Bitcoin Forum
November 09, 2024, 06:01:37 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 65 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Diggit.io | Over Dice? | Brand new game! | 800+ BTC Invested! | 1% Edge  (Read 80576 times)
lauri132
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 02:47:50 PM
 #181

I really like diggit.io but its having DDos again, hopefully it will stop soon.
Dicer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 02:53:52 PM
 #182

Hope it gets back sooner
Shogen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 08, 2014, 03:10:06 PM
 #183

Site will be back up in 12 hours everyone. We mitigated the attack but our host did not have the new IP ready yet and then the second attack happened. We will come back online with a new IP behind cloudflare which will stop any future DDoS. Thanks. Obviously we will not be paying any ransoms.

I don't get it. Why do you think that new IP is going to help?

From your trust feedback, I believe you have been doing this kind of extortion for a few months already. Have you ever got anything from it? Why don't you use your skills and knowledge on more positive stuff?

DD4BC
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 03:32:00 PM
 #184

From your trust feedback, I believe you have been doing this kind of extortion for a few months already. Have you ever got anything from it? Why don't you use your skills and knowledge on more positive stuff?

If I didn't get anything, I would stop doing this long time ago. Most admins simply pay, without complaining publicly...
Matthias195
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 03:53:08 PM
 #185

From your trust feedback, I believe you have been doing this kind of extortion for a few months already. Have you ever got anything from it? Why don't you use your skills and knowledge on more positive stuff?

If I didn't get anything, I would stop doing this long time ago. Most admins simply pay, without complaining publicly...

At this point in your lifetime, you could be having the best sex ever with a girl that fully loves you for the great person you are.

But you aren't a great person. And there is no girl that can love you.
Instead you are just here, behind your computer, wasting your time because you think you have nothing else to achieve.

Save your energy and your time, and become the person you really want to be, with a girl that comes home to you for who you are.
Or just keep DDOS'ing. Either way, we don't give a shit since we are full of patience, accompanied by the people we love.

Have a good night my boy.
BitCoinPokerBro
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 08, 2014, 03:56:19 PM
 #186

Definitely better than dice  Cool
Jet
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 04:34:08 PM
 #187

From your trust feedback, I believe you have been doing this kind of extortion for a few months already. Have you ever got anything from it? Why don't you use your skills and knowledge on more positive stuff?

If I didn't get anything, I would stop doing this long time ago. Most admins simply pay, without complaining publicly...

If that's the case, why aren't people publishing your explanation on how to prevent this kind of thing, to put you out of business, provider by provider?

What proof does any site owner have that you actually stick to your word?
FanEagle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1129


View Profile
December 08, 2014, 05:05:40 PM
 #188

Be a white hat! Offer the solution to the admin and he will compensate you with a bug bounty no? isn't that easier?
detector
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 484
Merit: 124




View Profile
December 08, 2014, 05:13:28 PM
 #189

Be a white hat! Offer the solution to the admin and he will compensate you with a bug bounty no? isn't that easier?

maybe he prefer bigger bounty...

Too bad you have some skill but used at the wrong side  Undecided
What a pity
CryptoFuture (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100

Diggit.io Admin


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 02:18:27 AM
Last edit: December 09, 2014, 05:57:03 AM by CryptoFuture
 #190

We're back up!

yenzae0215
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 02:39:20 AM
 #191

From your trust feedback, I believe you have been doing this kind of extortion for a few months already. Have you ever got anything from it? Why don't you use your skills and knowledge on more positive stuff?

If I didn't get anything, I would stop doing this long time ago. Most admins simply pay, without complaining publicly...

is this your only income to feed your family? better think twice buddy

Banned**
CryptoFuture (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100

Diggit.io Admin


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 08:09:04 AM
 #192

Some small bug fixes today. Finally can get back into development!

chazley
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 395
Merit: 264


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 10:58:13 AM
 #193

Have you heard of Just-Dice.com (the dice site which had over 60,000 bitcoins invested) yeh? Well the guy with the puppet avatar, dooglus, controlled the site. Trustworthy? I think so.
I've know douglus ran Just-dice. It was a great site and I played there personally myself. I also think highly of dooglus. My decision still stands though. Did dooglus trust the 60,000 BTC with another forum member? I am not personally comfortable putting $270,000 worth of BTC with another member. It might help boost our reputation, but it would greatly lower our security, and that's what we plan on keeping to the absolute highest standards above anything else.

If anyone believes that it is a shady decision to not hold the coins of our own users, then once again please do not invest.

I find it laughable that your reasoning behind not doing a multi-sig cold wallet with dooglus is 'it would greatly lower our security'. That is one of the most mind-boggling excuses I have ever heard, and I cannot believe no one called you out on it. You don't think there are preventative measures put in place in the event Dooglus dies tomorrow and has control of the private keys? Of course there are. Dooglus is, and will forever be, the most trusted member on bitcointalk because he ran a dice site flawlessly, and the day he shut down returned 100% of the funds. Any new sites to the bitcoin gambling investment market should have a multisig REQUIREMENT before people trust a single cent to anybody. Sorry, but you don't get the benefit of the doubt, and to say it greatly lowers your security to do so is either incredibly naive or shows intent to eventually run off with funds. Maybe you are trustworthy now, but who's to say the temptation to eventually run off with funds when you reach 5,000 or 10,000 bitcoin won't be too much to ignore?

