DARKANGEL6415
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:37:22 AM |
|
all i know is i see the price of the amhash shares going down and down. For a moment there i thought it would always or atleast for a longer time be near the initial ipo price but noy was i wrong
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:45:22 AM |
|
all i know is i see the price of the amhash shares going down and down. For a moment there i thought it would always or atleast for a longer time be near the initial ipo price but noy was i wrong Well, the price of the shares has to adjust to the tanking yield.
|
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:47:48 AM |
|
all i know is i see the price of the amhash shares going down and down. For a moment there i thought it would always or atleast for a longer time be near the initial ipo price but noy was i wrong natural cause an effect due to current conditions and possible other cheaper offerings, i have heard mention but i have no real idea? unless you have your whole life savings invested into amhash i would just ride out the storm or try some trading with a portion of your holdings.
|
|
|
|
ajw7989
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:48:58 AM |
|
all i know is i see the price of the amhash shares going down and down. For a moment there i thought it would always or atleast for a longer time be near the initial ipo price but noy was i wrong Well, the price of the shares has to adjust to the tanking yield. If you want to see the price go up we need the price of btc to go up which in turn will allow payouts to increase.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:51:44 AM |
|
all i know is i see the price of the amhash shares going down and down. For a moment there i thought it would always or atleast for a longer time be near the initial ipo price but noy was i wrong Well, the price of the shares has to adjust to the tanking yield. If you want to see the price go up we need the price of btc to go up which in turn will allow payouts to increase. Of course.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:06:54 AM |
|
Since by their very nature markets try to be ahead of the curve my main concern at the moment is what the yield will amount to in six days when this whopper hits and whether BTC will move noticeably up or down. Or languish sideways. Right now I´m anticipating yield of ca. .00000550 and will bid .00075000 tops. Well, maybe 80000 if BTC shows signs of life or that diff. bubble corrects. In the unlikely even that both coincide, maybe a bit higher. Not selling now although my average is pretty low, betting that the yield won´t go much lower this month at least. But if the market decides to rally, that may change.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:28:02 PM |
|
Some pullback there on the chart. Promising.
|
|
|
|
alevlaslo
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:45:07 PM |
|
Fair rate to calculate very easily - day dividends multiply by 100
|
Sale the first NFT of the first foto
|
|
|
skuser
|
|
January 06, 2015, 12:52:07 PM |
|
Fair rate to calculate very easily - day dividends multiply by 100 Don't scare me please, that would mean drop to .005 in 6 days: http://nextdifficulty.comHow about multiplying by 150?
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:00:34 PM |
|
Fair rate to calculate very easily - day dividends multiply by 100 even 100 is too much IMO. If for simplicity sake we assume divs will go down linearly, then your math would mean divs halt in 200 days - just to break even, and more than that for any profit. In reality this is likely much sooner considering 0.1-0.2W/GH hardware that will come online in Q1. Moreover, even if difficuly goes up linearly, divs go down faster than that because of the fixed fees.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:04:39 PM |
|
It´s complex, several factors to take into account.
And bloody constant and chronic uncertainty that is a major
factor in this scam ridden and volatile and unregulated marketplace.
That´s the absolutely worst poison in any market uncertainty is..
Bad news you can take for pretty long because they eventually turn good again.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:07:42 PM |
|
Fair rate to calculate very easily - day dividends multiply by 100 even 100 is too much IMO. If for simplicity sake we assume divs will go down linearly, then your math would mean divs halt in 200 days - just to break even, and more than that for any profit. In reality this is likely much sooner considering 0.1-0.2W/GH hardware that will come online in Q1. Moreover, even if difficuly goes up linearly, divs go down faster than that because of the fixed fees. Yeah, at this point preservation of capital is a more important concern than return on investment if you want to play this mining game.
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:16:56 PM |
|
It´s complex, several factors to take into account.
And bloody constant and chronic uncertainty that is a major
I think its actually quite easy; there is always someone who overpays compared to expected divs/mining revenue, because he cant do the math or doesnt understand the dynamics of this market, be it for hardware or cloud mining. Look no further than cex.io pricing to see my point. THat means hardware and contracts will pretty much always be overpriced. And even if they werent, so many would be sold that difficulty would catch up with it again until it becomes overpriced. You can gamble you can gain a bit flipping shares, but long term anything based on mining is a loser.
|
|
|
|
AirWolf
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Havelock robbed me 170BTC
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:20:03 PM |
|
Fair rate to calculate very easily - day dividends multiply by 100 even 100 is too much IMO. If for simplicity sake we assume divs will go down linearly, then your math would mean divs halt in 200 days - just to break even, and more than that for any profit. In reality this is likely much sooner considering 0.1-0.2W/GH hardware that will come online in Q1. Moreover, even if difficuly goes up linearly, divs go down faster than that because of the fixed fees. Yeah, at this point preservation of capital is a more important concern than return on investment if you want to play this mining game. From my observation of the difficulty evolution, it looks like some major mines have the strategy of running the mine at full throttle half the time between difficulty adjusting periods in order to maximize yield and not letting the diff go up as much as it could, which makes sense as a long term business policy, and then the other half they shutdown or throttle down a lot, this will not only mitigates the impact on the diff, but also saves power and maintenance cost. Would someone care to analyze the integrity of this argument?
|
HAVELOCK ROBBED ME MORE THAN 170BTC - BEWARE OF THIS THIEVES!
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:23:26 PM |
|
Doesnt make any sense at all. It would be far cheaper to run with just a fraction of the hardware than running it for a fraction of the time, and its even better to run everything underclocked, ie at higher efficiency, all the time. Idle hardware is not a sensible business plan.
|
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:26:14 PM |
|
last difficulty movements were downward, why?
1. bitcoin price is decreasing and hashrate is increasing - false, hashrate was decreasing but the price was going down 2. a portion of the network moved away to mine some new scaamcoin - true
difficulty is moving upward.
1. bitcoin price is increasing and hashrate is increasing - false price is decreasing 2. a portion of the network moved back from scam coin and created and increase in difficulty - possible
will difficulty continue to move upward? 1. no 2. yes
i guess i am in 2 minds regarding the outcome
|
|
|
|
Puppet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1040
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:28:51 PM |
|
last difficulty movements were downward, why?
It could be statistical noise. But there is also another reason you have overlooked: bitmain shipping their S5s that have been 'burning in ' for a while.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:30:43 PM |
|
Don´t forget this guy
|
|
|
|
HarmonLi
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Honest 80s business!
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:31:12 PM |
|
Doesnt make any sense at all. It would be far cheaper to run with just a fraction of the hardware than running it for a fraction of the time, and its even better to run everything underclocked, ie at higher efficiency, all the time. Idle hardware is not a sensible business plan.
Yeah, in this case it only makes sense that they have pointed their hashing power towards another coin or used it otherwise. Still I don't think that it is feasible for every miner to be run at a reduced speed/consumption.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
January 06, 2015, 01:34:22 PM |
|
last difficulty movements were downward, why?
It could be statistical noise. But there is also another reason you have overlooked: bitmain shipping their S5s that have been 'burning in ' for a while. Even the wildest bubbles tend to have an occasional plateau for consolidation.
|
|
|
|
|