This frozen chicken “had a rich, emotional life.”

[Saksham]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKGG-B-M1bY

Well this is strange. Honestly, a coffin in a shop??? And let be real, they are gowned for food so the situation is simple.

[1714962416]

1714962416

[1714962416]

1714962416

[1714962416]

1714962416

[1714962416]

1714962416

[Totalnuts]

Regarding rights of animals i think they can't have no rights cause they don't have obligations. Killing animals for food is cruel of course but it's nature and the survival of the fittest.

[sneakycoin]

C'mon, animals kill other animals for food.

[robbylove]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKGG-B-M1bY

WeWork bans meat for employees expensing meals, at company events

If WeWork employees want a burger while on business, the money is coming out of their own pockets. The global workplace startup told employees this week that the company will ban employees from expensing meals that contain red meat, pork or poultry, Bloomberg reported.

The company won’t provide meat for events at its 400 locations, either — part of an effort to reduce its environmental footprint.

“New research indicates that avoiding meat is one of the biggest things an individual can do to reduce their personal environmental impact, even more than switching to a hybrid car,” WeWork co-founder Miguel McKelvey said in an email to staffers.

The no-meat policy will also affect self-serve food kiosks at many of WeWork’s 400 locations worldwide, according to Bloomberg. Employees wanting “medical or religious” exceptions can hash those out with a company policy team.

WeWork boasts 6,000 employees worldwide, according to Bloomberg. The company estimates its no-meat policy will save 15,507,103 animals by 2023, according to Business Insider, along with 16.6 billion gallons of water and 445.1 million pounds of carbon dioxide, the heat-trapping gas that alters Earth’s climate.

https://www.greatfallstribune.com/story/money/nation-now/2018/07/14/wework-bans-meat-employees-expensing-meals-company-events/785409002/

[BADecker]

^^^ Companies who feed their employees are simply giving them a bonus.

[Cryptotenuse]

Is Killing a mosquito more ethical than Killing an animal to eat it?
But I have a better one:
Is poisoning rats more ethical  than Killing animals to eat them?

[criza]

Well, I personally, I am not against with people who are vegetarian and does not eat meat just like chicken because it is theor choice and no one should ever deprived them of whatever they want to it. However, this belief of mine is applicable also to the ones who chooses to eat meat like chicken. And I don't think that eating chickens is the same as killing and abusing animals. Yes, I do believe that animals do also have their right but we must not forget to prioritize first the rights of the human. We cannot compromise the need of the human for the sake of animals. I don't want to be cruel but the truth is that it is natural for animals to be eaten by people. And to make things clear, eating them is not the same as abusing them. Thise are two different things.

[BADecker]

Is Killing a mosquito more ethical than Killing an animal to eat it?
But I have a better one:
Is poisoning rats more ethical  than Killing animals to eat them?

Or, better yet. Even if we don't take drugs or medicine, our immune systems kill off millions or billions of bacteria and viruses each day, within each of us, naturally. And we don't even have the ability to stop it if we want (would suicide do it?).

Just think. One of those little critters could have evolved into intelligent life far superior to ours ( ).

Is saving one life worth more that killing billions? Spock would say, "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few."

We are so immoral... just by remaining alive. Pathetic humans   !

[robbylove]

‘Trans-Feminist’ Vegan Group Releases Pro-Chicken Video Where Hens Are Separated by Roosters Who Rape Them Without Consent


Almas Veganas, a transfeminist vegan group from Spain, recently released a video where they argue that hens should be separated from roosters who are out to rape them without consent.

Vegan activists separate chickens from cockerels on Spanish farm 'so the hens aren't raped' because they do not give 'consent' in video released by 'anti-specist, transfeminist' group


This is the moment two vegan activists separate chickens from cockerels because they 'don't want the hens to be raped'.

The video was released by the Spanish vegan group Almas Veganas (Vegan Souls), based in Girona in the north-eastern Spanish region of Catalonia.

They published the video on Twitter where it has been viewed 570,000 times.

On their Twitter page, the activists describe themselves as 'anti-speciesist' and 'transfeminist.'

Anti-speciesists believe that judging types of animals as different to each other, or humans, is wrong.

They also believe that humans favour and treat some species better, like dogs, which we shouldn't do.

Transfeminism is created by and aimed at transgender women and says that the freedom of trans women is coupled with the liberation of all women.

It also says that any individual should be able to express and define themselves in whichever way they choose without fear of retaliation. 

In the footage, the two activists can be seen smashing eggs on the ground because 'they belong to the hens.'

The vegans then reveal that 'we separated the cocks because we don't want the hens to get raped.'

In another video, the activists said that they based their decision on 'the notion of consent.'

The vegans add: 'The hens do not want to be mounted and always try to escape. They are sometimes seriously injured by the cocks' claws as well.'

They also say the hens 'are genetically modified to make them lay more eggs' and they want to 'prevent them from reproducing.'

'Either you are vegan or you help to finance animal slavery. Eating animals is fascist,' they added.