Is the decision to hold onto your cold wallet funds with no multi-sig, and slowly build your reputation over time with the community, an acceptable stance to take? Yes, absolutely. But that SHOULD result in you getting zero investors. Of course, there will always be the suckers who never learn from history and will invest anyways.

At the very least, detailed personal information of the site owners should be held in escrow by a highly trusted member of the community. That would be a start, but for me or anyone else in the community with half a brain to EVER invest in another bitcoin gambling site, you need to have a multisig cold wallet partly controlled by dooglus. If you intend to run an honest site, there is not a valid excuse not to do it. The rules have changed in this market, and failure for new operators to follow them should result in people staying away from your site like the plague.

Best of luck, and I hope for the community's sake you change your mind.
Criterion
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 73
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 11:58:45 AM
 #194

From your trust feedback, I believe you have been doing this kind of extortion for a few months already. Have you ever got anything from it? Why don't you use your skills and knowledge on more positive stuff?

If I didn't get anything, I would stop doing this long time ago. Most admins simply pay, without complaining publicly...

At this point in your lifetime, you could be having the best sex ever with a girl that fully loves you for the great person you are.

But you aren't a great person. And there is no girl that can love you.
Instead you are just here, behind your computer, wasting your time because you think you have nothing else to achieve.

Save your energy and your time, and become the person you really want to be, with a girl that comes home to you for who you are.
Or just keep DDOS'ing. Either way, we don't give a shit since we are full of patience, accompanied by the people we love.

Have a good night my boy.
Well said Wink
CryptoFuture (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100

Diggit.io Admin


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 12:33:26 PM
Last edit: December 09, 2014, 01:36:30 PM by CryptoFuture
 #195

I find it laughable that your reasoning behind not doing a multi-sig cold wallet with dooglus is 'it would greatly lower our security'. That is one of the most mind-boggling excuses I have ever heard, and I cannot believe no one called you out on it. You don't think there are preventative measures put in place in the event Dooglus dies tomorrow and has control of the private keys? Of course there are. Dooglus is, and will forever be, the most trusted member on bitcointalk because he ran a dice site flawlessly, and the day he shut down returned 100% of the funds. Any new sites to the bitcoin gambling investment market should have a multisig REQUIREMENT before people trust a single cent to anybody. Sorry, but you don't get the benefit of the doubt, and to say it greatly lowers your security to do so is either incredibly naive or shows intent to eventually run off with funds. Maybe you are trustworthy now, but who's to say the temptation to eventually run off with funds when you reach 5,000 or 10,000 bitcoin won't be too much to ignore?

Is the decision to hold onto your cold wallet funds with no multi-sig, and slowly build your reputation over time with the community, an acceptable stance to take? Yes, absolutely. But that SHOULD result in you getting zero investors. Of course, there will always be the suckers who never learn from history and will invest anyways.

At the very least, detailed personal information of the site owners should be held in escrow by a highly trusted member of the community. That would be a start, but for me or anyone else in the community with half a brain to EVER invest in another bitcoin gambling site, you need to have a multisig cold wallet partly controlled by dooglus. If you intend to run an honest site, there is not a valid excuse not to do it. The rules have changed in this market, and failure for new operators to follow them should result in people staying away from your site like the plague.

Best of luck, and I hope for the community's sake you change your mind.
Giving the coins to a third party such as dooglus won't matter. If I was malicious, I could use a server_seed to act like a lucky player winning lots of bitcoins, then simply ask dooglus for the winnings to pay out.

I'm sorry but I've answered this question multiple times in this thread. We won't be having a third party hold our coins. We have analysed many methods of coin-storing security and came to a conclusion which we are happy with, and that involves holding our own coins.

We already have 780+ BTC invested and that is more than enough for one week into launch. No one has come close to the max bet yet, if I was pushing for more investors and had a tiny amount of bitcoins already invested I might have looked at other options to get the initial reputation.

I understand you require dooglus to hold the coins for you to trust us, and I completely understand. There is lots of scams in the Bitcoin world and I have been scammed myself. It's simply your choice not to invest and I respect anyone for being risk-averse.

BuGGuru
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 06:42:48 PM
 #196

Site runs better then before.
Thank you for the hard work.
edmundduke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1624
Merit: 1007


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 06:43:18 PM
 #197

Im really starting to like this site. One of the sites i feel i can actually win on and the crowds amazing! Come join and give it a try Wink
unamis76
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 07:08:17 PM
 #198

Glad to see we're back online, good job CryptoFuture Smiley
erwin45hacked
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 09, 2014, 07:52:00 PM
 #199

Have you heard of Just-Dice.com (the dice site which had over 60,000 bitcoins invested) yeh? Well the guy with the puppet avatar, dooglus, controlled the site. Trustworthy? I think so.
I've know douglus ran Just-dice. It was a great site and I played there personally myself. I also think highly of dooglus. My decision still stands though. Did dooglus trust the 60,000 BTC with another forum member? I am not personally comfortable putting $270,000 worth of BTC with another member. It might help boost our reputation, but it would greatly lower our security, and that's what we plan on keeping to the absolute highest standards above anything else.

