!
[2017-02-11 11:35:05] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 1307.07 kH/s
[2017-02-11 11:35:05] accepted: 396/396 (diff 0.055), 3919.06 kH/s yes!
[2017-02-11 11:35:17] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 1295.12 kH/s
[2017-02-11 11:35:34] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 1292.98 kH/s
[2017-02-11 11:35:34] accepted: 397/397 (diff 0.015), 3920.16 kH/s yes!
[2017-02-11 11:35:35] GPU #2: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 1310.53 kH/s
[2017-02-11 11:35:36] accepted: 398/398 (diff 0.119), 3920.32 kH/s yes!
[2017-02-11 11:35:42] GPU #0: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 1338.79 kH/s
[2017-02-11 11:35:48] GPU #1: Gigabyte GTX 1070, 1292.03 kH/s
[2017-02-11 11:35:48] accepted: 399/399 (diff 0.083), 3920.13 kH/s yes!

.

[m1n1ngP4d4w4n]

You should use gold rated psu at the minimum, you are losing 4-5% more electricity with a bronze one even @50% load, or maybe you don't pay for electricity ?

[giagge]

You should use gold rated psu at the minimum, you are losing 4-5% more electricity with a bronze one even @50% load, or maybe you don't pay for electricity ?

I think the difference its not justify more cost for gold .

I pay electricity .

[bensam1231]

Lyra2Z definitely can be improved immensely. Any of the developers are looking to make some money, take a look at the new miner. It's silly slow based on the power consumption.

Not really worth hiding the Zcoin relaunch at this point. Enough people with loose lips ruined it already.

[sp_]

Amiga computer from 1993

50mhz cpu. Rendered realtime. Written in 100% assembly language.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPdB_zdyMbM

[Slava_K]

Amiga computer from 1993

50mhz cpu. Rendered realtime. Written in 100% assembly language.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPdB_zdyMbM

My hobby is progamming on z80 assembler.

[bathrobehero]

Lyra2Z definitely can be improved immensely. Any of the developers are looking to make some money, take a look at the new miner. It's silly slow based on the power consumption.

Not really worth hiding the Zcoin relaunch at this point. Enough people with loose lips ruined it already.

It barely covers electricity so you would need 3-4x faster speeds to make it worthwile.

You need 125 x 1070 just to hit a block a day ($82) or it's $0.65 per card currently before electricity (diff 3273).


And their wallet is a piece of crap I've never seen before, it synced 9500 blocks in 24 hours and you can't use bootstraps.

[Nikolaj]

I never use cheap CPU..never.
My miners are either Xeon Hexa Core or i7 Quad.
My next baby will be Kaby-Lake and Skylake-EP :-D X299 FTW.

Rephrase what I always noticed and see in this forum: Who buys cheap buys twice! Or cry because weak cpu is not capable of running the miner. Pfff tired of this.

.. no offense but an expensive cpu for mining purposes it's useless.

Plenty of experience in matter .

If you need to use these machinery for something else ok then, but don't generalize.

A good xeon V3/V4 could have earned a lot the first days of zcash mining, when amd/nvidia gpu had lower performance than a high end cpu... (50h/s on a 5960x against 20h/s on the GTX 1080 with the first nicehash cuda miner).
You may buy a QS/ES version on ebay for a reasonable price.

Sorry but this doesen't make sense at all.

1) CPU mining it's totally useless in the crypto scene: density (1 CPU vs 7 VGAs), control (configure them in a VGA farm, good luck), availability (ES, really?), benefits (Not a single one. If you put an heavy load on the CPU, you'll cripple the VGAs performance)

2) High end CPUs are useless in opposition to cheap - decent - ones, due the total absence of a CPU bottleneck in the mining process (Bandwidth)

Bullshit³³ you have no idea but it's okay but stop talking about something you have no idea about instead of giving you bla bla

It would be optimal if you would report your direct experience and gains (cpu vs gpu in the same system, at the same time), because the only one making claims about high end cpu benefits, it's just you . No offense, but I prefer to talk by considering facts. Proove your statements, sir.

[grrrgrrr]

I never use cheap CPU..never.
My miners are either Xeon Hexa Core or i7 Quad.
My next baby will be Kaby-Lake and Skylake-EP :-D X299 FTW.

Rephrase what I always noticed and see in this forum: Who buys cheap buys twice! Or cry because weak cpu is not capable of running the miner. Pfff tired of this.

.. no offense but an expensive cpu for mining purposes it's useless.

Plenty of experience in matter .

If you need to use these machinery for something else ok then, but don't generalize.

A good xeon V3/V4 could have earned a lot the first days of zcash mining, when amd/nvidia gpu had lower performance than a high end cpu... (50h/s on a 5960x against 20h/s on the GTX 1080 with the first nicehash cuda miner).
You may buy a QS/ES version on ebay for a reasonable price.