According to reports, the vegan group has recently appeared on several Spanish television shows including the popular talk show 'Todo Es Una Mentira' ('Everything Is A Lie') where they believed they were 'ridiculed' by the presenter.

The footage prompted comments on social media such as 'is this a joke?,' 'there is no room for more morons' and 'you have to be frigging crazy.'

They said afterwards: 'We knew they would make fun of us, but we wanted to use the platform to spread our message anyway.'


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7423141/Vegan-activists-separate-chickens-cockerels-hens-not-raped.html



-------------------------------------------
I am pretty sure dogs, cats, cows and chicken were *invented* through thousand of years of breeding techniques to become the domesticated animals we now know and love today.

[BADecker]

^^^ Actually, the female has a purpose built right into her body. It's to have kids. Those women who are "raped" by society propaganda that there is a better life for them somewhere else, aren't much good for what they were designed for. After all, what good is a machine that won't do what it is designed for? People don't buy cars that don't work. Rather, they part them out, or scrap them.

Domesticated is what all the animals were before the fall into sin. Sin made the animals wild. God has allowed a few animals to remain domesticated, as a method for helping people in life.

[TECSHARE]

I think all chickens should have to sign a consent waiver before having sex, otherwise how else will we know if they consent for sure?

[BADecker]

I think all chickens should have to sign a consent waiver before having sex, otherwise how else will we know if they consent for sure?

Not only that, but hold harmless paperwork, as well.     

[robbylove]

I think all chickens should have to sign a consent waiver before having sex, otherwise how else will we know if they consent for sure?

This was supposed to be a joke, but it is now reality.
https://youtu.be/urS8GmwmeWQ

A Chinese lab with a CRISPR system is already working on helping the chickens with that waiver somehow.

[af_newbie]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

[BADecker]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Humans are not animals. Research is showing us that even though humans and animals have many similar systems within them, they are two different kinds of creatures.

Human life is way more important than all other life. People are the owners and controllers (at times) of other life. However, wanton destruction of other life by humans does not generally benefit humans, and should not be done.

Humans, not being animals, cannot eat other animals. Cannibalism does exist, however.

Humans who are simply living, kill multitudes of individual bacteria organisms within their bodies. If you really want to be completely just, kill yourself, so that you are not found guilty of killing off the multitudes of bacteria in your body. If you don't commit suicide, you are a mass killer by your own standards.

[robbylove]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

We are the only 'animals' that can name all the other animals on planet Earth. We are the only 'animals' that know we are on a planet, even giving it a name.

Although we keep saying to ourselves our lives are no more important than other animals, we are, as far as I know, the only 'animals' that can reflect on how their lives are important or not.

We are not simple 'animals'. We can decide that eating each other was good, or bad.

We are the only 'animals' questioning the existence of God.

Lobsters get 'rapped'. Are these people planning to go deep in the oceans and stop millions of underwater rapes too?

Just visiting their habitat with our heavy waterproof equipment would be, according to their own logic, a rape by humans.

[TECSHARE]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Except human life IS more important than animals. This concept that humans and animals are equal is nothing but a backdoor way to lower the standing of humans to that of an animal so that mistreatment of humans is excused. There is no way to give animals equal protection to humans and not do so. This is an anti-humanist viewpoint covered in a thin veneer of cute little furry creatures regardless if you recognize it as such or not.

[robbylove]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Except human life IS more important than animals. This concept that humans and animals are equal is nothing but a backdoor way to lower the standing of humans to that of an animal so that mistreatment of humans is excused. There is no way to give animals equal protection to humans and not do so. This is an anti-humanist viewpoint covered in a thin veneer of cute little furry creatures regardless if you recognize it as such or not.

A.K.A. Nihilism?

[BADecker]

The frozen chicken was thawed and cooked before it was eaten. It supplied the nutrition that several people in the family needed. So, in its "resurrection," it rose to heights of rich emotion in the lives of its hosts, that it could never have achieved in its own life before it was frozen.

[af_newbie]

We as a society will not respect the rights of animals because we don't recognize human rights properly yet.

First step:

Recognize that humans are animals.

Next step:

Recognize that human life is not more important than life of any other animal.

However, animals eat other animals.  So do humans.

Even if you eat only plants, you still kill life to eat.

Humans are not animals. Research is showing us that even though humans and animals have many similar systems within them, they are two different kinds of creatures.

Human life is way more important than all other life. People are the owners and controllers (at times) of other life. However, wanton destruction of other life by humans does not generally benefit humans, and should not be done.

Humans, not being animals, cannot eat other animals. Cannibalism does exist, however.

Humans who are simply living, kill multitudes of individual bacteria organisms within their bodies. If you really want to be completely just, kill yourself, so that you are not found guilty of killing off the multitudes of bacteria in your body. If you don't commit suicide, you are a mass killer by your own standards.

Take a biology class, come back and report your findings. 

We are mammals, we belong to the Great Apes family together with chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human