If anyone believes that it is a shady decision to not hold the coins of our own users, then once again please do not invest.

I find it laughable that your reasoning behind not doing a multi-sig cold wallet with dooglus is 'it would greatly lower our security'. That is one of the most mind-boggling excuses I have ever heard, and I cannot believe no one called you out on it. You don't think there are preventative measures put in place in the event Dooglus dies tomorrow and has control of the private keys? Of course there are. Dooglus is, and will forever be, the most trusted member on bitcointalk because he ran a dice site flawlessly, and the day he shut down returned 100% of the funds. Any new sites to the bitcoin gambling investment market should have a multisig REQUIREMENT before people trust a single cent to anybody. Sorry, but you don't get the benefit of the doubt, and to say it greatly lowers your security to do so is either incredibly naive or shows intent to eventually run off with funds. Maybe you are trustworthy now, but who's to say the temptation to eventually run off with funds when you reach 5,000 or 10,000 bitcoin won't be too much to ignore?

Is the decision to hold onto your cold wallet funds with no multi-sig, and slowly build your reputation over time with the community, an acceptable stance to take? Yes, absolutely. But that SHOULD result in you getting zero investors. Of course, there will always be the suckers who never learn from history and will invest anyways.

At the very least, detailed personal information of the site owners should be held in escrow by a highly trusted member of the community. That would be a start, but for me or anyone else in the community with half a brain to EVER invest in another bitcoin gambling site, you need to have a multisig cold wallet partly controlled by dooglus. If you intend to run an honest site, there is not a valid excuse not to do it. The rules have changed in this market, and failure for new operators to follow them should result in people staying away from your site like the plague.

Best of luck, and I hope for the community's sake you change your mind.

just bookmark this page and come back few months later Smiley JD and PD didnt give their btc for others to hold too Smiley and i think OP dont need it too, he is trying to gain trust here, perhaps u should check this back few months later and see what happen after that
unamis76
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012


View Profile
December 09, 2014, 08:40:56 PM
 #200

Have you heard of Just-Dice.com (the dice site which had over 60,000 bitcoins invested) yeh? Well the guy with the puppet avatar, dooglus, controlled the site. Trustworthy? I think so.
I've know douglus ran Just-dice. It was a great site and I played there personally myself. I also think highly of dooglus. My decision still stands though. Did dooglus trust the 60,000 BTC with another forum member? I am not personally comfortable putting $270,000 worth of BTC with another member. It might help boost our reputation, but it would greatly lower our security, and that's what we plan on keeping to the absolute highest standards above anything else.

If anyone believes that it is a shady decision to not hold the coins of our own users, then once again please do not invest.

I find it laughable that your reasoning behind not doing a multi-sig cold wallet with dooglus is 'it would greatly lower our security'. That is one of the most mind-boggling excuses I have ever heard, and I cannot believe no one called you out on it. You don't think there are preventative measures put in place in the event Dooglus dies tomorrow and has control of the private keys? Of course there are. Dooglus is, and will forever be, the most trusted member on bitcointalk because he ran a dice site flawlessly, and the day he shut down returned 100% of the funds. Any new sites to the bitcoin gambling investment market should have a multisig REQUIREMENT before people trust a single cent to anybody. Sorry, but you don't get the benefit of the doubt, and to say it greatly lowers your security to do so is either incredibly naive or shows intent to eventually run off with funds. Maybe you are trustworthy now, but who's to say the temptation to eventually run off with funds when you reach 5,000 or 10,000 bitcoin won't be too much to ignore?

Is the decision to hold onto your cold wallet funds with no multi-sig, and slowly build your reputation over time with the community, an acceptable stance to take? Yes, absolutely. But that SHOULD result in you getting zero investors. Of course, there will always be the suckers who never learn from history and will invest anyways.

At the very least, detailed personal information of the site owners should be held in escrow by a highly trusted member of the community. That would be a start, but for me or anyone else in the community with half a brain to EVER invest in another bitcoin gambling site, you need to have a multisig cold wallet partly controlled by dooglus. If you intend to run an honest site, there is not a valid excuse not to do it. The rules have changed in this market, and failure for new operators to follow them should result in people staying away from your site like the plague.

Best of luck, and I hope for the community's sake you change your mind.

just bookmark this page and come back few months later Smiley JD and PD didnt give their btc for others to hold too Smiley and i think OP dont need it too, he is trying to gain trust here, perhaps u should check this back few months later and see what happen after that

Exactly. Admin seems fair and he goes up in my consideration for being capable of managing the funds and not trust them to a 3rd party. He seems convinced of the success of his website and this is very good. Let's see what happens from now on Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 65 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!