Sorry but this doesen't make sense at all.

1) CPU mining it's totally useless in the crypto scene: density (1 CPU vs 7 VGAs), control (configure them in a VGA farm, good luck), availability (ES, really?), benefits (Not a single one. If you put an heavy load on the CPU, you'll cripple the VGAs performance)

2) High end CPUs are useless in opposition to cheap - decent - ones, due the total absence of a CPU bottleneck in the mining process (Bandwidth)

Bullshit³³ you have no idea but it's okay but stop talking about something you have no idea about instead of giving you bla bla

It would be optimal if you would report your direct experience and gains (cpu vs gpu in the same system, at the same time), because the only one making claims about high end cpu benefits, it's just you . No offense, but I prefer to talk by considering facts. Proove your statements, sir.

Donate me 0.1 BTC for my closed source pcpartpicker build grrr-rig #1 

[scryptr]

128 CORE CPU ONLY CRYPTONIGHT RIG--

I suspect 32 4-core Raspberry Pi 3.0 cards, but the rig is proprietary.  Here is the link:  https://gpushack.com/collections/gpushack/products/gpushack-128-core-pro .

The cost is $2000  US dollars.  The output is 3.6kH XMR hashrate at 1000W.  For comparison, I have a 6-card RX 460 rig that generates 1.95 kH XMR hashrate at 600W using Wolf0's SGminer-GM.       --scryptr

[Lucky - Luciano]

I never use cheap CPU..never.
My miners are either Xeon Hexa Core or i7 Quad.
My next baby will be Kaby-Lake and Skylake-EP :-D X299 FTW.

Rephrase what I always noticed and see in this forum: Who buys cheap buys twice! Or cry because weak cpu is not capable of running the miner. Pfff tired of this.

.. no offense but an expensive cpu for mining purposes it's useless.

Plenty of experience in matter .

If you need to use these machinery for something else ok then, but don't generalize.

A good xeon V3/V4 could have earned a lot the first days of zcash mining, when amd/nvidia gpu had lower performance than a high end cpu... (50h/s on a 5960x against 20h/s on the GTX 1080 with the first nicehash cuda miner).
You may buy a QS/ES version on ebay for a reasonable price.

Sorry but this doesen't make sense at all.

1) CPU mining it's totally useless in the crypto scene: density (1 CPU vs 7 VGAs), control (configure them in a VGA farm, good luck), availability (ES, really?), benefits (Not a single one. If you put an heavy load on the CPU, you'll cripple the VGAs performance)

2) High end CPUs are useless in opposition to cheap - decent - ones, due the total absence of a CPU bottleneck in the mining process (Bandwidth)

Bullshit³³ you have no idea but it's okay but stop talking about something you have no idea about instead of giving you bla bla

It would be optimal if you would report your direct experience and gains (cpu vs gpu in the same system, at the same time), because the only one making claims about high end cpu benefits, it's just you . No offense, but I prefer to talk by considering facts. Proove your statements, sir.

Donate me 0.1 BTC for my closed source pcpartpicker build grrr-rig #1  

You are imagining . Minimum CPU that I use for mining is the Xeon E3 1220 V3 socket 1150. Follow him i7 4930K on the motherboard ASUS X-79 DELUXE socket 2011, Xeon E5 2670 socket 2011 and DELL Alienware Aurora r4 socket 2011 ..... There we are still fanatics  .  In the my mining rigs  I use SSD Samsung  Pro 256 Gb.etc. Better not to mention all of them. I know that that all is not necessary, but I'm comfortable type  and speed me never not enough .

[bensam1231]

Lyra2Z definitely can be improved immensely. Any of the developers are looking to make some money, take a look at the new miner. It's silly slow based on the power consumption.

Not really worth hiding the Zcoin relaunch at this point. Enough people with loose lips ruined it already.

It barely covers electricity so you would need 3-4x faster speeds to make it worthwile.

You need 125 x 1070 just to hit a block a day ($82) or it's $0.65 per card currently before electricity (diff 3273).


And their wallet is a piece of crap I've never seen before, it synced 9500 blocks in 24 hours and you can't use bootstraps.

It's not going to stay that way. The kids are still figuring out what's profitable and losing money while it's happening since Whattomine doesn't have a calc up yet. They just mine anything that's trending without being able to figure out the most basic form of profitability.

Keep in mind there are still AMD users trying to mine this, not just small guys, but also big farms that have no idea what's going on. Increasing the hashrate even 50-100% would drop the AMD users off as it would become much less profitable for them.

[sxafir]

I buy gtx 1080 to mininng lbry,cost electricity for 1 month was 0,each day i mine lbry 50 ,to get back refund from my card i must be immortal.