|
eof
|
 |
May 16, 2011, 12:01:06 AM |
|
hrm.
no those were both my transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
tomcollins
|
|
May 16, 2011, 12:26:15 AM |
|
Room switched to bitcents. i.e. if you see on table 1, this means you bet 0.01 BTC.
The tabbed sections don't work on Chrome for Windows. You can't click on Heads Up or Regular - you only see the Popular tables. Could someone else confirm this bug? I just tried in Win7 with freshly downloaded Chrome and it works. tomcollins, what browser and OS version you use? may be something specific to these versions.. Also, please try to clear cache and try again. May be something cached? Now it works. Weird. |
|
|
|
|
nextnonce
Member
 Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
www.minethings.com
|
|
May 16, 2011, 01:51:44 AM |
|
A tip for betcoi.in: rename the .css file each time you change it, otherwise ppl will have the old one until F5.
|
BTC accepted at my browser-based MMO, Minethings.com. ~1500 active players mining now. |
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014
Strength in numbers
|
|
May 16, 2011, 08:59:27 PM |
|
I signed up... but there only seems to be 3 players online?
Sunday afternoon is pokerstars.com's busiest day....?
That, and the two players I saw playing were almost definitely bots. They were folding and betting hands within fractions of a second.
If you come in during a hand it catches you up at lightning speed. You probably saw that. If the speed persisted they were just really fast players. |
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone. |
|
|
tanerlorn
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2011, 11:49:35 PM |
|
10 20 nl being played
|
|
|
|
|
anisoptera
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2011, 11:59:14 PM |
|
10 20 nl being played
To be specific - 10/20 bitcents, not btc  (not quite the crazy nosebleeds) |
|
|
|
Dangerhorse
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2011, 05:10:48 PM |
|
Small bug? You can't withdraw fractions of a bitcent apparently. I had 1.0933 bitcoins and it would let me withdraw 1.09, but not 1.0933.
|
|
|
|
|
anisoptera
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2011, 05:14:33 PM |
|
Small bug? You can't withdraw fractions of a bitcent apparently. I had 1.0933 bitcoins and it would let me withdraw 1.09, but not 1.0933.
This is not a bug, the site calls this out as a limitation on the withdrawal page. Well, I mean. Clearly it isn't a feature either, but we know about it and warn you on the site. Maybe we could send fractions as long as it's over a penny (to avoid your entire tx being eaten by fees), I'll look into it. Another solution would be to buy in with your fractions and flip until you lose or have a whole penny :p |
|
|
|
Dangerhorse
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2011, 06:18:39 PM |
|
The withdrawal page says the minimum withdrawal amount is 0.01 bitcoins (one bitcent), but that's not the same as saying that you can't withdraw fractions of a bitcent as part of a larger withdrawal.
Not a big deal, but maybe you want to clarify the warning (or else fix the issue for larger withdrawals).
|
|
|
|
|
anisoptera
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2011, 06:22:10 PM |
|
The withdrawal page says the minimum withdrawal amount is 0.01 bitcoins (one bitcent), but that's not the same as saying that you can't withdraw fractions of a bitcent as part of a larger withdrawal.
Not a big deal, but maybe you want to clarify the warning (or else fix the issue for larger withdrawals).
Yeah, I can see that. I'll look into it. Thanks |
|
|
|
cmondegens
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
May 26, 2011, 05:57:50 PM |
|
Cmon degens spread the word. With the government now going after the smaller sites (bodog, cake, etc) this is now the only option for people in the us to decide whether they want to voluntarily play a card game. Get this thing running through tor, fast, and get it up and promote, promote, promote. p5s, 2p2, etc, cmon we are all born with human rights...lets not let them take this away from us.
|
|
|
|
|
cmondegens
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
May 26, 2011, 06:00:01 PM |
|
This is quoted from another forum, in a discussion regarding whether or not weapons should be sold on that forum. These are the type of people we have supporting us. Cmon we can do this. I think it's a great idea. GPS dead drops of weapons will give us the money and force we need to maintain
staying power as the united states economy crumbles. Think about what crime did for the USSR after they fell apart.
It's why we have WMZ today.
There is no reason to avoid this opportunity, or to be so happy puppy rainbow hopscotch lollipop sunday surprise
that we can presume that good vibes will keep us safe forever. we should be protecting our interests and be
openly preparing to militarise our highly mobile cellular based units so that our ideological suit has potential
to survive in the upcoming tempest.
ignoring the obvious is a fatal position.
I think you're missing the forum for the trees, admin. Half liberty is not liberty, and the ugly fact is
that the truth about what freedom actually means doesn't necessarily resonate with most. If you're trying
to win a popularity contest you can bet that running a huge public international drug vending site isn't going
to get you far.
also: isn't it interesting that most of our thoughts expressed publicly on this site are going to end up in the
minds of the opposing force? That's sort of neat, isn't it? I wonder if they're keen on memetic warfare, yet?
Planting dangerous seeds like "love everyone" seems like a blast to me, all abyssal gazing aside. |
|
|
|
|
tanerlorn
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2011, 07:30:06 PM |
|
4 handed 4btc action
|
|
|
|
|
tanerlorn
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
May 31, 2011, 07:28:34 AM |
|
oma freaking ha
|
|
|
|
|
|
tomcollins
|
|
June 04, 2011, 03:50:31 PM |
|
Now that the price of BTC has gone up so much, 1BTC max rake seems a bit high ($17!). It is rare that a pot will get that large, but it is scaring some people away. The 1% rake structure is extremely fair. Perhaps make a .4 BTC (40 chip) max rake now (.2BTC HU - 20 chip) ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
eof
|
|
June 04, 2011, 03:57:19 PM |
|
1% upto 5 BB would be super fair.
Live casinos, which have the worst rake are typically 10% upto $4 or $5 depending on the limit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tomcollins
|
|
June 04, 2011, 04:07:17 PM |
|
1% upto 5 BB would be super fair.
Live casinos, which have the worst rake are typically 10% upto $4 or $5 depending on the limit.
It's 10 BB now, which isn't even that bad (you only get that when you have a 1000BB pot, which is super hard to get). But the cap of $17 is real high. You'll have $10 rake if you ever have a $1000 pot, which is pretty steep. I bet if you went through the hand histories, there was never a hand where more than $5 USD was ever taken, so it's not like it would really change anything other than not scare people away. |
|
|
|
|
anisoptera
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
June 04, 2011, 04:29:16 PM |
|
If BTC continues to be valued so high for a while, we'll probably adjust the cap down, like we did previously. As I said the last time this came up - no one plays high enough to hit the cap anyway, so we can wait and see what happens to the market. After all, it could just be a bubble.  |
|
|
|
anisoptera
Member
Offline
Activity: 308
Merit: 10
|
|
June 06, 2011, 07:03:39 AM |
|
Latest update fixes omaha8 and re-enables mucking at showdown, since cards are now shown in hand histories.
Going in sometime this morning when the server gets restarted (while no one's playing, hopefully!)
|
|
|
|
|
luv2drnkbr
|
|
June 06, 2011, 10:06:32 AM |
|
I'd love to test it out but the STT satellites at the series are so fucking soft, I'm spending almost every waking moment at the Rio.
|
|
|
|
|
